Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2004, 06:52 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 57

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Camshaft - Advance/Retard Optimization

It seams that nearly every off the shelf cam comes with a ground-in 4 degrees of advance. Every single engine combintation that I have simulated on Desk-top-Dyno shows best power with 0 degrees of advance (about 20-40 hp better than with 4 degrees of advance). The dyno curves also show very very little low end loss at 0 degrees of advance.

So what gives? If Desk top dyno has any accuracy, why are all the cam manufactures recommending installing them 4 degrees advanced? Am I missing something here? Is it not done because of a reduction in idle quality?
formulaman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2004, 08:13 AM   #2
ede
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Jackson County
Posts: 14,815

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to ede
the cam grinders don't recommend you install a cam advanced, or retarded any more than straight up. they grind 4* advance into a cam to make more torque. i'd install the cam straight up with the 4* advance ground into it. you'll make the most HP with the cam installed at 4* retard. DD isn't known for being greatly reliabler either, more of a good guess sort of thing.
__________________
MM Black Diamond 538 F&AM

Ex quocumque facere poteris te sauciabit, nihilo comprehenso.

ICON Motorsports

S10 Manual Stearing Box 75$
ede is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2004, 12:57 PM   #3
TGO Supporter
 
vexter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: White Hall, Ar
Posts: 748
Car: '88 Iroc
Engine: 305
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (3)
.

Last edited by vexter; 01-04-2004 at 01:14 PM.
vexter is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2004, 01:14 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Loveland, OH, US
Posts: 18,462
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Cam grinders design their cams to be installed with the intake lobe centerline at a particular angle with respect to the crank rotation. It is pointless to get all worked up about whether the specific angular relationship the mfr calls for happens to be "advanced", "straight up", or "retarded" from the stock angle.

In other words, use the right timing set, put the cam in using the timing set's "0" mark, and the cam will come out where it was designed to come out. It's a waste of time trying to pick apart whether that's "advanced" or whatever, compared to where some other cam was designed to go. It's meaningless. So: if the cam was designed to go in with the intake center at 106°, then put it in at 106°, and don't bother whether it's "advanced" or whatever.
__________________
"So many Mustangs, so little time..."
RB83L69 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2004, 01:45 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 4,942
Car: Girls
Engine: Indian
Transmission: Change

Classifieds Rating: (0)
If DD2000 is showing a big difference by advancing or retarding the cam 4* either way, you either have too big of a cam, or too small of a cam for the rest of the combo, be it heads, intake, carb, exhaust, etc.

David Vizard points this out in many of his books, including one about dynomometer simulation software.

You should worry more about choosing the right cam, not making the wrong cam work better.
AJ_92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2004, 01:45 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
advance, camshaft, retard
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details