Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-17-2009, 11:20 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quench??????

can someone please explain this to me? i know basically what it is but i dont fully understand it. How do i determine proper quench for my engine? how do i adjust it? also how do i measure it? i have searched some but i cant really find much on it, maybe i just suck at searching.
If someone has a link or something that would be greatly appreciated. I am going to be assembling my engine soon and i want to get all the detils right!
Blaize is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 12:00 AM   #2
TGO Supporter
 
Stekman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,803
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Stekman Send a message via MSN to Stekman
Re: Quench??????

The quench or squish area (of the head) is the flat part of the cylinder head, inside the cylinder bore, but not part of the combustion chamber. When the block is decked to the rotating assembly, so a flat top piston, when at TDC, lines up flush with the deck, it has a corresponding flat area. When a .039-.042" compressed head gasket is used (ideal quench distance), it creates a very small space between the top of the piston and the bottom of the cylinder heads flat area. When the piston comes up the bore, this creates a sandwhich effect, which squishes the air, causing what is similar to a shockwave effect, of air, throughout the cylinder. This helps cool the combustion chamber.

To get your quench dialed in, you'll need to know the total height of your rotating assembly: crankshaft radius (stroke divided by 2) + connecting rod length + piston compression height = height of rotating assembly. An uncut SBC block is generally 9.025" crank centerline to top of deck pad. So if your rotating assembly comes out to be 9.010", you'd want to cut .015" off the deck. Also obtainable, by having the piston slightly down in the hole at TDC, and using a thinner head gasket. For example, if your piston was .020" down in the hole at TDC, you could use a .020" head gasket to obtain optimal quench.

Last edited by Stekman; 06-18-2009 at 12:04 AM.
Stekman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 04:16 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Quench??????

wow! you totally cleared all of this up for me!!! man i thought it was rocket science heh. thanks alot for the info!! how much difference does having a proper quench make in your typical street engine? once again thanks for a very informative post!
Blaize is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 04:35 AM   #4
TGO Supporter
 
Stekman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,803
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Stekman Send a message via MSN to Stekman
Re: Quench??????

I like having quench in my motors. It helps the combustion to move faster. Faster flame travel. In a nutshell, with proper quench, you can move the flame from one side of the piston to the other, faster. This means you won't need as much ignition timing. If you have a big quench, say .050" or greater, flame travel is slower. Thus, you need more timing to get the combustion to its fullest. Anything you can do to increase the speed at which the combustion process takes place, the later (or closer to TDC) you can light the fuse - less ignition advance.

One of the downsides of a lot of advance, is the lovely ping you get from too much ignition timing (the ignition timing that's required to get a complete combustion - with an incorrect quench). And I'm all for anything that reduces the chance of marbles in a coffee can.

There is no downside to having maximum air movement in the cylinder, when at TDC.

Last edited by Stekman; 06-18-2009 at 04:39 AM.
Stekman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 02:38 PM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 161
Car: 1989 Iroc-z
Engine: 5.7L 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.77 posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Quench??????

Above is correct, I like to run my motors with anywhere from .035-.040 of quench area. For instance, I just put heads on the motor in my car. The shortblock is a run of the mill gm crate 350, knowing that a stock 350's piston sits .025 in the hole (always measure this anyway) I ran a felpro .015 shim head gasket. This puts my total quench area at .040 witch is ideal for a good clean and fast combustion process. With lightly milled 64cc heads this put me at 10.3to1 compression. Not to much but not too little just enough to have to replace back tires every 3 months

On the same note though....I have seen motors ran with way over .040 of quench (like in the .060ish range) and not have any problems.
Jaydog143 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 04:03 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Quench??????

allright it makes alot of sense now, thanks alot for the input guys i will definetly be paying attention to this. it sounds like the shim head gasket is the way to go in my case as well, as the 350 is stock and im putting heads on it with 64cc chambers. of course i am still going to measure everything out though. again thanks for the informative posts!
Blaize is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 04:12 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
92 Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Palm Coast, Fl.
Posts: 686
Car: 1992 Camaro RS, 66 Mustang, 78 t/a
Engine: 5.0 TBI, 289, 400
Transmission: 700R4, C4, th350

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Quench??????

this enlightened me too, thanks.
__________________
sold my camaro 11/26/2011
92 Camaro is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 10:33 AM   #8
TGO Supporter/Moderator
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 6,170
Car: '79 Z28
Engine: 400 bored .060 over, forged
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 8.5" 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Re: Quench??????

After a ton of machine work to my 400, I don't feel like setting it back up to deck it again. We decked it to get it perfectly straight with the crank centerline, and thought after measuring the pistons that they would be right around 0 in the hole, but after measuring every hole is .010 down.

So with that said, my ideas of using a felpro 1014 gasket (4.200 bore, .039") is kinda out the door.

Anyone have any idea of a gasket around .028" or so, with a 4.200" bore ?

I'm somewhat considering trying a pair of (local) bowtie 14011034 heads, 58cc. If I can get them to flow 260/185 they might be a good head for the 412.

Static compression be around 10.9, with a DCR at 8.66 with my cam. I think i'd want to get the quench under .040" with those numbers, especially with Iron heads..


-- Joe
__________________
1979 Z28 - 400 Block, .060 reverse domes, eagle SIR rods, forged crank, XR288HR cam, AFR 195 heads, T5 trans, 8.5" 10 bolt 3.73 gears.
anesthes is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 05:31 PM   #9
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Quench??????

I dont know if its available, but apparenly the composite MrG gasket was .028, though I dont know if they have one with a 4.2" hole.
Might also consider a MLS like Cometic. Little pricey, but seal good on fresh parts... and they can make you up whatever thickness you want.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 07:09 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canberra, the REAL capital of Australia!
Posts: 39
Car: 1971 GM Holden, HQ GTS Monaro Coupe
Engine: Gen I 350 Chev soon to have TPI
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Going to be a 3.55

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Quench??????

Talk about interesting timing for this subject. I have just been looking into this with the existing motor for my car as I'm going to replace my 041 heads with some AFR 180's. One concern I have is dome top pistons and the heart shape chamber, the other is the quench/squish distance.

I measured my piston crown to block deck height at 0.065" and my head gasket at 0.050"
making my quench/squish 0.115"

Does this seem a bit excessive? I think that there is no real way to reduce this without total rebuilding and blueprinting the motor.

Any thoughts from anyone?
__________________
Cheers,
Col. aka Bald_noggin

http://www.ctturner.homeip.net:8080/monaro_images
bald_noggin is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 10:31 PM   #11
TGO Supporter/Moderator
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 6,170
Car: '79 Z28
Engine: 400 bored .060 over, forged
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 8.5" 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Re: Quench??????

Quote:
Originally Posted by bald_noggin View Post
Talk about interesting timing for this subject. I have just been looking into this with the existing motor for my car as I'm going to replace my 041 heads with some AFR 180's. One concern I have is dome top pistons and the heart shape chamber, the other is the quench/squish distance.

I measured my piston crown to block deck height at 0.065" and my head gasket at 0.050"
making my quench/squish 0.115"

Does this seem a bit excessive? I think that there is no real way to reduce this without total rebuilding and blueprinting the motor.

Any thoughts from anyone?
If your piston is .065" in the hole something is off.

-- Joe
anesthes is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 11:46 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canberra, the REAL capital of Australia!
Posts: 39
Car: 1971 GM Holden, HQ GTS Monaro Coupe
Engine: Gen I 350 Chev soon to have TPI
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Going to be a 3.55

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Quench??????

I'd dearly love to talk to the bloke who built the motor but he has sinced passed away. I bought the motor about from him about 15-16 years ago and I have only put about 10,000 K's on it. You can still see the cross hatch marks from honing apart from along the thrust lines on the top and bottom of the bore.

I was planning on putting my ACCEL HI-FLO TPI setup onto this motor.

Think I may just find a good engine builder and get it re-built our turn it into a 383.
__________________
Cheers,
Col. aka Bald_noggin

http://www.ctturner.homeip.net:8080/monaro_images
bald_noggin is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 11:46 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
065, 64, cc, cylinder, distance, engine, heads, ideal, much, obtaining, optimum, piston, proper, quench, quenchsquish, sbc
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details