Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-22-2009, 10:01 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Car: 86 camaro
Engine: mild 385
Transmission: t-braked th350 5000 stall
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt spool 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to xx11seczxx
weight savings manual steering??

i was looking at doing an s10 manual steering box as i heard that it is a direct bolt in and will save a ton of weight but my question is just how much. im sure someone knows..
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________

86 camaro Mike Ford racing engines pumpgas 383, FTI t-braked th350/ 8" 5000 stall. under construction..... again.
xx11seczxx is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 10-22-2009, 10:23 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Car: 86 camaro
Engine: mild 385
Transmission: t-braked th350 5000 stall
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt spool 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to xx11seczxx
Re: weight savings manual steering??

nvm did a search and found it so before you start screaming i got it. just curious tho, how many of you woud do this? the car is mostly race its got skinnys on the front and is only driven once a month at the most. is it a pain to turn?
xx11seczxx is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 01:30 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,303
Car: 1985 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: weight savings manual steering??

It doesn't take a lot of extra effort, you just have to turn the wheel a lot further. With skinnies, I'd just do the swap. Even if you don't like it, you can re-install power steering and only have wasted a couple hours.

BTW, it isn't a direct bolt-it if you're still using a front swaybar, you have to grind away a little bit of the top/rear part of the DS swaybar mount.

While you're at it, you should check and see if the S10 pitman arm will bolt on. If you could use the S10 idler arm, you could also use the S10 pitman arm, to reduce steering effort. My S15 has manual steering and a small aftermarket steering wheel, and the steering effort is noticeably lighter than it is in my camaro, even while not moving.

Last edited by gregsz-28; 10-23-2009 at 01:36 AM.
gregsz-28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 05:32 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Car: 86 camaro
Engine: mild 385
Transmission: t-braked th350 5000 stall
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt spool 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to xx11seczxx
Re: weight savings manual steering??

its used for drag for the most part no swaybar and a small grant wheel. my thing is if im going down the track and the car gets out of shape can it be corrected without turning the wheels a full turn.
xx11seczxx is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 08:19 AM   #5
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 12,585
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 540 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: weight savings manual steering??

I got well out the groove once this year. Just like a power box, it only takes a little effort to correct the steering while you're moving.

A power box has 2-1/2 turns from stop to stop. An S10 manual box is 7 turns. Because I use a 27.5" tall skinny, I can't turn from stop to stop before the tires hit the inner fenders. This just means I don't have a short turning radius and occasionally need to make a 3 point turn.
__________________
87 IROC-Z
All engine, no power adders! Bests: 9.260@146.31 (at altitude)
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 03:58 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Car: 86 camaro
Engine: mild 385
Transmission: t-braked th350 5000 stall
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt spool 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to xx11seczxx
Re: weight savings manual steering??

so going down the track it doesnt take more than the usual small turn of the wheel to straighten it up?
xx11seczxx is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 07:07 PM   #7
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 12,585
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 540 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: weight savings manual steering??

Correct.

You can watch how much steering I do in these videos including turning off the track at the end. No more than a 1/2 turn in either direction for normal steering.

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/M...rag_699695.htm

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/C...car_163625.htm
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 07:25 PM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gap, PA
Posts: 231
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: TH350, 8" Converter
Axle/Gears: S60 with 4:11 and Locker

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: weight savings manual steering??

you will be fine. I drive mine on the street and track.
__________________
1986 Camaro. 383 SBC. Scat forged bottom end, Diamond Pistons, Bullet solid roller, Crower HIPPO Roller lifters, Motown heads that flow 320cfm, Comp Pro Magnum Rockers, Ported Hurricane Intake, TRC 950 Carb.
TH350, RMVB. ATI 8" converter.
Strange S60 With 4:11's and Detroit Locker. Strange Adj Shocks
All Spohn Suspension.
275/60/15 MT ET streets. Sportsman up front.

2000 Camaro SS. M6, SLP. Usual Bolt ons.
1966 Chevelle 427 4 speed.
kens86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 07:36 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Car: 86 camaro
Engine: mild 385
Transmission: t-braked th350 5000 stall
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt spool 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to xx11seczxx
Re: weight savings manual steering??

sounds good and this is a pretty simple install? probly less than an hour. also looking to pull the ac and water pump what kind of belt set up would you guys recommend switching to just need to run an alternator at that point.
xx11seczxx is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 08:01 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,303
Car: 1985 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: weight savings manual steering??

My Camaro with manual steering was my daily for a while, it isn't bad at all.

Do you have v-belts or a serpentine belt, or both?
gregsz-28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 06:23 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Car: 86 camaro
Engine: mild 385
Transmission: t-braked th350 5000 stall
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt spool 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to xx11seczxx
Re: weight savings manual steering??

ive got a full serpentine at this point. ac/ powersteering/waterpump/and alternator. everything but the smog pump. looking to shed some pounds.
xx11seczxx is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 03:34 PM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gap, PA
Posts: 231
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: TH350, 8" Converter
Axle/Gears: S60 with 4:11 and Locker

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: weight savings manual steering??

currently i am running the serp setup that came on these cars that power the water pump,crank and alternator. Putting electric WP on this week though. NOw i need a new setup.
__________________
1986 Camaro. 383 SBC. Scat forged bottom end, Diamond Pistons, Bullet solid roller, Crower HIPPO Roller lifters, Motown heads that flow 320cfm, Comp Pro Magnum Rockers, Ported Hurricane Intake, TRC 950 Carb.
TH350, RMVB. ATI 8" converter.
Strange S60 With 4:11's and Detroit Locker. Strange Adj Shocks
All Spohn Suspension.
275/60/15 MT ET streets. Sportsman up front.

2000 Camaro SS. M6, SLP. Usual Bolt ons.
1966 Chevelle 427 4 speed.
kens86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 12:32 PM   #13
Member
 
Project-RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cumberland, R.I
Posts: 195
Car: 1989 Camaro RS A.K.A Project-RS
Engine: 1979 355sbc
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: weight savings manual steering??

which manual boxes could i use for my 89 rs? what year s-10 and malibu's?
Project-RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 01:04 PM   #14
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 12,585
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 540 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: weight savings manual steering??

84+ S10's with the 4 bolt top cover manual steering box. The manual steering box was only available in S10's with a 4 cylinder engine but not all 4 cylinder S10's have manual steering.

You can use an older version manual box with the 3 bolt top cover but it's not as easy to install because of the different sized input and output shafts.
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 04:28 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: p'cola FL
Posts: 2,093
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5200 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.22

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via AIM to stage20
Re: weight savings manual steering??

it will take more than an hour start to finish.
you will need to REUSE your factory pitman arm from your camaro box.
there isnt much weight savings, but if its a track car, get all you can get.
the box itself is smaller. its a pound or two lighter.
weight savings will come in brackets, pump, pulley, hoses, bolts, weight of the fluid.
the most weight savings will come by converting to rack and pinion.
i weighed my entire factory steering setup at 52.5 pounds. i only put back 12 pounds.
you can buy kits, or fab up your own. a rack setup is for the serious only.
__________________
1988 IROC-z/28. 4th gen interior. 408 LSx
sporting the stock fuse box and taillights.
too many mods to type.
6.23@109.71 pump gas. all motor.
stage20 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 10:11 AM   #16
Junior Member
 
c10crewchief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mt. Olive, NC
Posts: 24
Car: 1985 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 355cid
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Open Rear

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to c10crewchief
Re: weight savings manual steering??

Hey stage20, I am sure your car is mostly for the track but is it hard to turn the rack and pinion? I am thinking of converting to R&P (along with K-member) instead of the S10 box but I do some street driving too (plus the wifey drives the car occasionally). I know the weight savings are better but wanted to see how hard it is to actually turn the wheel. Thanks
__________________
"Paint doesn't make Horsepower!"

1985 Camaro Sport Coupe, Daytona Fiberglass Hood, B&M console Mega-shifter, Shaved firewall, Heat, A/C, and radio removed, 355 (350, .030 over), 9.75:1 cr, Summit Crank, Trick Flow Aluminum Heads 2.02/1.60, Comp Cams CS XE284H-10 Hydraulic Flat Tappet, Advertised Duration 284/296, Lift .507/.510, 1.5 Comp Cams Gold Roller Rockers, Edelbrock RPM Air Gap Intake, 650cfm Speed Demon Vac Secondary Carb, 1" ported Carb Spacer, Stock HEI, K&N Style Flow thru Air Cleaner, 1 3/4" Hooker Full length Headers, 2 1/5" pipe w/ H-pipe and two Summit Turbo mufflers dumped before the rear, TH350 w/ Turbo Action Shift kit, TCI 3200-3600 stall Super Street Fighter Converter, Open rear w/ 3:73 gears, 3 way adjustable Summit drag shocks, Stock Suspension.
c10crewchief is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 08:33 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: p'cola FL
Posts: 2,093
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5200 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.22

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via AIM to stage20
Re: weight savings manual steering??

Quote:
Originally Posted by c10crewchief View Post
Hey stage20, I am sure your car is mostly for the track but is it hard to turn the rack and pinion? I am thinking of converting to R&P (along with K-member) instead of the S10 box but I do some street driving too (plus the wifey drives the car occasionally). I know the weight savings are better but wanted to see how hard it is to actually turn the wheel. Thanks
you will have to shorten the steering arm on the stock spindle or get a set of racecraft spindles for a rack.
when i had a posi in the car, the pinto rack turns much easier(less steering effort)than an s10 box.
you are turning the wheel more, but much less force.
now that i have a spool in the car it feels like i have a power steering box with the hoses looped, but thats to be expected.
i could drive it with one finger in a parking lot before the spool.
you MUST use a shortened steering arm or dont bother, it wont turn.
stage20 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
1979, 1985, 84, 88, 92, box, camaro, gen, malibu, manual, pinion, power, rack, s10, s15, savings, steering, swap, weight
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2010 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.