Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TBI
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2006, 08:58 AM   #51
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 200
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI (L03)
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Truetrac posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RBob
When the EGR is active there is a 12 line table of BPC's that is used. It is vs. manifold vacuum (not pressure). Table is at $2A1. Note this is for the '8746 ECM.

RBob.
Another BPC table??, that I didn't know . . . that complicates things. So you're saying that while I've been out datalogging with the BPW raised, EGR may be active, so the fact that I raised the BPW constant is being overridden by the "BPC when EGR off" table? I don't see any table by that name in my TunerProRT xdf file. Is that something that has to be patched?

Is there a way I can tell if EGR is active? I see Flags in WinAldl for the AIR solenoids, but not any for EGR. How do I shut off EGR to see if that is my problem? Can I do that by maxing out the "EGR On" parameters so the engine can't get into EGR?

So let's say the BCP EGR table is my issue. If I turn off EGR, raise BPW and get my blm's back in line, then go back and turn EGR back on (for fuel mileage), won't I be right back where I stated. Seems like the solution is to to fix the BPC EGR table.
91RockS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2006, 09:09 AM   #52
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,661
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Seems like the solution is to to fix the BPC EGR table.


BINGO!!!

The "BPC when EGR off" is a constant, the one you've been tweaking. There is a table of BPC values for when the EGR is on. If tunercat doesn't have it shoot an e-mail their way they are very good about adding things like that. In the mean time set the EGR temp enable temps to something sky high and see if that is your problem.
BMmonteSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 11:04 PM   #53
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 200
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI (L03)
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Truetrac posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I got EGR turned off now, things seem to be much better. VE's all between 126-128. After a few iterations I got WOT to be completely flat at 12.5:1 across the whole rpm range. Now I need to get back to fixing AE.

One quick question about AE: Some of my VE's are now in the upper 90's. Can the VE table limit AE if you're close to 100%? I think it might be time to crank up my FP and adjust BPC to get some headroom.
91RockS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 09:48 AM   #54
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,661
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Just having your VE in the 90% range doesn't necesarily mean your injectors are going static. You could be going static, or you could have 30% headroom. Your AE will be added on top of whatever PW your VE and BPC result in. Keep in mind on stock code that AE is injected Asynch, what this means is that it's injected on a schedule of every 12ms instead of on every ignition signal. Asynch is complicated beast and takes some reading to completely understand. Best to output your PW and check the result of your tune..
BMmonteSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 09:43 PM   #55
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 200
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI (L03)
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Truetrac posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I got the PW patched into the PromID field of the datastream. So now I export the log file to excel and do the math => promid x .01526 + injector bias = pulse width. I just want to confirm that the injector bias value is the "PW - Injector bias added to pw (sync)" constant in my TunerPro XDF file. Is that correct. If so, then my bin has that constant set to 0 usec. Does that sound right?

I see that total spark advance can also be patched into the datastream as well. If PW is already being reported in the PromID field, is there another field that spark advance can be patched into so both can be logged simultaneously? That would be great to have both in the same log.
91RockS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 09:52 PM   #56
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 200
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI (L03)
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Truetrac posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I got the PW patched into the PromID field of the datastream. So now I export the log file to excel and do the math => promid x .01526 + injector bias = pulse width. I just want to confirm that the injector bias value is the "PW - Injector bias added to pw (sync)" constant in my TunerPro XDF file. Is that correct. If so, then my bin has that constant set to 0 usec. Does that sound right?

I see that total spark advance can also be patched into the datastream as well. If PW is already being reported in the PromID field, is there another field that spark advance can be patched into so both can be logged simultaneously? That would be great to have both in the same log.
91RockS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 10:06 PM   #57
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 5,958
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 91RockS
If PW is already being reported in the PromID field, is there another field that spark advance can be patched into so both can be logged simultaneously? That would be great to have both in the same log.
I usually patch it into some non-vital place. The IAT works well for me.
Fast355 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 10:08 PM   #58
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,661
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
You are correct on the math, and yes some bin's don't have an injector bias.

You can out put the spark into any of the sensor channels, Jprevost posted a .xdf that was nothing but aldl stuff so you could completely change what got put into the data stream, the only problem is that winaldl does some math to most of the channels so outputing your spark advance in the voltage field gives you some funky numbers that are hard to convert. If your using tunerpro to log, then it's easy to change the math.
BMmonteSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 10:19 PM   #59
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 200
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI (L03)
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Truetrac posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast355
I usually patch it into some non-vital place. The IAT works well for me.
Fast, can you walk me through how to patch the spark into the IAT channel? In know that if I used the PROM id channel, I would need to modify the following addresses and change the values as shown below?

addr: Value:
$D414 $00
$D415 $61
$D416 $00
$D417 $62

What addresses do I go to and what should they be changed to? I actually would prefer to not use IAT since I look at that temp fairly regularly in my log files.

Thanks
91RockS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2006, 08:30 AM   #60
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 11,386
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Here are a couple of locations that I like to use:

To put SA in IAC steps: change address $419 to $62 (was value $FD)
To put SA in INTegrator: change address $425 to $62 (was value $A2)
To put SA in knock Cnts: change address $435 to $62 (was value $69)
To put SA in Battery Volts: change address $431 to $62 (was value $40)

The first three typically won't have math done on them. The BatV may be divided by 10, if so just drop the decimal point.

The reason for only needing to patch in the value $62 is that 99.9% of the time the SA will be BTDC. It will only use both bytes when the SA is ATDC (retarded).

Note these locations are for the '8746.

RBob.
RBob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2006, 01:19 PM   #61
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 200
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI (L03)
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Truetrac posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thanks RBob, that's exactly what I was looking for. I'll give that a try.
91RockS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 09:53 PM   #62
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 200
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI (L03)
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Truetrac posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
It's been a week or two since I've had time to do any more tuning. Anyway, I got pulsewidth and spark advance patched into my datastream. I've also tapped into the spark retard signal coming from the ESC module and wired it to the 0-5 volt user defined channel of my ZT-2 wideband oxygen sensor to monitor when knock is occurring. The ESC signal is normally a flatline 9 volts. When knock is detected, the volage drops in proportion to the amount of knock detected. Once the ECM pulls timing out and knock goes away, the voltage goes back up to 9 volts. I made a little voltage divider to drop the voltage down to about 3 volts for the ZT-2. So now when I datalog, I simultaneously log with WinALDL to get all the sensor data AND with the ZT-2, which records AFR, rpm, MAP, TPS and ESC signal. It really helps see where knock is occuring and how much timing is being pulled out.

I've attached a snapshot of a log showing both the wideband data and the WinALDL data for a WOT blast. The screen shot show up through 3rd gear. You'll notice a few things:
1. Still have nasty lean spikes during shifts (see ARF on top trace of the graph). I need to keep working on PE.
2. A missed 2-3 shift (that's the double clutch in the middle of the trace). Back to driving school!
3. Thee instances of knock. (see the bottom trace that says "2.84 User 1"), These are the three downard spikes. Height of spikes is proportional to the amount of knock. The last one happend during the missed shift. If you look at the WinALDL data you will also see the knock coutner increment and pull out timing.
4. The ESC signal gets a little dirty at higher rmp's. You can see the signal getting fuzzy instead of a nice flat line. Not sure if I'm on the ragged edge of knock, or maybe starting to pick up false knock??

So a little more work on PE and SA to squeak out a bit more performance. Hope to make a trip to the track next week to get some times.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg WOT run.JPG (89.5 KB, 89 views)

Last edited by 91RockS; 04-30-2006 at 09:57 PM.
91RockS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 10:54 PM   #63
Senior Member
 
DM91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,853
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
91RockS

That is cool that you are getting all that data like that. And getting good results.

And thanks for the PM.
DM91RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2007, 04:31 PM   #64
Member
 
escort_ford84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 148

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Tuning TBI

$226 and $227 filter coef. in the ANLU hac being lag i would assume the values ($226 = 20 and $227 = 36) are in time? Possibly Usec ? (V = 15.260000 * X + 0.000000) If so, i come up with Cold Filter ($226) = 305.20 Usec and Warm Filter ($227) = 549.36 Usec. IS this correct?
escort_ford84 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 07:45 AM   #65
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 88

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Tuning TBI

Where can i find a good tunner in md baltimore area?
oramac91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 07:50 AM   #66
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 88

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Tuning TBI

Ihave a 91 z28 5.7 liter 9.5 pistons heads worked polish ported 3 angle job cam(lift not sure)computer stock, chip stock.injectos stock. where sould i start? with a reprogram,HELP PLZ!!!! NEW MOTOR!!
oramac91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 02:30 AM   #67
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 88

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Tuning TBI

help plz.Ihave a 91 z28 5.7 liter 9.5 pistons heads worked polish ported 3 angle job cam(lift not sure)computer stock, chip stock.injectos stock. where sould i start? with a reprogram,HELP PLZ!!!! NEW MOTOR!! Plus can find out how to post a new post TY Jason..
oramac91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 02:30 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TBI

Tags
1500, 50, chevy, convert, curve, factory, ford, log, operating, promid, reaching, run, tbi, temp, timing, tunerpro, tunerprort, winaldl
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details