Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-06-2009, 10:38 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
perpetualjoshie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: illinois
Posts: 81
Car: 86' Z28
Engine: 5.0l w/ new cam
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 4.10's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
305 heads

What are they capable of? HP/ cfm flow with porting and bigger valves. Im considering using them on my 350 build. thought I would get some oppinions from the pros first!
perpetualjoshie is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 09:16 AM   #2
RiV
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 31

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 heads

Not sure of the year of the heads or even the flow numbers. However 1987-89 305's with tuned port injection had heads that flowed well or decent for that setup. In other words if you have the those piticuler heads with larger valves installed 2.02/1.62 along with a bowl and port job(three angle cut)... you will have a good set of heads to throw on a 350 with the performance of a set of $500-600 heads for about $200 dollars of machine work. Sry that I don't have numbers to post. Hope this helps. Kinda remmber those 305 heads having around 64cfm-174ccm stock and around 220-230 with larger valves installed and machine work maybe more. I bought a set of heads for about 500 dollars that came with roller rockers strengthend rods and the larger valve size of 2.02/1.62 that have less flow at around 52cfm but allow plenty of air power and cam I chose with the valve size increase alone. Just the route I took. Could have saved a little money having work done to the 305 heads and had slighty better numbers...but the new heads cam with all the stuff I was going to have to shop for.
RiV is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 02:02 PM   #3
On Probation
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 5,261
Car: '84 Trans Am WS6
Engine: LQ9 w/ Wegner LS6 heads
Transmission: 4L60E, seeking good used NV3550HD
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23:1, posi, swapping to 8.5"

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 heads

If you try to go to 2.02" intake valves in most 305 heads, you'll hit water, so stop at 1.94". this is good for about 215 cfm with good porting, and the 2.02s won't give you any more peak flow anyway. If you just run #416 heads, you'll get 180-190 cfm. Even with 1.94" valves and good porting, they're done by 5500 rpm, and they're behind Vortecs as low as 3000 rpm. Don't go any bigger than the GMPP "HOT LT4" cam. Otherwise you're giving up low end and midrange torque without getting anything useful back in exchange.
Atilla the Fun is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 02:38 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
perpetualjoshie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: illinois
Posts: 81
Car: 86' Z28
Engine: 5.0l w/ new cam
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 4.10's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 heads

first off, thank you for the information. i have a set of 416's on my 305 at the moment, so i was going to use those for the build. would Comp cams Xtreme Energy XR276 Hydraulic Roller Camshaft be a good choice with the ported/polished 416's with 1.94'' 1.5'' valves? I've heard that the gain from going up to 1.6'' on the eghaust is very minimal. This would be going on a stock 350 shortblock until i can build a a stonger bottom end.
perpetualjoshie is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 03:53 PM   #5
Moderator
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Disneyland, SoCal
Posts: 10,488
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 L98 siamesed runners
Transmission: LT1 T56
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to Kevin91Z Send a message via AIM to Kevin91Z
Re: 305 heads

Dont bother. You'd have a better starting point if you use someone's cast-off 350 L98 iron heads and spending the money on those. Some better 1.94/1.50" valves will drop right in (such as Manley part numbers 10721-8 and 10722-8) with no extra work to cut up the valve pockets. They also have larger intake runners and larger combustion chambers so you will flow more air and not have too high of compression that leads to knocking and pinging.
__________________
377 RWHP, 390 RWTQ (05-21-11)
12.803 @ 108.50 MPH (1.923 60') (04-11-01)
Work: Manley Performance Products
Founder: SoCal Thirdgenners
Founder: SoCal TPI Organization
Kevin91Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 04:16 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
perpetualjoshie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: illinois
Posts: 81
Car: 86' Z28
Engine: 5.0l w/ new cam
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 4.10's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 heads

What kind of hp/tq difference would there be from the 416's to the l98 heads? I'm hoping for 350 flywheel hp/tq for this engine, would this be attainable with the 416's or l98's? I'm planning on porting/polishing either set too.
perpetualjoshie is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 04:16 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details