Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-10-2003, 08:22 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 142
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: See Signature
Transmission: B&M 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to IROC of 88
COMP CAMS recommended

Here is what i sent them...

Could you please recommend a good cam for me.... I am looking ot get the most performance possible... and I do like the rough idle...
I have a 1988 Iroc Z28 Engine Size: 350 Bore: 4"
Stroke: 3.48" Compression Ratio: 9.3:1 Connecting Rods: Stock
Rocker Arm Ratio: Stock(1.5 I think) Intake: Stock TPI Computer Controlled: YES Meet Emissions Standards: NO
Cylinder Heads: Stock, but will be ported eventually
Valve Size: Stock intake, Stock exhaust Pistons: Stock
Transmission: B&M 700r4 Street Auto
Converter: B&M 2100 Hole shot converter
Rear End Ratio: Currently 2.77, but will be 3.45 eventually
Rear Tire Size: 245/50/16
Fuel Used: 91 octane pump gas, sometimes 93 octane
Exhaust: Single 3" Flowmaster 40 series, no cat.
Headers: Flowteck ceramic coated 1.5" primary's and 2.5" collecters Curb Weight: 3400 lbs RPM Range: 1000-5500
Car Use: daily driver, fun at the track, street racing
Computer has: JET stage II performance chip
Current Cam: Stock GM 10066049 int.415 exh.430 int207 exh213 lobesep 117

this is what they recommended....
PART NUMBER 08-502-8
ENGINE CHEVY SM BLK 305-350
GRIND # CS XR269HR-12
DESCRIPTION HYD ROLLER CAM
INT EXH
VALVE ADJUSTMENT HYD HYD0
GROSS VALVE LIFT .495 .503
DURATION AT
.006 TAPPET LIFT 269 276
VALVE TIMING OPEN CLOSE
AT .006 INT 26 62
EXH 74 22

THESE SPECS ARE FOR CAM INSTALLED
AT 108 INT C/L
INT EXH
DUR AT .050 218 224
LOBE LIFT .3300 .3350
LOBE SEPARATION 112.0 INT MASTER ID 331
ADVANCE 4 EXH MASTER ID 331
RECOMMENDED CC VALVE SPRINGS 986-16

my question is..... Is this a good recommendation.... or should i go with something else... I know there are a million opinions on the right cam... also this car is gonna be mainly street driven, but taking to the track some... please give me some help, is hte lift enough/too much... is the duration tooshort/toolong???
thanks guys
__________________
1988 Iroc-Z

350 bored .040 over, 9.72 Forged Pistons Ceremic coated/Moly coated, Comp Cams 280HR Cam, 1.6 Pro-Magnum RR's, Pro Action Iron Lighting 200cc Heads, Manley 2.02 /1.60 valves, Comp Cams 3/8" hardened push rods with guideplates, Melling Hi volume oil pump, WalBro GS340 Fuel Pump, Holley Stealth Ram Intake, ARP head-intake-rocker studs-header bolts, Flowtech Ceremic Coated Headers, Custom Off-road y-pipe, 3" into a 40 Series Flowmaster, MSD 8.5MM Super Conductor plug wires, MSD blaster 2 GM coil, Ed Wright Custom Chip, 30lb SVO injectors, B&M 2100 Stall, B&M S/S 700R4, and the never over looked K&N
IROC of 88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2003, 08:38 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Miami & Coral Springs
Posts: 2,530
Car: Sometimes. Usually.
Engine: 2.0 Liter @ 250 hp
Transmission: Synchro soup
Axle/Gears: 3.91278172

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Kingtal0n
its a good recommendation, but you can do better. that cam will not "idle rough" in a mild motor, but will be nice on the street, and in a near stock motor it will probably idle a bit rough. its also TPI computer compatible, by the looks of it.

The reason I say you can do better, is because the .050-.050 VS advertised is almost the same as a Flat tappet XE262 cam. 218/224 but LESS advertised on the XE262.

that means your extra "advertised" duration is going to waste on a perfectly good roller cam. of course, they probably recommended it because they figured you didnt want to upgrade your valve spings.

but if you want to get the best value, upgrade springs / rockers / pushrods and get a cam with about the same .050-.050 but alot less advertised and a little more lift.

thats MY recommendation, and other people may have DIFFERENT recommendations.
Kingtal0n is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2003, 08:15 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,823
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thats nice.... Do all the mods you said you'd do "eventually".


Then change the cam.
F-BIRD'88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2003, 08:56 AM   #4
Moderator
 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 17,679

Classifieds Rating: (0)
King,

It appears that they DID recommend new springs with the cam (as they commonly do).
__________________
Later,
Vader
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, and not one step simpler."
Vader is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2003, 09:44 AM   #5
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Loveland, OH, US
Posts: 18,462
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
All of their XR roller series have specs that compare to the XE flat series like that. I can tell you, having changed the otherwise identical motor from a XE274H (230°/236°) to a XR282 which has the same .050" spec, the difference in the "advertised" duration is negligible, and the roller cam runs a whole lot stronger than the flat did.

Their recommendation is actually pretty aggressive for them; they usually tend a little toward the conservative. It looks like a good choice to me for your engine after the mods you talk about, but will probably slow the car down and merely make it drink more gas if you put that much cam in it as it now sits.

Believe the valve spring recommendation. Note that they are the 986 spring, which is a 1.45" outer diameter dual spring with damper as opposed to the stock 1.25" diameter single spring with damper; this will require machine work to the heads. You can't put any more lift in without having to do this, if you want long-term reliability. You really should upgrade the rocker arms at the same time too, get rid of the lame rubbery stock ones and put something in with a consistent ratio.
__________________
"So many Mustangs, so little time..."
RB83L69 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2003, 10:25 AM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 142
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: See Signature
Transmission: B&M 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to IROC of 88
the only other mods i am planning on doing is port and polish the heads, change the rear end from 2.77 to 3.4x and upgrade the ignition.... so i should do all that before i get a cam?
IROC of 88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2003, 10:53 AM   #7
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: College Station, Tex USA
Posts: 1,443
Car: 89rs
Engine: 400Sb
Transmission: Tremec 3550

Classifieds Rating: (0)
do rearend and ignition now..

then do the heads when you go inside for the cam.
Get a good set of aftermarket non-stamped rockers.
__________________
89rs w/a 400, some aluminum things, a tremec, 9inch-4.10 gear
mods

and it sounds like this
idle.MPG
jcb999 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2003, 10:53 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
085028, 280hr, 495503, cam, cams, comp, compcams, computer, heads, machining, oil, recommended, sale, stock, vortec, work, xe262
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details