Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2010, 01:41 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In my garage next to my car
Posts: 474
Car: 89 Red IROC
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Ride height differences

I'm on my 3rd Camaro but most recently I went from a 91 RS to a 89 IROC. My RS was severly damaged in a parking garage by some evil bitch. The RS sat pretty low to start but by the time I got the car it had 175k on it and very fatigued springs and the 5.0l so I installed so Eibach Pro 1" springs. The car sat about the same but no longer bounced and bottomed out going into drive ways.
I put these springs on my IROC and that car does not sit anywhere near as low. I thought the ride height difference originaly was in taller and stiffer springs between an IROC and RS but it seems to be that is not it.

I have not gotten into looking at the two closely yet and searched but found nothing so, what makes the ride height difference in the two?
Mad_IROC-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 02:32 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
skirkland1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: morrow, ga
Posts: 1,043
Car: 82 S10, 83 280ZX, 84 Z28
Engine: 355 smallblocks..na, 2.8 turbo
Transmission: 85:th350, 84:700R4
Axle/Gears: 85:ford9 4.85, 84:stock 3.24

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Ride height differences

yeah...i noticed that too. my Z28 sits much lower than my 85 coupe. and both have the factory springs and such...??
skirkland1980 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 07:58 AM   #3
Moderator
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 16,248
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Ride height differences

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_IROC-Z View Post
what makes the ride height difference in the two?
Mad, welcome to TGO. The IROC had a .5 inch lowered ride height (Springs determine ride height.) Check the following link for more info, but if IIRC, the Z28 (and perhaps the RS) spring height is 11 inches while the IROC is 10.75.

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/su...ring-info.html (Stock Replacement Spring Info)

JamesC
__________________
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." Nietzsche

Last edited by JamesC; 03-11-2010 at 08:14 AM.
JamesC is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 08:35 AM   #4
Supreme Member
 
3rdgenmaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lincolnton, NC
Posts: 1,045
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 97 5.7 Vortec LT4 hotcam
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Re: Ride height differences

welcome to the site!
__________________
88 Camaro, 97 5.7 vortec, lt4 hotcam, 700r4, 3.73
85 S10, 350/350, 10.5:1, Dart Pro1 200Ps, 244/249@50, .565/.543, Air-Gap, 650 DP, 3000 stall, 3.42s
67 SS Chevelle, 396, 4 speed, 3.73
3rdgenmaro is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 10:53 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
mean350rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 30
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 LT1
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Ride height differences

geez mike, didnt know you had all that stuff on your car?!

its probably the weight from that yada yada you have installed in the car. ive heard thats pretty heavy stuff. haha
mean350rs is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 04:09 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In my garage next to my car
Posts: 474
Car: 89 Red IROC
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Ride height differences

Hey Mean350,
I wish all the yada weighed it down but its gone the wrong way.
The IROC sits higher than the RS


Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesC View Post
Mad, welcome to TGO. The IROC had a .5 inch lowered ride height (Springs determine ride height.) Check the following link for more info, but if IIRC, the Z28 (and perhaps the RS) spring height is 11 inches while the IROC is 10.75.

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/su...ring-info.html (Stock Replacement Spring Info)

JamesC
Now that is what I thought as well.
When I pulled the IROC springs out and set them next to the 1" lower Eibachs the IROC springs were much taller than 1".

What makes things worse and more confusing, The RS sat low (about as low as the Z28 in the pic from the link you provided). I had all new steering and suspension parts in the RS so, I took all those parts (control arms with the new bushings and ball joints, left the spindles attached, struts and strut bearings) and installed them onto the IROC expecting the IROC to sit as low as the RS but it does not.
Mad_IROC-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 06:36 PM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In my garage next to my car
Posts: 474
Car: 89 Red IROC
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Ride height differences

Here is the RS with eibach coils installed,

http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/b.../camaro001.jpg

Here is the IROC with all the RS stuff installed as well as the Eibach coils,


http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/b...e128/iroc2.jpg

Ok it seems I can not use the insert image thing. Maybe because I'm new???

But anywhooo, Why does the IROC sit higher with all the goods from the RS. One would assume the IROC should have the same stance as the RS did.
Mad_IROC-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 07:01 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SoCal "Riverside"
Posts: 549

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Ride height differences

are the springs indexed properly?
__________________

THE MODS
Suspension: 18X9.5" hyper black c6 wheels with 265/40/18, 275/40/18 michelin PS2, AGR 12.7 to 1 steering box .225 valve, J&M strut mounts KONI Yellow sport/ Ground Control Weight Jacks#1,000/200, double adjustable lower control arms+ UMI LCA relocation brackets, UMI Panhard relocation "chassis side" with single adjustable UMI panhard, JEGS Panhard relocation "axle side". UMI SFC's. UMI tunnel mounted torque arm, 36/ 23 mm swaybars, Iroc wonderbar, Edelbrock 3 pt STB, Moog front end steering componets, Spohn bumpsteer kit.
Intake: Ultimate T.B. + spacer, 14 X 3" open element 1.6 Comp Cams Roller rockers
Exhaust: 1 5/8" Edelbrock shorty headers through 3" Flowmaster, carsound 3" converter.
1988-305-tbi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 07:16 PM   #9
Moderator
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 16,248
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Ride height differences

OE ride height is, though I've never been able to verifiy it, 27.5. How's your set-up compare? And as 88 mentions, have you indexed properly?

JamesC
__________________
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." Nietzsche

Last edited by JamesC; 03-11-2010 at 07:17 PM. Reason: Happy Hour
JamesC is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 08:05 PM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In my garage next to my car
Posts: 474
Car: 89 Red IROC
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Ride height differences

I just measured the IROC and its 27". I can no longer measure the RS but it clearly sat lower.
The front spoiler on the RS would just clear those cement blocks in a parking lot while the IROC has lots of room to spare.

And yes the springs are in correctly. I have had so many years experience in R&R'ing springs I do it faster without a spring compressor and just use a prybar and floor jack. (and never had any damage or injury)
Mad_IROC-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 08:05 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
3rd, 91, a4, arms, body, camaro, control, gen, height, heights, installed, limited, lower, modified, ride
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details