Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-18-2008, 08:03 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
slow_90firebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manchester, CT + Nashua, NH
Posts: 1,448
Car: 90 Firebird Formula
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 one wheel peel

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

Alright, I am confused, so lets clear this up for once and all.

First of all, how do bilsteins and koni compare? Like, in terms of quality, performance, life, and ride comfort (yeah that is important to me).

Now-

Bilstein offers the "Sports" and the "HD" shocks. What is the difference?? I believe the price is the same.

Also-

Koni offers the "Red" and the "Yellow." Besides the yellow's being adjustable, is there any other difference? Like does one do a better job with controlling stiff springs, does one last longer, does one ride better?
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________
-Adam

1990 Firebird Formula
Bone Stock 305TBI, T5 tranny, 62k Origional
UMI subframe Connectors
slow_90firebird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 05-19-2008, 12:35 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
racing geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,278
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: Stock 305 TPI V8
Transmission: Stock 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27 posi w/ disks

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

I wish I could help answer some of these questions but I dont have the first hand experiance needed to help you.

I never really considered Bilstein because they can't adjust from a softer ride on the street to a really stiff ride for the autocorss events I attend. That left Koni and KYB. I like the lifetime warrenty on the Koni's so I figured I would pay the extra for the lifetime service from Koni and have a part that is better suited for what I plan to do. That, and everyone on here is going nuts about how great the Koni Yellows are.

If I'm not mistaken, aren't the Bilsteins more expensive than the Koni Yellows?
__________________
I started racing when I was 7 years old and here I am now...

KONI Yellows | Pro-Kit | J&M Strut Mounts | Edelbrock STB | Spohn SFC | 9-bolt disk 3.27
36mm/24mm | UMI Adj LCA/PHB/LCARB | Corbeau seats | plus more ..
.and I'm only 18

racing geek is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 06:33 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 800
Car: 87 Black Formula
Engine: Rollercammed Lg4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt Locker

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

I believe you could put the Koni's and the Bilsteins in 2 different categories. Bilsteins being the maximum handling for a street vehicle, not totally compromising comfort, while the koni's are the full race, not considering comfort at all.

I have only had bilsteins, so, I cant say anything other than the handling was the best I've ever experienced, in any car. And the comfort level was very good. the short stiff springs I had at the time, was the biggest contributor to uncomfort when going over speedbumped roads. All other driving, it was awsume. Note that this was not a thirdgen vehicle.

I currently consider getting bilsteins/and/or airbags. Koni's is said to be too harsh by some, for street use. THe construction of them is quite different as I understand it.

Maybe some Koni drivers could chime in?
tilstad is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 06:51 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: my garage
Posts: 511
Car: 84 firebird T/A
Engine: pig
Transmission: slush box
Axle/Gears: round ones

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

They are adjustable...dont run them dead soft though you will feel it. A good set of tires will compliment the Koni's

Jeff
jjlabinski is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 07:35 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
racing geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,278
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: Stock 305 TPI V8
Transmission: Stock 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27 posi w/ disks

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjlabinski View Post
They are adjustable...dont run them dead soft though you will feel it. A good set of tires will compliment the Koni's

Jeff
What do you mean when you say "dont run them dead soft though you will feel it"?
racing geek is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 08:09 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
2.8RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,512
Car: 89 V6 Camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open diff

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

Quote:
Originally Posted by racing geek View Post
If I'm not mistaken, aren't the Bilsteins more expensive than the Koni Yellows?
Actually I believe that they are about the same prize.
2.8RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 04:41 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 800
Car: 87 Black Formula
Engine: Rollercammed Lg4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt Locker

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

I think the OEM car manufacturers, when dveloping a "sport" kit or hndling kit for a car model, often end up with Bilsteins if they want the best handlig, and also some level of comfort. That should say something. Same as the Eaton compressor vs the Roots I guess.
tilstad is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 03:56 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
slow_90firebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manchester, CT + Nashua, NH
Posts: 1,448
Car: 90 Firebird Formula
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 one wheel peel

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

Well, thats why I ask these questions. Because, arent the koni reds supposed to be made for daily driving?

And I imagine that the yellows, being adjustable, would be able to soften up a certain amount.

I have also heard that bilsteins have a 2yr life, and no warentee.
__________________
-Adam

1990 Firebird Formula
Bone Stock 305TBI, T5 tranny, 62k Origional
UMI subframe Connectors
slow_90firebird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 02:39 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 800
Car: 87 Black Formula
Engine: Rollercammed Lg4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt Locker

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

From Bilstein.com pages;

"ThyssenKrupp Bilstein of America warrants its gas pressure shock absorbers against defects in workmanship and materials for as long as you, the original purchaser, own your car.

If at any time after purchase or installation, the shock malfunctions and Bilstein determines it to be defective, we will either replace it or repair it."

Good enough for me, I don't plan on selling the car.

http://www.bilstein.com/warranty.php
tilstad is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 03:45 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
TheScaryOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,380
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: L98 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via ICQ to TheScaryOne Send a message via AIM to TheScaryOne Send a message via MSN to TheScaryOne Send a message via Yahoo to TheScaryOne
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

Don't the Blisteins need to be modified to fit? I remember reading where someone had to do some clearancing to get them not to rub.
TheScaryOne is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 08:30 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,789
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to 91_5.7_TPI
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

If you use anything other than stock springs and don't revavle them, you'll have some pooie shocks in a short time. I think that the KONIs/Pro-Kit are little too stiff for most people on the street, but I love the handling. I think with the right springs, they would be ok. I am going to try the stock WS6 springs I have and see how things go. I like the adjustability with them though. I use mine on full soft when I'm on the road, and bump them up when I want to play or go auto-x. I think that the Reds may also be adjustable, but I'm not sure. If you want a 'nice' riding car with nice handling, I would get a set of IROC Moogs and the Bilsteins (which ever is the ones more tuned for handling). I'd actually be interested in seeing how my KONIs work with the WS6 springs. Once I get this done, I'll report back. Might not be a bad combo.
__________________

KONIs I Eibach Pro-Kit I 36mm/24mm sway bars I Spohn: Adjustable PHB I Wonder Bar I SFCs
Custom LCAs I LCARBs I J&M Products Camber/Caster plates
I Hawk's Ceramic Pads I 4th Gen 3.23 Posi I LS1/LT1 Brakes
91_5.7_TPI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 10:56 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
slow_90firebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manchester, CT + Nashua, NH
Posts: 1,448
Car: 90 Firebird Formula
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 one wheel peel

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

Well the reason I want the Pro-kit is because the stock springs sit wayyy to high for my taste. The 1" drop will help that enough to look good, however should retain some ground clearence. I wish they made springs with the same type 1" or 1.25" drop, but with similar rates to the WS6 springs. Then I could have nice wheel gap, and still have a nice ride with decent handling.

---

From what you guys say, the Bilsteins sound like the way to go. If they ride nice, I dont need the adjustability. Which ones are the better ones though, "sport" or "HD" ???

Also, why would I need to re-valve them? I thought that being nice shocks, they were supposed to be able to handle the 1" drop?? If not, then I will get the KONIs. I am not gonna pay $700 for new shocks, just to have to send them to someone else to get re-valved! Thats crazy talk!
__________________
-Adam

1990 Firebird Formula
Bone Stock 305TBI, T5 tranny, 62k Origional
UMI subframe Connectors
slow_90firebird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 11:50 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
TheScaryOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,380
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: L98 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via ICQ to TheScaryOne Send a message via AIM to TheScaryOne Send a message via MSN to TheScaryOne Send a message via Yahoo to TheScaryOne
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

Or you could go at it the old fashioned way and have a local shop start slicing off coils from a new WS6/IROC spring until you're at the height you want! If you go this route, do not use the CC### springs from Moog. They're variable rate, and if you cut them, it messes things up.
TheScaryOne is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 12:04 AM   #14
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: K.C.MO
Posts: 144
Car: 88 Formula
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

Quote:
Originally Posted by slow_90firebird View Post
Well the reason I want the Pro-kit is because the stock springs sit wayyy to high for my taste. The 1" drop will help that enough to look good, however should retain some ground clearence. I wish they made springs with the same type 1" or 1.25" drop, but with similar rates to the WS6 springs. Then I could have nice wheel gap, and still have a nice ride with decent handling.

---

From what you guys say, the Bilsteins sound like the way to go. If they ride nice, I dont need the adjustability. Which ones are the better ones though, "sport" or "HD" ???

Also, why would I need to re-valve them? I thought that being nice shocks, they were supposed to be able to handle the 1" drop?? If not, then I will get the KONIs. I am not gonna pay $700 for new shocks, just to have to send them to someone else to get re-valved! Thats crazy talk!
The Koni reds are adjustable too. Here's a chart that illustrates the difference between the yellows and the reds-

http://www.tirerack.com/suspension/k...ialvssport.jsp

Don't waste your money on the prokit, and don't buy the Moog springs either-the rears aren't right for any of the high-perf cars (IROC,WS6). Here's a little logic for you-if your cars springs were worn out it wouldn't sit so high. Cut a half a coil off your stock springs and get the Bilsteins or the Koni reds and maintain the balance of the WS6 spring rates, and save some money. As long as you don't get the springs too hot while cutting them they will be just fine(don't use a torch).
RacerX13 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 01:40 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Matthew91-Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,296
Car: 1991 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 with 28 spline axles and gov-l

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

I run Koni reds and prokits in my kidney-busting convertible. I have them on the softest setting here in Austin texas because the streets suck. There are some streets I wont even drive down in certain residential areas. What previous people have said, it can be a rough ride.

I cant say what bilstein/prokit would be like compared to soft setting Koni/prokit. I havent run them.

I can tel you my car handles like a beast (but thats along with every other suspension mod in my sig).
__________________
Suspension Eiback prokit springs, boxed-in stock LCA's with poly bushings, Lakewood panhard rod, boxed panhard bar brace, WS6 36mm front sway bar and 32mm rear sway bar, Koni reds, BMR tubular non-adj torque arm.
ChassisCustom b-pillar brace, custom front subframe reinforcement, custom STB, MAC sfc's, Wonderbar.
Interior 4th gen leather seats, in-dash fan control switch.
Engine Reman/ rebuilt 350, Moroso 8mm spiral core wires, homemade CAI, Edelbrock aluminum H2O pump, K&N air filters.
Exhaust hi-flo cat, Flowmaster cat back exhaust, custom exhaust tips,
Drivetrain rebuilt 3.23 rear with gov-loc posi, HD transmission servo.
Brakes LS1 front brakes.

Jesus built my hotrod: "Where you are doesn't matter unless you can get away from it."
Matthew91-Z28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 06:35 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
slow_90firebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manchester, CT + Nashua, NH
Posts: 1,448
Car: 90 Firebird Formula
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 one wheel peel

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

Well, I definately dont want to cut springs. Especially not the ones that are stock. The stock springs would be my last resort if I dont like the eibachs.

So what is the concensus on the bilsteins / koni's needing to be re-valved? Do they, or will they work right out of the box?
__________________
-Adam

1990 Firebird Formula
Bone Stock 305TBI, T5 tranny, 62k Origional
UMI subframe Connectors
slow_90firebird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 06:38 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
2.8RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,512
Car: 89 V6 Camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open diff

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

I think that Konis are fine with lowered cars, may want to double check on that. But I do know that the Bilsteins need to be revalved for sure.
2.8RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 09:02 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,789
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to 91_5.7_TPI
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

The Bilsteins are designed to operate with at stock ride height. Changing that makes them wear out like any other shock, just not as fast as the cheaper brands. Their vavling would be better as well, I assume. I'm pretty sure the KONIs are designed to work with different ride heights and stiffer spring rates than the Bilsteins. That's why they are prefered by auto-crossers and road course drivers. I would get them if I were you and see how you like them with the stock springs. Cutting the stock springs is fine as long as you do it correctly. I would get a spare set or two for cheap and experiment.
91_5.7_TPI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 09:14 PM   #19
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: K.C.MO
Posts: 144
Car: 88 Formula
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

Quote:
Originally Posted by slow_90firebird View Post
So what is the concensus on the bilsteins / koni's needing to be re-valved? Do they, or will they work right out of the box?
Only for racing applications.

For what you're doing and what you want you would probably be happier with the Tokiko Illumina's, and you can buy them with the matched lowering springs for about half the money of the Konis and Eibachs.
RacerX13 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 10:28 PM   #20
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 246
Car: 88 5.7 Iroc, 2000 SS
Engine: Vortec Hot cam TPI/LS1
Transmission: Pro-Built/T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Bilstein Vs. Koni vs. each other

I have the pro-kit and Bilstiens. It hugs turns but I believe the handling to be a little off. I had a choice between the two (koni and Bils.) and chose Bilstien - I wish I would have gotten the Koni's, as they would do a much better job of controlling the pro-kit springs.

I have koni's on my SS, and they are way better than the bilstiens it came with.(I know not apples to apples)

either way I have the bilstiens made for a lowered car (sports I believe, the only difference between sports and HD's is the rear shock is like 3/4 shorter I think - the fronts are identical according to shox.com)

and yes Konis do ride hard but very controlled, but the handling they provide is worth it IMHO. Off the shelf Bilstiens are not in the same league as Koni yellows.period.

I'm actually gonna eventually call sam strano and see if he has a better option than the pro-kit springs. They look good on the car but def. don't handle as good as stock Iroc springs. Anyone who tells you a pro-kit handles better than a stock spring/bilstien set up is either lying or doesn't have experience with anything better IMHO.

If you go pro-kit get the Konis.
Kennerz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
bilstein, bilstien, box, compare, comparison, fsport, full, handling, koni, red, soft, sport, versus, vs, yellow
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.