Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tech / General Engine Why is my car making that sound? My car won't start! Combination questions? Don't see a board for your problem or have other technical or engine specific questions? Post them here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-07-2009, 06:00 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
wesrams1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 82
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 .060 over
Transmission: stock
Axle/Gears: stock for now

Classifieds Rating: (0)
2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

Is a 2 ton floor jack sturdy enough to hold our cars up? Or would you guys buy a 2.5 ton?
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
wesrams1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 10-08-2009, 05:33 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Viprklr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: N. Illinois
Posts: 3,280
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

2 ton is sturdy enough.
Most of the time you're not lifting the entire car up off the ground.
Our cars weigh in ~3500lbs.
Viprklr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 07:54 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
84Z28406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 325
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28 T-tops
Engine: 350 from a truck
Transmission: Rebuilt T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

I'd love to see your floorpan after you manage to get your jack to lift the entire car at one time. :P I use a 1.5 ton jack on my camaro and it's more than plenty, so a 2 or a 2.5 ton jack will be all you'd ever need.
84Z28406 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 10:56 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 13
Car: GMC 1500 P/U 4x4
Engine: 350
Transmission: stock 4 speed auto
Axle/Gears: 4:10

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

i've used 2 ton floor jacks since i've been working on cars. unless you plan on lifting a tractor or semi you don't even need a 2.5 ton jack. I've even used 2 ton jacks for very obsquer things such as taking tree stups out after all of ther root going horizontally from the tree. it works great for breaking the taproots off.
demonseed304 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 10:56 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 2,446
Car: '84 Trans Am, &'82 Camaro
Engine: LM7, & 454
Transmission: 4L60E, & 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23:1, & none

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

And you'd have to lift the car right at the exact location under the center of gravity. Which might be under the flywheel.
Atilla the Fun is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 11:06 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 13
Car: GMC 1500 P/U 4x4
Engine: 350
Transmission: stock 4 speed auto
Axle/Gears: 4:10

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

I try to find a spot on the frame towards the front and then torwards the rear and that will lift up one side and put jack stand under neith it. lifting a car and leaving the jack under the car to support the car is a death wish all it would take is a little bump and the car would come down on you. in which the jack stands you have more stability. the jack stand should be placed as closed to the hubs at the rear as possible with out disturbing the break lines and any other lines that might be in that area. and in the front as close to the a arms on the frame as passible
demonseed304 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 11:13 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 2,446
Car: '84 Trans Am, &'82 Camaro
Engine: LM7, & 454
Transmission: 4L60E, & 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23:1, & none

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

I was playing with the hypothetical, by the way, not suggesting you actually try that.
Atilla the Fun is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 11:16 AM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 13
Car: GMC 1500 P/U 4x4
Engine: 350
Transmission: stock 4 speed auto
Axle/Gears: 4:10

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

lol i would not try that because i've seen how unstble that is just by changing oil on some modern cars i just jack it up pull the pulg and let it down over the oil pan and try to get at the filter from the top
demonseed304 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 03:00 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
vbMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 398
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 350ci L98
Transmission: T56 - Hurst Shifter
Axle/Gears: BW - 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

If your trying to get the whole car up on jack stands I'd say lift the front and put on stands and then lift the rear. I wouldn't try to lift from the sides. Thats just me, maybe it makes no difference but I would think it would be more unstable to lift from the sides.
vbMike is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 08:23 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
wesrams1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 82
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 .060 over
Transmission: stock
Axle/Gears: stock for now

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

alright thanx everyone, looks i can save some money and buy the 2 ton lol
wesrams1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 12:19 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
BigBadGTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 270
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

lol I have a 4.5 ton jack and stands I use. I don't have to worry about **** lol
__________________


My Cardomain Link
BigBadGTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 12:37 AM   #12
Junior Member
 
Jimmy D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southern California / Antelope Valley
Posts: 61
Car: Camaros and Suburbans
Engine: V8's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

Quote:
Originally Posted by 84Z28406 View Post
I'd love to see your floorpan after you manage to get your jack to lift the entire car at one time. :P I use a 1.5 ton jack on my camaro and it's more than plenty, so a 2 or a 2.5 ton jack will be all you'd ever need.

"...floorpan?" I don't get it.
Jimmy D is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 05:25 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Viprklr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: N. Illinois
Posts: 3,280
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

The floorpan can't support the weight of the car. The jack, itself, would go through the floor before lifting the car.

Just this year I had an 07 Grand Prix GXP fall off of one of my jacks. I had just turned around to get the stands when it fell. The pictures are sickening. I ended up removing nearly the entire front clip and paying ~ $800 in parts to fix it. What sucks is that I was jacking it up so that I could get measurements of the engine cradle so that I could complain to GM that they don't know how to do an alignment. Trying to get $49 back cost me around $800.
Viprklr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 01:46 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Jimmy D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southern California / Antelope Valley
Posts: 61
Car: Camaros and Suburbans
Engine: V8's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viprklr View Post
The floorpan can't support the weight of the car. The jack, itself, would go through the floor before lifting the car.

Just this year I had an 07 Grand Prix GXP fall off of one of my jacks. I had just turned around to get the stands when it fell. The pictures are sickening. I ended up removing nearly the entire front clip and paying ~ $800 in parts to fix it. What sucks is that I was jacking it up so that I could get measurements of the engine cradle so that I could complain to GM that they don't know how to do an alignment. Trying to get $49 back cost me around $800.
Thanks, I learned in shop class (make that, in 1972), that you don't use floor pans to lift a car. I made the bad assumption that all "Senior Members" here on this forum such as our member - 84Z28406 - would already know not to do such a thing.

Or I think I was just confused by his post. Anyway... I think this is a great and fantastic forum - tons of info and fun. Because of this site, I'm meeting other owners in my area!
__________________

--------------------
1957 Chevy Belair (454)
1966 Mustang GT Convertible (HP289)
1968 Ranchero GT (429CJ)
1969 Mach 1 Mustang [2] (351 4spd and 390 automatic)
1984 Z/28 T-Top (305 - 4 Barrel-H.O. 700 R4)
1985 Trans Am (403 Olds 700 R4)
1989 IROC T-Top (engine swap in progress) 700R4
1994 GMC Suburban (5.7 4WD)
1997 GMC Suburban (5.7 Vortec 2WD)
Jimmy D is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 11:36 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Supervisor42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arab, Alabama
Posts: 1,610
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

Some points that I thought were missed:
1. Make sure the handle is long enough. Jacking up the rear of the car by the differential, or the front by the crossmember, you'll appreciate one with a good long handle.
2. The capacity also says a lot about how much effort it takes to jack up a load. Jacking up the same weight with a 3 ton ($80 from Harbor Freight) jack is much easier than with a 2 ton jack.
Stay away from "rapid-pump" jacks unless you have a light race car or you weigh over 280 lbs.

Last edited by Supervisor42; 10-10-2009 at 11:48 AM. Reason: added URL
Supervisor42 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 09:20 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
vbMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 398
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 350ci L98
Transmission: T56 - Hurst Shifter
Axle/Gears: BW - 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

Why is that? I have a rapid pump 3 ton jack and I love it. It pumps fast until under load and then it pump at the normal slower speed and isn't any harder to operate the handle.
vbMike is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 08:22 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
84Z28406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 325
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28 T-tops
Engine: 350 from a truck
Transmission: Rebuilt T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy D View Post
Thanks, I learned in shop class (make that, in 1972), that you don't use floor pans to lift a car. I made the bad assumption that all "Senior Members" here on this forum such as our member - 84Z28406 - would already know not to do such a thing.

Or I think I was just confused by his post. Anyway... I think this is a great and fantastic forum - tons of info and fun. Because of this site, I'm meeting other owners in my area!
It's a bad assumption to make, but I do know better. My comment about the floor was a joke. Meaning that if he did jack on the floorpan, it would at least bend far out of shape or go so far as the jack punching through the floor. Perhaps I didn't word it clearly enough, but rest assured, I know much better than to jack on the floor... The previous owner of my car didn't.
84Z28406 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 08:29 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Supervisor42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arab, Alabama
Posts: 1,610
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy D View Post
Thanks, I learned in shop class (make that, in 1972)...
Looks like I'm not the only "Senior" member in here...
Supervisor42 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 09:02 PM   #19
Junior Member
 
Jimmy D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southern California / Antelope Valley
Posts: 61
Car: Camaros and Suburbans
Engine: V8's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

Quote:
Originally Posted by 84Z28406 View Post
It's a bad assumption to make, but I do know better. My comment about the floor was a joke. Meaning that if he did jack on the floorpan, it would at least bend far out of shape or go so far as the jack punching through the floor. Perhaps I didn't word it clearly enough, but rest assured, I know much better than to jack on the floor... The previous owner of my car didn't.

...ouch!
At some point in life, somebody thought the oil pan on my 1984 would make a good lift point ...

Amazing what goes through people's minds.
Jimmy D is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 09:04 PM   #20
Junior Member
 
Jimmy D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southern California / Antelope Valley
Posts: 61
Car: Camaros and Suburbans
Engine: V8's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supervisor42 View Post
Looks like I'm not the only "Senior" member in here...
Old Dudes Rule!!!
Jimmy D is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 10:07 PM   #21
Junior Member
 
Jimmy D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southern California / Antelope Valley
Posts: 61
Car: Camaros and Suburbans
Engine: V8's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supervisor42 View Post
Looks like I'm not the only "Senior" member in here...
Old Dudes Rule!!!

Everybody knows that we're the best as:
- Drivers
- Welders
- Mechanics
- Bench Racers
- Car Salesmen
- Chute Packers
- Track Officials
- Pit Crew Chiefs
- Diagnostic Techs
- Hub Cap Polishers
- Spark Plug Indexers
- Power-Wheelie Pullers
- Sponsor Fee Negotiators
- Powerglide, Lenco and 4speed Shifters

(...just to name a few). And most people know that when "Old Dudes" are not racing or raising havoc somewhere in the world, you can generally find us doing one or more of the following:

- Brain and General Vascular Surgery
- Re-defining the Basic Laws of Thermodynamics
- Astronomy
- Winning the Nobel Peace Prize (for actually doing something)
- Pre-Briefing the Next Space Shuttle Crew on Re-Entry Emergency Scenarios
- Making $1.25 per gallon - 160 Octane Fuel Available at Your Corner Gas Station

...Like I said; Old Dudes Rule!!

;-)
__________________

--------------------
1957 Chevy Belair (454)
1966 Mustang GT Convertible (HP289)
1968 Ranchero GT (429CJ)
1969 Mach 1 Mustang [2] (351 4spd and 390 automatic)
1984 Z/28 T-Top (305 - 4 Barrel-H.O. 700 R4)
1985 Trans Am (403 Olds 700 R4)
1989 IROC T-Top (engine swap in progress) 700R4
1994 GMC Suburban (5.7 4WD)
1997 GMC Suburban (5.7 Vortec 2WD)
Jimmy D is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 12:13 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
84Z28406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 325
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28 T-tops
Engine: 350 from a truck
Transmission: Rebuilt T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy D View Post
Old Dudes Rule!!!

Everybody knows that we're the best as:
- Drivers
- Welders
- Mechanics
- Bench Racers
- Car Salesmen
- Chute Packers
- Track Officials
- Pit Crew Chiefs
- Diagnostic Techs
- Hub Cap Polishers
- Spark Plug Indexers
- Power-Wheelie Pullers
- Sponsor Fee Negotiators
- Powerglide, Lenco and 4speed Shifters

(...just to name a few). And most people know that when "Old Dudes" are not racing or raising havoc somewhere in the world, you can generally find us doing one or more of the following:

- Brain and General Vascular Surgery
- Re-defining the Basic Laws of Thermodynamics
- Astronomy
- Winning the Nobel Peace Prize (for actually doing something)
- Pre-Briefing the Next Space Shuttle Crew on Re-Entry Emergency Scenarios
- Making $1.25 per gallon - 160 Octane Fuel Available at Your Corner Gas Station

...Like I said; Old Dudes Rule!!

;-)
Oh to dream.

Last edited by 84Z28406; 10-13-2009 at 12:21 AM.
84Z28406 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 01:54 AM   #23
Senior Member
 
transam85dudeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 606
Car: 85' Trans Am
Engine: 305tpi 215hp LB9 two bolt,
Transmission: th-700r4
Axle/Gears: stock (3.27)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

i say get the bigger jack. the smaller ones suck, because of the surface area a few walmart jacks have. i got the big floor jack with a diameter of about 6 inches and to top things off, i bought one of those polyurethane jack cushions so jacking up the car, it doesn't bend the metal as much, and conforms to the slightest shape, i cant really explain it. its pretty sweet..even got the polyurethane jack stand cushions. they mold directly to the jack stand top mounts. pretty wicked. and with smaller floor-jacks with the 2 and half inch diameter, (If its the one im thinking of That GM Good-wrench trolly jack) the small lifting point has less center of gravity, and can damage the rear lower control arm metal frame. ANYWAYS theres always a different preference out there, just a overlook. defiantly get at least a 1yr warranty. They will fail if you lower them too fast. blow seals. If i had another jack new, the first thing id do is bleed the air out for sure. peace out dude
transam85dudeman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 05:43 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
Viprklr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: N. Illinois
Posts: 3,280
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

Where'd you get a polyurethane saddle cushion?
I've been looking.
Viprklr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 03:36 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
transam85dudeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 606
Car: 85' Trans Am
Engine: 305tpi 215hp LB9 two bolt,
Transmission: th-700r4
Axle/Gears: stock (3.27)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

i got it at Harbor Freights. heres a link http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=96306 its awesome
transam85dudeman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 08:35 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 939
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 2 ton jack VS 2.5 ton jack

if you can afford the bigger jack get the bigger jack... hate to have it fail!
also, if you can afford it, get a jack that raises quickly with one pump.
i have one that will raise up to meet the car in one pump and then works like a normal jack using one pump to raise the car an inch or whatever
i cannot describe how nice this feature is
RED_DRAGON_85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
07, 25, cars, gm, goodwrench, grand, gxp, jack, lift, points, prix, stands, support, ton, tons, weigh
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.