Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-16-2008, 07:28 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
paulisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 70
Car: GM
Engine: v8
Transmission: slushboxes
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Steel vs. Chrome Moly

I wanted to know if I should pay for the chrome moly or would I be ok with the steel. Is chrome moly lighter? Is that the only advantage? Looking to get adjustable LCA's and adjustable torque arm from hawks. Looking to use spohn cause I have the spohn subframes and love em! Is BMR better?
paulisgod is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 07:56 PM   #2
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Moly will only be lighter if they used less material ie:thinner wall tubing. Same volume of steel and chromoly = same weight.
I dont know that any of them weld the material properly, even though they state otherwise, so I'll say the steel will give you less chance of failure.

Chromoly is stronger, in some respects. Thats why you can get away with thinner tubing, if its all put together correctly. They may not reach it (and I havent seen it in failed parts yet) but too thin and the tubing will fail regardless of it being stronger.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 08:15 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
paulisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 70
Car: GM
Engine: v8
Transmission: slushboxes
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

So should I go with Chrome Moly, or with the steel? Is it worth another $125 for a chrome moly torque arm compared to a steel torque arm?
paulisgod is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 09:53 PM   #4
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Personally, no. I dont think its worth the cost and risk involved that it was made right... and the weight savings if any will be minimal. If you're trying to save every ounce then yes, otherwise stick with the steel.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 10:19 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
paulisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 70
Car: GM
Engine: v8
Transmission: slushboxes
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Bingo! That's the answer I was looking for. Thanks. I know Spohn makes good stuff but I don't think it is worth the weight savings either. Any other opinions.
paulisgod is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 10:38 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Western Mass
Posts: 346
Car: 1985 Camaro/89 Merkur XR4Ti
Engine: 5.0 305 LG4/2.3 Turbo (180hp/205tq)
Transmission: TH700R4 with Shift Improver Kit/T-9
Axle/Gears: 3.42LT1 Rear/3.64

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Camaro5690 Send a message via MSN to Camaro5690 Send a message via Yahoo to Camaro5690
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Ive heard that Chrome Moly takes stress differently than steel. Like Chrome Moly when damaged once, will completely break if it gets damaged again, where as steel would bend. Not sure on the validity on this though. I believe there maybe a post about it on here somewhere,
Camaro5690 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 11:25 PM   #7
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Chromoly has a higher carbon content and is more brittle than a mild steel. When it breaks it doesnt yield and then work harden and then eventually snap over its loading cycle, it just snaps once it yields.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2008, 12:02 AM   #8
Junior Member
 
paulisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 70
Car: GM
Engine: v8
Transmission: slushboxes
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

I'm going to order steel components tomorrow from spohn unless someones says otherwise.
paulisgod is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2008, 10:40 AM   #9
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Philipsburg, Pa
Posts: 431

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Please keep us in mind as well, we over a variety of products for the 3rd generation car including the torque arm. I think you will like our prices as well

www.umiperformance.com

Chrome Moly like mentioned has a higher tensile and yield strength than mild steel. This allows us as manufacturers to use thinner wall tubing to reduce weight but still maintain strength. The price increase of Chrome Moly is the material itself along with the fabrication time it takes when using it. Chrome Moly must be TIG welded due to heat and can not be MIG welded like mild steel... this increases time in building the item. Also it requires preheating before welding where mild steel does not.

If I can help anymore please ask. Thank you!
Ryan
UMI Performance is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2008, 10:40 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
arm, building, chassis, chrome, chromoly, mass, mig, mild, moly, price, steel, strength, tools, torque, welding, yield
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details