Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-02-2001, 07:30 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lake Oswego, OR, USA
Posts: 179

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to BenDoe
Canfield heads 195cc or 220??

I'm slowly piecing together parts for my car, and it i have decided on canfield heads because of their high flow numbers, and relitivly low cost. I noticed on their web site that the 220cc intake port heads are only $50 more than the 195. The engine i'm building is going to be a 327 with a miniram setup that i plan on spinning to 7000 rpm only when racing. I think i know the answer to this question(195cc), but want to get other peoples opinions. This car is going to be a daily driver, so would i loose any drivability/gas mileage with the larger intake heads?

------------------
1991 Z28 305 5spd 1LE, TES headers, dual cats, 3 Chamber flowmaster, Comp cams .488/.495 212/218, 187 head castings with bigger valves, self-burned eproms.
All work done by myself, and proud of it!
SOON TO COME 327 Miniram (3/2002) PARTS NEEDED:Titanium valvetrain parts, stud girdles, fluidampnr, miniram, bulletproof bellhousing, MONEY(im in college).
Find a .bin on the internet and want it burned? I'll do it for you!
BenDoe is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2001, 01:29 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Missisauga ON
Posts: 223

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yeah,I think the 195`s would be better.The 220`s are probably more suited for a 383 or
larger engine.
84zeddd is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2001, 01:29 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
195, 195cc, 218, 220, 383, camaro, canfield, canfieldheads, cc, daily, driver, flow, heads, numbers, racing
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details