Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-13-2005, 07:40 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Evansville,IN,USA
Posts: 1,965
Car: 89' T/A, 00' Firehawk
Engine: 406 Roller
Transmission: TH700R4 w/2800 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (5)
406 build up, starting to get to be to much?

Well, the 406 has been apart for a long while now, things have gotten better so it's gone back to the machine shop. Right now it's getting cleaned and the block is getting decked. Something that I should have done before but didn't. Compression should be about 10.2:1. If anyone is familiar with this build up it's a mild 406, stock crank and rods, good rod bolts, hyper pisonts. 288XR roller cam, 220cc protopline heads. 2800 9.5 ACT stall, 3.23 gear. Car ran 7.8's in the 1/8 with so suspension work and on pep boy 255/50/16 tires.

The car always smoked, always. burned a lot of oil. took it apart, found out i had put the second ring upside down, in all the cylinders.

Now that I am putting the engine back together I have found the MORE syndrome kicking in. I am getting the 294xtreme roller cam, which is a step up from the 288.

I had the heads flowed, and I don't have the numbers yet, but mike at the machine shop said they flowed 290+ at .750 lift.

the problem that I am having is this, do i put the engine back together the way it was, 288XR roller and RPM air gap intake, or put the 294XR roller in it with a single plane.

according to desktop dyno, with as accurate info as I can put in it, with the 294XR cam and single plane intake would make almost 600hp.

Now I'l all for running stock parts as hard as you can, but if I start making this much power, the mains are starting to worry me, as is the stock harmonic balancer.

the car ran great before, and was as streetable as my stock 89 305 TBI.

I don't want to get into a situation where the car is no longer fun to drive, or I start blowing stock parts up.

I thought about putting it back together the way it was, and then changing the intake and cam later on.

Any ideas? I was going to order parts tonight, but decided to wait till I talk to a few people. Thanks.
__________________
Wide Open Till You See GOD ...Then Brake
If You Are Upside Down And on Fire....Its To Fast

Still dreaming of the solid roller 406 for
the 89'
LilJayV10 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2005, 09:15 PM   #2
Member
 
flyin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 178

Classifieds Rating: (7)
I'd save some money and get a set of 2352 or better forged pistons If I were you because I've seen 2many 400's windowed when the hyper piston came apart. The long stoke short rod makes the piston rock more than any other sbc high rpms with that rocking and a hard brittle piston can equal a disaster.

Also a set of 3.73's would help considerably.


L2352 are a little lighter but can be used without balancing the dampner as long as the rubber ring is in good shape will work fine .



PS if you decide to sell the 288 cam PM me a price I have a 350 I'm building.
flyin89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2005, 09:19 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moscow, ID I need my own machine shop
Posts: 3,852
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I pretty much agree. There is no way i would run stock rods and crank at the rpm levels that motor will spin to. Its not gonna be pretty the first time you really get on it.
__________________
LT1 headed LG4 305 beast! Comp Solid lifter XS-262-10S, 1.6 Roller Rockers, 10.2:1, Holley 4160 600cfm, modded Weiand 7502 intake to fit LT1 heads____ Custom cylinder head cooling. Weiand 8208 Short Water Pump____TH-350 3 series 3.73 with 2 series posi and spacer____ Hedman Hedders 1 5/8 headers and Y-pipe 3in Exhaust, Dynomax 3" Bullet muffler ____Moroso Ultra 40 Wires ACCEL HEI Super Coil ____Competition Engineering 3120 Bolt-on SFC's____Homemade: Wonderbar, solid tie rod sleeves, Aluminum LCA and Panhard Rod with spherical rod ends, alternator and PS bracket, Strut tower brace, and Decoupling torque arm with telescoping link.
3000lbs

"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group or by any controlling private power."
-FDR

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."

-- President George W. Bush
During a photo-op with Congressional leaders on 12/18/2000.
ME Leigh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2005, 10:39 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Irockz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Springfield,Mo
Posts: 688
Car: 87 Berlinetta,work in progress
Engine: 468 BB,still in the build process
Transmission: TH350,3500 stall
Axle/Gears: 9" Ford,learning how to live under

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Irockz
Quote:
Originally posted by ME Leigh
I pretty much agree. There is no way i would run stock rods and crank at the rpm levels that motor will spin to. Its not gonna be pretty the first time you really get on it.
I agree as far as pistons/rods go.You need to have a good set of forged slugs,as well as a quality I beam connecting rod.

While it would be best to go with a forged steel crank,I am still running a cast unit,although I won't say I should be.But I really think that it being a hydraulic roller as opposed to solid will help keep the revs down just a touch,so you PROBABLEY can survive a while with the stocker.The key,I have found,is to keep reciprocating mass as low as possible,and use your head.When your already pushing parts beyond their limit,one wrong move will ruin your whole day!
Irockz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 08:18 AM   #5
Member
 
flyin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 178

Classifieds Rating: (7)
I think the rods would be Ok to about 6500 max most 400's don't
like to rev and the hydraulic roller as mentioned previously don't like real high rpms either valve float usually occurs before 6500 rpm. Match your cam to your max rpm you will be fine. Just remember to get you some forged pistons if you make no other investment in this motor keep your block around for a few more builds.

Lf you were to take a hammer and hit a hyper piston it would break into many pieces (kinda like the biggest piece of a piston I found in one that shattered was about the size of gravel)

If you take a hammer and hit a forged piston it will bend and fold it won't come apart easily. (its insurance in its purest form.)
flyin89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 09:32 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
HiTech5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: ILL
Posts: 833
Car: 1986 Pontiac TA
Engine: 406
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (4)
I thought the XR was a solid roller cam?

That's great that your heads flow so much at .750 lift but what good will that do you on a street motor. Before you pick out another cam, look at the flow numbers and base the cam on intake to exhaust ratio. My heads have a very high intake to exhaust ratio so consequently I'm running a single pattern solid roller. I would not hesitate going with a single plane intake for your application. You will lose a little bit of torque down low. The trade off will be worth it in the mid and upper rpm.

However, the combination of single plane coupled with the XR 294 will drive the peak HP well above 6000 rpm.


www.geocities.com/dzperf
HiTech5 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 06:16 PM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minny
Posts: 200
Car: One of 5
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Aren't hyper pistons be OK unless he detonates it. For a street car I would think the hypers should be adequate.
ditchbangr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 07:53 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Evansville,IN,USA
Posts: 1,965
Car: 89' T/A, 00' Firehawk
Engine: 406 Roller
Transmission: TH700R4 w/2800 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (5)
The rods are 5.7 reconditioned rods w/ ARP bolts. The pistons are KB 147's.

The cam is a 288XR hydraulic roller.

I talked to mike at the machine shop today and he said that 600hp is starting to push it on stock parts and he said 400 blocks aren't known for being really strong.

The smart thing for me to do is put it back together the way it was and run it.

I normally spun the motor to 6000-6300 with the 288XR cam. I don't know how much the second ring being upside down effected it. Mike seems to think that it's going to make a big difference.

The car never hooked, it would spin the tires at a 40 mph kickdown. I figure thats why the rearend survived.

Mike talked about putting main studs on it, then it would have to be lined honed. I put new GM main bolts in it when I built it last time. I don't know how strong those are. I noticed that ARP sells different main stud kits for 400's, I know the main bearings are bigger, which makes me wonder is the bolts the same? There wasn't a seperate part number for it.

Thanks for the advice guys.
LilJayV10 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 08:45 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 1,543
Car: 1990 WS6/1988 WS6
Engine: 383/LB9
Transmission: th400/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via AIM to Dialed_In
what are the specs on these cams? It doesn't matter what the heads flow at .750" if the cams max out at .500 or so.

FOrged or Hyper, it all depends on the application. And how they break makes no difference, a melted forged slug or a shattered hyper. Both can destroy an entire motor. I thnk the hypers will be fine for you.

As for the intake I wouldn't be going with any single plane unless your heads flow super well and you don't mind giving up a buch of low end grunt. Seen 625+ on a 432ci. and dual plane.

Just because you put main studs in the block doesn't mean it'll need to be line honed, but it should be checked nonetheless. Most of the time if the line bore is good with bolts, the studs wont change it enough.

Your HP level will be fine for a stock crank, but a set of at least Eagle rods would be a little insurance.

Don't put gears in the car until you figure out where the power peaks at. Also take into account the tire height and ratio in the trans.

As for the desktop dyno, throw that POS away. It's all theoretical. Let your engine builder put together a combination that works together. If this Mike guy is all you make him out to be, then he should be able to put together a strong motor. I'm sure he's built a 406 or two.
Dialed_In is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 09:00 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Evansville,IN,USA
Posts: 1,965
Car: 89' T/A, 00' Firehawk
Engine: 406 Roller
Transmission: TH700R4 w/2800 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (5)
The cam specs, for the cam I have now is

288/294 adv., 236/242 @.050 .520/.540 110 LSA

the specs on the cam I might get is

294/300 adv. 242/248 @ .050 .540/.562 110 LSA

obviously I am not running .750 lift, it's going to be less than that. I haven't gotten the flow sheet yet so I don't know what they flow at .600, which is more what I am concerned about.

I don't think that 242/248 is that big for a 400.
LilJayV10 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:13 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 1,543
Car: 1990 WS6/1988 WS6
Engine: 383/LB9
Transmission: th400/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via AIM to Dialed_In
The first one you listed is an excellent cam. I've used it in a couple of my 383 buildups for customers. It's in our dyno mule that made around 470 fwhp on a 383. Made 510 with it with AFR heads for a customers Nova. I wouldn't go bigger than that, especially for a street motor. To get the potential out of it you'll have to run an intake setup that will sacrifice too much torque and you'll need too much converter and gear to keep it streetable. Wont be as much fun to drive/cruise.
Dialed_In is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2005, 06:53 AM   #12
Member
 
flyin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 178

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Give me a melted forged slug over a broken hyper anyday. I've seen to many windowed blocks to EVER use hyper pistons in a 400.
When the rod and pin is done sliding up and down the side of
the bore it aint pretty. The only reason to build using hyper
pistons is if rules forbid forged. Just ask anyone who races with
motors making the kind of hp your talking. As posted earlier
detonation can happen with the quality of gas today thats
all it'd take. On a 11 to flat top 400 its 10 times more likely.

BTW I seriously doubt your hitting 480hp much less 600 not flaming just being honest.

Last edited by flyin89; 11-16-2005 at 08:54 PM.
flyin89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2005, 06:15 PM   #13
Supreme Member
 
Confuzed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: GO PACK GO
Posts: 2,949
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged 400 sbc
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Hey LilJayV10, what's up?

I thought you gave up on the car and were looking into other things? Anyways, glad to see you're sticking with it!

My honest opinion? Put the rings in the right way this time and see how it runs.

I can tell you from my experience, mine ran much better after I had my block honed and installed TSS gapless rings. No oil burning, no dealing with oil fouled plugs misfiring all the time. Amazing how firing on all 8 improves performance! lol

600 HP at 6500 RPM's? I think you're at a crossroads so to speak. Strip car or street car?
__________________
GSMC, USN-RET. 1998 - '83 Camaro Z28HO -400 SBC (+.040), Magnuson MP122 Supercharger, Speed Demon carb, Dart 200cc Iron Eagles, Scat forged crank, Comp NX276HR cam, SRP forged pistons, G Force T-5 w/Pro-5.0 shifter, Moser 9" w/Detroit True-trac posi, UMI TQ arm, Lakewood LCA's, Edelbrock TES headers, Hooker SuperComp Catback, Griffin aluminum rad. Chassis dynoed 495 ft. lbs. RWTQ - Got Traction?
Also: '04 Vibe 1.8 Ecotec, 2000 S10 4.3L 4WD, 1990 Cav. Z24 3.1L., 2011 Dodge Challenger SRT 392 Hemi
Confuzed1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2005, 06:15 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
11, 294xr, 406, 406ci, 600hp, build, buildups, cam, comp, l2352, max, mild, pistons, sbc, sec, supercharger, tq
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details