Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-06-2008, 12:10 PM   #1
Supreme Member
 
jamon8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern IL
Posts: 1,793
Car: 91 firebird, 81 toy pic
Engine: 361 tpi, 2.2 diesel
Transmission: 700r4, 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.56, ?

Classifieds Rating: (2)
compression ratio vs psi

shouldnt we be able to determine what the comp ratio is by the psi on the compression tester
jamon8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 12:26 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: compression ratio vs psi

No.

There are a number of reasons... leakage, different cam profiles that cause a variation in how much compression is actually captured, the fact that compression is more or less an adiabatic process except that there's variables in how much heat escapes during the process, etc. etc. etc.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 03:21 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,823
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio vs psi

No but the test result from a cranking compression test can be used as a "guideline" to indicate what the motor will need for fuel octane.
180ish PSI is usable on pump gas.
over 200psi gets a little too dicey.
F-BIRD'88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:40 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Viprklr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: N. Illinois
Posts: 3,456
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Re: compression ratio vs psi

I'm alright on pump 93. 210psi 10.25:1 CR Aluminum heads though.
Viprklr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 07:00 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio vs psi

130 psi is okay on a small block chevy with 64 cc heads and flattops? it's a 350 cu.in with standard normal deck heigh.
thanks
peter355camaro is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 07:35 PM   #6
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: compression ratio vs psi

Quote:
130 psi is okay ... ?
Depends on what cam is in it.

If all 8 are the same within 10 psi or so, and the motor runs right, then yes.

If of course, the test was performed properly.

A motor that actually had that little compression would have trouble running, unless this is an all-out race piece. Which is why I feel that it's necessary to add that little qualifier.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 07:35 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
130, 200, block, calculating, chevy, compresion, compression, copmpression, f350, psi, ratio, reatio, small, test, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details