Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-08-2001, 10:13 AM   #51
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: SC
Posts: 279

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The theory is that the swirling air would better ATOMIZE (mix) the fuel/air charges. It makes sense, if you think about it. The swirling air would allow more air molecules to be exposed to the fuel, therefore promoting better fuel/air mixture. Better FAM would of course promote the mentioned benefits.

I would imagine the most benefit would go to the Carbs, then TBI, and lastly to the MPFI guys.

What I gather from the lack of evidence is not that the setup doesnt work, but that the newer vehicles are already working at or beyond the help provided by the Tornado. I would imagine that older vehicles pre 80 something would indeed benefit from this thing.

Clayton
El Guapo is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2001, 12:10 PM   #52
jag
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Henderson,KY,USA
Posts: 69

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The whole swirl idea is the principle jet engines work on. Several sets of blades rotate to swirl the air, which is directed by vanes located around the outside of the turbine casing. The result is more pressure (comparable to a supercharger, or turbocharger) and a whole lot of power. I don't know about the tornado thing, it sounds like a cheap way to attempt supercharging. Stick with a supercharger. "The question was: will 305 heads make more power on a 350. Answer yes they will make more power on a 350 than on a 305" This statement is too generic, and I can't agree with it other than to agree that the same volumetric efficiency applied to more cubes will make more power because of the extra cubes. If you were to state that 305 heads make decent power on a 350 I would agree, or that if you already have the 305 heads that it might be cheaper to polish & port them (doing the work yourself, not hiring it out) than to buy performance or aftermarket 350 heads I would agree. As for performance, I guarantee a set of Performer heads, L98s, LT4s, or several other 350 heads will outperform pretty much any set of 305 heads. The determining factors for what heads are needed or should be used depend on the application. In this case, 'spartyon' started this topic and is already running a 350 (per the signature), so I have put forward the question what heads are on it now? The second question I'd have to ask is what is your budget for heads or head work? And lastly, is this a daily driver, a strip car only, or both street and strip? Before stating that 305 heads are better on a 350, or even 350 heads are better than 305s we should have all the relevent facts available. What sense would it make if this guy already has a set of 350 heads to get rid of them to bolt on a set of 305 heads, and if he's running 9.5:1 compression and goes from 76cc to 58cc he's going to pick up 1.5-2 points of compression and end up 11-11.5:1 compression. At that compression, he will most likely have a set of cracked heads using iron (without one major polish job and cooling system). Obviously he could use a .060 head gasket and drop some of that to be more streetable, but I think the application and your personal budget should determine what heads you use. Smaller ports are more responsive to throttle changes as is a dual plane manifold, but both of these are only good for lower (5500) RPM ranges. Anyone planning to run 8000 or so should go with larger ports and a single plane manifold regardless. It all depends on your usage. Compression can be controlled through other factors, so heads can't really be judged by that aspect fairly. They should be judged by port volume, valve sizes, and flow results and per application. Personally, I will continue buy performance designed 350 heads for any 305s or 350s that I build, because I can.

[This message has been edited by jag (edited November 08, 2001).]
jag is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 06:26 PM   #53
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12

Classifieds Rating: (0)
a lot of the circle guys use them because of the restrictive rules. 2 bbl carb, stock intakes, exhaust manifolds. Who cares about head flow if you cant get any air in or out.
balljoint_ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 08:53 PM   #54
hwp
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 13

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to hwp
Pudding

Not taking sides but I have seen what Fbird88 has done and it is quite impressive . Check out what he has posted and what he has done with these 305 heads over the years. Like my grandma used to say " Son ,the proof is in the Pudding". Enuf said.
hwp is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 10:18 PM   #55
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16

Classifieds Rating: (0)
How about seperating those long, rambling replies into some paragraphs there, Jag?

Not only are your replies long winded, they are impossible to read with no spacing. It's like you are just trying to blurt out everything at once.
mourningyou is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 10:18 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
100cc, 58, 76cc, buret, cc, ccd, closed, deluxe, difference, heads, kit, open, rd400, sbc, summit
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details