Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-03-2005, 10:11 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
Dissapointing dyno, what else is new?

Not too bad but there is a problem after 5500rpm. The curve hits a flat spot (at 5500) and then drops off around 6500. When I say flat, this thing doesn't fluctuate more then 5hp over 1000rpm. I'm also losing 100lbs of tq in 200rpm. Could be valve float or someone had mentioned that the valves could be too tight. One more thing, not sure if its related, the tq curve was shifted to the left (lower rpm) more than what the dyno guy was used to seeing. Long story short here's the build,

355 holley stealth ram and 58mm TB
30# injectors at ~41psi (the needle was bouncing very fast)
Protopline 200cc
comp cams @ 0.050 230/244* and .544/.576
commander 950pro.
10.18:1 c/r dynamic is around 7.58:1 (low)

and the numbers 355rwhp and 357rwtq I was hoping for closer to 380+. A/f was close to 13:1

I have the dyno files but don't know how to read them. I can send the files to someone if they want to post them for me. I would GREATLY appreciate it.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 10:35 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
MaxxMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: shawnee, ks
Posts: 711
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: Wheeler 383 shortblock
Transmission: Th350 w/edge 3k converter
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.23, Zexel diff, T/A cover

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to MaxxMitchell
You can send them to me MaxxMitchell@kc.rr.com but i wont beable to check my email till after 5 or so, but i could upload the pics tonight, unless you can get someone else to get it for ya.

Are you sure 41 PSI is enough? How much was it bounching, a 1-2 PSI or more? Sounds almost like you where running a little too lean at WOT. Might need to recheck your fuel system, sounds like either a pump or a filter/lines might not be up to par. Checking out the graph will help alot.
__________________

E85, GT88, JY LQ4 623rwhp- 1.54 9.97 @ 138, 807rwhp @ 18lb/18deg. Alum 5.3/Twin 6266's soon.
MaxxMitchell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 10:47 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 496
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to poorboy8
I still think you needed to jack up the FP and lean out the tables...JM2C! Although I still wouldnt rule out the mechanical side of things!
__________________
91 GTA
02 1500
05 VTX1300C
----
Check out the CamaroZ28.Com Podcast!
Tune in each week for Camaro news and info, contests and a whole lot of fun!
----
poorboy8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 11:02 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
I agree, I think the pressure is too low. It was bouncing violently about 4-5psi never dropping below 39. I didn't want to waste dyno time going thru the tables again. Anyway I figured out something, here's the graph. I still can't get the hp & tq va rpm.

Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 11:17 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
That's going through a T-56 and a 9"
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 12:31 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
Posts: 91
Car: '91 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 4-bolt 350 TBI w/ Holley ProJection
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 10bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Brian Murray Send a message via MSN to Brian Murray Send a message via Yahoo to Brian Murray Send a message via Skype™ to Brian Murray
definitely a fuel pressure problem if its bouncing around that much, but just out of curiousity, what does the ignition map look like.

Dang, that thing fell on its face...
Brian Murray is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 12:46 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird


Working on the spark map.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 07:59 PM   #8
Supreme Member
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,325
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Too bad there was not a widebanc O2 sensor available. Looks like pretty good number to me. Get that problem solved and it will be better yet.
1989GTATransAm is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 08:38 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
There was a WBO2. It was reading 13.1:1
We played w/ the timing and fuel tables but not the pressure.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 11:19 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
MaxxMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: shawnee, ks
Posts: 711
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: Wheeler 383 shortblock
Transmission: Th350 w/edge 3k converter
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.23, Zexel diff, T/A cover

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to MaxxMitchell
If you can post the O2 readings vs the RPMs with the HP & TQ graph it might be a little easier to see where theres more power. But i would deffinitly work on your fuel system first and get the pressure evened out. What are you using as a pump, lines, regulator? If its an external pump, did you remove the intake and make a pick up?
__________________

E85, GT88, JY LQ4 623rwhp- 1.54 9.97 @ 138, 807rwhp @ 18lb/18deg. Alum 5.3/Twin 6266's soon.
MaxxMitchell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 11:46 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Posts: 1,366
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Getting some knock retard maybe? 13.0-13.1:1 afr should have been pretty good if it's stable. 355rwhp isn't out of line IMO, the Protoplines are unported right?

If it's not weak springs yeilding some valve float I'm wondering about some knock retard w/ that wavyness going on if the AFR was steady, the C950 show you KR during the run?
__________________
Ray87Z
-87 Z28 w/ a Vortec headed 350.
R.I.P. - Just totaled by a 16 year old girl in a 94 Mustang, go figure....

-New ride, 94 Z28 - LT1, A4 w/ 3.23s
new mods: Edelbrock headers, gutted cat, magnaflow catback, Moroso CAI

Last edited by Ray87Z; 08-03-2005 at 11:49 PM.
Ray87Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2005, 08:47 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
Not running a knock sensor. Thinking too much timing?
Here are some runs w/ the A/F ratio.


Last edited by Free Bird; 08-04-2005 at 11:41 AM.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 11:09 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
Quote:
Originally posted by Ray87Z
355rwhp isn't out of line IMO, the Protoplines are unported right?
Unported off the shelf. They still advertise flow number up there w/ AFR. And according to all the calculators I've seen they'll support 544hp (in theory). 355 +15% = 408hp @ crank.

Today I drove the car and it's now breaking up real bad above 5500. I'm pulling some springs this weekend to check install height and pressure, see if they're the culprit.

Do you think that the motor itself my not like the 14* split in dur. from the intake to the exhaust?
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 11:11 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
One more thing, doing some math ( i know, more bench racing) the car (3440#) went 7.78 @ 89mph. That works out to around 375rwhp.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 11:41 AM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
Posts: 91
Car: '91 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 4-bolt 350 TBI w/ Holley ProJection
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 10bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Brian Murray Send a message via MSN to Brian Murray Send a message via Yahoo to Brian Murray Send a message via Skype™ to Brian Murray
Quote:
Originally posted by Free Bird
One more thing, doing some math ( i know, more bench racing) the car (3440#) went 7.78 @ 89mph. That works out to around 375rwhp.
which is about right if you're making 410 crank HP, considering frictional losses through the transmission & diff.
Brian Murray is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 12:48 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
westman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 382
Car: 90 Camaro RS
Engine: 6.3L 383 V8
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to westman
what kind of dyno were they using?? Dynojet? Mustang??
westman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 02:21 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
Dynojet dyno.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 02:23 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
Quote:
Originally posted by Brian Murray
which is about right if you're making 410 crank HP, considering frictional losses through the transmission & diff.
That's what I thought 375rwhp sounds right, it make sense. 355 OTOH seems low. I'd be happy w/ another 20rwhp.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 04:32 PM   #19
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
Posts: 91
Car: '91 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 4-bolt 350 TBI w/ Holley ProJection
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 10bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Brian Murray Send a message via MSN to Brian Murray Send a message via Yahoo to Brian Murray Send a message via Skype™ to Brian Murray
Quote:
Originally posted by Free Bird
That's what I thought 375rwhp sounds right, it make sense. 355 OTOH seems low. I'd be happy w/ another 20rwhp.
fuel pressure...
Brian Murray is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 11:17 PM   #20
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,657
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 2.77's

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to dimented24x7
What kind of fuel pump do you have? Sounds like its time for a better one that can keep up if your having pulsations.
dimented24x7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2005, 12:20 AM   #21
TGO Supporter
 
Lo-tec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gambrills, Md
Posts: 1,767
Car: clapped out 84Z
Engine: 355 efi roller
Transmission: tremec TKO

Classifieds Rating: (0)
been there done that. What's in the tank??
Lo-tec is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2005, 12:30 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,580

Classifieds Rating: (0)
if your using hydraulic rollers its likely valve float, there have been many posts dealing with this. I have afr 190's with the upgrade springs with a comp 224/230 roller and i set my rev limit at 6000 to avoid any chance of float. My power should peak around 5500 with a 383. i think you should peak around 6000 so i can see wanting to get to 6500. I was told by Rick Spearling (owner of afr) that the bsaic spring they sell would float by 5500-6000 with the hyd roller i chose the upgrade i have is good to 6000-6500.

don't rule out FP but its common to have these problems with hyd rollers and off the shelf heads
laiky is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2005, 12:34 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 949

Classifieds Rating: (0)
If the Top line and the Pro Action heads are the same heads, the CHP flow numbers are a good bit lower than the advertised. If that's the case, your numbers look really good to me.

You posted SAE numbers with a smoothing factor of 0. Most magazines and a number of people post the "standard" HP numbers which would probably boost your HP by at least 15 horses. They typically do not use the smoothing factor of 0 either,,, 3 usually, sometimes 5 which typically drop your peak HP by a few horses, but literally smooths the fluctuations in the graph. So, make sure you note those when comparing your numbers.

Your A/F looks good, nothing to suggest you had a fuel problem,, your gauge jumping around could be the gauge. I'd check it out though, because if the fuel pressure really is jumping around you'll need to correct it. Although it might not have any real significant impact on HP, it could extend the life of the engine if the pump is going bad and craps out on you.

The curve is shifted a little more to the left as I would have expected myself. It looks like there might be more than 4 degrees advancement on the cam. Did you degree the cam? If you have the cam advanced more than 4 degrees and throwing a lot of timing at it, it could break up at the top end - backing off the timing would let you know if too much timing is a problem.

More than likely you're getting into valve bounce or float due to the springs - a tell-tell sign is if the rpm it starts to break up keeps getting lower and lower. Try adjusting the lifters to 1/8 turn - if that,,,, and the timing drop doesn't cure things, my bet it you'll need to replace the valve springs.
BadSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2005, 08:43 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
I pulled off a couple springs and will be taking them to get tested today. If that's not it, I'll bump up the FP and adj. the valves 1/8 turn or less.

Thanks for everyone's help.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2005, 09:28 AM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
fuel pump is an intank walbro 255.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2005, 09:54 AM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 496
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to poorboy8
BTW, these are none corrected #s. "standard" and there is only a difference of about 8 hp versus the SAE corrected #s. Remember, this was with less timing IIRC, the 6th pull you added timing and a little fuel where you were lean from the 005 pull, and your numbers dropped...correct!?


DYNORUN.005: 102.64°F 30.09in-Hg Humidity:8% STD:1.02 Average Gear Ratio:N/A

s mph hp Air/Fuel
0.18 59.00 N/A 11.71
0.34 60.00 198.60 11.88
0.45 61.00 205.58 12.31
0.56 62.00 210.88 12.53
0.67 63.00 216.88 12.61
0.78 64.00 221.92 12.60
0.88 65.00 226.49 12.55
0.99 66.00 231.60 12.52
1.09 67.00 236.13 12.51
1.20 68.00 241.47 12.48
1.30 69.00 246.33 12.46
1.41 70.00 250.73 12.44
1.51 71.00 255.39 12.41
1.61 72.00 260.58 12.39
1.72 73.00 264.77 12.38
1.82 74.00 267.81 12.35
1.92 75.00 271.66 12.32
2.02 76.00 275.60 12.32
2.13 77.00 279.88 12.37
2.23 78.00 284.15 12.43
2.33 79.00 288.71 12.48
2.43 80.00 292.42 12.52
2.53 81.00 296.21 12.57
2.64 82.00 300.68 12.61
2.74 83.00 304.23 12.62
2.84 84.00 307.58 12.62
2.94 85.00 311.59 12.64
3.04 86.00 314.50 12.67
3.14 87.00 317.34 12.69
3.25 88.00 321.13 12.69
3.35 89.00 324.26 12.69
3.45 90.00 326.89 12.69
3.55 91.00 329.08 12.69
3.66 92.00 331.74 12.68
3.76 93.00 333.94 12.68
3.86 94.00 336.60 12.66
3.97 95.00 338.20 12.68
4.07 96.00 340.88 12.73
4.18 97.00 344.38 12.79
4.28 98.00 347.10 12.83
4.39 99.00 350.02 12.87
4.50 100.00 353.27 12.91
4.60 101.00 356.65 12.96
4.71 102.00 357.74 12.99
4.81 103.00 360.88 13.02
4.92 104.00 361.98 13.03
5.03 105.00 364.04 13.03
5.14 106.00 363.21 13.02
5.25 107.00 363.29 13.00
5.36 108.00 363.49 13.02
5.47 109.00 363.10 13.05
5.58 110.00 363.50 13.09
5.70 111.00 364.51 13.14
5.81 112.00 364.10 13.15
5.93 113.00 364.64 13.13
6.04 114.00 364.00 13.02
6.16 115.00 361.55 12.89
6.28 116.00 360.61 12.83
6.40 117.00 359.38 12.74
6.53 118.00 356.01 12.55
6.65 119.00 355.08 12.01
6.78 120.00 347.78 11.38
6.92 121.00 313.37 10.93
--------- --------- --------- ---------
MAX: 6.92 121.00 364.64 13.15
MIN: 0.18 59.00 198.60 10.93


DYNORUN.006: 102.06°F 30.10in-Hg Humidity:8% STD:1.02 Average Gear Ratio:N/A

s mph hp Air/Fuel
0.22 51.00 N/A 10.90
0.44 52.00 153.23 10.72
0.57 53.00 160.27 11.31
0.69 54.00 166.29 11.84
0.80 55.00 173.80 12.14
0.92 56.00 179.16 12.30
1.04 57.00 183.45 12.33
1.15 58.00 188.31 12.31
1.26 59.00 192.91 12.27
1.38 60.00 198.06 12.23
1.49 61.00 204.14 12.21
1.60 62.00 209.06 12.20
1.71 63.00 214.39 12.21
1.82 64.00 219.56 12.24
1.92 65.00 224.17 12.26
2.03 66.00 228.94 12.26
2.14 67.00 234.19 12.22
2.24 68.00 238.55 12.22
2.35 69.00 243.48 12.28
2.45 70.00 248.22 12.31
2.56 71.00 252.67 12.27
2.66 72.00 257.18 12.24
2.77 73.00 261.91 12.24
2.87 74.00 266.24 12.25
2.97 75.00 270.89 12.28
3.07 76.00 274.83 12.31
3.18 77.00 278.75 12.33
3.28 78.00 282.55 12.35
3.38 79.00 286.88 12.38
3.48 80.00 290.89 12.42
3.59 81.00 294.61 12.48
3.69 82.00 298.78 12.55
3.79 83.00 303.11 12.58
3.89 84.00 307.17 12.57
3.99 85.00 309.93 12.58
4.10 86.00 313.03 12.62
4.20 87.00 316.79 12.65
4.30 88.00 320.56 12.66
4.40 89.00 322.22 12.66
4.51 90.00 323.69 12.63
4.61 91.00 326.33 12.60
4.71 92.00 329.03 12.59
4.82 93.00 330.71 12.59
4.92 94.00 332.76 12.62
5.03 95.00 336.04 12.64
5.14 96.00 339.37 12.63
5.24 97.00 341.40 12.64
5.35 98.00 344.02 12.68
5.45 99.00 346.52 12.74
5.56 100.00 348.78 12.77
5.67 101.00 352.41 12.79
5.77 102.00 354.50 12.82
5.88 103.00 356.08 12.84
5.99 104.00 358.13 12.82
6.10 105.00 359.71 12.79
6.21 106.00 360.39 12.77
6.32 107.00 360.08 12.78
6.43 108.00 359.94 12.82
6.54 109.00 360.16 12.86
6.66 110.00 359.91 12.86
6.77 111.00 360.37 12.83
6.89 112.00 359.82 12.80
7.01 113.00 360.58 12.76
7.12 114.00 357.82 12.71
7.24 115.00 356.48 12.67
7.37 116.00 356.71 12.66
7.49 117.00 354.27 12.59
7.61 118.00 351.67 12.45
7.74 119.00 351.93 12.20
7.87 120.00 347.17 11.80
8.00 121.00 333.71 11.13
8.15 122.00 298.87 10.60
8.31 123.00 275.90 10.45
8.48 124.00 263.95 10.89
--------- --------- --------- ---------
MAX: 8.48 124.00 360.58 12.86
MIN: 0.22 51.00 153.23 10.45
poorboy8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2005, 11:50 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to DuronClocker
You didn't mention it being 102* when you were dynoing. I'm sure that's good for 1-2% more power.

Something seems off with that fuel pressure still. Why do you have it set to 41psi anyways? I'd set it to at least 43, maybe something more like 45-47, and then just raise the injector constant in the chip, see if that fixes anything at all.
DuronClocker is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2005, 12:39 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Macedonia ,OH
Posts: 3,938
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27

Classifieds Rating: (8)
Send a message via AIM to Mkos1980
It seems to be running a tad rich the way it is across the whole board.
Mkos1980 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2005, 12:47 PM   #29
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,657
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 2.77's

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to dimented24x7
Quote:
Originally posted by DuronClocker
You didn't mention it being 102* when you were dynoing. I'm sure that's good for 1-2% more power.

Something seems off with that fuel pressure still. Why do you have it set to 41psi anyways? I'd set it to at least 43, maybe something more like 45-47, and then just raise the injector constant in the chip, see if that fixes anything at all.
Id hold off raising the pressure untill there is a good reason to raise it, like very high injector duty cycles.
dimented24x7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2005, 08:51 AM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
Quote:
It seems to be running a tad rich the way it is across the whole board.
I agree, I'd rather see 13.5:1, I don't like the 12.X:1. Loads up my colder plugs to much.

FP, I think I am going to set it at 45psi even though it isn't going lean. Piece of mind.

Poorboy8, Yes. On run 6 we tried adding a bit more timing and the numbers did go down, not much, but they sure didn't improve. I don't think we changed the fuel from dyno 5-6.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2005, 08:53 AM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
Quote:
Originally posted by DuronClocker
I'd set it to at least 43, maybe something more like 45-47, and then just raise the injector constant in the chip,
I'm running a C950 ECU from holley which doesn't recognize injector size. There is no place in the ECU to change the constant. It's all done w/ the fuel table.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2005, 09:18 AM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 496
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to poorboy8
Quote:
Originally posted by Free Bird
I'm running a C950 ECU from holley which doesn't recognize injector size. There is no place in the ECU to change the constant. It's all done w/ the fuel table.
YES! Which is fine by me Although do you remember weither or not you can your duty cycle on your injectors?
poorboy8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2005, 11:55 AM   #33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
I didn't see any, I'd have to check again.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2005, 11:57 AM   #34
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
New Information.

Got the springs checked out,
130# on the seat
325# over the nose.

Damn near coil bind though, less than .080". Any votes on valve float? My machinist said I should be looking at something w/ around 380# open.

Problem is finding a spring w/ an install height of 1.750
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2005, 12:31 PM   #35
TGO Supporter
 
Lo-tec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gambrills, Md
Posts: 1,767
Car: clapped out 84Z
Engine: 355 efi roller
Transmission: tremec TKO

Classifieds Rating: (0)
According to comps catalog, for your cam you should be using a 987 dual spring: 121@1.800, 388@1.200. Your machinist can probably get an offset retainer or whatever is needed to get these to fit. This is also a 1.430" spring, what size is in there now? I would call comp and get their opinion.
Lo-tec is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2005, 12:48 PM   #36
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Free Bird
Comp keeps telling me to go w/ the 918's which is 130 and 318. That just doesn't sound like enough to me at open.

The springs I have cam on the heads from summit and were supposed to rated to .600 lift but didn't give me any pressures at open and close.

Will running a different retainer like that screw w/ my valvetrain geometry? Would it req. longer pushrods?

Last edited by Free Bird; 08-09-2005 at 03:12 PM.
Free Bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2005, 12:48 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details