Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-06-2009, 10:54 AM   #1
TGO Supporter/Moderator
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 6,170
Car: '79 Z28
Engine: 400 bored .060 over, forged
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 8.5" 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (5)
i-beam breaking point

Eagle SIR rods:

Advertised Horsepower Rating (hp) 500 hp


How serious do you think that should be taken? I've run GM "X" rods to around 560hp and never broke one.


Was thinking of pushing this current combo to the mid 600s.


-- Joe
__________________
1979 Z28 - 400 Block, .060 reverse domes, eagle SIR rods, forged crank, XR288HR cam, AFR 195 heads, T5 trans, 8.5" 10 bolt 3.73 gears.
anesthes is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 06:02 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gap, PA
Posts: 233
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: TH350, 8" Converter
Axle/Gears: S60 with 4:11 and Locker

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: i-beam breaking point

if you wanna go i beam i would go with the scat pro comps over the eagle. There rated to 750hp. Or if you are stuck on eagle then upgrade to the h beams. just my 2 cents.
__________________
1986 Camaro. 383 SBC. Scat forged bottom end, Diamond Pistons, Bullet solid roller, Crower HIPPO Roller lifters, Motown heads that flow 320cfm, Comp Pro Magnum Rockers, Ported Hurricane Intake, TRC 950 Carb.
TH350, RMVB. ATI 8" converter.
Strange S60 With 4:11's and Detroit Locker. Strange Adj Shocks
All Spohn Suspension.
275/60/15 MT ET streets. Sportsman up front.

2000 Camaro SS. M6, SLP. Usual Bolt ons.
1966 Chevelle 427 4 speed.
kens86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 07:21 PM   #3
TGO Supporter/Moderator
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 6,170
Car: '79 Z28
Engine: 400 bored .060 over, forged
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 8.5" 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Re: i-beam breaking point

Quote:
Originally Posted by kens86 View Post
if you wanna go i beam i would go with the scat pro comps over the eagle. There rated to 750hp. Or if you are stuck on eagle then upgrade to the h beams. just my 2 cents.
I have the short block assembled and balanced.. I was just wondering what other folks thoughts are. I can go 500hp naturally aspirated, or toss a blower on it and run in the mid 600s. But I don't want a rod to go through my nice new 400 block.

I agree, I'd do H-beams had my original target been 600+ hp.. It wasn't until I realized how much the car weighed that I came to the conclusion that I need more power to make the same trap speeds as a thirdgen fbody..

-- Joe
anesthes is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 07:32 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Enschede, Netherlands
Posts: 2,986
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (19)
Send a message via AIM to Twin_Turbo
Re: i-beam breaking point

revs kill rods you'll be fine.
__________________
Twin_Turbo is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 07:41 PM   #5
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: i-beam breaking point

Really unless someone has a lot of experience with breaking those rods, its guesswork. Usually parts have some sort of factor of safety but less so with stuff like connecting rods. I'd imagine 50-100HP over the rated power wont kill it but likely beyond that you're venturing into risk territory especially if they're not totally perfect.

Have you tried contacting Eagle? Just ask them what their factor of safety is, if any.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 09:40 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gap, PA
Posts: 233
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: TH350, 8" Converter
Axle/Gears: S60 with 4:11 and Locker

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: i-beam breaking point

What kind of rpm's are you expecting to be turning?
__________________
1986 Camaro. 383 SBC. Scat forged bottom end, Diamond Pistons, Bullet solid roller, Crower HIPPO Roller lifters, Motown heads that flow 320cfm, Comp Pro Magnum Rockers, Ported Hurricane Intake, TRC 950 Carb.
TH350, RMVB. ATI 8" converter.
Strange S60 With 4:11's and Detroit Locker. Strange Adj Shocks
All Spohn Suspension.
275/60/15 MT ET streets. Sportsman up front.

2000 Camaro SS. M6, SLP. Usual Bolt ons.
1966 Chevelle 427 4 speed.
kens86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 10:45 PM   #7
TGO Supporter/Moderator
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 6,170
Car: '79 Z28
Engine: 400 bored .060 over, forged
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 8.5" 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Re: i-beam breaking point

Quote:
Originally Posted by madmax View Post

Have you tried contacting Eagle? Just ask them what their factor of safety is, if any.
I spoke to them once. I spoke to a guy who is more paranoid than my machinest. Asked about their cast cranks for a build, told me not to even think about using it in a manual car unless the car weighed 2000lbs and I was slipping the clutch.

I asked about the rods, he said I had the "old SIR rods" (with the bolts not cap screws). He didn't really give me any indication of guarantee one way or the other, and like you guys said, he said it's a factor of RPM more than anything. But again mentioned that with a manual trans things shock.


Now, I have a TH350, so I'm sure it will be mooshy but I went with the forged crank because I may put a TKO in the car eventually.

Ken:

Cam is XR288HR. In a 400 I think it's safe to assume it will flatline around 6,000.. Figure 6200 max.

The combo should be pretty stout. Figure, 525 or so hp naturally aspirated if I go with 10.9:1 compression. If I went like 9:1 and ran 10+psi of boost it could potentially be in the mid 600s.. Though durability starts to be questioned.. (1976 400 block, bored .060 over, I beam rods, 2 bolt mains)..

My machinest told me to keep it in the low 500s. If I do this again, I'll buy a dart block I think.. The '70s 400 might have been a poor choice on my part.

-- Joe
anesthes is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 11:12 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Irockz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Springfield,Mo
Posts: 688
Car: 87 Berlinetta,work in progress
Engine: 468 BB,still in the build process
Transmission: TH350,3500 stall
Axle/Gears: 9" Ford,learning how to live under

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Irockz
Re: i-beam breaking point

NO WAY would I put boost of ANY kind on that block.Run this one N/A,and enjoy the HP.At .060 over,what started as a ticking time bomb (the stock 400 block) turned into an A-bomb.I'd bet you any amount of money you want that if you boost it,it will split a cylinder within 20 full passes.
The SIR rods,however,are safe way beyond their rated HP level.Never had a single failure due to one in any engine,Ford,Chevy,Mopar,SB or BB.
__________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't good for anything, but you can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.

Welcome to the internet,where anyone can make a car run 10's,and the nations top engine builders have time to offer engine build advice.
Irockz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 11:12 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
beam, breaking, calculate, crower, engine, factor, hp, ibeam, point, rating, rod, rods, safety, sbc, sportsman
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details