Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-19-2010, 06:01 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SW Chicago Burbs
Posts: 7
Car: 89 Vette
Engine: Built 383 :)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

Hi guys, this is a mirror of a post I made over at CG. Just looking for some more insight and personal experiences. Thanks
http://www.corvette-guru.com/modules...post_id=117046

I saw Summit has these on sale:

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-G6938-16/

I need to pick up roller rockers for my build. Heads are 3/8 stud, non self aligning (has guideplates), centerbolt vcs. I can hardly find any information about them. Some guys claim they are made by scorpion, I can't verify that. Anyone running these or have any personal experience with them?

Matthew
MattVette89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 10:19 AM   #2
Supreme Member
 
305sbc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 2,205
Car: 1986 & 89 Irocz
Engine: sbc's
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 / 3.25:1

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

I have used those. Not the BEST quality, but fine for light duty.
You may run into problems trying to run them with center-bolt VCs. I used them with perimeter bolt heads.
They are light in weight.
Be careful not to run them too far down on to the radiused area of the stud where they might touch.
305sbc is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 05:50 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SW Chicago Burbs
Posts: 7
Car: 89 Vette
Engine: Built 383 :)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

Thanks for the reply. This will be in a daily driver street car. I have no problem paying for quality, but I want to make it a budget build as much as possible.

As far as the VCs, these are narrow bodied and I will be using aftermarket edelbrock covers. I don't remember if there are drip tabs, but if there are I will trim them off.
MattVette89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 07:40 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gap, PA
Posts: 233
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: TH350, 8" Converter
Axle/Gears: S60 with 4:11 and Locker

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

i have a set of brand new scorpion 1.5 for 3/8 stud for sale. If iterested, pm me.
__________________
1986 Camaro. 383 SBC. Scat forged bottom end, Diamond Pistons, Bullet solid roller, Crower HIPPO Roller lifters, Motown heads that flow 320cfm, Comp Pro Magnum Rockers, Ported Hurricane Intake, TRC 950 Carb.
TH350, RMVB. ATI 8" converter.
Strange S60 With 4:11's and Detroit Locker. Strange Adj Shocks
All Spohn Suspension.
275/60/15 MT ET streets. Sportsman up front.

2000 Camaro SS. M6, SLP. Usual Bolt ons.
1966 Chevelle 427 4 speed.
kens86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 07:46 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Enschede, Netherlands
Posts: 2,990
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (19)
Send a message via AIM to Twin_Turbo
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

Looks like Prime 1 Rockers.....those are great rockers...



if you want to screw up your engine that is.

They are not scorpions!

Here's more uglyness

http://forums.corral.net/forums/show....php?t=1037191
__________________
Twin_Turbo is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 09:53 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SW Chicago Burbs
Posts: 7
Car: 89 Vette
Engine: Built 383 :)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

Thanks for the reply and link, TT. I like this guy's quote:
"OUCH! As a general statement from me and regardless of how this came to be, this is a good example of why when it comes to custom engine building we should not think strictly with our wallets but instead give the greatest priority to using quality components that are up to the job and application!"

As far as my build, my motor will never see 7000 rpms. It will be a ported SLP LTR setup. However, if spending an extra $75 gives me that much extra piece of mind, it's well worth it to me.

On that note, suggestions for narrow bodied, non self aligning 1.6 rrs?
MattVette89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 09:54 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SW Chicago Burbs
Posts: 7
Car: 89 Vette
Engine: Built 383 :)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

Quote:
Originally Posted by kens86 View Post
i have a set of brand new scorpion 1.5 for 3/8 stud for sale. If iterested, pm me.
Thanks for the offer, Ken, but I'm trying to go with 1.6 for my cam

Matthew
MattVette89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 10:52 PM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gap, PA
Posts: 233
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: TH350, 8" Converter
Axle/Gears: S60 with 4:11 and Locker

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattVette89 View Post
Thanks for the offer, Ken, but I'm trying to go with 1.6 for my cam

Matthew
I understand. good luck.
kens86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 11:08 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
88gta3508's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 530
Car: 89 TA / 94 C4
Engine: 358 / 383
Transmission: WC T5 / ZF 6sp
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 10 bolt 3.73 / Dana 44 3:45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

Quote:
Originally Posted by kens86 View Post
I understand. good luck.
those are just like the proform rockers.. the hardened material in those style rockers are HORRIFIC!! the set I had the bearings wore through the fulcrum the poly locks were chipping in less then a 1000 miles my engine at that time was flawless... all that nice material goes where OHHH yes inside your engine.. I would stay away form that style rocker!!! step up and get HD stainless or chrome moly!!! rockers at least proform was great.. I sent them in. they knew they were bad they changed there design they sent me a new pair I SOLD THEM

looking at the pic... of that rocker someone had a clearance problem.. or they were not adjusted correct

Last edited by 88gta3508; 02-20-2010 at 11:20 PM.
88gta3508 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 04:30 AM   #10
Supreme Member
 
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Enschede, Netherlands
Posts: 2,990
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (19)
Send a message via AIM to Twin_Turbo
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

That pic is from a guy here that knows what he's doing, they were sold to him by a cam grinder as being scorpion rockers. There were no clearance issues, they exploded from the high spring pressures
__________________
Twin_Turbo is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 05:54 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,823
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

TT While I feel your pain with your busted rockers, those are neither Summit brand or Scorpion rocker arms and are not evidence that either the Summit branded or Scorpion rocker are sub standard.

Reguardless..... it takes a lot of force/shock abuse to create the failure you experienced. Like valve float/crash.

I have not used the Summit branded narrow body rockers specifically but the conventional wide/full body aluminum roller rockers are top notch and if they are not actually made by Scorpion, are a dame good copy. Mine (plain/natural aluminum finish) look exactly like the Scorpions without the Iodizing colour finish. If these Summit rockers were a cheap piece of crap they would have gone back to Summit a long time ago.
F-BIRD'88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 06:34 AM   #12
Supreme Member
 
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Enschede, Netherlands
Posts: 2,990
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (19)
Send a message via AIM to Twin_Turbo
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

Great technical analysis, they look great so they must be good...good luck with that
__________________
Twin_Turbo is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 06:47 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,823
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twin_Turbo View Post
Great technical analysis, they look great so they must be good...good luck with that
My experience with the Summit/Scorpion brand rockers goes way beyond appearance comparison. They have proven to be a top notch rocker in more than one race motor and marine race motor for me and my friends. If they were crap they would have come unglued or wore out a long time ago.
If it will stand up in a high rpm max performance marine motor, it's a dame good part.
F-BIRD'88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 03:59 PM   #14
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 166

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twin_Turbo View Post
Great technical analysis, they look great so they must be good...good luck with that

Same as your technical analysis that summit rockers LOOK like that failed one.
SeanW is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 04:27 PM   #15
Supreme Member
 
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Enschede, Netherlands
Posts: 2,990
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (19)
Send a message via AIM to Twin_Turbo
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

point me to my tech analysis please, I would love to see where I point out the fact that they don't look nice and thus are not strong
__________________
Twin_Turbo is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 04:55 PM   #16
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 166

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twin_Turbo View Post
point me to my tech analysis please, I would love to see where I point out the fact that they don't look nice and thus are not strong

Paraprashing, "they look like these, these are garbage". This implies based on looks that the summits are also garbage. Otherwise why even bring it up?
SeanW is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 06:12 PM   #17
Supreme Member
 
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Enschede, Netherlands
Posts: 2,990
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (19)
Send a message via AIM to Twin_Turbo
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

Whatever, stupid arguing of semantics. If you are such a brass knuckle racer and have been there done that you tell me what the run-out is on those things. They're either proform, procomp or prime 1 pieces most likely (leaning towards proform since they sell that a lot) and they'll have up to 10 times the run-out that a quality comp cam or crane rocker will have.

But since everyone here seems to like the cheap Chinese junk don't start pouting when your engine turns to shrapnel.
__________________
Twin_Turbo is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 08:28 PM   #18
Supreme Member
 
305sbc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 2,205
Car: 1986 & 89 Irocz
Engine: sbc's
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 / 3.25:1

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

They do have a lot more run-out, which can become a big problem when the springs are no longer controlling the valve motion. Many things can go wrong in that situation, and a bargain rocker arm is not immune to such things.

If everything is set up right, they perform well in light duty applications.
If you intend to abuse the valvetrain with the combination of high revs and a camshaft with radical closing ramps, and/or possible over-revs, the best bet is to use the much heavier and more expensive steel rockers like Comp sells.

An over-rev situation can create clearance in the valvetrain and the pressures against the rocker will spike to levels of double or triple the pressure of the spring momentarily.
305sbc is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 10:02 PM   #19
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Where winter comes from
Posts: 73
Car: 85 vette
Engine: 427 SHP block,AFR 210,MiniRam
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3:07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

So how do you measure run-out for a roller rocker? What are acceptable numbers?
redcorvette is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 10:39 AM   #20
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SW Chicago Burbs
Posts: 7
Car: 89 Vette
Engine: Built 383 :)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

I'm leaning towards a set of CC roller rockers. Still not sure. This is the cam I'll be using - comments?

http://www.compcams.com/Cam_Specs/Ca...?csid=207&sb=0

08-465-8
RPM Range 1200-5200
Duration 260/270
Duration at .50 210/218
Valve lift (1/6 rr) .56/.555
LCA 113
Intake centerline 109

Thanks,

Matthew
MattVette89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 03:36 PM   #21
Supreme Member
 
305sbc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 2,205
Car: 1986 & 89 Irocz
Engine: sbc's
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 / 3.25:1

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Summit 1.6 roller rocker quality

You can measure runout in a rocker with a dial indicator, but an exact number is fairly meaningless. They are either loose or tight.
I have used both, actually many different types of roller rockers and never had a failure, so both are very usable.
Don't miss my point on having clearance in your valvetrain. If it develops clearance ANYWHERE during operation, you are likely to have some parts damage. With tight rockers, it is much less likely that the rocker will be what fails. Loose rockers will likely fail quickly in that situation.
If you don't generate clearance during operation, the loose rockers work fine in most cases.
Even a tight aluminum rocker can break due to clearance caused by whatever reason, be it an over-rev or a stud or posi-lock coming loose.

I have seen CC steel rollers with a lot of runout after heavy usage, but Comp offers a rebuilding service. Some other companies also offer this service.
305sbc is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 03:36 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
16, 1987, arm, corvette, failure, junk, measure, prime, proform, rocker, rockers, roller, street, summit, thirdgen
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details