Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-27-2009, 05:59 PM   #1
Supreme Member
 
85Iroc-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,327
Car: 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Lower Control Arm and LCARB Question

I am looking to get better traction with my car and I was wondering how much of a difference it would make it I installed a set of UMI lower control arms with the relocation brackets? Would it be worth doing or wouldn't I see that much of an improvement?
__________________
1985 Camaro Iroc-Z, 383 TPI, ported TPIS Bigmouth Intake, TPIS Runners, BBK 52mm Throttle Body,
Comp Cams XFI roller 224/230 @.050 .566"/.569" lift 112 LSA, AFR 195cc heads, Dyno Don 1 3/4" headers, TKO-600, Custom burned prom, BBK AFPR, K&N's, UMI Lower Control Arms, Relocation Brackets, Subframe Connectors, Adj. Panhard Bar, Tunnel Mounted Adj. Torque Arm, Caster/Camber Plates, A Arms, 36mm/24mm sway bars, Auburn Pro Posi, Moser Axles
85Iroc-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 06:39 PM   #2
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: Lower Control Arm and LCARB Question

LCARBS are a must for lowered car, if you wanna race. They correct the LCA angle on a lowered car. They even help on a non-lowered car.

As for the UMI LCAs.....If you have the stock sloppy rubber bushings, at the very least, the double ended poly bushing ones help. Poly & rod end are better, then the double rod ends would be the best.

For autox/road race....Double poly ended ones can bind too much in cornering.

I'm planning on getting some double rod-ended UMI LCAs soon. I already have Spohn weld-on LCARBs.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 12:49 PM   #3
Supreme Member
 
85Iroc-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,327
Car: 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Lower Control Arm and LCARB Question

Can anyone with a stock height car tell me how much of a difference it made to their car?
85Iroc-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 03:58 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 10,299
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, open 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Re: Lower Control Arm and LCARB Question

what is the condition of the rest of the suspension? shocks and tires? simply adding new control arms and brackets will not make and earth shattering difference of the rest of the car is still stock.
//<86TA>\\ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 06:11 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
85Iroc-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,327
Car: 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Lower Control Arm and LCARB Question

The rest of the suspesnion is stock. The shocks are brand new but they are the very cheap monroe pair. The tires are Futura Supersport GTX's but im looking at getting a pair of bf goodrich g-force sport's soon.
85Iroc-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 07:58 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Darkshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 1,914
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to Darkshot
Re: Lower Control Arm and LCARB Question

I did LCARB, but I also did
Lower control arms double poly
Panhard double poly
torque arm poly
sway bay endlinks poly
brand new IROC springs
koni reds
SFC

Yeah, it made one hell of a difference. It's actually hard for me to really spin the tires from a stop now without using the brakes, the car just hooks and goes.

LCARB are good for traction. They prevent the car from squatting on launch (bad) and they actually help to lift the rear of the car into the air.
Darkshot is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 08:08 AM   #7
Supreme Member
 
85Iroc-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,327
Car: 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Lower Control Arm and LCARB Question

What other susspension mods should I do also? Is it true that putting on the aftermarket lower control arms hurts your handling from the polyurethane businhgs binding?
85Iroc-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 08:58 AM   #8
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: Lower Control Arm and LCARB Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by 85Iroc-Z View Post
What other susspension mods should I do also? Is it true that putting on the aftermarket lower control arms hurts your handling from the polyurethane businhgs binding?
Straight line, 1/4 mile, you'll be fine.

In autocross/road racing, "spirited" street driving (corners).......The poly can bind, when one side goes up, the other side down.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 01:43 PM   #9
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 353

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Lower Control Arm and LCARB Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by 85Iroc-Z View Post
What other susspension mods should I do also? Is it true that putting on the aftermarket lower control arms hurts your handling from the polyurethane businhgs binding?
Hello,
Thanks for you interest in UMI Performance. What is the vehicle used the most for? If its a street car then poly is fine with the LCARB's. What are your future plans for the car? Leave me know and I will be glad to help.
Thanks
Brad
UMI Sales is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 05:12 PM   #10
Supreme Member
 
85Iroc-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,327
Car: 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Lower Control Arm and LCARB Question

The car is used mostly on the street. My only future plans really are upgrading to a 350 or a 383 motor.
85Iroc-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 07:34 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 10,299
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, open 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Re: Lower Control Arm and LCARB Question

if it just going to be for cruising, and maybe a trip down the strip, then poly will be fine. If the funding allows, i would splurge for a poly/rod end combo. It will allow some adjust-ability and eliminate the bind and they dont cost that much more that the poly ones do.
//<86TA>\\ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 10:20 PM   #12
Supreme Member
 
85Iroc-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,327
Car: 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Lower Control Arm and LCARB Question

Should I go for the UMI Panhard Bar while i'm at it or not?
85Iroc-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 10:20 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details