Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-24-2005, 10:32 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Deerfield, Il. Near chicago( Purdue University for school)
Posts: 265
Car: 1991 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to raptere
You think you know how to pass emmissions, PLEASE HELP ME!

Hey all,

Time for emmissions again, and of course first attempt failed. hydrocarbons are nearly tripple the limit and co is still just over the limit. I have cats new o2 sensor as of last season, and last time i had to take emmissions i just had to do the alchahol in the tank trik to get by. I've set my timing to 0 with the plug undone.

Few things i cant remember and couldnt find a clear answer to by searching is what fuel pressure are you supposed to use, i have an afpr, and also i heard loweroctane fuel burns faster, and more completely than higher octane fuel, so which should i be using for the test.

Any other suggestions are greatly appriciated. Also if any other information is required please ask, i will post promptly.

thanks a lot everyone!
Eli
Raptere

PS: This is my first failure this round and i get three, before i get an underhood inspection, the problem with that is that i have a stealth ram and no egr, i have heard of people passing with this set up but i cant allow that underhood inspection or i will have some reall issues.
__________________
Best 1/4 mile 13.985 at around 99.28MPH
60' 2.153
:::::::::::::::::Modifications:::::::::::::::
Engine:
Slp Shortie headers
Dual Flowtech Cut outs (Before Cats)
Dual 2.5" Magnaflow cats
Flowmaster Y-Pipe
Magnaflow 3" Cat back W/ dual 3.5" tips
Crane cams Hi-6 ignition box
LX-92 race coil
Throttle body coolant bypass
Custom made ram air intake, behind fog lights
Holley Stealth ram
Holley billet throttle body dual 58MM
Billit AFPR
underdrive pullys

Suspension:
Lakewood Drag shocks front 70/30 back 50/50
All polyurithane bushings
Lakewood lca's
Edlbrock panhard rod

Other Stuff:
Power slot front rotors
Hawk pads all around
Michilin Pilot sport a/s 245/50/16 (winter)
Centerline Telstars with bfg radial t/as in the front and 275 drag radials in back (summer)
Alpine mp3 headunit
All kicker speakers
Pair of Polk MOMO 12" Subs
Knewood Exellon monoblock sub amp
1000W rms
1.0 Farad Digital Capacitor

Check out my car on car domain
raptere is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2005, 10:51 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
82 Iron Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,076
Car: 04 Silverado
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: auto

Classifieds Rating: (21)
That's a battle. Move here to Santa Fe NM and we have zero emmisions testing. I wish I could help you ouy but I am ignorant to emmisions and all that good stuff. Have a wonderful Christmas.
PS- there is one sure fire way to pass , pass the person some bux's under the table
82 Iron Duke is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2005, 11:53 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Deerfield, Il. Near chicago( Purdue University for school)
Posts: 265
Car: 1991 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to raptere
i almost wish i could, but even that wouldnt work your car gets entered into the coputer and it does the whole test for the most part with out the worker telling the computer weather it passes or not, darn computers.

So anyone out there willing to meet the challange, never figured it out last time either and would really like to find out what is wrong.
raptere is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2005, 01:31 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mead, WA
Posts: 317
Car: '84 Berlinetta
Engine: ZZ4 / Fast burn
Transmission: BT0D stage 3 w/22oo
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi disc

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Berlinetta00 Send a message via Yahoo to Berlinetta00
As far as the gas, yes the lower the octane, the more comlete the burn. If a tune-up (plugs, wires, cap and rotor) didn't help, and your hydrocarbons are still too high, you might have a oil burning problem. You can try running a heavier weight oil for the test (say 10-40 if you run 5-30, or 20-50 if you run 10-30), that might slow the consumption rate, but other than that, just hae the car fully warmed up with the lowest octane gas possable before you take the test. If all else fails, a Jefferson is never wrong
__________________
-Berlinetta00-
USMC Motor Transport

'84 Berlinetta
'00 Ford F-250 Diesel
'71 Scout 800B
Berlinetta00 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2005, 01:02 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
VincentZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rubidoux-Riverside Ca
Posts: 1,704
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z
Engine: 360cu 5.9Liter
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Quote:
Originally posted by raptere
I've set my timing to 0 with the plug undone.


Try setting the timing to 6* burn a chip for the present combo.
__________________
Starchild 1990 IROC Z, 360ci, (Super Ram Runners, Big Mouth Manifold Extrude Honed), BBK 58mm TB, 280XFI Comp Cam, Lift 576-571 with 1.6 Roller Rockers, Trick Flow 23* Heads, 10.6 Compression, G-Force T5 Trans, 3.73 Gears, Dual cats, SLP 1 3/4 Headers, 3in Catback Exhaust, Hooker Maxi-flow Muffler. As of 3/26/11 392rwhp@5700rpms-407rwtq@4700rpms with all the California Emissions equipment hooked up. Switch to a Miniram 8-10-11 only 409whp@6100-372wtq@5100

Last edited by VincentZ28; 12-25-2005 at 01:11 PM.
VincentZ28 is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2005, 07:04 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: shreveport louisiana
Posts: 7
Car: 87 z with 89 everything, cam, jet chip, full exhaust, yellow with green flames
Engine: 5.7 tpi, 89 l98
Transmission: 89 700-r4 w/ b$m shift kit

Classifieds Rating: (0)
hate to say it

from cali, the land of all that is choking and restricted, comes the advice of pain-- get an egr and a good chip, find if your burning oil, check fuel pressure and air filters, and make sure the car is warm when you run it. all ive got to offer, but usually works back home, and if you have an oil problem try some ring seal or just heavy oil
flamed 87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2005, 11:24 PM   #7
Supreme Member
 
DENN_SHAH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: houston
Posts: 2,161
Car: 83 POS monte carlo
Engine: 92 5.7 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.42

Classifieds Rating: (1)
the numbers would help as far as what to look for.

list them something like this,

............. limit .......... actual
Nox,....... 895............ 755 ........... pass
Co.......... 0.85........... 1.32 .......... fail
Hc...........188............. 245 .......... fail
O2.......... N/A............. 2.1

Last edited by DENN_SHAH; 12-25-2005 at 11:30 PM.
DENN_SHAH is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 01:09 AM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 21

Classifieds Rating: (0)
EGR's biggest purpose is to trim back on NOX emissions. not saying that adding an egr wouldn't help, but I don't think that it's the big problem. If your HC emissions were just a little over the limit, then the lower-octane or alcohol tricks and all the little tuning could make a difference, but with the levels around triple what they should be, you've got a misfire.
please post what the CO emissions were (or all the levels, for that matter), with that you can tell if it was a lean misfire or a rich misfire. Either way, a lot of unburned fuel is slipping through the engine and out the tailpipe. witht the info that you've provided, you could have a cylinder not firing correctly, or possibly the computer is making the mix so lean or rich that you're getting misfires that way (come to think of it, maybe the lack of an EGR is screwing up the sensor readings).
anyways, good luck.
~Erik~

PS. The clean-air department that your shop sends the emission data to gets a lot more data than the computer tells the technician doing the test. it's a REALLY bad idea to try to ge the guy to clean-pipe the car (run the test on another car)
zstalker is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 12:14 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Toehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Central Mass.
Posts: 2,123
Car: 1985 Berlinetta
Engine: Megasquirted TPI
Transmission: Transgo 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Toehead
Unless it is the same car....
Toehead is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 12:49 PM   #10
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Colchester, CT
Posts: 326
Car: 1987 Iroc, 1987 MCSS TPI
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4 in both

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 87tpi7749
Can you post results? All four gasses will help determine problem. Is it dyno test or two speed idle?
87tpi7749 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2005, 12:43 PM   #11
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 165

Classifieds Rating: (0)
ttt
2new2funny is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2005, 12:51 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD

Classifieds Rating: (1)
I've always heard it's a better idea to run higher octane fuel. A guy I used to know alwaysj put race fuel in his truck before taking emissions. and he passed prety easy. How old are your cats? If they're getting on in years, those may be worth replacing..


And I'm sorry, but I just have to. Coolant is spelled coolant. You may want to change that in your sig.
305q_ta86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2005, 02:29 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Deerfield, Il. Near chicago( Purdue University for school)
Posts: 265
Car: 1991 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to raptere
sry for taking so long getting back to you guys , dont worry bout the spelling thing lol I do take the dyno test here in IL. Here are the results:

HC(GPM) reading:2.41 Standard: .80 FAIL
CO(GPM) reading: 16.3 Standard: 15.0 FAIL
CO2 (GPM) Reading: 391.0 Standard: na
NOx (GPM) Reading: 4.70 Standard: na

Would it be helpfull if i could scan and post the whole sheet with the graphs and everything?

As for the cats i think they should be fine, but is it possible if there is some other problem that they could be blown again since the last time i replaced them last two years. And i still havnt heard any suggestions for FUEL PRESSURE if someone could just leave a pressure i could try id greatly appriciate it.

And yea still seems to be a little contriversy as to which fuel to be using?
raptere is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2005, 04:46 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Deerfield, Il. Near chicago( Purdue University for school)
Posts: 265
Car: 1991 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to raptere
few more updates not sure how it effects anything though.

I reset my fuel pressure to about 39psi without vacume, and also realized i had messed around with my tps sensor. I went ahead and set that to .70 which is the bottom of the range i found was suggested for speed density TPIs.

I must say the exhaust smeels better, yet the engine still shakes a bit at most rpm ranges. I really am unsure what this part means but i took my digital temperature gun and checked my header primary temps some were reading about 300*f and some were about 350-400*f. Could this mean i have some cylinders running lean or others running rich. and also could that account for the span of temperatures, and engine shaking, because the cylinders with the leaner combustion would be producing a stronger combustion right?

Hope, somehting in that helped.

Thanks a lot and keep up the great help,
Eli
Raptere
raptere is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2005, 07:51 PM   #15
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Colchester, CT
Posts: 326
Car: 1987 Iroc, 1987 MCSS TPI
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4 in both

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 87tpi7749
Car is rich, quite possibly dripping/leaking injectors. Look at sheet on using CO to diagnose. You have no left over oxygen or it would be CO2. HC & CO are high, too much fuel.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg c0chart.jpg (48.4 KB, 63 views)
87tpi7749 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 02:44 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Yeah. I agree, too rich. Does it smoke black when you rev it at all? Maybe call the dealership and see what the stock fuel pressure is. I wanna say 110, but that's right off the top of my head.
305q_ta86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 09:21 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,042
Car: 88' IROCZ
Engine: 388 TPI Motown 350 Race block
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to rgarcia63 Send a message via Yahoo to rgarcia63
Quote:
Originally posted by 305q_ta86
Yeah. I agree, too rich. Does it smoke black when you rev it at all? Maybe call the dealership and see what the stock fuel pressure is. I wanna say 110, but that's right off the top of my head.
Fuel pressure is 43.5psi with the engine off and the fuel pump on, or engine on and no vacuum at the regulator. This is referred to as static fuel pressure. Increasing the static fuel pressure will resulting in a richer fuel mixture until the ECM can get it under control in closed loop, if you're already rich more fuel pressure will make it worse.

Here's a link to Bosch Oxygen Sensor FAQs and questions

Oxygen Sensor
Go to this question: Q. What will damage my oxygen sensor?
At the end of the answer there'a link to pictures of damaged sensors and the cause.
rgarcia63 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 09:21 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
1992, 240sx, egr, emission, emmissions, fail, gpm, high, ka24de, moved, nissan, nissannox, nox, pass, passing, tricks
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details