Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-26-2006, 04:28 AM   #1
Supreme Member
 
Tony89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Prince George, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,744
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (7)
What's the proper way to measure pushrod length for hydraulic lifters?

As the title says using a adjustable pushrod. I have some AFR heads comming so like to learn this before they get here, thanks.
__________________
89 T-Top GTA 5.7L T-56
ATI Procharger D1sc, AFR 195 Eliminator heads, ZZ9 cam, AS&M SS runners, Accel base, 58mm TB, 60Ibs injectors, Stainless Works LT 1 3/4 headers, Mufflex 4" catback, McLeod Street twin clutch, Moser Ford 9" with 3.70, 18" Boyd Smoothie II wheels 8"/10", DIY prom with code59. Stock short block

Miniram & Monoblade throttle body soon to be added.

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2480939
Tony89GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 05:00 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,770
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
For starters, you'll have to get a solid lifter that is the same height as one of your hyds. And a set of light pressure checking springs is a good thing too. And you can make your own adjustable pushrod from an old pushrod that's still in nice shape. By cutting it in half and brazing or epoxying a piece of all thread (5mm worked for me) in the hole.
You can get the checking springs at the hardware store.

Then you do a mock assy of your block w the heads assembled using the checking springs, solid lifter, and adj pushrod.

Comp Cams has a tech article explaining rocker geometry, but most guys who know will tell you that's wrong. (unless they've changed it since the last time I looked)

Basically @ slightly over 50% lift, An imaginary line that goes through the CL of the rocker pivot and the CL of the roller tip should be perpendicular to the valve stem.
That's the way that you get the most lift and the greatest efficiency out of your valvetrain geometry.
There's a measurable increase in lift, using that method opposed to the method of simply centering thr roller tip on the valve stem.

It's called the Mid-Lift Plus method, and it's THE way to get it correct.
If you center the roller tip on the stem and measure your lift, then measure the lift using the mid lift plus method, you will see that by using the centering method, you're cheating yourself out of a significant amount of lift.

Visual aids are helpful here, and I have none. But maybe someone else will.

Last edited by Streetiron85; 11-26-2006 at 05:04 AM.
Streetiron85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 06:16 AM   #3
Supreme Member
 
Tony89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Prince George, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,744
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (7)
I heard of people taking the guts out of the hydraulic roller lifter and using washers or a cut bolt to give the same effect as using a solid lifter. I'am wondering though since the solid lifter don't account for preload wouldn't that give you a false reading? I'am thinking of gutting one of my lifters and using washers but adding in a preload of say .030 or what ever 1/2 turn will give me but not totally sure it that's the right way.

I'll have to look up this Mid-Lift Plus method, I wouldn't mind more lift.
Tony89GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 05:51 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
Confuzed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: GO PACK GO
Posts: 2,949
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged 400 sbc
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac

Classifieds Rating: (2)
The whole purpose for "checking springs" is that they are light enough in tension not to compress the plunger on a hyd. lifter. Just got done doing this when I installed a retro roller cam in mine, and I didn't need any solid lifters.

Do a search under my name and I think I have a post w/pics of the checking springs and adjustable pushrod checker.

BTW- The adjustable pushrod checker will have instructions on how to use it...
Confuzed1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 05:50 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 92
Car: 89 Z28
Engine: 350 with ads
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Clarification.....

Quote:
That's the way that you get the most lift and the greatest efficiency out of your valvetrain geometry.
There's a measurable increase in lift, using that method opposed to the method of simply centering thr roller tip on the valve stem.
I Agree the the "Mid-Lift plus" Method is the most efficient use of the rockers geometry. I disagree that you can get more lift by shifting the tip of the rocker on the tip of the valve.

The Mid lift method centers the tip of the rocker on the center of the valve at the middle or center of the lift arc created by the rocker. If you simply centered the rocker when the valve is closed you might come off the valve stem at full lift, especially in a high lift cam / high ratio rocker scenario.

Please correct me if im wrong, but lift is determined by the cam lobe and rocker ratio. If the lobe moves the lifter .300 and you have 1.5 rockers the valve will move .450 inches. In theory the pushrod could be as long as a baseball bat, and the valve will only move as far as the cam pushes it.....
littlebagz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 08:42 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,770
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
As I mentioned earlier, it's difficult to explain without a visual aid.
But the further away the valve stem tip gets from being perpendicular to the rocker arm fulcrum, the less travel there will be along that tangent to the arc.
I think that's the correct terminology for explaining it geometrically.

I had a hard time believing it til I actually measured it using a mock assembly on an actual engine.
Try it yourself and you'll see, then there will be no more debate.
When the valve stem is perpendicular to a line that goes through the axis of the roller tip and the rocker arm fulcrum, at 50% lift, then the valve will have the greatest amount of lift.
Mid lift + became the accepted way to do it because the rocker is most efficient at the point where it's perpendicular. And the valve spring is compressed more tightly as the lift is increased, therefore engineers determined that to have the point where it's perp being slightly past mid lift to be advantageous.
Try it yourself, measuring the max lift with a dial indicator, and find out.
Pushrods are usually available in .050" increments. To err on the plus side of mid lift is the way that has been accepted as being best. Unless you happen to be a fan of less lift.

With the mid lift method, the alignment of the roller tip in relation to the center of the valve stem tip is irrelevant. It's all the angle of the fulcrum and rollertip centerlines in relation to the valve stem angle.

Last edited by Streetiron85; 11-27-2006 at 08:47 PM.
Streetiron85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 07:27 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 92
Car: 89 Z28
Engine: 350 with ads
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thanks for the clarification. I will have to take a look next time im setting up a set of heads. Im glad i was doing it the right way, If even for the wrong reason....
littlebagz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 07:27 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
300, checking, correct, finding, ford, hydraulic, lenght, length, lift, measuring, mid, push, pushrod, pushrods, rod, rollers, theory
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details