Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-06-2004, 11:52 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Covington, WA
Posts: 3
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
420 cid tpi ?

O.k. I'm new to this site and I was hoping that I could get some feed back from all the people here. I'm currently building a 420 cid sbc for my 89 IROC-Z and the thing is I want it to look as stock as possible. I like the look of the factory TPI and was hoping that maybe with SLP runners that are fully siamesed and a good base manifold that I could have an engine that'll run realy strong on the street and still look near stock. I think that the LTR TPI set up will choke the engine to much so the other option is a HSR and I just wanted to know what every one elses opinion is. Thanks alot guys!
Idle_wild is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 12:00 AM   #2
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Oakdale, Ca
Posts: 4,311
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Welcome to thirdgen.org!!!

Forget the looks of a TPI if you wanty to feed the beast. You'l have to consider aftermarket intakes...you have a lot of cubes to work with, and the stock looking setups will just choke ya out.

Do you have to stay CARB legal or not?
8Mike9 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 01:28 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
RSFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,213
Car: 1985 Camaro, 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L carbed and 5.0L TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 and 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 8Mike9


Do you have to stay CARB legal or not?
CARB stands for California Air Research Board. He seems to be in Washington.

BTW Idle, check out the link in my sig to hook up with other NW 3rdgen fanatics.
__________________
1989 Camaro RS - 2.8L MPFI - T5 SOLD
1986 Firebird Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6 - 3.27 posi
1985 Camaro Berlinetta - 5.0L carbed

RSFreak is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 01:59 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moscow, ID I need my own machine shop
Posts: 3,852
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yeah you don't want tpi, that will kill all the potential of your cubes. If i were you i would seriously consider converting to carburetor. Your not gonna make any power at all with something that looks stock.
__________________
LT1 headed LG4 305 beast! Comp Solid lifter XS-262-10S, 1.6 Roller Rockers, 10.2:1, Holley 4160 600cfm, modded Weiand 7502 intake to fit LT1 heads____ Custom cylinder head cooling. Weiand 8208 Short Water Pump____TH-350 3 series 3.73 with 2 series posi and spacer____ Hedman Hedders 1 5/8 headers and Y-pipe 3in Exhaust, Dynomax 3" Bullet muffler ____Moroso Ultra 40 Wires ACCEL HEI Super Coil ____Competition Engineering 3120 Bolt-on SFC's____Homemade: Wonderbar, solid tie rod sleeves, Aluminum LCA and Panhard Rod with spherical rod ends, alternator and PS bracket, Strut tower brace, and Decoupling torque arm with telescoping link.
3000lbs

"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group or by any controlling private power."
-FDR

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."

-- President George W. Bush
During a photo-op with Congressional leaders on 12/18/2000.
ME Leigh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 12:02 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yeah, installing TPI would be like putting a carb on with a rev limiter set to 4500. It would just suck.
ljnowell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 12:34 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Covington, WA
Posts: 3
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
yeah I thought that the TPI would choke the motor quite a bit, I want to try and keep my power band around 5500 rpm for a good street motor. Money isn't really a concern, so I was thinking of going with the SR, but I think if I went with a HSR on that big of a motor that I could pull of 6000 rpm at my hp peak. The motor will sit in front of a 700r4 and I want to try to keep the power band around were the transmission will operate. I've seen the LPE 420's dyno numbers with the SR and both of the motors are near ideal for what I want.
Idle_wild is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 01:21 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
The motor will sit in front of a 700r4 and I want to try to keep the power band around were the transmission will operate
The transmission will operate fine at any RPM, its the torque and HP that will kill it, not the RPMS.
ljnowell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 10:05 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Covington, WA
Posts: 3
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
no, what I meant about having a automatic, is that the auto when in drive shifts right around 5000 rpm at WOT and 4700 rpm under normal exceleration. I want the power band of the motor to match where the trany likes to shift.
Idle_wild is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2004, 12:26 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 5,741

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Idle_wild
no, what I meant about having a automatic, is that the auto when in drive shifts right around 5000 rpm at WOT and 4700 rpm under normal exceleration. I want the power band of the motor to match where the trany likes to shift.
Don't do that. Build the tranny around the engine. All you have to do is change the weights around to get it where you want.
25THRSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2004, 12:51 AM   #10
Moderator
 
Air_Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,068
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Air_Adam
Yes, TPI would be a mistake to put on something that big IMO. It just can't feed that many inches. TPI shouldn't have even been used on the 350 I think, because even on that its pretty restrictive.

On the plus side though, you'd make enough torque with a 420 TPI setup to pull your house outta the ground
Air_Adam is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2004, 12:51 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
420, 50, band, build, cid, power, sbc, torque, tpi
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details