Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-18-2006, 07:35 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
question about the 345 np 030 piston.

There been a mixup between my engine builder and me on what pistons to use. He rebuild my engine with the 340np 030 cast pistons. I whanted the hyper version of that piston.
He will ofcourse fix that or give me money to compensate for the error.
But as I did not see this until the engine whas re-installed to the car ( with no heads ), I having second thouts about take it out again. It will take some time to do this all over again. And the summer in Sweden is short :/
He say that I will be fine with those cast piston and the engine combo i will use. What do your experince say? This is my engine combo.

355
scat 9000 crank
scat 9000 i-rods
345np 030 cast pistons
LT4 hotcam
1.6rr
canfield 197cc heads
Converted lt1 intake
Headers
dual 3inch

Car is a manual -91 corvette

I will not use F/I

And I shift around 6000rpm.

Thanks for your time..
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 09:39 AM   #2
Supreme Member
 
mw66nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wonderful Robins, GA
Posts: 10,409
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 370ci lsX
Transmission: CER th400 w/ TSI 9" converter
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 4.30:1

Classifieds Rating: (8)
just don't spray it, it should be fine.
__________________
Matt

370ci LSx, "Close Enough Racing" th400, Transmission Specialties XHD9" 4500 stall converter, Moser 9" 4.30's, Mickey Thompson 28x10.5S's rollin' on BS Street Lites. Pump gas and street driven...doin' it all motor!
mw66nova is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 09:43 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mw66nova
just don't spray it, it should be fine.
Yeah no spray will be used.
Im a bit worried if those pistons will be more sensitve to detonation than the hyper version?

Thanks
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 09:54 AM   #4
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Less sensitive to detonation.

Much more sensitive to excessive RPMs however. Use a rev limiter if you can. Set it to no more than 6200, if you want it to live a long time.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 09:59 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Less sensitive to detonation.

Much more sensitive to excessive RPMs however. Use a rev limiter if you can. Set it to no more than 6200, if you want it to live a long time.
Ok.
Sounds good about the beeing less sensitive to detonation, as I need to get this tuned right away.
With my cam and the intake I got my power should peak at around 6000rpm.
You think that will be a probleme?
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 10:18 AM   #6
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Should be OK.

Check your deck clearance before you put the heads on; I'll bet that those are going to be .045" (just over 1mm) down in the hole. Your compression won't be whatever you think it is.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 10:24 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Should be OK.

Check your deck clearance before you put the heads on; I'll bet that those are going to be .045" (just over 1mm) down in the hole. Your compression won't be whatever you think it is.
Ok, I whas a bit worried that those pistons should be junk considering my engine is pretty much build for RPM ( the cam and the intake ).

The heads i use are with 64cc chambers. Mmm what do you mean about the compression? I thougt it should land between 9.5:1-10:1 somwhere??

Regards
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 10:33 AM   #8
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
64cc heads, .045" deck clearance, .039" head gasket (such as FelPro 1010), 6cc valve reliefs, .030" over 350:

9.3:1

That's a pretty small cam, the motor isn't going to make power at or above 6000 anyway (probably will top out around 56-5700), so just don't run it way up there, I don't think the pistons will be a problem.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 01:02 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sofakingdom
64cc heads, .045" deck clearance, .039" head gasket (such as FelPro 1010), 6cc valve reliefs, .030" over 350:

9.3:1

That's a pretty small cam, the motor isn't going to make power at or above 6000 anyway (probably will top out around 56-5700), so just don't run it way up there, I don't think the pistons will be a problem.
Well i do use 1.6 rrs so it will lift .525, but perhaps that not extreme. hehe i dont know

Good news about the pistons, so I can get a good nights sleep...

regards
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 01:24 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
shaggy56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Armpit state
Posts: 1,119
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Those cast pistons are so far in the hole your engine wont have any good compression. The quench is going to be untouchable. Rule of thumb is not to go over .060 of quench. With a stock deck clearance and gasket thickness you will be way over this desired quench. Deck clearance can vary if the block was never decked and most head ccs are usually off like a few points. They could really measure out to 67 cc. .035 of quench is usually desired since this helps prevent detonation and helps performance. Im pretty sure those pistons are meant for a decked block. You can end up with a bad running engine with lots of detonation with that much quench. Theirs more to compression than just slapping parts together to reach a desired compression. You have to get the correct pistons to get the adequate quench. I would suggest having the block decked if it hasnt already or get different pistons.

Last edited by shaggy56; 05-18-2006 at 01:44 PM.
shaggy56 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 01:45 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaggy56
Those cast pistons are so far in the hole your engine wont have any good compression. The quench is going to be untouchable. Rule of thumb is not to go over .060 of quench. With a stock deck clearance and gasket thickness you will be way over this desired quench. Deck clearance can vary if the block was never decked and most head ccs are usually off like a few points. They could really measure out to 67 cc. .035 of quench is usually desired since this helps prevent detonation and helps performance. Im pretty sure those pistons are meant for a decked block. You can end up with a bad running engine with lots of detonation with that much quench. Theirs more to compression than just slapping parts together to reach a desired compression. You have to get the correct pistons to get the adequate quench.
That dont sound to good
Part number STL-345NP30 has ,"Compression Distance (in): 1.560 in."
From sumit.. If that tell you something??
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 01:46 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
shaggy56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Armpit state
Posts: 1,119
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The cast pistons your are reffering to have a compression height of 1.540. Look it up on the Federal Mogul website. The hypers are 1.560. If you want to be absolutly postive you need to measure your pistons in the hole.
shaggy56 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 02:03 PM   #13
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
No matter what the catalog says, if your TRUE compression ratio really matters to you, you MUST measure the deck height. The specs are almost always too ambiguous to be useful. Plus, blocks vary widely, even before they've been worked on.

As stated, the "ideal" quench, which is the distance from the flat part of the top of the piston to the flat part of the head deck, is in the .035" - .040" range. The most common head gaskets are about that thick, so "zero decking" the block to the pistons, such that the pistons are exactly level with the block at top dead center, gives the "perfect" result. The higher the compression, the more important it becomes. However with the motor you're building, you're not pushing any kind of limits on that, so I doubt that it will be critical.

The reason your deck height will be about .045" is because "rebuilder" pistons ALMOST ALWAYS locate the piston about .020" lower than stock (1.54" compression height vs 1.56"). The people who make them must think that it's better that the pistons not come up and hit the head, as compared to giving up a little compression. Stock deck clearance is about .025", and those pistons have about .020" more, for a total of about .045".

Measure all 4 "corner" cylinders. You might even get a surprise in the difference between them.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 02:10 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Whery interesting. Does this also apply to the overbore 345np30 pistons. I cand find those pistons on the federal mogul web catalog?`

So what you are saying is that in my case my comp will be lower then what i first belived? As you said around 9.3:1? Due to the .020" lower than stock?

i dont follow what shaggy56 is talking about "...035 of quench is usually desired since this helps prevent detonation and helps performance." Will i get trouble with those pistons? Perhaps time to talk to my engine builder again ..

Regards
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 02:38 PM   #15
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Yes it applies to those pistons. I'm pretty sure they have 1.54" compression height.... which is -.020" compared to stock.

With the low compression you have there, you'll be fine. Don't worry about it. As I said, the higher the compression, the more important it is; but correspondingly, the lower the compression, the less difference it makes. It's all about the combo, not just one part.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 02:41 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Yes it applies to those pistons. I'm pretty sure they have 1.54" compression height.... which is -.020" compared to stock.

With the low compression you have there, you'll be fine. Don't worry about it. As I said, the higher the compression, the more important it is; but correspondingly, the lower the compression, the less difference it makes. It's all about the combo, not just one part.
I havent order the heads yet, shall I get even smaller chambers on the heads then 64cc to not loose power or low end response on the engine?
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 03:00 PM   #17
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
That would be good.

With aluminum heads, you should aim for close to 10:1 compression. Something around 58-60cc would be ideal.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 03:09 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
shaggy56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Armpit state
Posts: 1,119
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I have read this numerous times and thought it would apply but you suggest it wont in his engine. With his deck which could even be more that .025 and even a shim gasket he would be at .060. But of course that using a nominal measurement not his actual deck height. With a thick gasket his quench would be way out of bounds.


Im quoting out of an engine builders book. If you have Performance Trends Engine Analyzer see what happens if you try and punch in a quench higher than .060.

Quote:
running quench height in excess of .060" will forfeit the benefits of the quench head design and can cause severe detonation.

Last edited by shaggy56; 05-18-2006 at 03:33 PM.
shaggy56 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 03:30 PM   #19
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Yes I've seen alot of engine builder books too. And I don't mean to discount what they say; only, that you have to put things in their proper perspective.

The lower the compression ratio, the lower the tendency toward detonation, in the first place. Meaning there is little or no need to worry about preventing it. The higher the compression, the more of an issue it becomes.

Which is why things like stock motors with dished pistons, where the quench might easily be .125" or more, still don't have detonation issues.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 03:31 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
can i help this with a thin headgasget? or do i need to get the hole rotating assembly out again, and get new pistons, rebalance the hole thing?
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 03:32 PM   #21
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Not really... if it was me, I'd leave the short block alone, order heads with smaller chambers, and move on.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 04:57 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
shaggy56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Armpit state
Posts: 1,119
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Here straight from the horses mouth.

United Engine and Machine Co.


Quote:
If you are building an engine with steel rods, tight bearings and pistons, modest RPM and automatic transmission, a .035" quench is the minimum practical to run without engine damage. The closer the piston comes to the cylinder head at operating speed, the more turbulence is generated. Unfortunately, the operating quench height varies in an engine as RPM and temperatures change. If aluminum rods, loose pistons (they rock and hit the head), and over 6000 RPM operation is anticipated, a static clearance of .055" could be required. A running quench height in excess of .060" will forfeit the benefits of the quench head design and can cause severe detonation.

The suggested .040" static quench height is recommended as a good usable dimension for stock rod engines up to 6500 RPM. Above 6500 RPM, rod selection becomes important. Since it is the close collision between the piston and the cylinder head that reduces the prospect of detonation, never add a shim or head gasket to lower compression on a quench head engine. If you have 10:1 with a proper quench and then add an extra .040" gasket to give 9.5:1 and .080" quench, you will create more ping at 9.5:1 than you had at 10:1. The suitable way to lower the compression is to use a KB dish piston.

Last edited by shaggy56; 05-18-2006 at 05:14 PM.
shaggy56 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 11:09 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
shaggy56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Armpit state
Posts: 1,119
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
variations

Heres a random block someone I know got. It shows how much deck heights vary. This is a good reason to deck a block.

#1: .032"
#2: .033"
#3: .027"
#4: .029"
#5: .029"
#6: .029"
#7: .029"
#8: .027"
shaggy56 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 08:07 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
well the engine is out and on its way to the engine builder. New TRW forge pistons is going in. Now I dont have to worrie..

Thanks for the help sorting this out..
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 09:26 AM   #25
Supreme Member
 
mw66nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wonderful Robins, GA
Posts: 10,409
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 370ci lsX
Transmission: CER th400 w/ TSI 9" converter
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 4.30:1

Classifieds Rating: (8)
excellent, good to hear...pistons are one thing i've learned to NOT cheap out on...

__________________
Matt

370ci LSx, "Close Enough Racing" th400, Transmission Specialties XHD9" 4500 stall converter, Moser 9" 4.30's, Mickey Thompson 28x10.5S's rollin' on BS Street Lites. Pump gas and street driven...doin' it all motor!

Last edited by mw66nova; 05-19-2006 at 09:31 AM.
mw66nova is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 11:16 AM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
A new question popped up that relates to this.
My block is bored out 030 and then honed. Will any forge pistons that is +030 fit? Or do you need to rehone the block to get the right piston to cylinder wall clereance that the manufactor recomend?
I sure my engine builder knows this, Im just curious mysefl

THanks
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 12:25 PM   #27
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Hard to say....

Measure your bore as it is now, accurately. If it's no larger than .030" overbored after honing, then at least your bores aren't already too large. Too large would be bad, because then you wouldn't be able to use it at .030" over, you'd have to bore it to the next oversize and buy that size of pistons.

But, with forged pistons, the EXACT bore clearance isn't as critical as with any type of cast, and also the desired clearance is larger. So for example (just pulling numbers out of the air) let's say your bores are at 4.031", and the current pistons require a bore clearance of .000" - .002", and there's .001" of clearance now. In other words, your machinist got it right on the money. Let's say that your new forged pistons require a bore clearance of .004" - .010", and it turns out that they're at .005" to the bore as it is now. Obviously you're "in spec", and no more work is required. You'd still be "in spec" if there was .008" of clearance; it might just be a bit noisy when cold, until it warms up and the pistons grow. On the other hand, you might find that your new clearance is now .002", which will require some more honing.

There's no way to know for sure until you have the parts in your hand. But, I'd suspect that your bores will be at least close, and quite possibly able to be used, as they are now.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 03:15 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
thanks for the answer

The block is bored 030 and then torqueplate honed to use moly rings.

So the honing process is not only used for making the cross hatch marks in the cylinder bore to let the rings seat. But ALSO a way to take away material from the cylinder bore to keep the right piston to wall clerance, depending on what kind of pistons you will use? like a "fine" over-bore if you whant?

More questions.
If you take a piston that is +030 and whant to run a .004 cylinder wall clerance, Is that piston EXACT 4.030 big and then its up to you to hone out material to get .004? Or is that piston 4.030 minus .004?, and based on a "perfekt" 4.030 cylinderbore?
Regards

Devil..
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 03:18 PM   #29
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Depends on the pistons.

That's why it's standard procedure to NOT hone a block until you have the pistons in your posession.

But for the most part, for American cars anyway, the pistons are "undersize", and the bore should usually be finished within a thouandth or 2 of the "nominal" size. But not always.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 03:33 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
ok.

But in my case the engine where honed for the 345np030 pistons that I now will not use. it would be a shame if i need to bore it out to .040. I guess I just need to find a forge piston with the same ( or withing spec) piston to wall clerance as those pistons. Or messure the cylinder bore to se how big they are and then decide on what pistons to get.
As I look around for pistons, I do however see that the recomenden piston to wall clerance for most of the forge and many of the hyper pistons has got a pretty big span. From, lets say, 005-0015 etc etc.. So Perhaps Im within spec after all..
Thanks for your help so far. Im learning big time here
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 03:33 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
008, 030, 033, 340np, 345, 345np, 345np030, clearance, cylinder, ls1, np, overbore, piston, trw, wall
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details