Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-09-2009, 02:30 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 189

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Vortec Rockers, Beehive Springs

How do stock Vortec self- aligning rockers compare to the old, stock high performance long- slot rockers? Do the self aligners have the long slot feature too? How much lift is the stock Vortec rocker capable of handling? I know I'd be better off getting some aftermarket rockers but I'm just curious.

Also, I was recently able to pick up a decent but high mileage set of #12558059 305 Vortec heads for $100. This might just sway me to go ahead and warm up my Camaro's stock 305 (I know, I know!) or just keep them around to bump up a low compression 350 build.
Anyway, can I trust the old valves to just get some aftermarket springs, and have a high perfromance valve job done for a mild 300-350 hp build with around .450 lift? Or should I replace the high- mileage valves? If so, does anybody have a brand recommendation for stock type 1.94/1.50 stainless valves?
Has anyone used the beehive springs with any success on a mild build without trimming down the valve guides? Beehive spring brand recommendations? I MIGHT end up wanting to go a little over .450 lift someday, especially on the exhaust side, or even try 1.6 rockers.
basiccamaro is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 02:37 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
92droptopws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sin city(702crew)
Posts: 709
Car: 96z28,95z28
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 6spd
Axle/Gears: 8.8 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (6)
Re: Vortec Rockers, Beehive Springs

aftermarket rockers are they way to go,i have seen too many stamped steel rockers have the pushrod push through them..
305 vortec heads are terrible flowing heads unfortunately, the 350 vortecs are nice....you should save your money and do more researching
92droptopws6 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 02:27 PM   #3
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,568
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 92droptopws6 View Post
305 vortec heads are terrible flowing heads unfortunately...
Contrary information here: http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/te...light=12558059 (Vortec Heads)
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 02:27 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
12558059, 350, beehive, behive, guide, heads, rocker, rockers, spring, springs, stamped, steel, stock, valve, valves, vortec
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details