Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-26-2009, 11:55 AM   #1
Member
 
dave w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 138

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Piston to Valve Clearance

I built a custom SBC. The pistons have a .060" dish, WITHOUT a valve relief. I know I need to use a clay mock-up to determine piston to valve clearance. My question is, how much clearance between the piston and valve is SAFE?

Thanks,
dave w
dave w is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 03:10 PM   #2
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 13,966
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 582 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Piston to Valve Clearance

Minimum piston to valve clearance:

Intakes .100"
Exhaust .125"
__________________
Hardtail Racing
All engine, no power adders! Bests: 9.029@150.45 (at altitude)
Theoretical sea level performance 8.623@157.05
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 06:52 PM   #3
Member
 
dave w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 138

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Piston to Valve Clearance

Thanks Stephen 87 IROC

My piston to valve clearance is real close! I'm less than 0.080"! Maybe only 0.070". I'm not good at measuring clay ... soft stuff.

I think I will use a much milder camshaft ... I don't have any other affordable options?

Based on the picture I have attached ... let me know if you agree weather or not, I found the closest contact point?

Thanks,
dave w
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCN2589.JPG (166.9 KB, 19 views)
dave w is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 08:08 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Silverhill,Al
Posts: 831
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Piston to Valve Clearance

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave w View Post
Based on the picture I have attached ... let me know if you agree weather or not, I found the closest contact point?
Thanks,
dave w
Based on the attached picture which measures about 7.15" in dia. on my screen and the clearance point is about .14 then scaling that down I come up with about .081 clearance. If the engine hasn't been balanced then you can still have the pistons clearanced, I've even seen guys use a cutter that fit's in the valve stem and do it themselves and not rebalance. It's up to you.
DartByU is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 09:38 PM   #5
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 13,966
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 582 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Piston to Valve Clearance

Are you checking clearance with a head gasket installed? Are you using solid lifters?

Lift and duration are not usually the factors in piston to valve clearance. It's the valve timing. During the duration, the valves open and close at specific degrees. You can have a cam with more lift and duration but still allow more piston to valve clearance than what you have. You can have 5 different cams with the same lift and duration and if the valves open and close at different points, all 5 cams will act differently.

You can also play with degreeing the cam to change the clearance. If you retard the cam, you will gain some clearance on the intake and lose some on the exhaust. Advancing the cam is the opposite.

Depending who you ask, a minimum clearance can also be .080" on the intake and .100" on the exhaust.
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 09:42 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gap, PA
Posts: 233
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: TH350, 8" Converter
Axle/Gears: S60 with 4:11 and Locker

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Piston to Valve Clearance

yep agree. i ran .070" PTV on the intake with supers stock hemis spinning 9400 rpms. .100" is a good number for exhaust.
__________________
1986 Camaro. 383 SBC. Scat forged bottom end, Diamond Pistons, Bullet solid roller, Crower HIPPO Roller lifters, Motown heads that flow 320cfm, Comp Pro Magnum Rockers, Ported Hurricane Intake, TRC 950 Carb.
TH350, RMVB. ATI 8" converter.
Strange S60 With 4:11's and Detroit Locker. Strange Adj Shocks
All Spohn Suspension.
275/60/15 MT ET streets. Sportsman up front.

2000 Camaro SS. M6, SLP. Usual Bolt ons.
1966 Chevelle 427 4 speed.
kens86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 12:12 AM   #7
Member
 
dave w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 138

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Piston to Valve Clearance

Solid lifters? - Yes
Head gasket? - No, but I am using .045 shims ... same as the compressed gasket thickness.

Current cam is a real mild .423 / .423, but I only measured .410 / .403 with the stock rocker arms. If I was to use roller tip rocker arms, my measurements would be more accurate?

I think I will be OK with a .390 / .410 and some roller tip 1.52 rocker arms. I'll need to measure again, but I should be around +0.080 ~ -0.100.

I don't know if anyone noticed, but the bore is 3.540 / stroke is 3.10 so this 4.0 liter SBC V8 engine is really for Mileage, not Performance. Kind of cool using 6.00 rods. I have Weiand Stealth intake, with a 4.3 V6 TBI.

Say bye, bye 2.8 V6 say hello 240 cubic inch V8.

dave w
dave w is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 12:12 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
305, 540, bbc, car, clearance, clearence, duration, image, piston, race, sbc, tolerance, v6, valve, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details