Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-21-2008, 04:54 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Rayzor32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: BUFFALO
Posts: 1,157
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 edge 3000 stall
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
202 heads "492" castings?

found a guy selling some 202 heads the casting number is 3991492. I am aware of the "461" "462" 202 fuelie camel hump heads but haven't heard of these ones. Are these heads any good for performance use with port/polish work
__________________
My '89 IROC-Z:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3161271
Rayzor32 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 05:02 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
1bad66ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 27
Car: 66 Chevy II SS/89 iroc
Engine: 355/305
Transmission: 350 Turbo/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

I've got a few sets of 492 also 186's, back in the day they use to be the hot set up.
1bad66ss is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 05:06 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Rayzor32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: BUFFALO
Posts: 1,157
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 edge 3000 stall
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

i better pick them up then. My buddies 406 had 202 fuelie heads on it and that motor roared like a big block
Rayzor32 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 06:12 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

They are not 202 heads. Please stop calling them that, that drives me nuts!
They just so happen to have 2.02" intake valves.
They are 492 heads. And yes, fuelie/camel hump heads. And they HAVE 2.02" intake valves, that does not make them "202 heads". The valves play a small part in the quality of the head.

Remember what he said, they "used to be" the hot setup. It's now 2008, and they are far surpassed by other heads
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 11:16 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Supervisor42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arab, Alabama
Posts: 1,660
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonix View Post
Remember what he said, they "used to be" the hot setup. It's now 2008, and they are far surpassed by other heads
But they are the best $250/pair heads around. If they have the front accessory mounting holes and you don't want to spend $600 for Vortecs, they'll work.
Supervisor42 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 11:20 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Rayzor32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: BUFFALO
Posts: 1,157
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 edge 3000 stall
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

which are better 202 fuelie/camel hump heads or vortec heads?
Rayzor32 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 12:01 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Supervisor42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arab, Alabama
Posts: 1,660
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rayzor32 View Post
which are better 202 fuelie/camel hump heads or vortec heads?
Vortecs with 2.02 valves, of course. But they cost more than $600/pair...
The 1.94 "vortec" heads, I don't know, probably be close, depends on who ports them...
With the old heads, it all depends on those front accy holes... If they ain't there, the heads are only good for early cars and hot-rods.

Last edited by Supervisor42; 10-22-2008 at 12:05 AM.
Supervisor42 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 09:25 AM   #8
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 13,970
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 582 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

$250 for a set of old camel back heads isn't a good deal even if they have 2.02 valves. Late model heads flow better and have better castings. There's more to heads than just the valve size.

Having the camel back heads rebuilt to good performance specs can cost a lot more than buying a good set of aftermarket heads. New valves, guides, larger springs which requires machining the spring pockets. If they don't have screw in studs, machining the stud boss down to install screw in studs. Just having all the machine work down and the cost of new parts can put those obsolete heads over $1000.

40 years ago, camel heads were a performance head because there was little to no aftermarket choices and production heads were all poor. With available choices now, camel heads are only good for collectors or someone who needs a specific casting.

Stock Eliminator racers still need camel heads however as soon as someone who's selling a set has done anything such as a valve job, port and polish etc, the Stockers can't use them.

Any head can have 2.02 valves. A real performance head can have 2.08 intake valves.
__________________
Hardtail Racing
All engine, no power adders! Bests: 9.029@150.45 (at altitude)
Theoretical sea level performance 8.623@157.05
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2008, 11:12 PM   #9
Moderator
 
Air_Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,068
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Air_Adam
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

You can get junkyard Vortecs for a song, and have them rebuilt for not much more. They are 10x better than the double-hump castings - more power, torque, throttle response, and fuel mileage. Better heads in every way, and you can build them for about the same.

Vortecs breathe better with the stock 1.94 valve than those double-humps do with 2.02 valves - Vortec head flow is actually very comparable to the 195cc LT4 cylinder heads, and have the same chamber design as the LT1/LT4.
Air_Adam is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2010, 09:35 AM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonix View Post
They are not 202 heads. Please stop calling them that, that drives me nuts!
They just so happen to have 2.02" intake valves.
They are 492 heads. And yes, fuelie/camel hump heads. And they HAVE 2.02" intake valves, that does not make them "202 heads". The valves play a small part in the quality of the head.

Remember what he said, they "used to be" the hot setup. It's now 2008, and they are far surpassed by other heads
Please to explain what a "202" head is. I always thought "202" designated the intake valve diameter; i. e. 2.02" diameter. If not, what is a "202" head? By the way, patten number 3991492 is from a '69 to '72 350 with 2.02" intake and 1.60" exhaust [yup, I know I'm about two years late with that info].
NHEngineer is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2010, 09:38 AM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Air_Adam View Post
You can get junkyard Vortecs for a song, and have them rebuilt for not much more. They are 10x better than the double-hump castings - more power, torque, throttle response, and fuel mileage. Better heads in every way, and you can build them for about the same.

Vortecs breathe better with the stock 1.94 valve than those double-humps do with 2.02 valves - Vortec head flow is actually very comparable to the 195cc LT4 cylinder heads, and have the same chamber design as the LT1/LT4.
How can I tell if the head is a Vortex or not?
NHEngineer is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2010, 09:22 PM   #12
Moderator
 
Air_Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,068
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Air_Adam
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NHEngineer View Post
How can I tell if the head is a Vortex or not?
'Vortec' not 'Vortex'... and Vortec heads are their own unique animal - very tall and narrow intake ports and a unique intake bolt pattern that only uses 4 intake bolts on each side, that point straight up. Normal SBC heads have 6 on each side, and only some point up.
Air_Adam is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2010, 09:37 PM   #13
Member
 
whatever84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ankeny Iowa
Posts: 266
Car: 84 Camaro
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10's / Strange LSD

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

A 492 is a good head, They will get the job done. I have the 292 angle plug heads which were only sold over the counter bare and they work great, yes a new set of performance heads will outflow them but these have been ported and the WOW factor that i get out of them is worth it. So buy them and put them on!!


Mark.

Last edited by whatever84; 03-04-2011 at 04:52 PM.
whatever84 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 09:24 AM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Quote:
Originally Posted by whatever84 View Post
A 492 is a good head, They will get the job done. I have the 292 angle plug heads which were only sold over the counter bare and they work great, yes a new set of performance heads will outflow them but these have been ported and the WOW factor that i get out of them worth it. So buy them and put them on!!

Mark.
OK, I will. Got a good source? I'm putting together a 350 for 1/4 mile circle track racing. Someone told me Vortex heads cooling passages don't line up with earlier vintage blocks. Is that true?

DSLee
NHEngineer is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 09:27 AM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Air_Adam View Post
'Vortec' not 'Vortex'... and Vortec heads are their own unique animal - very tall and narrow intake ports and a unique intake bolt pattern that only uses 4 intake bolts on each side, that point straight up. Normal SBC heads have 6 on each side, and only some point up.
Thanks Adam. Sorry for another dumb question but what is "SBC"? I've been away from Chevy racing stuff for a while [30 years].
NHEngineer is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 10:45 AM   #16
Member
 
whatever84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ankeny Iowa
Posts: 266
Car: 84 Camaro
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10's / Strange LSD

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NHEngineer View Post
Thanks Adam. Sorry for another dumb question but what is "SBC"? I've been away from Chevy racing stuff for a while [30 years].
SBC= Small Block Chevy.


Mark.
whatever84 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 11:03 AM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rayzor32 View Post
found a guy selling some 202 heads the casting number is 3991492. I am aware of the "461" "462" 202 fuelie camel hump heads but haven't heard of these ones. Are these heads any good for performance use with port/polish work
In case anyone is interested, the link click here is an index of most Chevrolet engine and cylinder head patten numbers sorted by number. It's in a YAHOO group so you may need to join before you can open it ....or not. You can always quit once you've downloaded the book.

Regards,
DSLee
NHEngineer is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 11:04 AM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Quote:
Originally Posted by whatever84 View Post
SBC= Small Block Chevy.


Mark.
Jeekers, now I feel like a real jerk. Sorry.....
NHEngineer is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 03:02 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley, Ca.
Posts: 548
Car: 67 Elky
Engine: 358 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 202 heads "492" castings?

Porting a cast iron head isnt cheap, a nice job will set you back more than a new set of those Vortecs. Plus any machine work, ie surface valve job spring/seals etc if they need it.
cuisinartvette is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 03:02 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
186, 194, 202, 355, 492, camel, cars, double, flow, fuelie, good, heads, hump, valves, vortec
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details