TBIThrottle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.
Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!
Could someone comment on my calculations. This is from info I have collected from various sources including the TGO boards. I chose numbers that lean towards a worse case as far as psi requirements.
This is the desired inj.(125) divided by available inj.(80 or 90), squared and then multiplied by original psi to yield required psi for the available injector.
With 30psi being the often stated limit, 425hp requires the 90s. Working the number back for the 80s would limit them to 413hp and 464hp for the 90s.
Do you have a calculation that describes idle quality? I have seen on here that bumping up the injectors hp capabilty (size and pressure) has an adverse effect on low end fueling.
Also, any formula for injector longevity per increase in psi?
I run my 90 lb/hr injectors at 18psi, i suspect they will be at 20psi when i finish tuning. The PW at idle is short, but still controllable. There's a short discussion on that topic here: http://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/show...hreadid=290728
I can't comment on injector lifespan, but i haven't had a problem..
You probably will have an easier time controlling idle with a 383 as it natuarally can use the fuel. Imagine a smaller engine that needs your level of top end fuel trying to idle on your setup. Would you say it would be difficult or are you not that close the the limit with the 383? Going to 20 psi should make it worse too.