Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-16-2004, 03:23 PM   #1
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,773
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Rotating Mass Questions

Alright, I have done some searching on here, got some info, but I have some questions.

I found a thread stating that 1lb of rotating mass = about 15lbs dead weight. Sweet!

Now, wouldn't this formula vary according to what part(s) are rotating?

I would think that crank/flywheel would be one formula, engine accssorys would be another, driveshaft another, and axle/brake drums/wheels be a another. The reason I'm thinking this is most of that goes thru a gear system changing its speed/ratio off the orginal formula. Would that gearing change anything?

Also, does anyone know how much 1cubic inch of steel, and aluminum weight?

I would like to do some figuring, and see if the gains I can make are worth that of my time and money. I know less roating mass is better, but is that better worth my pocket book?
__________________
2007 Infinity G35 Sedan
1997 C3500 CCD
91 Camaro RS Vert
old car 91 Camaro RS HDTP 3.4/t5
Dale is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2004, 03:29 PM   #2
ede
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Jackson County
Posts: 14,815

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to ede
i tihnk the big differance is how far fro the center of gravity it is located. you also need to consider it's better to remove weight from the front than the rear. cubic inch of steel is .283 pounds and cubic inch of aluminum is .0998 pounds
__________________
MM Black Diamond 538 F&AM

Ex quocumque facere poteris te sauciabit, nihilo comprehenso.

ICON Motorsports

S10 Manual Stearing Box 75$
ede is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2004, 06:35 PM   #3
Moderator
 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 17,679

Classifieds Rating: (0)
And such calculations apply only to acceleration and deceleration forces. Once a mass is moving, input power remains constant.

"A mass in motion tends to remain in motion..."
Vader is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2004, 08:42 PM   #4
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,657
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 2.77's

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to dimented24x7
Re: Rotating Mass Questions

Quote:
Originally posted by Dale
Alright, I have done some searching on here, got some info, but I have some questions.

I found a thread stating that 1lb of rotating mass = about 15lbs dead weight. Sweet!

Now, wouldn't this formula vary according to what part(s) are rotating?

I would think that crank/flywheel would be one formula, engine accssorys would be another, driveshaft another, and axle/brake drums/wheels be a another. The reason I'm thinking this is most of that goes thru a gear system changing its speed/ratio off the orginal formula. Would that gearing change anything?

Also, does anyone know how much 1cubic inch of steel, and aluminum weight?

I would like to do some figuring, and see if the gains I can make are worth that of my time and money. I know less roating mass is better, but is that better worth my pocket book?
The gearing will certanly change things. In low gear, the rotating assy. accelerates alot faster then it does in a higher gear so all that mass has to be spun up rapidly and you loose power to that. Id only go as far as maybe getting an aluminum driveshaft and thats about it. Not worth it if your not racing or something.
dimented24x7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2004, 08:42 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
1lbs, axel, camaro, mass, removing, roating, rotating, rotational
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details