Search



Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by Weld Racing
Click Here

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-05-2003, 02:51 PM   #1
FJK
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Illinois
Posts: 244

Classifieds Rating: (0)
vALVE sPRING iNSTALLED hEIGHT: Help!

I'm changing valve stem seals on a 88 GTA 5.7L & decided to install a little better valve spring at the same time. The springs I got were from competitioin products & were stated to be Z28 springs. They also came with retainers. Their installed height are to be 1.700". BTW, I'm doing this in-vehicle. Well, if you remove the exhaust rotator & replace it with the supplied retainer, the installed height is 1.860" which will set the preload too low. The installed height WITH the rotator is 1.685, which is right for the new spring. I'm thinking the lock groove on the exhaust valves are cut higher for applications running valve rotators. I guess my question is, how do you replace the rotator with a plain spring retainer and maintain your 1.700" installed height. I'm .160" off. Am I missing something here in my thought process? A final question, do factory Z28 sbc use rotators on the exhaust valve? I'm in the middle of this right now, so if anyone can quicly reply, it would be helpful.
Thanks, FJK
FJK is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2003, 03:12 PM   #2
Moderator
 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 17,898

Classifieds Rating: (0)

FJK,

If I'm correct, the springs you have are the old version LT1 springs from the early '70s. Those engines didn't use rotators on the exhaust valves. The spring pockets were also not machined as deeply as what you have in your heads. The options you have now are to stack two or three 0.060" spring shims under each exhaust valve and use real retainers (trash the rotators) or manufacture a single spacer from a hardened material. If you use shims, I'd suggest two, and leave the spring just a little loose (taller). The reduced mass from the lack of a rotator coupled with the slightly better springs (120# @ 1.70" vs. 85# @1.70") should allow good control of the valve with the slightly reduced seat pressure.
__________________
Later,
Vader
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, and not one step simpler."
Vader is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2003, 04:56 PM   #3
Supreme Member
 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,833
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction

Classifieds Rating: (0)

You'll need 1 .060 shim, 1 .030" shim and 1 .015" for each of the eight exhaust spring seats. (.105" total)
You can get them From local Automotive machine shops, some performance shops and from Competition Products.
When you install this combined with the factory valve spring oil shield (.030") and a stock retainer, you'll be good to go with the Z28 springs.

the exhaust spring seat is machined deeper in these heads

Last edited by F-BIRD'88; 04-05-2003 at 05:00 PM.
F-BIRD'88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2003, 11:39 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 18

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Try offset locks, they make them in .030 so you can get away with only two shims. Good luck!
jkesselring is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2003, 12:46 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 6,585

Classifieds Rating: (0)

Been there, done that many times. Your heads have the exhaust spring pocket milled slightly deeper than the intakes to compensate for the thicker exhaust rotator/retainer. They take exactly the same spring as the intake side if you keep the rotator/retainer in place.

Otherwise, if you ditch the rotator/retainer and go with standard retainers on the ehxaust side you'll have to shim the spring up as stated in above posts.

The exhaust valve lock groove is in the same place on the valve stem regardless of whether you use standard retainers or rotator/retainers.
Damon is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2003, 12:46 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
exhaust, height, installed, low, oil, remove, rotator, rotators, sbc, shield, shims, spring, springs, valve, z28
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content copyright 1997 - 2014 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details