Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-12-2006, 10:05 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 234
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Fred91GTA
Cylinder head size too big

Hey guys, I was thinking about getting a new set of heads for my second 91 GTA. I was just going to do a simple cam and head swap. I can get a good price on a set of Dart Pro 1 aluminum 200cc heads with 58cc combustion chambers and 2.02 intake and 1.60 exhaust valves. Are these heads too big for a basically stock 350 with an SLP 510006 cam? Thanks in advance for any input.
__________________
1991 Trans Am GTA
Gunmetal Grey Hardtop, L98/Auto
SLP Performance Package
Mirror polished TPI
...and a few other mods
Fred91GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 10:33 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,325
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Those are excellant heads. I have been thinking about this and I just don't know without upgrading the exhaust. Did some compression calculations using the GM .028 head gasket and I came up with 10.18:1 compression which is not to bad with the stock lower end. So if you were to use one of the new high lift cams such as the Comp Cams 218 and good valve train componets you might get away with it and with some decent perfomance. But you really need to upgrade the exhaust and catback and then you will be cooking. Then upgrade the intake system and you will be smoking the tires to no end.

Last edited by 1989GTATransAm; 04-12-2006 at 11:44 PM.
1989GTATransAm is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 10:36 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
brutalform's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,387
Car: 2007 Nissan Maxima SE
Engine: 3.5
Transmission: CVT

Classifieds Rating: (0)
200 cc runners are too big, and port velocity, at lower engine speed would suffer. Way overkill for a TPI. You would never see the RPM range, where those heads come to life, with a TPI.
brutalform is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 10:38 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,325
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
I defer to MadMax and his 195cc AFR's and the stock TPI runners. 331RWHP with an automatic and XFI cam. That is what has changed my mind on the subject. I was at the club dyno tune for the witnessing along with getting my car dyno's with the current numbers.
1989GTATransAm is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 10:57 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
brutalform's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,387
Car: 2007 Nissan Maxima SE
Engine: 3.5
Transmission: CVT

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1989GTATransAm
I defer to MadMax and his 195cc AFR's and the stock TPI runners. 331RWHP with an automatic and XFI cam. That is what has changed my mind on the subject. I was at the club dyno tune for the witnessing along with getting my car dyno's with the current numbers.
I saw your sig, and your combo is almost identical to my old one a few years back. Our MPH are dead on, except my best ET was only 13.00, with a stick. I know, I know, the ET should have been better. The ZZ9 cam and TrickFlows were a great match.

Yea, he had like 1 HP on you. What was the TQ?
brutalform is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 11:30 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moscow, ID I need my own machine shop
Posts: 3,852
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer

Classifieds Rating: (0)
If you can get them for a really good price, $600 go for it. Its true though 200cc runners is alittle big for you application. But it would'nt be a bad choice if you were going to upgrade latter to a bigger motor or ditch the TPI.
__________________
LT1 headed LG4 305 beast! Comp Solid lifter XS-262-10S, 1.6 Roller Rockers, 10.2:1, Holley 4160 600cfm, modded Weiand 7502 intake to fit LT1 heads____ Custom cylinder head cooling. Weiand 8208 Short Water Pump____TH-350 3 series 3.73 with 2 series posi and spacer____ Hedman Hedders 1 5/8 headers and Y-pipe 3in Exhaust, Dynomax 3" Bullet muffler ____Moroso Ultra 40 Wires ACCEL HEI Super Coil ____Competition Engineering 3120 Bolt-on SFC's____Homemade: Wonderbar, solid tie rod sleeves, Aluminum LCA and Panhard Rod with spherical rod ends, alternator and PS bracket, Strut tower brace, and Decoupling torque arm with telescoping link.
3000lbs

"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group or by any controlling private power."
-FDR

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."

-- President George W. Bush
During a photo-op with Congressional leaders on 12/18/2000.
ME Leigh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 11:48 PM   #7
Supreme Member
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,325
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
I don't recall what his torque was but it was higher than mine. Mine is at 370RWTQ which works out to about 460tq at the motor. However my torque curve is pretty flat like an LS1.
1989GTATransAm is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 12:09 AM   #8
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
331.6hp, 379.9tq.
More on both counts. AFR seemed fine, didnt do any tuning at all. I may have been able to pick up another 5 or so like everyone else did that day if I had wasted any time with it. Cant wait to see what it does with those factory dented up runners gone.

Oh, they are AFR 190's, not 195. Ported (specs hiding somewhere) and cut to 60cc, for 10:1 compression on the button.

As for low RPM power, I really wish I could tell you that. Stupid trans was having attitude and we didnt get any decent lower RPM runs. So your guess is as good as mine. It smokes the 245's off idle with ease though. Even burns up ET streets at the track. Friggen traction issues...

Last edited by madmax; 04-13-2006 at 12:15 AM.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 03:27 PM   #9
Supreme Member
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,325
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Sounds like low end torque is not an issue. Glad you chimed in for the proper figures and your input.
1989GTATransAm is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 04:22 PM   #10
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Saw my name, figured I'd chime in since its ME you're talking about.

Flow specs as follows:
0.100 77.8, 60.4
0.200 141.8, 108.3
0.300 207.4, 150.4
0.400 246.0, 187.0
0.500 271.5, 199.8
0.600 285.2, 209.0

Cant tell you the runner CC, was not measured. I honestly didnt care. They were opened up a fair bit though, and matched to a 1206 on the intake side. Dont ask me about the exhaust flow, those are the numbers and I guess thats as good as it got.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 04:44 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,325
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
They flow a tad better than my Dart 200's. When you upgrade the intake I think you will gain bigtime on the horsepower. Here are the Dart 200's going on my next rebuild. Lift then intake and then the exhaust with a pipe.

.300...209....155
.400...237....193
.500...269....216
.600...281....222
1989GTATransAm is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 05:36 PM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 234
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Fred91GTA
Well, that's the thing. I also don't want to kill mu low end torque that much. If I stayed with an aftermarket TPI system like the Super Ram, would those heads be able to give me good torque on the 350 and still come to life at the higher RPM ranges?
Fred91GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 06:21 PM   #13
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
More than likely. Another member (Vincent Z28) dyno'd same day with a Super Ram, he has a 350 with a Lunati grind (226/.565 something or other) and put down almost 375hp but I dont remember the torque. I dont recall it being overly low. I think it was over 400. His is a stick though.

I dont know why people get so stuck on torque. Its a TPI, it will have torque. If you really want more, buy a diesel. No offense. Torque really should be the least of any TPI owners worries. Take mine for example, are you even hitting 380tq at the rear? I dont think so.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 09:05 PM   #14
Supreme Member
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,325
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
My torque seems to go up with each mod. I can break the tires loose at 45 mph by just stomping on the gas pedal. You are right Vincent's torque was just over 400 at the rear wheels something like 404. Vincent is running the Trick Flow 195 heads and the 226 degree cam as stated. He passes California smog just fine and with his dual cats. These are California smog legal cars.
1989GTATransAm is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 09:05 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
350, 510006, big, cam, cylinder, head, heads, large, size, slp
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details