10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 1978 L82 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Would 70cc heads be a problem replacing my 76cc 882 heads? I have domed piston making 10:1 compression.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,038
Received 1,666 Likes
on
1,264 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
If iron, yes; very bad.
If aluminum, probably not so much.
Be assured though, your compression probably isn't 10:1 with those heads, even with the domes; to get a .030" over 350 with .045" deck clearance, .039" gaskets, and 76cc heads to 10:1 would require domes about .250" tall. While it's possible you're in that situation, it's not all that likely.
If aluminum, probably not so much.
Be assured though, your compression probably isn't 10:1 with those heads, even with the domes; to get a .030" over 350 with .045" deck clearance, .039" gaskets, and 76cc heads to 10:1 would require domes about .250" tall. While it's possible you're in that situation, it's not all that likely.
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 1978 L82 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Good to know. what would the situation be If I got 64cc aluminium heads? And if a bad idea, Howso?
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,038
Received 1,666 Likes
on
1,264 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
if a bad idea, Howso?
It's not much fun driving a pinging, detonating, premium-gas-sucking pig that you have to back the timing off so far just to make it bearable that the gas mileage gets even worse, it runs lazy, and overheats.
All in all, NOT a recipe for anything most of us would consider "fun".
what would the situation be If I got 64cc aluminium heads?
What pistons are they? Part #s ONLY please.
What's the deck clearance?
What heads?
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St.Louis, IL
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 377
Transmission: TH350; Circle D 4200 converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
What you have now is right within acceptable limits. Unless you want to be running race gas in the tank at $8 a gallon like I have had to do, I highly suggest you don't go pushing your luck. Your compression right now is fine where it's at, and I wouldn't go trying to get more out of it because you're going to need to change a lot more than just your heads if you start doing that (with much more than what you've got now, anyways).. There's better ways to see power gains.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 1978 L82 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Thanks for the replies. Well, i honestly have no Idea what the part numbers are on the pistons, just believing what I was told from previous owner who rebuilt it.. Came to the conclusion that if my compression is 10:1, then I must have domed pistons but haven't physically checked. My 882's are holding back a lot of hp, but I don't want to invest more than I need to in order to get better flow. If all said is true, what would be the best path to tale to do this?
#7
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: cape cod ma
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 gta
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3:23
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Until you pull the heads off, and start measuringeverything, it's all speculation.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St.Louis, IL
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 377
Transmission: TH350; Circle D 4200 converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
This. You don't know anything for sure right now, so don't go out buying parts until you pull those heads off and figure out exactly what you're working with. Once you figure that out, then formulate a gameplan.
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,038
Received 1,666 Likes
on
1,264 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
just believing what I was told from previous owner
but haven't physically checked
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 1978 L82 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Found out I have the 3998993 993 heads instead of the 882s which I was informed of due to the block casting. Trying to research some input on these. Seen that there were some with 1.94 - 1.50 and 2.02 - 1.60. Anyone aware how I can specifically identify which I have by the casting numbers?
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,038
Received 1,666 Likes
on
1,264 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Nope...
Valve size is a matter of machine work. You can take ANY junk smogger casting such as 882, 993, or 624, and graunch the larger valves in it. It'll still be a crappy smogger POS casting, won't run noticeably different in any way, won't make the slightest difference to the overall outcome.
Gotta LOOK AT THE PARTS to know what you've got though. There really aren't any substitutes.
But you already know you have garbage heads, so it doesn't matter at this point what valves are in em, they're still garbage. Frankly, if they were mine, I wouldn't even bother to waste the 10 seconds that finding that out would take, if the heads were already laying on the ground. No sense delaying their trip to the recycler by those precious seconds of my life that I'd throw away uselessly and couldn't ever get back.
Valve size is a matter of machine work. You can take ANY junk smogger casting such as 882, 993, or 624, and graunch the larger valves in it. It'll still be a crappy smogger POS casting, won't run noticeably different in any way, won't make the slightest difference to the overall outcome.
Gotta LOOK AT THE PARTS to know what you've got though. There really aren't any substitutes.
But you already know you have garbage heads, so it doesn't matter at this point what valves are in em, they're still garbage. Frankly, if they were mine, I wouldn't even bother to waste the 10 seconds that finding that out would take, if the heads were already laying on the ground. No sense delaying their trip to the recycler by those precious seconds of my life that I'd throw away uselessly and couldn't ever get back.
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 1978 L82 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Okay, thanks for the replies. I read about them putting out 300-350hp but sounds like I'd be better off spending 2 grand to get the results that I am looking for. Looks like I would have to pull the heads, see what I got then PUT THEM BACK ON to keep myself rolling which sounds like the biggest waste of time and discouraging. Smart approach to take must be buying a new cam (since I'm unaware the specs), new heads, and pistons to match a setup that would work for me. Any recommendations on where to go with this situation will be considered.
#15
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 1978 L82 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
how would these dart's be for a direct replacement?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/360534636687...84.m1438.l2649
http://www.ebay.com/itm/360534636687...84.m1438.l2649
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,038
Received 1,666 Likes
on
1,264 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Depends on what pistons you actually have, what the deck clearance is, etc.
Don't start trying to buy parts until after you know what you're buying parts for.
Tear down.
Measure.
Evaluate.
Plan.
Purchase.
Assemble.
Tune.
In that order.
Don't start trying to buy parts until after you know what you're buying parts for.
Tear down.
Measure.
Evaluate.
Plan.
Purchase.
Assemble.
Tune.
In that order.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St.Louis, IL
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 377
Transmission: TH350; Circle D 4200 converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
how would these dart's be for a direct replacement?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/360534636687...84.m1438.l2649
http://www.ebay.com/itm/360534636687...84.m1438.l2649
Don't go cheap on cylinder heads. They're the most critical part of the engine when it comes to making power. A cam is worthless if the cylinder heads can't feed it properly. Save up some change and buy a set of complete heads that ARE ready to bolt on.
And like Sofa said.. you don't go buying parts until you know what you have. That's just dumb, and you're throwing money down the drain by doing that.
#18
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 1978 L82 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Valid points, Thanks guys. Appreciate your time and putting up with my inexperience. Really don't know what I would do without this extremely resourceful website.
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St.Louis, IL
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 377
Transmission: TH350; Circle D 4200 converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
That's what we are here for. We were all new to the game at some point, and it's only right to pass that information along to the next person. Just be smart about your build, and more importantly - be smart with your money.. because in this hobby, when it's gone it's definitely gone.
#20
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 1978 L82 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Oh and deltaelite, regarding your first post on this thread, what would be some significant upgrades to get more power other than swapping heads that you were referring to? I've been looking into upgrading my ignition setup to a msd 6al with msd coil and msd distributor, getting some 1.6 rockers (builder told me I can go 1.6), an edelbrock rpm performer intake and possibly a bigger carb than my 1406 edelbrock. Are these all going to make some more power alone, or should I be looking to upgrade elsewhere?
#21
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sanctuary state
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes
on
24 Posts
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
All most street/strip motors need are a good quality HEI and a decent coil thats it. I only used the MSD as I run a pretty large cam and plan on spinning it well over 7k' dont want low speed fouling-
I know that one day that lousy box will leave me stranded somewhere.
Keep it simple.
I know that one day that lousy box will leave me stranded somewhere.
Keep it simple.
#22
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Johnstown, PA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 94 camaro z28
Engine: lt1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Oh and deltaelite, regarding your first post on this thread, what would be some significant upgrades to get more power other than swapping heads that you were referring to? I've been looking into upgrading my ignition setup to a msd 6al with msd coil and msd distributor, getting some 1.6 rockers (builder told me I can go 1.6), an edelbrock rpm performer intake and possibly a bigger carb than my 1406 edelbrock. Are these all going to make some more power alone, or should I be looking to upgrade elsewhere?
#23
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 1978 L82 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Wow, That just blew my mind. Guess it is time I start saving for another car, then new heads.
#24
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Johnstown, PA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 94 camaro z28
Engine: lt1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
If you want heads I would seriously consider summits aluminum head after you measure your domes.
#25
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 1978 L82 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
I apologize, no sarcasm was intended. Just surprised how much these smog heads hold back even with the goods you have on the top end in your situation. I will look into those, thanks for the recommendation. Any idea who makes them for summit?
#26
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Johnstown, PA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 94 camaro z28
Engine: lt1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Heres a thread that might help you a bit, They are for my 383, but hey its only 23 cubes
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tech...uch-hp-my.html
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,038
Received 1,666 Likes
on
1,264 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
even with the goods you have on the top end
First thing to understand about THAT is, power comes from fuel. Each incremental amount of fuel you burn, releases energy, in the form of heat. The engine's job is to turn that heat energy, into mechanical energy. It accomplishes this by allowing the high-pressure hot gases produced by combustion to expand by pushing the piston down, which cools the gas and takes the heat out and turns it into the mechanical pushing action.
Note that AT NO TIME does it make THE SLIGHTEST DIFFERENCE exactly how the fuel (a) gets into the motor, or (b)gets set on fire. Which ultimately means, the brand or size of carb makes NO DIFFERENCE WHATSOEVER to the engine's power output, as long as it delivers the correct amount of fuel at the correct time; and similarly, the ignition system makes NO DIFFERENCE WHATSOEVER ("gimmick" spark plug ads notwithstanding) as long as it sets the fuel on fire properly, just like th efire in your fireplace doesn't burn hotter because of the brand of match you started it with.
Once you get those myths and "fog of war" cleared out of your mind, THEN you can begin to understand what DOES "make more power".
Since power comes from fuel, and subsequently the conversion of heat to mechanical energy, it is immediately obvious that to "make more power" you have to (a) burn more fuel, or (b) do a better job of energy conversion. Eh?
Energy conversion is controlled by the compression ratio - which has another aspect that's MORE IMPORTANT than "compression" itself, which is, EXPANSION as the hot gas pushes the piston down; and, the "leakage" of heat out of the conversion process, either into the cooling system, or into the exhaust. Engines with higher "compression" make more power because the gas expands to a greater multiple of its original volume during the power stroke, thereby extracting more of the heat and converting it ot mechanical energy. Too much compression though, and other BAD things happen. The maximum compression ratio you can use is controlled primarily by the fuel you run. As a result you can't change it very much.
Heat can escape from the hot gases in the chamber, and pass into the piston top and the castings. In point of fact, the majority of the heat that escapes directly from the chamber, does so into the head casting. Which is why the cyl head material affects things: heat passes more readily into aluminum than iron, meaning aluminum automatically "cools" the mixture (a LOSS) more than iron, meaning you NEED higher compression with aluminum than iron to get the same results, if all else is equal. (yes I teach math in college) You can use ceramic coatings on things to further reduce heat loss, which is common practice nowadays in about all forms of competitive motorsports. So, assuming you have the mechanical compression optimized for your fuel and head material, there's not much more you can do to make the engine "convert" the energy more efficiently. It was pretty much baked into the design of the motor long before it was built.
Just as a FYI, in a properly working engine at its max HP RPM, about 1/3 of the fuel's heat energy goes into the cooling system, about 1/3 out the tailpipe, and about 1/3 into mechanical work (useful). Keep those #s always firmly in mind: 2/3 of the energy in the fuel is thrown away, and you can't do anything substantial about it, once the motor has been designed and constructed. But even just a little bit of efficiency improvement at design time results in a MANY % increase in power, so every little bit helps. That's the kind of thing that makes supposedly "equal" engines run so differently; why a Reher-Norrison or the like can build a motor out of the same parts somebody on this forum would, but will get 20% or 30% or even 50% more power out of the identical same parts list.
Which leaves, burning more fuel. Each unit of mass of fuel releases a specific amount of energy. (spark plug, ignition system, or carb brand DOES NOT change this) Energy = work. 2 words for the same thing. (yes I was a physics and math major my first time through college) Power, as measured in horespower or watts, is the time rate of doing work, which is to say, the time rate of energy release, which is the time rate of burning fuel, which would be measured in units like lbs per hr or the like. But... fuel requires air to burn, no? and as we all know, it takes almost exactly 14.7 times as much air as fuel, by mass, to produce complete combustion. So in the end, the time rate of burning fuel that an engine can burn, is limited by the time rate at which it can move air through itself.
Well that makes life pretty easy, doesn't it? The time rate of air movement has a word to describe it: we call it FLOW. It is usually described in cubic feet per minute, or in grams per second in the case of computer tuning... basically the same thing, just a larger or smaller chunk being measured at a time.
So what have you learned?
- "More power" isn't made by an ignition system, as long as the one you already have is adequate. Don't waste your money.
- "More power" isn't made by carb brand or size, as long as it can deliver as much air and fuel as the engine can consume. Don't waste your money.
- "More power" IS made by careful choice of compression ratio, to get as close as posible to "optimum" for the fuel you are using, without going over. If you were to graph power against compression for any given fuel, the curve would look like a rounded-off saw tooth; a gentle rising ramp as compression increases, increasing more slowly as the "perfect" spot is approached, levelling off as it's reached, then PLUMMETING as that spot is passed, from all the "compensation" that has to be done.
- "More power" depends on FLOW, which is DOMINATED by the heads, cam, and exhaust. The intake is a relatively minor tweek, and the carb is nearly irrelevant.
- Find out what your compression is, so you can optimize it for the least amount of money. Replacing pistons might be necessary, but is EXPENSIVE, and should be reserved as a last resort.
- Don't waste money on things that won't get you closer to your goal. Big shiny pretty eye candy sitting up on top of the motor in plain sight like carbs, intakes, brightly colored spark plug wires, "chrome" such as air cleaners, etc. are for people of weak will and limited understanding but who are easily distracted by the shiny things beside the path. Don't be one of those people.
- Concentrate your money, time, mental focus, and effort, on WHAT MATTERS. Right now you already know the heads you have are GARBAGE and therefore are your first and most immediate need to upgrade. Keep your money in your pockcet until you have enough to buy them. Don't get all hung up just yet on which ones you need to buy, if you don't already have the money for them; start saving the $1500 or so that you KNOW you will need.
- Don't buy a cam yet; if the one you have works, use it, and at the time you buy heads, buy a cam that suits THEM.
Any questions?
Last edited by sofakingdom; 12-26-2012 at 11:12 AM.
#28
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 1978 L82 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Shew, good information sofakingdom. It's good not feeling like a dumbasses on this site anymore. Looks like I have a lot of work to do and money to save.
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St.Louis, IL
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 377
Transmission: TH350; Circle D 4200 converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"
Re: 10:1 76cc, to 70cc heads bad idea?
Your best weapon when it comes to cars is being informed. Notice how he explained how and WHY things work the way they do? That is someone who has a very clear perspective on engine operation. You will find many people have their biased opinions based on things that are false, and they will try passing that along to you. This is why you need to do your research, read, and do as much as you can for yourself.. and most importantly, ask questions.. because ultimately - it's your time and money on the line, not ours.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NinjaNife
Tech / General Engine
27
08-23-2015 11:49 AM