Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-14-2006, 06:25 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
.030 Side Clearance, too much?

I just got a phone call from the guy buildin g my engine, that my side clearance ended up being nearly .030.

For street/strip applications, is this way too much?

i understand desirable is 8-12... but... i cant spend $800 on another forged nitrided steel crank to be reground and balanced again. total cost of this crank was nearly $1000.

What can i do?
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 07:44 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
bump...
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 09:32 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
anybody got an idea?

the side clearance i am reffering to is the clearance betwen the two rods on the one journal.
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2006, 04:37 AM   #4
ede
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Jackson County
Posts: 14,815

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to ede
you have .030 with all new parts? you're more than double the max tolerance. rod side clearance is about the least thing i'd worry about as far as the specs go but being that far out i'd be looking at something to figure out what the problem was and correcting it.
__________________
MM Black Diamond 538 F&AM

Ex quocumque facere poteris te sauciabit, nihilo comprehenso.

ICON Motorsports

S10 Manual Stearing Box 75$
ede is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2006, 06:33 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
well rods are exactly correct, rods had nothing done to them.

i purchased the crank off ebay, guy had 2 runs on it he went to a 3.75in stroke, and i had the machine shop do whatever needed to be done.

so .030 is double max tolerance?

darn...
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2006, 07:50 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
bump......
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2006, 09:35 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to DuronClocker
How did the machine shop do whatever needs to be done, but then they call you and tell you your tolerance is .030" like its going to be okay. Are you sure this engine builder knows what he's doing?
DuronClocker is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2006, 11:07 PM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
machine shop and engine builder are two different people.

I called them today, and they said if the crank was ground that far off, they would replace the crank. So i have to bring it to them and have them replace it, only bad thing is, i gotta pay for it all to be balanced again.
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 04:10 PM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
update:

turns out, after i got there to the machine shop, they wanted to have me bring everything already assembled. I did this. they cheacked my rod side clearance, and it was indeed, .030, but since other things i have, they said this wouldn't hurt a thing at all.

My 7 quart oil pan, high volume pump, and gm high pressure spring, would subdue just about all that could come bad from this.

There will be more oil leaked and maybe sprayed on the bores, but my rings will rid them of it, and it can also help lubricate the rod sides and have a cooling effect.

thanks for the help guys...
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 07:00 PM   #10
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Sounds like a bunch of sunshine to me.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 08:58 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,445
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Rod side clearance should be around .012 - .016". You've got twice that.

Somebody messed up something.

What will happen, is your rods will hammer the Spirolox out the sides of the pistons; and destroy your cyl bores.

The builder can't "build" side clearance away.

Whoever worked your crank, and/or whoever worked your rods, need(s) to fix this.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 10:43 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
spirolox? these are bushed rods? Either way, the tolerance is there for a reason i'd think...

Quote:
I called them today, and they said if the crank was ground that far off, they would replace the crank. So i have to bring it to them and have them replace it, only bad thing is, i gotta pay for it all to be balanced again.
Then they measured it, and was indeed .030".... Sounds like they are ready to fulfill their end of the bargain, getting you a new crank. If they worked the crank, and are therefore to blame on making it out of whack, then they should be responsible for replacing your crank to get you back to where you should be, ie, a fully balanced setup. They should be eating the cost of the new crank, and balancing, since it's their mistake. If they blame the rods you can easily caliper/micrometer up your rods, .030" off should be easy to tell. (if, 2 rods being collectively .030" skinny...) Then you can blame whoever supplied the rods.

If I was paying a machine shop and engine builder to do this for me, i'd expect nothing less then perfection, that's how they earn $80/hr, if you wanted it half assed you'd do it yourself
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2006, 11:18 AM   #13
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
things are, guy balanced the rotating assembly on the side, not through the machine shop.

Machine shop explained all that this could do, and the possible benifits as well, and after i left did make a good effort to call every machine shop in town(like over 20) and they all pretty much said the same thing. Rod side clearance in performance/race motors is normally higher then a "stock" rebuild anyway, as most said. The exitiing oil makes its way to a lot of things that could use it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonix
spirolox? these are bushed rods? Either way, the tolerance is there for a reason i'd think...



Then they measured it, and was indeed .030".... Sounds like they are ready to fulfill their end of the bargain, getting you a new crank. If they worked the crank, and are therefore to blame on making it out of whack, then they should be responsible for replacing your crank to get you back to where you should be, ie, a fully balanced setup. They should be eating the cost of the new crank, and balancing, since it's their mistake. If they blame the rods you can easily caliper/micrometer up your rods, .030" off should be easy to tell. (if, 2 rods being collectively .030" skinny...) Then you can blame whoever supplied the rods.

If I was paying a machine shop and engine builder to do this for me, i'd expect nothing less then perfection, that's how they earn $80/hr, if you wanted it half assed you'd do it yourself
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 08:39 AM   #14
Member
 
SLEEPER 86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: columbus ohio
Posts: 426
Car: 86 coupe
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
tell em you want it replaced and ground correctly!
make sure they give you the same exact crank too,not some stocker or other b.s.!
Eric B
SLEEPER 86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 08:39 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
clearance, clearances, crankshaft, engines, rod, side
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details