Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-16-2009, 09:43 PM   #1
Member
 
Blackdog36's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 406
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: 5.7 L
Transmission: 700r
Axle/Gears: LSD/3.23

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Stock bottom end ok for my build?

I am a ways off from upgrading my engine and drivetrain but had a few questions for planning out my build. I'm going for a repaint first but engine build keeps floating around in my head. Just wondering what your thoughts would be.

I currently have an auto 5.7 with 43,000 miles. I like the idea of making a very strong 350 engine. Car would be mainly a street cruiser with occasional time at 1/8 track. Below are upgrades I am thinking about for engine that would yield around 420 HP at around 5,600-5,800 rpm. I am not sure if my stock bottom end would be able to withstand the increased power. After reviewing a lot online, it seems that stock bottom end should be ok since auto and moderate rpm use. However it appears that upgrading bottom end, especially rod bolts would be a wise decision. If I have to tear down bottom end for ARP bolts, rod resizing and crank balancing, it would make sense to get a 383 storker assembly. I have no objections of going stroker route other than it is going away from my goal of strong 350 build. A couple years down the road I may want to go stroker which at that point I can tear down engine and get a kit.

-stock 350 roller block, 2 bolt main
-reuse stock crank, rods and 7 cc flat top pistons
-FIRST TPI intake
-Comp Cam XFI 268 or similar
-AFR 180 with 65 cc chambers
-upgrade 700r transmission
-most likely will replace rear end with 8.5, Dana S60 or moser

With the above, I have some questions about CR's. Using Pat Kelley's CR calculator, I get static CR of 9.9:1 and dynamic CR of 8.03:1 assuming piston to deck clearance of 0.025" and 0.015" head gasket thickness. Is this CR too low? I thought that you should go up to around 11:1 static while keeing dynamic under 8.5:1 for aluminum heads. Milling heads to 62 cc's increases static to 10.25:1 and dynamic to 8.3:1. This would help CR for 350 build but would probably be too much CR if I wanted to used milled heads for a 383 build. Only other option to raise CR would be to change piston deck clearance or piston relief. Both options would involve tearing down engine for which 383 makes sense.

What do you think?
Blackdog36 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 12:26 PM   #2
Member
 
Blackdog36's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 406
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: 5.7 L
Transmission: 700r
Axle/Gears: LSD/3.23

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Stock bottom end ok for my build?

bump
Blackdog36 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 01:03 PM   #3
Supreme Member
 
bluegrassz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: LONDON, KY
Posts: 3,073
Car: Camaro
Engine: Carbed L98
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Stock bottom end ok for my build?

My mods are in my sig and I have a stock bottom end.
__________________
L98, Afr190, Edelbrock RPM airgap, Holley 750 Street HP, Comp XR282HR-12, Crane Gold 1.5 RR's, Hedman LT's, Dynomax Bullets, Th350 Probuilt kit, Jegs 3800 10" converter, Spohn LCARB'S, Richmond 3.73, Hoosier
QTP's
New Best!!!
12.01 at 112.45 mph 1/4 with 1.62 60ft
7.641 at 90.02 mph 1/8

Pics at http://www.cardomain.com/ride/223847
bluegrassz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 01:38 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Glenbeulah, WI
Posts: 518
Car: 1988 Firbird
Engine: 355
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.91

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Stock bottom end ok for my build?

Stock bottom end is fine to 6000 RPM.

The compression ratio of 8.0 dynamic is fine. If you mill the heads for a little more those same heads will work fine on a 383 since you can order the correct pistons at that time to give your desired compression ratio.
__________________
1988 Formula 5.7L/6sp 3.91 gears,10.6 cr, SLP cold air kit, MAS gutted, TPIS air foil, TPIS AFPR, Superram, MAC headers, Mac under drive pulleys, MAC cat back, Relocated MAT, E-Tec 200 heads, SDPC Vortec manifold, ZZ-409 cam.
Best ET 12.17
Best 60 FT 1.754
Best MPH 113.1
RWHP 369
RWTQ 399
bjankuski is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 04:27 PM   #5
Member
 
Blackdog36's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 406
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: 5.7 L
Transmission: 700r
Axle/Gears: LSD/3.23

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Stock bottom end ok for my build?

Thank you for the responses. I have seen other people here with stock bottom ends on built 350's but was looking for some more feedback. Now I just need to figure out AFR 180 or 195

Bluegrassz, your engine takes quite a bit of power with higher stall and more aggressive cam than I am contemplating. I like to mash the throttle but its hard to get over 4,500 rpm on the street. Stock bottom end will be ok for what i'm planning.

I think that static CR of 10 vs 11 will reduce max power by 16 hp. I will probably have heads milled a few cc's. I may never go 383 but nice to know I could. I haven't had fast cars before and even stock my car feels powerful.
Blackdog36 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 08:51 AM   #6
Supreme Member
 
bluegrassz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: LONDON, KY
Posts: 3,073
Car: Camaro
Engine: Carbed L98
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Stock bottom end ok for my build?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog36 View Post
Thank you for the responses. I have seen other people here with stock bottom ends on built 350's but was looking for some more feedback. Now I just need to figure out AFR 180 or 195

Bluegrassz, your engine takes quite a bit of power with higher stall and more aggressive cam than I am contemplating. I like to mash the throttle but its hard to get over 4,500 rpm on the street. Stock bottom end will be ok for what i'm planning.

I think that static CR of 10 vs 11 will reduce max power by 16 hp. I will probably have heads milled a few cc's. I may never go 383 but nice to know I could. I haven't had fast cars before and even stock my car feels powerful.
Ive had no problems with my stock bottom end. I did replace the stock timing chain when I did the cam swap. Im still running the stock oil pump.

I shift out at 6100-6300 rpm, but I have ran it to 6500 without a problem.

We figure my static CR is 10.3-1. We milled my AFR 190's from 64cc to 60cc. This with the .028 head gasket from GM helped raise the compression.
Here is the part number for the gasket: 10105117

Oh yeah, I added ARP head bolts and rocker arm studs.
bluegrassz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 10:46 AM   #7
Member
 
Blackdog36's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 406
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: 5.7 L
Transmission: 700r
Axle/Gears: LSD/3.23

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Stock bottom end ok for my build?

Thanks for the info, good to know. ARP head bolts are a good idea too.

I've done some more research on CR and 10:1 seems pretty typical for aluminum heads. Many engine dyno tests use this CR and make good numbers. I found some info that raising CR from 10:1 to 11:1 would theoretically increase power by 2.5% or 10 hp for a 400 hp engine. Not a huge difference as I was thinking. Plus detonation would be lees of problem with lower cr.

I've read that AFR charges $260 for milling heads. Probably just would keep stock port size of 65 cc's and live with 9.9:1 cr. AFR just released vortec style 190 heads that look tempting.
Blackdog36 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 11:12 AM   #8
Supreme Member
 
bluegrassz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: LONDON, KY
Posts: 3,073
Car: Camaro
Engine: Carbed L98
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Stock bottom end ok for my build?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog36 View Post
Thanks for the info, good to know. ARP head bolts are a good idea too.

I've done some more research on CR and 10:1 seems pretty typical for aluminum heads. Many engine dyno tests use this CR and make good numbers. I found some info that raising CR from 10:1 to 11:1 would theoretically increase power by 2.5% or 10 hp for a 400 hp engine. Not a huge difference as I was thinking. Plus detonation would be lees of problem with lower cr.

I've read that AFR charges $260 for milling heads. Probably just would keep stock port size of 65 cc's and live with 9.9:1 cr. AFR just released vortec style 190 heads that look tempting.
You can flat mill 0.006 per cc or angle mill 0.008 per cc.
We flat milled mine 0.030, so when we did a buret cc test on them, it added up to 60cc. Watch how much you mill the heads, you can get into intake/head angle sealing problems. We used a thick felpro gasket and everything sealed fine. It was either a 1256 or 1205 gasket.

Oh yeah, I got my heads milled at a local machine shop for around $60 not $260.

Last edited by bluegrassz; 11-24-2009 at 04:30 PM.
bluegrassz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 11:12 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
409, assembly, bottom, end
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details