Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-26-2009, 03:47 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 12

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Moog CC635 Rear Springs

Ok so this sums up all the talk about which rear springs are correct. All I read is how the car sits to high now after new springs and all this crap back and forth about 5665 vs. cc635 vs. whatever. I have an 89 formula 5.7 TPI WS6. The car had the original springs and shocks/struts. 144,000 miles and still rode decent. Put cc635 springs and monroe shocks in the rear today and it's like a different car! Rides great. Got KYB's for the front and doin that tomorrow. The rear ride height is maybe an eighth to a quarter inch at max higher. I can hardly even notice and I have been looking at the car for 20 years! Wanna do the front springs to but a real pain in the *** so gonna just put the struts in and call it a day. Moral of the story is if you have a formula/iroc the cc635 rears work perfect.
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
jonxlh99 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 09-26-2009, 04:32 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
punkdude908's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 390
Car: 1983 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: LG4 305ci 4bbl
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt open diff.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to punkdude908
Re: Moog CC635 Rear Springs

i have the same rear springs in my Bird. i noticed a huge difference too. even better after i added a 24mm rear sway bar and poly bushings. they were pretty cheap too...around $50 if i remember correctly. the car has a nice stance being that i used the 4th gen rear spring isolators.
__________________
1983 Pontiac Firebird
pics

LG4 305ci 4bbl motor, 2.5" Cherry Bomb Extreme muffler- side exit exhaust, Cragar 15x7 Black D Window wheels (4" backspacing), Cooper Cobra Radial GT tires (P235/60R15), 36mm hollow front sway bar with wonder bar, 24mm rear sway bar, Energy Suspension endlinks and Guldstrand bushings, Edelbrock Elite 4222 air cleaner with K&N filter, FF Dynamics 16" Cyclone electric fan, Flex-a-lite Variable Speed Fan Controller, custom fixed headlight conversion with 5000K HIDs and Silverstar Ultra H7 bulbs, Pilot PL-362W driving lights with Hella 100W H3 bulbs, Deka Intimidator 9A78DT AGM battery
punkdude908 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 09:36 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 208

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Moog CC635 Rear Springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonxlh99 View Post
Ok so this sums up all the talk about which rear springs are correct. All I read is how the car sits to high now after new springs and all this crap back and forth about 5665 vs. cc635 vs. whatever. I have an 89 formula 5.7 TPI WS6. The car had the moog coil springs and shocks/struts. 144,000 miles and still rode decent. Put cc635 springs and monroe shocks in the rear today and it's like a different car! Rides great. Got KYB's for the front and doin that tomorrow. The rear ride height is maybe an eighth to a quarter inch at max higher. I can hardly even notice and I have been looking at the car for 20 years! Wanna do the front springs to but a real pain in the *** so gonna just put the struts in and call it a day. Moral of the story is if you have a formula/iroc the cc635 rears work perfect.
Can you please tell me this formula? I wanna learn something before diving into another garage project thanks.
allenfre is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 09:47 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 939
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Moog CC635 Rear Springs

its a firebird formula he is talking about
__________________
RED_DRAGON_85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 01:18 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
cprmn14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dixon, IL
Posts: 34
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-speed manual
Axle/Gears: Soon to be 3.42 posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Moog CC635 Rear Springs

i know man. I have a 91 rs and i just put Moog springs in the back, and KYBs all around. Definatly rides like a new car.
cprmn14 is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
5665, 85, camaro, cc635, coil, isolator, moog, page, part, rear, spring, springs, thirdgen
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.