Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tech / General Engine Why is my car making that sound? My car won't start! Combination questions? Don't see a board for your problem or have other technical or engine specific questions? Post them here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-15-2009, 11:07 AM   #1
Member
 
FlippindaBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Pocono Mountains, PA
Posts: 176
Car: 1987 firebird
Engine: 5.7 LG4, soon TPI Vortec 5.7L
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 lol soon to be 3.23 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to FlippindaBird
machining non roller for roller?

My friend has a 1988 L03 firebird, his father has a 85 L98 from a vette, we want to take the roller cam stuff (retainers, hold down spider, lifter guides, cam and thrust plate) from the L03 and put them in the L98, and swap it for the 5.0L is this possible? Has anyone done this? What machining is necessary and can this be done without complete dissassembly of the engine. this is a 75K motor that ran perfect when it was taken out and swapped for a ZZ383 in the 85 vette. Also, will the 2 peice rear main seal on the vette motor allow it to bolt directly to the flexplate of the L03 or can we use the stock vette flexplate as the vette has a 700R4 also... thanks for any help and if there is somewhere i can find the answers to these questions please just pm me with them and delete this post as i did search and was unsuccessful
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________
u call it "drifting"? i call it a lack of proper traction, the fastest way around the track isnt sideways with the tires smoking (well, most of the time). oh yeah japan makes the best race bikes, but the cars are for transportation.
and thats, your new opinion!
FlippindaBird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 09-15-2009, 02:40 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
1A Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lowell, MA
Posts: 441
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L Carbed
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: machining non roller for roller?

I knew I saw someone do this a couple years back on the board, take a look here:

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/te...ck-accept.html (pre -87 block to accept roller cam)
__________________

1987 Trans Am, work in progress
2008 Pontiac G8
Retired: 1984 Camaro "ZF" 2.8L, 1989 Camaro RS
Customer Service Manager, 1A Auto Parts
1A Dan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 04:39 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
JakeJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lancaster,TX, (Dallas)
Posts: 675
Car: 1996 Vette / 1992 GSX1100F Suzuki
Engine: 1996 Corvette Coupe 388 LT1 (+.060)
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to JakeJr
Re: machining non roller for roller?

Making that mod calls for disassembly of the engine in order to drill and tap holes for mounting the spider at a minimum. Camshaft movement, fore and aft, has to be addressed too (thrust button and Torrington bearing).

Once all the effort and money involved in going that route is, for me, is much more involved than to just go with a retro-fit kit. Retro-fit is the way I went when I did my 86L98 TPI.

Just my view.

Jake

West Point ROCKS! Nation's TOP COLLEGE per Forbes Magazine!
__________________
1996 Corvette Coupe, 388 LT1 (+.060), 10.7 CR, EAGLE 3.75" Forged Crank, EAGLE 6" 'H' Beam Forged FF Rods, SRP Forged Pistons, AFR 190s ported to 212 ccs (304 cfm@.600), matching ported LT1 intake, CompCams Hyd Roller (230/236@.050 113 LSA, .612/.610 Lift), CompCams Lifters, Scorpion 1.7 RRs, SVO 30# injectors, BBK 58mm TB, Crane Double Springs and Guide Plates, TFS Hardened Pushrods, CLOYES Timing Chain Set, ATI Super Damper, HUGHES 3000 Stall, PROFORM Cast Aluminum 1/4" Taller Valve Covers, SFI Flex Plate, PCMFORLESS PCM Tune
JakeJr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 04:45 PM   #4
Member
 
FlippindaBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Pocono Mountains, PA
Posts: 176
Car: 1987 firebird
Engine: 5.7 LG4, soon TPI Vortec 5.7L
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 lol soon to be 3.23 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to FlippindaBird
Re: machining non roller for roller?

yeah after reading that thread im thinking its too involved, what about the "solid roller"? is that feasible for a street engine? and is there any machine work involved or just new lifters and a cam? springs too obviously
__________________
u call it "drifting"? i call it a lack of proper traction, the fastest way around the track isnt sideways with the tires smoking (well, most of the time). oh yeah japan makes the best race bikes, but the cars are for transportation.
and thats, your new opinion!
FlippindaBird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 06:07 PM   #5
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 33,342
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: 86 LG4-> ZZ3(LS1)/mild 396
Transmission: TH700(T56)/TH400
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt 3.23(4.10)/8.2" 10-bolt4.11

Classifieds Rating: (3)
The "right" way to put roller lifters in an '86-earlier block is to get "retrofit" roller equipment, including lifters, cam, and some sort of cam button. It was done for years before 1987. The parts are still available, including hydraulic roller, but are very pricey. You really don't want solid lifters on the street, even roller.

It's much cheaper to get an '87-later roller-ready block and do whatever it takes to get it ready to run with the stock-type roller set-up.

Bottom line is you aren't giving up that much with flat tappets. Unless you already have factory roller lifters, just stick with flat tappets.

I'm not sure about the Vette flexplate. If it's 153-tooth (12-3/4" diameter), you should be able to use it.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 07:15 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
JakeJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lancaster,TX, (Dallas)
Posts: 675
Car: 1996 Vette / 1992 GSX1100F Suzuki
Engine: 1996 Corvette Coupe 388 LT1 (+.060)
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to JakeJr
Re: machining non roller for roller?

No machine work is needed if you buy a timing chain set that's already designed and comes with the 3-piece Torrington bearing to control rearward movement of the cam.

There's little difference between the cost of solid and hydraulic roller cams. However, solid roller lifters are lighter and less expensive. Also, solid roller lifters do take more of a beating due to the valve lash.

In either case, you'll need a thrust button and different length pushrods. Full roller NON self aligning rockers and guide plates are the way to go, too.

Jake

West Point ROCKS! Nation's TOP COLLEGE per Forbes Magazine!
__________________
1996 Corvette Coupe, 388 LT1 (+.060), 10.7 CR, EAGLE 3.75" Forged Crank, EAGLE 6" 'H' Beam Forged FF Rods, SRP Forged Pistons, AFR 190s ported to 212 ccs (304 cfm@.600), matching ported LT1 intake, CompCams Hyd Roller (230/236@.050 113 LSA, .612/.610 Lift), CompCams Lifters, Scorpion 1.7 RRs, SVO 30# injectors, BBK 58mm TB, Crane Double Springs and Guide Plates, TFS Hardened Pushrods, CLOYES Timing Chain Set, ATI Super Damper, HUGHES 3000 Stall, PROFORM Cast Aluminum 1/4" Taller Valve Covers, SFI Flex Plate, PCMFORLESS PCM Tune
JakeJr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2009, 02:20 PM   #7
Member
 
FlippindaBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Pocono Mountains, PA
Posts: 176
Car: 1987 firebird
Engine: 5.7 LG4, soon TPI Vortec 5.7L
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 lol soon to be 3.23 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to FlippindaBird
Re: machining non roller for roller?

how much difference is there between an L98 and an L05? since the L05 is the cheapest roller block, are the pistons that much different or will they net approx the same CR? so L98 heads and LT1 cam on an L05 with the stock intake a throttle body spacer the 5.7L injectors and ecm with headers sound ok? or should he be using a better intake manifold? should he get a throttle body from a 350 or will the stock one be ok ? he says his plan now is to stroke the 350 to a 383 btw but we are trying to come up with a cheap way to make it faster NOW lol
__________________
u call it "drifting"? i call it a lack of proper traction, the fastest way around the track isnt sideways with the tires smoking (well, most of the time). oh yeah japan makes the best race bikes, but the cars are for transportation.
and thats, your new opinion!
FlippindaBird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
57l, 87, cam, difference, engine, fastest, flat, gen, gm, hydraulic, lt1, motor, roller, tappet, tech
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.