Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TBI
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-25-2008, 04:09 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 26

Classifieds Rating: (0)
L05 heads- Max lift without machine work?

Stock '89 350 truck TBI Swirl port heads. First off, I KNOW they suck so please don't waste paragraphs trying to convince me you're right.

I've been searching trying to figure out what the maximum lift I can get out of them without machining anything, but I haven't really come up with any solid answers. I believe fast355 had a post that mentioned he was over .500 on exhaust but beyond that all I can find is a buncha heated opinions.

I intend to change the springs anyways and I'll even buck up for retainers but I want to accomplish this without removing heads from the block so machining is out. The cam I'm intending has .465 lift, so corrected the 1.6 is .496, at least according this calculator I found online- http://www.wallaceracing.com/rockercalc.php

I'd imagine I'm at about the edge of what I can get away with there. Anyone have a solid answer?

Thanks!

M.
therealmark is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 08:34 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
kdrolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 849
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: L05 heads- Max lift without machine work?

I don't think the 1.6s will work. IIRC the valve seal boss (around the valve stem) on the L31/LT1(iron)/L05/L03 is the same in terms of dimensions, and going above, or near, 0.480 valve lift on the LT1 (iron) is risky due to the mech interference. So I think the same "rule" applies for the L05.

Searching for Fast355's posts is a good idea. HTH.
kdrolt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 01:03 PM   #3
Supporter/Moderator
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,233
Car: '90 RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T5

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to ShiftyCapone
Re: L05 heads- Max lift without machine work?

.480" is about as far as you can go. There are slight dimensional differences from head to head but the norm is around that number. My 187 heads (305 TBI heads) had that limit exactly (baseline before I cut the guides). Even if you could hit your goal on stock heads you would risk pulling out the pressed in studs. To run that lift you will at a minimun have the pressed in studs removed for screw in units. Having a shop cut the guides at that point is another $20 or so. Fast has run some high lift cams on stock pressed in studs but I don't think he made it very far without them working loose.
ShiftyCapone is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2010, 09:00 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: BC
Posts: 1
Car: 94 K2500
Engine: 350 tbi
Transmission: 5sp

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: L05 heads- Max lift without machine work?

I realize this is an old thread. It is very pertainent to what I am preparing to do. My question is how much lift will the pressed in studs tolerate before any problems occur?

I built a 350 from a l31 shortblock, cam and all, with mildly ported 187 heads, tbi factory prom for the 193 heads, short headers into single 3"exhaust, no cat to power my camper truck. Its not for performance. It can rev 4500-5000 but will mostly stay under 3000. I have a manual tranny in it and i just want to get a little more bottom end and power around 2000 to 2500. That will keep me in high gear on the highway at speed without having to downshift. Better on fuel.

I bought a set of 1.6 roller tipped self aligning comp cams rockers. they will put me up to .43x intake and .45x exhaust on the factory L31 cam. LCA is nearly perfect at 106.25 for valve to displacement ratio: according to Vizard. The extra rocker ratio will make it seem like 105.5 which is still acceptable. overlap will be just over 40* which is in the high range for hauling and low range for street. Basically I expect to get a bit more torque with the extra lift but keep the power curve in the lower range with relatively low overlap. I know overlap will be more than with the stock rockers but should be acceptible.

My concern is this. what is the maximum lift tolerable for pressed in studs with factory springs keeping in mind that this is a mild cammed engine turning low rpm? Should i need to put screw in ones for only .455lift? I dont want to take the heads off again.

Last edited by 350BENZ; 12-11-2010 at 09:04 PM. Reason: just to clarify that it was not clearance i was concerned about, but of studs pulling out.
350BENZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2010, 11:35 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
alvanwie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dyer, In
Posts: 293
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: L05 heads- Max lift without machine work?

I would not think pulling out studs with stock valve springs should be an issue.
__________________
1991 Camaro RS [click for pictures]
Comp XR269HR-12 cam, GM Intake 12496820
454 TBI, Vortec Heads
Hypereutectic Pistons 10.3:1
Crane 10309-1 Valve Springs/Retainers
Pacesetter Ceramic Coated headers
CGS Subframe Connectors, Jegster Rollbar
alvanwie is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2010, 12:22 PM   #6
Supreme Member
 
UnderCover89TBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 6,064
Car: 89 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: TBI
Transmission: 700R4 w/ Vigilante Stall Converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Send a message via Yahoo to UnderCover89TBI
Re: L05 heads- Max lift without machine work?

But if you change to aftermarket springs thier could be a problem? I was going to do valve seals, pop in new springs, retainers etc while there and do 1.6 RR on it.
__________________
UnderCover89TBI is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2010, 05:12 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: West Palm Beach,Florida
Posts: 79
Car: 1992 Jeep Wrangler "custom"
Engine: 5.7 T.B.I
Transmission: art carr 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4:10

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: L05 heads- Max lift without machine work?

Im glad i found this today. im running l05 tbi with swirl port heads in a jeep (cause i love the torque). also 12-249-4 cam with upgraded springs. I was just going to buy some 1.6's and slap them in there. I take it this wont be good?
__________________
1992 Jeep Wrangler Built SBC 350 TBI, art Carr HD 700r4 125shot N20

JP Custom Controls
"Custom switch Panels For Race, Street & Offroad Vehicles"
JeepYJv8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2010, 05:12 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TBI

Tags
305, block, engine, heads, iron, l05, lift, lifting, lo5, lt1, max, pressed, stock, studs, tbi, valve
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details