Tech / General EngineIs your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!
i am going to put a cam in my 1991 305TPI. i have full access to a shop and air tools so it will only take about a day. i know its not a 350, and its "pointless" but i dont care.
my mods are headers, 3 inch catback, 3.73's, K&N. everything else is stock: automatic 305TPI, stock ECM. im looking for a cam that wont require a retune of the PROM. i would also like to avoid upgrading the injectors, but i will consider it if i have to. im just looking for something that will work with my factory PROM and be driveable. im getting lifters too. This car already makes pretty decent torque, and is quick off the line with the 3.73's. im not a cam expert so im not sure what to go with here.
thanks
__________________ -Dan
Click sig for Cardomain SOLD: 91 Z28, original paint, 35% tint, 305 TPI, headers, high flow cat, American thunder cat back, shift kit, 3.73 gears, Lakewood adjustable panhard rod, TB cone filter, Superior Axle and Gear Evolution Series axle shafts, Energy Suspension poly trans mount, Jet Fan Switch, 255/50/16 Falken Ziex ZE-512. my video
I have no clue why it's shown on Summit as "not computer compatible". Here's the Comp catalog pages that show it. Go down to page 144 (about pg 15 or so of this file) where it's listed in the "computer controlled" section as "best in 305 or 350 Tuned Port Injected engines with no modifications".
I personally don't think it's "pointless" to put a cam in a 305; rebuilding the short block would be, but a reasonable cam upgrade is certainly worthwhile.
__________________ Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate. — William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi
Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:
The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
Last edited by sofakingdom; 06-01-2007 at 10:43 AM.
now what about lifters...and also do i have to get new rocker arms? summit suggests 3 brands of new rocker arms with that cam, but does not suggest lifters. i may just call comp cams and ask them what lifters i need. how much engine power do u think i could gain with this cam? my car currently makes 205 wheel horse power which isnt too bad for what it is... 86k miles btw
You have to be very careful when changing a cam on a 90-92 TPI car. They use a MAP sensor so any time you increase air flow in to the engine you have to re program the chip. 85-89 TPI car use MAF sensor and can compensate for some increase in air flow because it measure the amount of air going in to the engine. I would try to buy a cam and chip combo or check with a chip company and see what cam they recomend for their chip.
i know a guy who put a pretty radical cam in his 1991 305 TPI formula, a non-roller too, and it ran fine....stock ECM and everything
I'll like to see that car running. I bet that if he took the car to the track is going to be slower. Any time you change a cam you have to re-do the computer chip on those 90-92 cars, if you want them to make more power that is. It is just like re-jeting a Carb. The MAP sensor can't read any increase in air flow coming in to the engine because a MAP sensor does not measure air flow it just measure Vaccume so your car is going to run very lean.
will i really have to program the PROM? more airflow = less vacuum...correct?
i figure i will replace the lifters just because if i do something to this car, i usually go all out and do it right.
maybe i could get away with an AFPR...increased fuel pressure will allow more fuel to leave the injector, compenstating for the higher performance cam. am i right?
i figure i will replace the lifters just because if i do something to this car, i usually go all out and do it right.
They ain't cheap. And, there's typically nothing wrong with them if the engine isn't full of no-oil-changes crud. I'm running unknown mileage used LB9 lifters, not a hint of a problem with them in almost 2 years of daily driving and summer racing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdtech
maybe i could get away with an AFPR...increased fuel pressure will allow more fuel to leave the injector, compenstating for the higher performance cam. am i right?
No, you are wrong. Speed density doesn't work that way.
On the other hand, that isn't that big of a step up in cam, so you may get away with doing nothing.
If you do, you should also get a new timing set, and the valve springs that are recommended for the cam, along with their correct hardware, and tools to set them up correctly. NO aftermarket cam will work like it's supposed to with already worn-out stock springs and chinesium/plastic cam sprocket.
No reason to waste $$$ on the lifters, if they're not bad somehow; which is unlikely. Not the wisest use of your $$$.
__________________ Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate. — William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi
Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:
The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
Last edited by sofakingdom; 06-06-2007 at 11:33 AM.
Just get yourself a used LT1 cam, throw it in with a new timing chain set and and some roller tip rockers. (1.5 ratio)
It won't be perfect but will function fine.
I have done this several times.
Stock rockers are 1.5:1. Rarely does much good to go 1.6:1. The "1.52" that Comp quotes is their way of saying their rockers are more accurate than stock stamped steel rockers.
The Comp link Sofa posted has the recommended springs to the right of the cam listing. 986-16 or 987-16.
I used the xe258 on my '91 305 tpi.
I didn't re-program the chip.
Without nitrous, I was about 14.1-14.3 in the 1/4
__________________ '91 GTA - 400sbc,AFR195elim,280 xfi cam,1 5/8 shorty headers and single 4", LT1 intake, 3200 stall, 3.75 gears with a ford 9" and Zex dry nitrous.
how do i know what valve springs to get? arent the stock rockers 1.5:1?
You can get a used 1988-89 350 cam (207/213 int/exh duration @.050 and .415/.430 lift) with 1.5 ratio rockers. If you use a set of 1.6 rockers you'll get .445/.460 lift and about 2 more degres of duration at .050. Your total dur. will stay the same. This cam is bigger than yours and will not change your vaccum much, but it will make more power.
__________________ 1988 IROCZ 355 cu.
SLP runners and headers, Trickflow heads, Edelbrock base plate, 36lbs injectors, Crane roller cam, Comp cams roller rockers, 4 bolt block, Ross pistons, Manley 6" rods, forge crank, Hamburger oil pan, Fluid damper, Accel DFI, MSD 6AL, 3200 stall 10 inch converter, 3.70 gears, March pulleys, 58 mm TB.