Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-21-2009, 11:02 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
DeathMetalTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ventura County, California
Posts: 1,078
Car: 1990 Integra LS
Engine: B18A
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to DeathMetalTony
Lakewood or UMI Performance Lower Control Arm's?

Hey Everyone,

Just wondering has anyone installed any of these lower control arms?

Im in a position where funds are coming in how I would love it to. So for these too items they run about the same as in price. I been reading that some people had problems with the Lakewood control arms that they brake or so?

My focuse is to get better traction my intentions with the car is more of a street car and once in a while like to go to the Malibu canyons.

I been reading also about the types of bushings that they offer is it really a big deal on these? Also whats up with the LCARB's should I go ahead and get these while im add it?

My car sits at a stock hight at the moment maybe in the future might lower it. I do understand a lil bit about the LCARB how it helps.

And if you have pics I would really appreciate it.

Thanks. Tony.
__________________

Last edited by DeathMetalTony; 12-22-2009 at 08:32 AM. Reason: *Miss Spelled Title*
DeathMetalTony is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 04:31 AM   #2
Supreme Member
 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 6,977
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Lakewood or UNI Performance Lower Control Arm's?

You can edit the title here, it is allowed.
__________________
86 Pontiac Firebird [68 Firebird HoodScoops, Notchback, Rear Mounted Tach, Inverted Wing,
T/A HoodVents in SailPanel, Front & Rear STB, Boxed LCA/PanHard, Fulley Welded Interior, Alston SFC]
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/v6...-all-over.html
See link for newer pics and above mods.

Gumby is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 08:10 AM   #3
Supreme Member
 
3rdgenmaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lincolnton, NC
Posts: 1,046
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 97 5.7 Vortec LT4 hotcam
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Re: Lakewood or UNI Performance Lower Control Arm's?

Im running the Lakewoods. No problems and I love them. Most of the time that you hear about the Lakewoods breaking are the "Lift Bars" that they have. I DONT recommend them.

UMI also has good LCAs. I bought the lakewoods because I got a good deal on a new set on ebay. That was my only decision maker. To me they are both equally good.

As far as the RLCAs go, when you look at your car (while it is on the ground) is the lca parallel to the ground? Or is it pointed down towards the front?

I bought a set, havent installed yet (got to fix trans first), because my lcas are pointing downwards (back to front).

There is alot of information on RLCAs on here that goes further into where they should be pointed and why.

Hope this helps
Brad
__________________
88 Camaro, 97 5.7 vortec, lt4 hotcam, 700r4, 3.73
85 S10, 350/350, 10.5:1, Dart Pro1 200Ps, 244/249@50, .565/.543, Air-Gap, 650 DP, 3000 stall, 3.42s
67 SS Chevelle, 396, 4 speed, 3.73
3rdgenmaro is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 08:30 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
DeathMetalTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ventura County, California
Posts: 1,078
Car: 1990 Integra LS
Engine: B18A
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to DeathMetalTony
Re: Lakewood or UNI Performance Lower Control Arm's?

Hey Brad,

Thanks for the info I'll check ii out when I return from delivering parts since I'm here at work. But regardless no matter what I hear really good things about the RLCA's even though the car is lower or not. You still get great performance.

What do people recomend bolt on or weld on?

Thanks. Tony.
__________________
DeathMetalTony is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 08:56 AM   #5
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 354

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Lakewood or UMI Performance Lower Control Arm's?

Hello
I noticed that you are considering upgrading your rear suspension! And like mentioned above UMI Performance offers a wide variety of suspension parts that may meet your needs. A lot of people go with the bolt on relocation brackets for easier installation and if needed later they can be welded. Below is a link to show you what all we have to offer.

http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...6rk085csefbig6

If you have any other questions feel free to ask and I will be more than glad to help.
Thanks
Brad
UMI Sales is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 09:06 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
DeathMetalTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ventura County, California
Posts: 1,078
Car: 1990 Integra LS
Engine: B18A
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to DeathMetalTony
Re: Lakewood or UMI Performance Lower Control Arm's?

Hey Brad,

Thanks for the info. Damm you guys have some good customer service Ryan has been PM today so far im gonna buy the lower control arms and the relocating brackets as well. But ill wait for your guys sell.

Thanks. Tony.
__________________
DeathMetalTony is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 09:10 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
DeathMetalTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ventura County, California
Posts: 1,078
Car: 1990 Integra LS
Engine: B18A
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to DeathMetalTony
Re: Lakewood or UMI Performance Lower Control Arm's?

__________________
DeathMetalTony is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 09:19 AM   #8
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: Lakewood or UMI Performance Lower Controling the car moving Arm's?

I have the UMI On-Car Adjustable, Double Heim Joint LCAs & love them.

Despite having the shorter sidewalls of the 17" tires vs the sidewalls of the stock 16" tires, I don't really notice any increase in ride noise, even despite the lack of any rubber/polyurethane bushings back there.

What I DO notice though, is that when I nail the gas, the car GOES. Never thought about or noticed the slight hesitation as the rubber bushings compressed, then the car moved.....But now I realize how the bushings compression delayed the response in getting the car moving.

I have a set of weld-on Spohn LCARBs I wanna sell though for $50, since I don't need them like I thought I would. Photobucket of pics The black spray-on paint is only there to prevent any surface rust from starting, since they come bare.

Last edited by Stephen; 12-22-2009 at 09:24 AM.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 01:37 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
DeathMetalTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ventura County, California
Posts: 1,078
Car: 1990 Integra LS
Engine: B18A
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to DeathMetalTony
Re: Lakewood or UMI Performance Lower Controling the car moving Arm's?

I might take you up on that offer, I'll let you know.

Tony.
__________________
DeathMetalTony is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 09:01 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
DeathMetalTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ventura County, California
Posts: 1,078
Car: 1990 Integra LS
Engine: B18A
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to DeathMetalTony
Re: Lakewood or UMI Performance Lower Controling the car moving Arm's?

I was thinking of trying to keep everything of its own brand, not sure if thats a good route to go though.

TOny.
__________________
DeathMetalTony is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 09:10 PM   #11
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: Lakewood or UMI Performance Lower Control Arm's?

I can understand that. But like SFCs.....

Lots of people like & use UMIs SFCs. Personally though, I don't care for their 2-piece, welded passenger side bar. Boils down to personal preference, which is why I waited & waited until I could find the Kenny Brown Double Diamonds. Some day, they may even make it on to the car, although I have thought about using them as a template & modifying a few things that I think could stand to be improved.

If you want them, great. If not? They'll still be up for sale.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 10:04 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
DeathMetalTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ventura County, California
Posts: 1,078
Car: 1990 Integra LS
Engine: B18A
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to DeathMetalTony
Re: Lakewood or UMI Performance Lower Control Arm's?

I'll let you know on what I decide to do.

Thanks. Tony.
__________________
DeathMetalTony is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 09:55 AM   #13
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 354

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Lakewood or UMI Performance Lower Control Arm's?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathMetalTony View Post
Hello Tony
Thanks for the interest in UMI Performance! The difference is the non adjustable s don't allow for articulation and the roto joints do! They also maintain a great ride quality as well. It give the customers that are running aftermarket rear and don't want to go with a rod end on the street a better ride quality (but everyone has there own opinion). If you have any other questions feel free to ask and I will be more than glad to help.
Thanks
Brad
UMI Sales is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 09:55 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
89, arm, arms, body, control, fbody, firebird, gen, joint, links, lower, performance, pontiac, roto, umi
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details