193 vs Vortec heads
#151
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 86 Trans am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt posi
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
just an update, i have my engine completely together, all i need is to get the rockers adjusted in and new exhaust manifolds since the 305 manifolds off the old engine wont bolt to the vortec heads
#152
Supreme Member
#153
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 86 Trans am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt posi
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
the very back bolt on the passenger side does not line up, on the 305 block there are 2 holes, the 305 utilizes the rear bolt, however the 350 vortec heads use the first hold, which isnt drilled in the manifold and the rear bolt overhangs out the back of the head
#154
Supreme Member
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
I had done the swap years ago (on a 70's vintage 350) but went straight to headers and didn't attempt to use the 305 manifolds that were in the car originally.
What's to prevent you from at least getting a short header set that will bolt up to your existing cat back arrangement (other than money I suppose)? The Vortecs are excellent heads, possibly the best GM OEM casting out there, but they can definitely benefit from a good exhaust system.
What's to prevent you from at least getting a short header set that will bolt up to your existing cat back arrangement (other than money I suppose)? The Vortecs are excellent heads, possibly the best GM OEM casting out there, but they can definitely benefit from a good exhaust system.
#155
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 86 Trans am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt posi
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
well my thoughts are to getting shorties anyways, but i noticed they wont bolt directly to the y pipe so i was weighing either cutting and welding the reducer in place to accept the 3 bolt flange or just replace the entire exhaust from headers to tailpipe
#156
Supreme Member
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
My original short headers came with a y-pipe that bolted right in except for the difference between the y and the cat o.d dimension. Other than that, it was pretty straightforward.
#157
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 86 Trans am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt posi
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
so did you just weld the y-pipe to the cat, i was also thinking about that route, however what is the rough hp gain difference from a new header and y pipe vs an entire system
#158
Supreme Member
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
That's a difficult question. There are so many possible arrangements.
I'll say that short headers don't offer quite the same performance as a short system. There are differences among short systems too, especially in the diameter of the y-pipe particullarly where it connects to the header flange and again where it meets the catalytic location. In this case, bigger certainly is better. You'll have to search a little to see who offers the best parts in a short headers/y-pipe arrangement.
LT headers are probably the better choice as far as potential goes (although Dyno Don and his group friom SoCal have excellent results with his shorties) but the problem with LTs is the need for a custom built y-pipe. That can run a few bucks for a well built part.
And yes, I welded a 2 1/4" to 3" adaptor between the cat and the y-pipe. My cat back exhaust was 3" so the catalytic fit directly using a clamp.
I'll say that short headers don't offer quite the same performance as a short system. There are differences among short systems too, especially in the diameter of the y-pipe particullarly where it connects to the header flange and again where it meets the catalytic location. In this case, bigger certainly is better. You'll have to search a little to see who offers the best parts in a short headers/y-pipe arrangement.
LT headers are probably the better choice as far as potential goes (although Dyno Don and his group friom SoCal have excellent results with his shorties) but the problem with LTs is the need for a custom built y-pipe. That can run a few bucks for a well built part.
And yes, I welded a 2 1/4" to 3" adaptor between the cat and the y-pipe. My cat back exhaust was 3" so the catalytic fit directly using a clamp.
Last edited by skinny z; 04-08-2012 at 04:22 PM.
#159
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
Good to hear you're getting close midge. Looks like i'm back in the ring. Fired up mine a couple weeks ago and took it out the first decent day, and had to figure the first time I hit the juice I end up with a problem. Really small crack in the block right at one of the oil galley plugs so every time I hit the juice it sprayed oil out of the block like a garden hose. So pulled it out, grabbed a new block, cleaned it up, and now starting to get it together piece by pice. Definitely no budget to work with, so gonna see how this turns out. All internals were atill fine, so gonna transplant into the new block and see how it turns out. Hopefully yours turns out good and all together and street worthy soon too
#160
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 86 Trans am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt posi
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
Wow that sucks to here, fortunetly for you all the internals are good, I just need to find the time to drop the engine in now
#161
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 86 Trans am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt posi
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
Ok guys next thing, I'm planning to drop this engine in this weekend, however I just realized I have no sensors in the engine block, heads or the intake. My intake is empty minus the carb and the t-stat so what all do I need to get and what do I go by as far as ordering everything for it. The intake is a summit dual plane intake, vortec heads, and 010 350 block
#162
Supreme Member
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
Ok guys next thing, I'm planning to drop this engine in this weekend, however I just realized I have no sensors in the engine block, heads or the intake. My intake is empty minus the carb and the t-stat so what all do I need to get and what do I go by as far as ordering everything for it. The intake is a summit dual plane intake, vortec heads, and 010 350 block
If you're running an electric fan(2), the sensor to trigger the relay is located in the other head between 6 and 8.
Alternately, some run the temp gauge sensor in the stat housing or the intake coolant passage if equipped with a threaded hub.
Last edited by skinny z; 04-17-2012 at 12:57 PM. Reason: Changed cylinders 5 and 7 to 6 and 8.
#163
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 86 Trans am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt posi
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
Ok I think I'm starting to make heads with this. Now my question is for the coolant fan switch the goes in the pass head. When I look up the part for a vortec truck nothing comes up, however when I look up say an 87 Camaro 350 one shows up, do my question is do will a 87 sensor fit in the vortec head and does the vortec heads even have the hole in the pass side head for the sensor. Also will this 350 need a knock sensor being that it is carbed
#164
Supreme Member
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
There is only one cylinder head casting and as such no real left or right. Both heads will have the same size hole. 3/8" NPT.
You'll have to distinguish between the temp sensor for your gauge/light and the temp sensor for operating the fan relay.
Aftermarket gauges typically come with their own sensor.
The fan relay sensors have several different connector types. They can be OEM or aftermarket.
In my case I used a Hyperterch sender that came with an OEM style connector.
If you've gone carbed, then you'll have no need for the factory knock sensor.
You'll have to distinguish between the temp sensor for your gauge/light and the temp sensor for operating the fan relay.
Aftermarket gauges typically come with their own sensor.
The fan relay sensors have several different connector types. They can be OEM or aftermarket.
In my case I used a Hyperterch sender that came with an OEM style connector.
If you've gone carbed, then you'll have no need for the factory knock sensor.
#165
On Probation
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
17 Posts
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
This is as far as I got before I fell out of my chair laughing. Thanks guys! Porting 193s is silly. They won't respond. I tried them, before and after, on a then-new SuperFlow 1020. Extrude-Honing can help these, but cheaper to just do virgin 416s.
#166
Supreme Member
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
Now my question: Why bother with 416's? I suppose from your point of view the cost to port them is just YOUR labour. (Can't say the same for myself). That said, I would think that you can get better results, a superior casting and spend less money by buying a set of iron EQ Lightnings, RHS Pro Action or similar Dart heads.
Keep in mind that this is from an average guys point who also has no interest in taking the time to port an old cylinder head.
#167
On Probation
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
17 Posts
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
First off, good to see you back at it Atilla. I hope you're well.
Now my question: Why bother with 416's? I suppose from your point of view the cost to port them is just YOUR labour. (Can't say the same for myself). That said, I would think that you can get better results, a superior casting and spend less money by buying a set of iron EQ Lightnings, RHS Pro Action or similar Dart heads.
Keep in mind that this is from an average guys point who also has no interest in taking the time to port an old cylinder head.
Now my question: Why bother with 416's? I suppose from your point of view the cost to port them is just YOUR labour. (Can't say the same for myself). That said, I would think that you can get better results, a superior casting and spend less money by buying a set of iron EQ Lightnings, RHS Pro Action or similar Dart heads.
Keep in mind that this is from an average guys point who also has no interest in taking the time to port an old cylinder head.
#168
Supreme Member
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
I had to decide what to do with my old but upgraded Vortecs this season.
I couldn't see spending money on them for new guides and a valve job despite the fact they're modified for screw in studs and guide plates as well as Comp 26918 springs.
After the machine shop would be done with them, I could purchase a NEW pair but still have stock port forms and have to get them upgraded.
I decided to step up and purchased possibly one of the last sets of bare RHS Pro Torker 170cc Vortecs. Upgraded them with 918 springs (the head kits come with Ferrea valves but inadequete 987 springs).
I figure it's much like having a nicely ported set of Vortec castings with an excellent valve job. All brand new.
I couldn't see spending money on them for new guides and a valve job despite the fact they're modified for screw in studs and guide plates as well as Comp 26918 springs.
After the machine shop would be done with them, I could purchase a NEW pair but still have stock port forms and have to get them upgraded.
I decided to step up and purchased possibly one of the last sets of bare RHS Pro Torker 170cc Vortecs. Upgraded them with 918 springs (the head kits come with Ferrea valves but inadequete 987 springs).
I figure it's much like having a nicely ported set of Vortec castings with an excellent valve job. All brand new.
#169
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 86 Trans am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt posi
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
just an update, got the engine in and running, however having carb issues, i think the old q-jet is wore out cause it wont idle and has no power unless your not pushing the throttle pedal
#170
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
Depending on how much time you want to spend you can rebuild that q jet. I know, everyone is gonna say screw it and just get a holley, but I'm a sucker for the q jets. I got a rebuild kit for mine, tore it down, replaced most of the working parts - needle/seat, float, vacuum diaphragm - dipped it for a while to clean it all out, and I love it. But ive always been a sucker for the way it sounds when those secondaries open. The rebuild is a bit complicated if youve never attempted to take apart or rebuild a carb before, but if you take pics and lay everything out in an open area its not horrible. If you end up rebuilding it, I can give you the name of the site where you can get the rebuild kits for about $50, and maybe another $50 for floats, needle/seat, etc
#172
Re: 193 vs Vortec heads
So this 355 I'm buying has cast number of 14102193 heads with block number 3970010 now the owner of the engine says I won't see much improvement from adding Vortec heads is that true or false. Vortec heads cost about 175 a side plus the carb intake so is it worth changing
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
08-20-2017 12:16 AM
L98GTA87
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
1
08-11-2015 06:55 PM