Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Old 08-17-2011, 12:15 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
UMI Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Philipsburg, Pa
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

You guys spoke and we listened. We have redesigned our lower A-Arms and added the things you would like to see to them including bump stops, spring index and steering stops. The steering stops are adjustable to work with a variety of wheel and tire widths.

www.umiperformance.com/2031



The following users liked this post:
88bullet (11-01-2019)
Old 08-17-2011, 12:20 PM
  #2  
Member

iTrader: (3)
 
jakemussman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: WA
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Ratio, Torsen LSD
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

WOW these look pretty sweet!
Old 08-17-2011, 06:00 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Old 08-17-2011, 06:13 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (33)
 
FSTFBDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Boosted Land
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Very nice. Glad to see a Co. out there listening what the people want.
Old 08-17-2011, 06:19 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
BlackenedBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9-bolt/3.27 posi
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Now THAT is what I call Customer Service! Responding to customers wants & modifying your design to please them!

Old 08-17-2011, 11:50 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
87350IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Those adjustable steering stops are awesome.
The following users liked this post:
Tidan (03-07-2020)
Old 08-18-2011, 12:17 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
Project 3.4 Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 2,615
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

shiny...
Old 08-18-2011, 12:24 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (12)
 
toxik IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: M.D
Posts: 1,923
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: 350 hsr
Transmission: 700R4(blown)
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

can we trade are old stlyes in for the new ones 8)
Old 08-18-2011, 04:58 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
 
88fastgta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1988 Flame Red Trans am GTA
Engine: Forged 355 4 Bolt, FIRST TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: ls1 torsen 3.42 gear
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

and i thought i was done with suspension mods...i think i found a new suspension mod to add to my to car...
Old 08-18-2011, 07:33 PM
  #10  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
jb3829's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 436
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by toxik IROC
can we trade are old stlyes in for the new ones 8)
Yea how bout it?!......I have last years model ;(
Old 08-18-2011, 10:35 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
CamaroRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Those very well may be the best pair of aftermarket A-Arms I've seen.
Old 08-20-2011, 04:06 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Primetime91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ogden UT
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 Camaro (Gone...)
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Those look very well made.

UMI, if you want to improve them further, how about an "upgrade" option which replaces the poly bushings with a bearing?
Old 08-20-2011, 04:17 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by Primetime91
Those look very well made.

UMI, if you want to improve them further, how about an "upgrade" option which replaces the poly bushings with a bearing?
they do Delrin bushings already

bearings wear out a lot faster, and in this application, not a great upgrade over a good bushing IMO
Old 08-22-2011, 02:16 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Primetime91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ogden UT
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 Camaro (Gone...)
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

A bearing in this application offers the best of both worlds. Less deflection than a bushing, & they actually ride & operate smoother too. Have your cake, & eat it
Old 08-22-2011, 02:31 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

 
itsMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 GTA/93 S13/91 Si
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by 88fastgta
and i thought i was done with suspension mods...i think i found a new suspension mod to add to my to car...
yup..

awesome to see that you guys actually listen to your customers!!
Old 08-24-2011, 09:51 AM
  #16  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
hellz_wings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,337
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

How would these work with 2" Racecraft dropped spindles? Would the steering stop at the right place?

P.S. Awesome job UMI.. Glad you listened
Old 08-25-2011, 07:58 AM
  #17  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
UMI Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Philipsburg, Pa
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
they do Delrin bushings already

bearings wear out a lot faster, and in this application, not a great upgrade over a good bushing IMO

This is correct, we offer a Delrin bushing options which allows the arm to travel up and down with very little friction.

Originally Posted by hellz_wings
How would these work with 2" Racecraft dropped spindles? Would the steering stop at the right place?

P.S. Awesome job UMI.. Glad you listened
They should work just fine. As long as there stop is in the same place as factory I don't see why not but haven't personally tried it.

Thanks everyone for looking!
Ryan
Old 08-25-2011, 08:06 AM
  #18  
Senior Member

 
lunati397's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Clovis NM
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2012 F350 lariot/1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Powerstroke/6.0
Transmission: 6R100/4L80e
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

always went with UMI nothing but the best just need a K memeber so I guess im building my own
Old 08-25-2011, 08:22 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
hellz_wings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,337
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

A tubular K-member would definitely make all the work in swapping to this newer, redesigned a-arm worthwhile!
Old 08-25-2011, 08:47 AM
  #20  
Senior Member

 
lunati397's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Clovis NM
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2012 F350 lariot/1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Powerstroke/6.0
Transmission: 6R100/4L80e
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Im going to build one to work with power rack and pinion
Old 08-25-2011, 09:39 AM
  #21  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
hellz_wings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,337
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Imagine a bolt in K-member / a-arm combo with a power rack and pinion with a 12:1 steering ratio (like the IROC boxes)? That's something I would buy in a heartbeat! (ofcourse it would have all the braces and stock mounting points so it really is just a "bolt in" setup)
Old 08-25-2011, 09:49 AM
  #22  
Senior Member

 
lunati397's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Clovis NM
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2012 F350 lariot/1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Powerstroke/6.0
Transmission: 6R100/4L80e
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

thats what im putting together now a bolt in k member a arm setup with power rack same turning radius with 2.25 or 2 turns lock to lock so better than the iroc boxes

Ive found the rack and it will work just has to be ajusted to get the 6 in of throw
Old 08-25-2011, 10:18 AM
  #23  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
hellz_wings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,337
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

yeah it's lighter weight and the weight sits lower and in the center of the car and it connected to the beefy k-member instead of the crack-prone frame where the steering box mounts to.
Old 08-25-2011, 09:55 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

 
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

These look great! my question is...would it not be beneficial to also incorporate some type of "hook" over the top of the tubes from the spring pocket? Thats just a ton of sheer force on the welds holding the spring pocket in place.
Old 08-26-2011, 04:23 AM
  #25  
Senior Member

 
lunati397's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Clovis NM
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2012 F350 lariot/1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Powerstroke/6.0
Transmission: 6R100/4L80e
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

welds especially good welds are stronger than the metal
Old 08-26-2011, 04:57 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Primetime91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ogden UT
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 Camaro (Gone...)
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by lunati397
welds especially good welds are stronger than the metal
Because welding reduces the surrounding metal's strength in the head affected zone... Just saying

Not too significantly with mild steel, but chromoly is a different story. Welding doesn't "Make the steel stronger", it's just stronger in comparison

Since this topic got brought up.... UMI, that's another way you could set yourself above the competition. As far as I know, the only aftermarket company that post-weld heat treats it's chromoly suspension components is J&M. I kinda wish more companies did...
I have no idea how many welds, if any have failed on your chromoly pieces, but it's just an idea.
Old 08-26-2011, 11:12 AM
  #27  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
stereojnky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Augusta, Ga
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Rs
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Do these work with the stock K member or do you have to use the tubular one?
Old 08-26-2011, 11:35 AM
  #28  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
hellz_wings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,337
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

They work with stock k-member. I have their older model and it fits great.
Old 08-26-2011, 01:49 PM
  #29  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
stereojnky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Augusta, Ga
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Rs
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by hellz_wings
They work with stock k-member. I have their older model and it fits great.
Thanks. I can't remember who made them, but I remember someone complaining about the a arms without the k-member moving tires tires back. Could have been BMR I don't know. Do you have any pics you could pm me?
Old 08-26-2011, 01:52 PM
  #30  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
KiLLJ0Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pleasant Grove, Utah
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1993 GMC Typhoon
Engine: 4.3 Turbo
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

question... what is the over all benefit to using these types of A-arms over stock? i mean the weight savings can only be minimal at best.. 1-2lbs?
Old 08-26-2011, 02:18 PM
  #31  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
hellz_wings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,337
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Besides looking fancy, they are probably "stiffer" than stamped steel ones (not sure if the gains from this are ever noticeable). But these comes with poly or Delrin bushings which are an improvement over stock rubber bushings (although you could install poly or delrin in stock control arms). They also come with new balljoints. These comes with adjustable steering stops, bump stops and finally a spring index (yay!). But to be honest, the weight savings are advertised as 5.5lbs of savings and that's not that much but it IS unsprung weight so there are definitely other things you can spend money on FIRST before you get these, although if your car is already fully done over then yes these are "better" than stock. I do like the way they look under the car though, damn sexy lol.
Old 08-26-2011, 04:38 PM
  #32  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,841
Received 211 Likes on 159 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

I want a set to put on my desk and admire......

And another set to put on the car.
Old 08-27-2011, 11:31 PM
  #33  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
91 1LE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Litchfield Park
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '91 1LE
Engine: 377 w/Stealthram
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Torsen
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Is there a part number for a replacement ball joint boot? I bought a set of your arms a while back but one came with a ripped boot. Looks like it got snagged during the ball joint install.
Old 09-01-2011, 01:36 AM
  #34  
Senior Member

iTrader: (11)
 
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bellflower, CA
Posts: 795
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

My biggest question is also my biggest concern. How is it possible that UMI did not realize the deficiencies in their original product? This is just my opinion, but I feel it's kind of lame for a company to have to realize the shortfalls of it's product in an online forum. Where is the Research and Development that goes into these products? Are these items not test fitted, scrutinized and reevaluated before the product sees actual production? I have the following products from UMI: 22mm Chromoly Rear Sway Bar, Chromoly Pan Hard Bar Double Adjustable with Rota Joints. Chromoly Double Adjustable Lower Control Arms with Rota Joints, Lower Control Arm Relocation Brackets (bolt in), Steering Brace, Cast and Camber Plates...


just my thoughts
Old 09-01-2011, 06:40 AM
  #35  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
stereojnky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Augusta, Ga
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Rs
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by SixSeriesCSi
My biggest question is also my biggest concern. How is it possible that UMI did not realize the deficiencies in their original product? This is just my opinion, but I feel it's kind of lame for a company to have to realize the shortfalls of it's product in an online forum. Where is the Research and Development that goes into these products? Are these items not test fitted, scrutinized and reevaluated before the product sees actual production? I have the following products from UMI: 22mm Chromoly Rear Sway Bar, Chromoly Pan Hard Bar Double Adjustable with Rota Joints. Chromoly Double Adjustable Lower Control Arms with Rota Joints, Lower Control Arm Relocation Brackets (bolt in), Steering Brace, Cast and Camber Plates...


just my thoughts
IMHO almost anything you buy first gen is pretty much a "beta" product. Cars, software, electronics, all get better as we figure out what we don't like about the product. It's no secret that companies use consumers to test their products. For the most part I just choose not to be a test subject.
You could maybe argue that it took too long to make the improvements, but I have yet to see a product introduced that doesn't need improvements/updates.
The following users liked this post:
Streetstuff (04-24-2021)
Old 09-01-2011, 08:42 AM
  #36  
Supreme Member

 
L695speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Andover, NJ
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 Trans Am GTA; '84 Trans Am
Engine: L98 350TPI; 5.3 LSx built
Transmission: N/A; T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9 bolt; 3.73 10 bolt
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Hmmm, perhaps I should spend 411 bucks in the near future......Summit's shipping is cheaper for me. These just look awesome. I'm sold, now to rob the nearest convenience store of a measly 500 bucks to buy'em.
Old 09-01-2011, 02:48 PM
  #37  
Supreme Member

 
Project 3.4 Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 2,615
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by stereojnky
IMHO almost anything you buy first gen is pretty much a "beta" product. Cars, software, electronics, all get better as we figure out what we don't like about the product. It's no secret that companies use consumers to test their products. For the most part I just choose not to be a test subject.
You could maybe argue that it took too long to make the improvements, but I have yet to see a product introduced that doesn't need improvements/updates.
I have to agree, no product hits the market as good as it can be, it was lacking features, not fatally flawed. If they were snapping right and left, and they didn't promptly revise them that's one thing, adding new and improved features is quite another...
Old 09-01-2011, 09:48 PM
  #38  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
 
88fastgta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1988 Flame Red Trans am GTA
Engine: Forged 355 4 Bolt, FIRST TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: ls1 torsen 3.42 gear
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

i just dont really see any advantage to this other than looking nice and flashy.... you can paint your stockers and put poly bushings in or those expensive derlin bushings in and have a control arms just as good for half the price of those...

the stocker a arms are plenty beefy and imo are beefier than the aftermarket setups.... i just wouldnt trust all the weight on those a arms on weld spots like that on a daily driver hittings bumps and all. and with all the problems poeple had with aftermarket a arms in the past i rather just spend that on something thats more beneficial...
Old 09-01-2011, 09:51 PM
  #39  
Supreme Member

 
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

I don't know if I'll ever put them on my car if it sees a lot of street use. But, while they may be built to hold up to street abuse...they're not really built for street cars. That's more of a race part, realistically.
Old 09-02-2011, 07:28 AM
  #40  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
UMI Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Philipsburg, Pa
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

We have never had issues with the spring perch being welded, it is welded fully around the ring and has been this same way since 2006 on all our A-arms.
Old 09-04-2011, 09:28 PM
  #41  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
zimmstoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 Iroc
Engine: 305 LB9
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Umi - will you guys consider a trade-up program? I recently bought a pair of the old style and would like to get the new design.
Old 09-08-2011, 11:15 AM
  #42  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (2)
 
luvofjah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,476
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: 91 Black Formula KR
Engine: 305 TPI R69/G92
Transmission: Astro A5-Pro 5.0-McCleod
Axle/Gears: US Gear 3.42 Eaton True Trac
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Hat's off to you guys for listening & improving a product...
Shame on Spohn for selling a part that is clearly wrong defective
(moved my wheels back int he well and rubbed-Addressed them several times, still no response)....

I ended up wasting tons of $$$ with Spohn a Arms, remove stock, install spohn, alignmens, defective part, buy upgraded bushings and ball joints for stock, paid to get that put in, get spohn out and ANOTHER alignment.... $1000 wasted...

Go for the UMI guys...
Old 09-08-2011, 11:26 AM
  #43  
Member
iTrader: (9)
 
mackjar66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lafayette, IN
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: pending install 383 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

I know what item im buying next
Old 09-08-2011, 09:09 PM
  #44  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
battmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 1,096
Received 404 Likes on 257 Posts
Car: 1984 TA (1 stock / 1 custom)
Engine: LG4 / turbo LQ4
Transmission: 700R4 / 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Stock / 4:11 Moser 9"
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

when's the next UMI 10% off sale so i can buy some stuff?? i was hoping you'd do a Labor Day sale, but no luck.
Old 09-09-2011, 09:17 AM
  #45  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
hellz_wings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,337
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

They did a labor day sale i think they were offering 15% off.
Old 09-09-2011, 09:40 AM
  #46  
Supreme Member

 
L695speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Andover, NJ
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 Trans Am GTA; '84 Trans Am
Engine: L98 350TPI; 5.3 LSx built
Transmission: N/A; T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9 bolt; 3.73 10 bolt
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by hellz_wings
They did a labor day sale i think they were offering 15% off.
I can confirm that. They had 15% off. I almost pulled the trigger on the arms then. Then realized they would have been flopping in the breeze because of no spindles or strut mounts. (I will use Koni Yellows but I can use the old blown struts for build purposes)

I did however get a set of Tie Rod adjusters and the on car adjustable panhard bar. Both were 15% off.
Old 09-09-2011, 12:29 PM
  #47  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Stevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

very nice...where's the k-member?!
Old 09-09-2011, 12:57 PM
  #48  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
hellz_wings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,337
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by Stevo
very nice...where's the k-member?!


UMI said next summer! So, come spring time, i'm hoping to have my mouse click the "add to cart" button for a UMI k-member
Old 09-09-2011, 07:09 PM
  #49  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
stereojnky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Augusta, Ga
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Rs
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by hellz_wings


UMI said next summer! So, come spring time, i'm hoping to have my mouse click the "add to cart" button for a UMI k-member
NICE!!! Can't wait! Just judging from these A-Arms, it should be well thought out and well constructed.
Old 09-09-2011, 10:55 PM
  #50  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (6)
 
The Project's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West of Toronto
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by UMI Performance
.
I'm waiting for the UMI k-member a-arm combo.

PLEASE make it so I can give you my money.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.