Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-30-2009, 11:58 AM   #1
Supreme Member
 
1MeanZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: North Central Indiana
Posts: 1,970
Car: 86 IROC-Z / 89 GTA
Engine: 383 Superram / L98
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600 / 700R4 -> T56
Axle/Gears: Dana 44HD IRS / 3.27 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (8)
Stock lower control arm bushings can't take much power...

heard and felt some popping in my rear suspension. checked the lower control arm bolts, then removed the lower control arms and found this.

the first pic shows how the LCA is on the car. The left is the rear axle side, the right is the chassis side. You can see the seam on the axle side is facing 9o'clock where braking force would spread it, but it seems fine. The bushing on the chassis mount has the seam facing about 9o'clock as well, where acceleration force would try to spread it.







Here is the other side of the bad bushing. Obviously the gap on each side is about the same, the bushing spread all the way across.



I should mention that THESE ARE 4TH GEN CONTROL ARMS, hence the star shaped bushings. The thirdgen bushings are solid rubber, but the sleeve in the ID of the bushing is the same.

I'll be ordering a set of these very soon...

http://www.hotpart.com/shop/index.ph...ct_detail&p=85
__________________

86 IROC, Superram 383, TKO 600, C4 IRS
89 GTA, L98, A4. T56 swap pending
91 TA LB9/T5 (R.I.P)
1MeanZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 12:45 PM   #2
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: Stock lower control arm bushings can't take much power...

I'd suggest....
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...06jbormpbrhh87

I went with.....
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...06jbormpbrhh87 (you can get equal sized bushings too, but I needed the extra room for my 315s)

While your at it....
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...4fvvlk126jlj40

I went with.....
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...4fvvlk126jlj40
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 04:43 PM   #3
Supreme Member
 
1MeanZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: North Central Indiana
Posts: 1,970
Car: 86 IROC-Z / 89 GTA
Engine: 383 Superram / L98
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600 / 700R4 -> T56
Axle/Gears: Dana 44HD IRS / 3.27 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (8)
Re: Stock lower control arm bushings can't take much power...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
I'd suggest....
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...06jbormpbrhh87

I went with.....
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...06jbormpbrhh87 (you can get equal sized bushings too, but I needed the extra room for my 315s)

While your at it....
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...4fvvlk126jlj40

I went with.....
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...4fvvlk126jlj40
Not to be a jerk, but those control arms are terrible for cornering performance. The hard poly bushings and stiff arms won't allow the axle to rotate in the car causing the car to be very loose under cornering. This car is used for open road course days and auto-x. I found this out the hard way when I put poly bushings and boxed my stock arms on the car. I went to the stock 4th gen arms and the loose condition went away. The control arms HAVE to twist in order for the axle to rotate in the car. Thats why I'm using the control arms from Hotpart.com. Click the link and read what they say. You can also go to www.frrax.com and find out TONS more info.
1MeanZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 05:01 PM   #4
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: Stock lower control arm bushings can't take much power...

I'd like to hear your idea on how your Hotpart ones, can rotate more than my UMI ones.

Mine have not vertical side wall beside the rod ends, restricting their rotation, unlike your Hot part ones.

You really think these captive rod end ones...

Have more flexibility over the UMI open end ones?


The Hotparts.com ones look like they could introduce a bind or restriction sooner, due the "captive" pieces.

I've been to fraxx....I left & I'll just leave it at that.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 07:23 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
1MeanZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: North Central Indiana
Posts: 1,970
Car: 86 IROC-Z / 89 GTA
Engine: 383 Superram / L98
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600 / 700R4 -> T56
Axle/Gears: Dana 44HD IRS / 3.27 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (8)
Re: Stock lower control arm bushings can't take much power...

well for whatever reason I can't get your links to work. So I did a quick search and all I found were the non-adjustable poly ones. I just searched more and found the rod ended adjustable ones.

The adjustable UMI ones will rotate as well as the Hotpart ones, but I am concerned about using rod ends for a car that sees around 6-8K street miles per year, so I'm going to use the poly ball design from Hotpart. Besides a member of frrax is a hotpart dealer and I can get a deal on them. If they wear out in a short amount of time, i'll consider it a lesson learned and I'll buy the aluminum ones hotpart sells.

I've been a frrax member for a few years now, and the site is full of intelligent and helpful members. I'm sorry you don't get along with them.
__________________

86 IROC, Superram 383, TKO 600, C4 IRS
89 GTA, L98, A4. T56 swap pending
91 TA LB9/T5 (R.I.P)
1MeanZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 08:21 PM   #6
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: Stock lower control arm bushings can't take much power...

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1MeanZ View Post
well for whatever reason I can't get your links to work. So I did a quick search and all I found were the non-adjustable poly ones. I just searched more and found the rod ended adjustable ones.

The adjustable UMI ones will rotate as well as the Hotpart ones, but I am concerned about using rod ends for a car that sees around 6-8K street miles per year, so I'm going to use the poly ball design from Hotpart. Besides a member of frrax is a hotpart dealer and I can get a deal on them. If they wear out in a short amount of time, i'll consider it a lesson learned and I'll buy the aluminum ones hotpart sells.

I've been a frrax member for a few years now, and the site is full of intelligent and helpful members. I'm sorry you don't get along with them.
I dunno why the links are not working for you. UMI make Poly, Poly/rod end, Rod End/ Rod End....All 3 options the above with & with adjustability.....


But apparently you spoke without seeing. Had you you looked before speaking the 1st time, you wouldn't have spoken.

If you can get a discount, or are concerned about mileage, that is one thing. But commenting without seeing.....Why does this thread feel like fraxx? "I'm right...I don't need to see before speaking."

If the rod ends were out on me, I could buy the different ends from UMI & go that way instead, but my car is my "daily driver" & I average 4k miles/year.....

Last edited by Stephen; 08-30-2009 at 08:27 PM.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 11:03 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
transam85dudeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 926
Car: 85' Trans Am !best car ever!
Engine: 305tpi 215hp LB9 two bolt,
Transmission: th-700r4
Axle/Gears: stock (3.27)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Stock lower control arm bushings can't take much power...

jegs.com has everything you need ,if you lowerd your ride, you might want to check out the drop brackets for the rear conrol arms, they sell adjustable arms, and well as panhard bar adjustable, and drop bracket for the panhard bar. they sell torque arm bushings, adjustable torque arms, and camber adjusters for lowered cars.
transam85dudeman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 09:19 AM   #8
Supreme Member
 
1MeanZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: North Central Indiana
Posts: 1,970
Car: 86 IROC-Z / 89 GTA
Engine: 383 Superram / L98
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600 / 700R4 -> T56
Axle/Gears: Dana 44HD IRS / 3.27 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (8)
Re: Stock lower control arm bushings can't take much power...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
I dunno why the links are not working for you. UMI make Poly, Poly/rod end, Rod End/ Rod End....All 3 options the above with & with adjustability.....


But apparently you spoke without seeing. Had you you looked before speaking the 1st time, you wouldn't have spoken.

If you can get a discount, or are concerned about mileage, that is one thing. But commenting without seeing.....Why does this thread feel like fraxx? "I'm right...I don't need to see before speaking."

If the rod ends were out on me, I could buy the different ends from UMI & go that way instead, but my car is my "daily driver" & I average 4k miles/year.....
I did a brief search before I spoke, all I found were the poly arms. Its not my fault the links you posted didn't work. They seem to be working now for whatever reason, and I am now more educated about what UMI offers. Thank you.

I now see why you don't get along with the guys on Frrax. They probably don't like your attitude anymore than I do.
1MeanZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 09:50 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 379
Car: 85 Z28, 88IROC, 91Z28 + parts cars
Engine: 305, 355, 408soon
Transmission: stock T56 in 88 and 85 built in 91
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1, 9" w/ 4.56 and spool

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Send a message via AIM to WIll36
Re: Stock lower control arm bushings can't take much power...

I was just reading the hotparts description of their "extreme joint". It does seem like a good quality piece. I'm wondering what sort of validity there is to their claim that their joint is better on acceleration compared to a regular rod end. From what they're saying the standard spherical end deflects too much. However I can't really see this happening since the combination of torque arm, LCAs and panhard bar should rather effectively limit the range of movement for the rear axle. Any thoughts?
WIll36 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 10:09 AM   #10
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 353

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Stock lower control arm bushings can't take much power...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
I'd suggest....
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...06jbormpbrhh87

I went with.....
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...06jbormpbrhh87 (you can get equal sized bushings too, but I needed the extra room for my 315s)

While your at it....
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...4fvvlk126jlj40

I went with.....
http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...4fvvlk126jlj40
Hello
Thanks for the suggestion and the business with UMI Performance!
Take it easy.
Brad

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1MeanZ View Post
I did a brief search before I spoke, all I found were the poly arms. Its not my fault the links you posted didn't work. They seem to be working now for whatever reason, and I am now more educated about what UMI offers. Thank you.
Hello
I noticed that you are not familiar with our products. We do offer a wide variety of suspension parts for you specific needs. If you have any questions or problems with anything feel free to ask and I will be more than glad to help.

http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...klscl4dffpb097

Thanks
Brad
UMI Sales is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 10:44 AM   #11
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: Stock lower control arm bushings can't take much power...

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1MeanZ View Post
I did a brief search before I spoke, all I found were the poly arms. Its not my fault the links you posted didn't work. They seem to be working now for whatever reason, and I am now more educated about what UMI offers. Thank you.

I now see why you don't get along with the guys on Frrax. They probably don't like your attitude anymore than I do.
My "attitude" is black & white". I don't deal with gray areas. If I can't SEE or FEEL something, I don't judge it, until I can. Had you held off posting how "bad" mine were, I doubt you would have dismissed them so quickly, would you have? Seemed to be real common on fraxx, people judging because they "knew" & not need to see. It's not my fault the links didn't work before either & now they do. I'm not crazy about UMIs new site. Never had a problem accessing it, until they changed it a few months ago. Now it doesn't always work good.

What I can't figure out about the Hotparts ones....Is how the description said something about polyurethane diminishing effectiveness, yet their own LCAs have a polyurethane shell around them! I think the poly shells Hotparts puts over their ends, plus the tubular/metal mount shell to hold those on, is what is going to restrict their deflectition & rotation, as the axle twists up & down.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 10:44 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
1989, 4th, arm, arms, bad, bushing, bushings, camaro, control, frrax, gen, lower, replacement, rod, tire, trans
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details