Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-23-2004, 01:30 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 821
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: HSR/355cid
Transmission: Modded 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.45:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Comp XR288HR-112: too much for street/strip?

My combo is: 355cid, Ported ProTopline 200cc aluminums, 10.3:1 compression, 1.75in shorties, StealthRam, 1.6 rockers, 3.45 gears, converter (stall to be determined after cam choice). I am willing to deal with a choppy idle, and if the car is driveable on the street, thats good enough for me. I just want decent power brakes. Im planning to get it ground on a 112 LSA as opposed to the 110*, hopefully this will help out the vacuum some. What are you guys opinions? Too much? Will a mail-order custom PROM (pcmforless) be able to take care of the programming for a cam this big? Anyone used this cam?
__________________
'89 Formula WS6
355/Toplines/HSR, '730, stall, gears, etc...
formularpm is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2004, 01:42 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: las vegas
Posts: 311
Car: '92 droptop bird
Engine: 5.7L,mild cam etc.
Transmission: modded 700r4 w/2600

Classifieds Rating: (0)
go for it ,the 288 cam is fine especially with the 112 lobe sep,had the 286 110 lobe it was more aggresive than i wanted for my driver it would have stayed in my bird if it had a 112 lobe,you should consider a 3200/3500 stall,just my opinion i am sure many will agree....
gen3z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2004, 05:46 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 821
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: HSR/355cid
Transmission: Modded 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.45:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I was originally going to go with the SLP 2600 stall, but that probably wont be enough for this cam. I will probably end up with something in the 2800-3000 range if I go with the 288. Forgot to mention the specs... 288*/294*, 236*/242* @ 0.050, .555"/.576" lift with 1.6s, 112* LSA
formularpm is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2004, 06:43 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ: Transplanted from Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,824

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Dont get stuck on only looking at XE cams.

Check out the GM 847 or if you really want the best of all worlds check out the Crane solid street roller grinds.

We are in the process of slapping together a Crane solid roller HSR 383, 236/244 @.050
OMINOUS_87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 08:38 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 821
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: HSR/355cid
Transmission: Modded 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.45:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I was looking at the XE cams because I heard that they can provide better vacuum due to their aggressive ramp rates. Not sure if theres any truth to this, however.
formularpm is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 08:41 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,551
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by formularpm
I was looking at the XE cams because I heard that they can provide better vacuum due to their aggressive ramp rates. Not sure if theres any truth to this, however.
solid rollers have more agressive ramp rates then hyd lifters will ever have.
MrDude_1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 09:35 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ: Transplanted from Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,824

Classifieds Rating: (0)
How many miles per year you plan to drive the car?

Once you take a hydra roller up past 230 or 236 @.050 vaccum and idle will really start to take a hit, in the XE series.

A solid roller will give a much better idle, a much fatter TQ curve, work better with big heads as it will get to max lift faster, and will not float the vlaves.

This Crane we are plugging into the 383 HSR will be our first solid roller motor, however it wont be the last as I never plan to run a hydra roller cam again in a weekend/cruiser car.
OMINOUS_87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 01:36 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 821
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: HSR/355cid
Transmission: Modded 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.45:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
solid rollers have more agressive ramp rates then hyd lifters will ever have.
I know, I meant compared to other hydraulic roller cams.


Omnious, the car is a sunny weekend only type, not a daily driver. I was under the impression that a solid roller will clatter enough to give a knock sensor false signals. Or is it a different type of vibration that the sensor can differentiate? Too bad I just bought a set of Comp R hydraulic lifters, hard to justify buying a set of solids and letting a $200 set of lifters sit on the workbench. Do you think that vacuum would be bad enough that reserve canister would be a must with 288HR?

Last edited by formularpm; 02-24-2004 at 01:58 PM.
formularpm is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 05:56 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ: Transplanted from Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,824

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Do you think that vacuum would be bad enough that reserve canister would be a must with 288HR?
I think it will be safe to assume that vaccum will be very questionable with a hydra roller of that size in a 350.
OMINOUS_87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 05:58 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ: Transplanted from Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,824

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
I was under the impression that a solid roller will clatter enough to give a knock sensor false signals. Or is it a different type of vibration that the sensor can differentiate?
It would need to be disabled via the chip.
OMINOUS_87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 06:06 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ: Transplanted from Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,824

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I would think long and hard about the valvetrain in a weekend pleasure cruiser.

I took the XE plunge and its cool, however once I get some cash in my pocket I am going solid roller. I dont like the idle of the hydra roller all that much, 224/230 cam.

The bottom line is that in the size range you want to run, a solid roller looks real atractive: better idle, fatter curve, no valve float, good chance of getting through emissions.

You could always sell the R lifters.
OMINOUS_87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 06:55 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,551
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by OMINOUS_87
It would need to be disabled via the chip.
my understanding is you can also disable it with a simple resistor.
MrDude_1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 08:12 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ: Transplanted from Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,824

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
my understanding is you can also disable it with a simple resistor.
Sure, either or will work just fine.
OMINOUS_87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 05:01 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 821
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: HSR/355cid
Transmission: Modded 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.45:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thanks for the advise guys. I think Im going to go with an XR282HR instead.
formularpm is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 05:52 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ: Transplanted from Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,824

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Thanks for the advise guys. I think Im going to go with an XR282HR instead.
Did yo look into the GM 847 cam?
OMINOUS_87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 08:42 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1
Car: 97 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E

Classifieds Rating: (0)
What are the specs on it?
97pontta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 09:21 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ: Transplanted from Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,824

Classifieds Rating: (0)
OMINOUS_87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 09:21 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
288, 288hr, 383, 847, cam, cams, comp, compression, gm, hr, hydraulic, idle, roller, specs, vacuum, xe, xr, xr288hr
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details