Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2002, 04:42 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N. Vegas NV
Posts: 56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
92rs vs. 78 t/a

ever since i bought my camaro my neighbor badly wants to race me in his 78 t/a. evertime i wash the car his kids jump around sayin "my daddy would woop you" and "my daddy's car gottsa v-10" and blah blah blah. well im getting tired of the nagging so i think i may race him in a few weeks.
here are the specs

78 t/a
6.6 402
stock

92rs
5.0 305
flowmaster american thunder cat-back exhaust
slp cold air induction
slp take off posi
3.42 gears
hotchis subframe connectors
spohn adjustable lca's(set for off the line traction)
lca re-location brackets

Were not racing for a few weeks so i might end up having another mod put on. Do you think i can take him right now and what do you suggest for the next mod(im getting a 350 for the summer so no expensive engine mods not available for both engines,interchangable)
i think i can take him
mike
__________________
92rs 305 V8
flowmaster catback
k&n
slp take-off posi
3.42 precision gears
hi-flo cat
hotchis sfc's
spohn lca's
lower control arm relocation brackets
180 stat
ss hood
jet stage 2 performance chip
K&N X-stream open element
bfg drag radials(best mod to date)



e.t. 16.44 @82.4 mph
not fast but I have great reaction time and 60ft's so I beat a good deal of competition, got vids to prove it to!!
t-rally is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2002, 04:51 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,108
Car: 2007 Saturn Sky Redline
Engine: 2.0 turbo
Transmission: m5
Axle/Gears: 3.91 LSD

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Inwo Send a message via AIM to Inwo
Smogger heads=suck... Probably you should win, unless he has better heads and cam... I think the late 70s trans ams were mid 15s low 16s? I don't remember but you should win anyway...
Inwo is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2002, 05:02 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Chitown
Posts: 1,238

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I ran my buddies 77 t/a that had the olds motor in my '85. I got him off the line (700r4 vs. th350), but once first gear was done I stopped pulling. He didnt make any ground up, but he certainly didnt loose any. His was stock other than cat back exhaust, a little more timing, and some carb tweaks. I'd put his quarter mile times in the 15.0-15.4 range.

You would probably loose your car as it is. Give it a try and let us know how things turned out.

-Doug
__________________
-98 trans am A4/3.23

Former ride - 85 trans am LB9/700r4
85transamtpi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2002, 05:23 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,156
Car: 1987 IROC
Engine: 350 or 305 not sure yet
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 92rs vs. 78 t/a

Quote:
Originally posted by t-rally
"my daddy's car gottsa v-10" and blah blah blah.
78 t/a
WHAT??? a v10, he's an idiot

stock that car will run a 17 flat, I had a '76TA and that thing was slow and the gearing in those cars are horrible. Not too mention they're tanks.

A stock 455 in '76 ran 17 flat, though I hear the 400s were better engines.
Mark A Shields is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2002, 05:33 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Chitown
Posts: 1,238

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Mark it really does depend on the stock gears. In the late 70's something like 2.41's were standard. The 77 I raced had the optional 3.08's

-Doug
__________________
-98 trans am A4/3.23

Former ride - 85 trans am LB9/700r4
85transamtpi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2002, 06:27 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,156
Car: 1987 IROC
Engine: 350 or 305 not sure yet
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 85transamtpi
Mark it really does depend on the stock gears. In the late 70's something like 2.41's were standard. The 77 I raced had the optional 3.08's

-Doug
Oh, I didn't know they had some with 3:08s, yeah the one I had, had the horrible gears.
Mark A Shields is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2002, 07:55 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 747
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit

Classifieds Rating: (0)
17????

No, even with 2.73s a guy with a 400 t/a made it into the 16s in a pontiac magazine. With 3.23s (or 3.73s?) and manual transmission-- 14s or 15s.
What the hell is a 402??? I've heard of a 403 rocket (heh heh) and a 400 chevy, oldsmobile, or pontiac...or ford or dodge.
Is it a 403 or 400? Or is it some kind of "planted" engine?
__________________
Road Warriors car and truck club
1981 Olds Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr... 403 Olds V8, .030 over...350 TH 3A, shift kit, 2200 stall...2.29 posi
1985 Ford LTD Crown Victoria 4dr...302 TBI V8...4 speed AOD, shift kit...3.08 open
1970 Ford F-100 Ranger Longbed...360 FE v8 2bbl...C6 Auto 3A...?.??
1992 Ford Taurus LX...182 Vulcan v6...4 speed AOD...3.37
1977 Buick Skylark 4dr...
Abel Kane is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2002, 08:28 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,156
Car: 1987 IROC
Engine: 350 or 305 not sure yet
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I remember a magazine where a guy had a rebuilt original 455 in his '76 and ran a 17.1 or .0 forget which.

Yeah, that motor is probably a 403.
Mark A Shields is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2002, 08:33 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N. Vegas NV
Posts: 56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
any ideas on the next modification that might give me a little extra edge for the race?
t-rally is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2002, 08:35 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N. Vegas NV
Posts: 56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
the motors probably a 403, i heard 402 and im not really familiar with those cars so...
t-rally is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2002, 08:57 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,156
Car: 1987 IROC
Engine: 350 or 305 not sure yet
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
HEADERS
Mark A Shields is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2002, 10:40 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 637

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 84TAProject
402 is a 396 chevy bored .030 over. We have one in the garage, but does it go in my trans am? Of course not. I guess i can be happy with the 350.
84TAProject is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2002, 09:39 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Chitown
Posts: 1,238

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I have a feeling this "402" is the olds 403, not a rebuilt rat. That would be cool...but I doubt it.

I also agree that headers will be the best way for you to even things up.

-Doug
__________________
-98 trans am A4/3.23

Former ride - 85 trans am LB9/700r4
85transamtpi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2002, 11:50 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Find out what kind of rear end the T/A has. If they are 2.41 you will destroy him. If they are 3.08 it will be close. But if he has some 3.73 or 4.11 or anything aftermarket like that it doesn't look good for you. I have a 1980 T/A with 2.41 they are total dogs, but the car will do 160 m.p.h. .
The 70's and early 80's T/A's where know for bad 1/4 gearing but a set of 3.73 will really bring that car to life.
But if you ask him and he says he doesn't know they are probably 2.41's or 3.08's so wax him :rockon:
Good Luck
CamaroFreak406 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2002, 12:36 PM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N. Vegas NV
Posts: 56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The only problem with headers is that for a 305 id have to get, if i want anytype of improvement, the 1 5/8 primaries which would not work well with the 350ho, which is what im getting put in this summer, hopefully

Another thing i got working to my advantage is the fact that the guy racing is about 300lbs while im sitting at around 200.
plus the guy hardly drives the car and its been leaking oil for the longest.

any idea on any other mods, as much as id love to get headers i dont think its worth the money right now, unfortunately.
t-rally is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2002, 10:49 PM   #16
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,367
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
a car sitting around, leaking oil is probably stock. If so, wax him...:rockon:
Shagwell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2002, 11:58 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
ChillPhatCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ballston Spa, NY
Posts: 1,728
Car: '87 IROC-Z/28
Engine: 350 Crate
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The TH350 came in those cars right? Or does this guy have 4 on the floor? If he's got the 2.41s then he's most likely gonna lose.

The TH350 has 2.52 first gear, with a 2.41 rear, that thing probably doesn't start to shine until 3rd after the race is over... But the 402 has got potential, it can probably still roast the tires and its probably pushing 260+ Hp... other than that, the car probably weighs 4000 lbs at the curb and it can't handle for ****... without 4.10's that car is gonna be wasting that TH350s capabilities...

If it is a 4 speed, I'd give him better odds, but not by much...
__________________
'87 IROC-Z - "L05" Replacement 350 Crate Motor, 2.73 Posi, 700R4.
Mods: Edelbrock Performer Intake, 1406 Carb, 3" Open Element, Summit Headers, 3" Catco Cat, 3" Hooker Aerochamber Cat-back, 200Ah CS130 Alternator, 115MPH/7k Gauge Cluster, Pioneer DEH-7800MP, Pioneer (2)4x6's, (2)6x9's, (2)6.5's, (1)10" sub and 600W Amp, 4th Gen Front Seatbelts, 4th Gen Black Leather Seats in Back, Cheapo "Naugahyde" Racing Seats Up Front.
ChillPhatCat is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2002, 12:08 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,063

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to SoCo80p
if its a 4-speed car you will get whacked, if its the olds 403 auto you will most likely win, if its a WS6 4-speed 400 pontiac you will get annihalted
__________________
SoCo80p is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2002, 12:02 PM   #19
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rockford,IL, Unitied States
Posts: 422
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Bluebird Send a message via AIM to Bluebird Send a message via Yahoo to Bluebird
how fast

So how fast is like the Smokey and the bandit transam???

I drove a Brown TRansm 6.6 one time, and it planted me
back in the seat and felt fast as Hell.. it sure felt alot faster
than my 305 TBI.. The dude who let me drive it told me it
was a 455 engine.
All I know is It planted me in the backrest, and I almost lost
control of the car cuz it fishtailed like crazy.. I regained control.. and hit the gas and I hit 100 mph so fast I bout shot monkey juice!
Bluebird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2002, 02:30 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Spring, TX, USA
Posts: 760

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Adam62083
IIRC, the 455 Super Duty was the only well performing motor of that era. And it ran 14's or 15's.

The smokey and the bandit TA was one of those that had been modified into the mid 13's.
__________________
FOR SALE
Adam62083 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2002, 07:09 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,063

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to SoCo80p
Quote:
Originally posted by Adam62083
IIRC, the 455 Super Duty was the only well performing motor of that era. And it ran 14's or 15's.

The smokey and the bandit TA was one of those that had been modified into the mid 13's.
should learn more about your 2nd gens there the SD-455's were in 73-74 and were running high 13's right off the showroom floor, threw a 2" Y-pipe exhaust and 8:1 compression! no other car was even close to pontiac in the 70's and running a high 13 in the middle of the smog area in the tank of a car was hauling some serious ***. the smokey and the bandit car was a "6.6 litre" (400) 4-speed WS6 car, they ran mid 14's with a even better 7.6:1 compression.
__________________
SoCo80p is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2002, 07:47 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plattsburgh,NY
Posts: 517
Car: 93 Mustang GT
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to CHEVY_EATER
403's suck...

The 403 olds was only 185HP and low 16's at best. Actual time form a mag is 16.4@80mph .There were 2 400 pontiacs available in 78. One is 220 HP 400..my dad had one with a 4spd. They are low 15's with the 4spd (time from mag 15.3@96.6). The other is less..can't remember off top of my head. The one's in Smokey and The Bandit had built up 455's in them with auto. I have some Pontiac mags from early 80's still and it talked about them!! If it is auto..you have a chance..if 4spd...doubt it...
__________________
'93 Mustang LX 5.0
too much to list...
CHEVY_EATER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2002, 09:48 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 747
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I've always heard that the Smokey and the Bandit Trans Am was a 403 modified, and it certainly sounds like it.
So, 400 trans ams are fast alright. But put them up to a 403 with 3.42 gearing and the tables are turned. I was up against at least 2 late 70s Trans Ams and embarrassed them everytime.
185 hp stock is correct...Might you have the torque numbers?
__________________
Road Warriors car and truck club
1981 Olds Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr... 403 Olds V8, .030 over...350 TH 3A, shift kit, 2200 stall...2.29 posi
1985 Ford LTD Crown Victoria 4dr...302 TBI V8...4 speed AOD, shift kit...3.08 open
1970 Ford F-100 Ranger Longbed...360 FE v8 2bbl...C6 Auto 3A...?.??
1992 Ford Taurus LX...182 Vulcan v6...4 speed AOD...3.37
1977 Buick Skylark 4dr...
Abel Kane is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2002, 10:15 PM   #24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Surrey, BC, Canada
Posts: 49

Classifieds Rating: (0)
i dunno if this will help but here it is
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 403data.jpg (26.4 KB, 129 views)
84_CamaroBC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2002, 10:25 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plattsburgh,NY
Posts: 517
Car: 93 Mustang GT
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to CHEVY_EATER
400 Pontiac is 200HP@4000RPM's and 325 ft lbs. torque at 2000 and the HP 400 was 220HP@4000RPM's and 320 ft. lbs. torque at 2800. The HP 400 had a larger cam..more HP less TQ. The above stated ratings for the 403 are correct for the T/A also.
CHEVY_EATER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2002, 10:29 PM   #26
Member
 
Cuco85T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 164
Car: 2001 Formula
Engine: LS2
Transmission: Auto

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Those are crappy hp numbers for such a big engine but gotta love that :hail: torque.
__________________
2001 Formula Firebird
Past cars:
-2004 350Z Enth.
-1994 Z28 LT1 Vert
-1985 Trans Am 305 TPI
-1990 300zx n/a
-1986 rx7 n/a
Cuco85T/A is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2002, 10:31 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plattsburgh,NY
Posts: 517
Car: 93 Mustang GT
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to CHEVY_EATER
ohh ya...

One of my favorite muscle cars...73 Super Duty T/A.. 455 with 310HP@4000RPM's and a smoking 390 ft. lbs@3600 of torque!! Ran 13.5-13.8 at 103-105 with crap radials back then...
__________________
'93 Mustang LX 5.0
too much to list...
CHEVY_EATER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2002, 11:05 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Red92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Katy
Posts: 580
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I own both a 92 RS (with headers back exhaust and edelbreck air cleaner w/k&n) and 78 t/a w/200hp 400 which is completely stock. Having driven both these cars, as long as the t/a is in good condition I believe it would be a drivers race. The problem with the t/a is that if running good will spin the tires off the line. If anybody in Houston wants to race my t/a we can give you a definate answer.
Red92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2002, 12:46 AM   #29
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rio grande Valley, Texas
Posts: 346

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Vicious 88 GTA
79 TA 403

my friend has a 78-79 TA 6.6 403 shaker hood scoop, punched .30 over ,black and all that crap except t tops, he has headers, glasspacks, orignal manifold, quadrajet carb, and ****ty gears, i think he run in the low 15's high 14's, i've driven it in comparison to my GTA i would slaughter him but he thinks he would kill me, if he changed his gears, he probably would.....
Vicious 88 GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 12:59 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 570
Car: Camaro

Classifieds Rating: (0)
If he got the crate 455 big blocks that are like 500 HP/500 ft. lbs that 4000 lbs monster second gen would be a beast. I hear the 77s run a 15.5 so, it's safe to say they are a 15 second car with a 400 cid engine.
zerotosixtyV8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 08:46 PM   #31
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: maryland
Posts: 18

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to firechicken305
just look at the shaker, if you see "6.6 t/a" don't mess with him, if you see "6.6 Litre" then try him, you got a good chance. My '78 has the pontiac motor :hail: "6.6 t/a" or :hail: 400 t/a. That motor is a factory hot rod. it's a pontiac 400 with 350 heads to boost compression, and a hotter cam. they choked it down with 70's smog intake and lowsey exhaust manifolds. Even stock it was good for 15 sec flat. I broke into the 13's with carb, intake, headers, and exhaust. if it's the olds motor ("6.6 Litre", 403) it's most likely stock (they didn't take well to hot rodding, many parts look like swiss cheese for all the holes in em) and it's most likely backed by a turbo 350. My advice for the 403, don't try him from a rolling start. Regaurless, those 2.73 gears and that "no replacement for displacement" tourque should put on a good show



oh, and the smokey and the bandi car was a '77 trans am special edition with the 400 t/a and the turbo 350 tranny. the only reason people think it's a hot rod is becuase all the tire smoke... but with those gears they do that stock, easily

Last edited by firechicken305; 10-11-2002 at 08:49 PM.
firechicken305 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 09:30 PM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 570
Car: Camaro

Classifieds Rating: (0)
For the longest time I wanted a 77-78 Trans-Am, I wanted to put in that crate 455 in there too, but the cars handling was nothing compared to that of the IROC-Z, or third gens in general, and it weighed quite a bit more than the IROCs, so I got my Black 89 with T-tops and a, at least according to the specs given here, more muscular L98. I ran a 14.8 bone stock, and I was very pleased, but I wouldn't mind having a 450 HP 396 at a slight expense of handling. Nothing so suspension upgrades can't take care of anyways.
zerotosixtyV8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 10:00 PM   #33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 747
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Well, for 185 hp, those 403 will move with descent gearing. That is, at least 2.73. All the same, torque messes people up. If they can smash someone into the seat, they tend to think it is a real monster.
__________________
Road Warriors car and truck club
1981 Olds Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr... 403 Olds V8, .030 over...350 TH 3A, shift kit, 2200 stall...2.29 posi
1985 Ford LTD Crown Victoria 4dr...302 TBI V8...4 speed AOD, shift kit...3.08 open
1970 Ford F-100 Ranger Longbed...360 FE v8 2bbl...C6 Auto 3A...?.??
1992 Ford Taurus LX...182 Vulcan v6...4 speed AOD...3.37
1977 Buick Skylark 4dr...
Abel Kane is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 10:17 PM   #34
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 570
Car: Camaro

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Abel Kane
Well, for 185 hp, those 403 will move with descent gearing. That is, at least 2.73. All the same, torque messes people up. If they can smash someone into the seat, they tend to think it is a real monster.
lol, as I thought with my 89 RS, then I ran a 16.8 and felt gyped
zerotosixtyV8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2002, 12:19 AM   #35
Supreme Member
 
91L98Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,142
Car: Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
My sister has a 77 firebird formula with the olds 403 in it, with a 2.5x open rear...

let me just say that if you sleep through the launch, and the 'bird is well tuned (even stock), and you don't run for a full 1/4, the 'bird WILL take you. These things have amazing torque. They have no HP and they quit pulling pretty quickly, almost kind of like a TPI that dies even sooner. but they are pretty stout off the line. The 403 is about all done by 4000 rpm.

With all that said, if you can launch with him, you've got him.

As for quarter mile time, all i can tell you is that my sisters has pulled repeateable high (gtech) 15's with 3 people in the car. My gtech is known to be about 1/2 second optimistic in the ET, so with 1 person in the car you are still looking at about a 16 flat.

With nothing more than a manifold, exhaust, and gears, these cars are knocking on the door of 14's.

good luck!
__________________
1991 Z28
L98/G80/G92/J65
LT1 injectors, DIY PROM, t-56, AS&M siamese runners, accel intake, F1 GS-D3's
* 14.46 @ 93.36mph, 1.98 60' 7/5/02 (stock)
* 14.89 @ 96.76mph, 2.51 60' 7/7/04 (T56, AS&M SS runners, accel intake)
...guess I need to work on that rear suspension!
1971 RS
406/4spd...a work in progress..
in the 13's @ 107mph without a posi, it's a start.
91L98Z28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2002, 08:39 AM   #36
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plattsburgh,NY
Posts: 517
Car: 93 Mustang GT
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to CHEVY_EATER
Quote:
Originally posted by firechicken305
just look at the shaker, if you see "6.6 t/a" don't mess with him, if you see "6.6 Litre" then try him, you got a good chance. My '78 has the pontiac motor :hail: "6.6 t/a" or :hail: 400 t/a. That motor is a factory hot rod. it's a pontiac 400 with 350 heads to boost compression, and a hotter cam. they choked it down with 70's smog intake and lowsey exhaust manifolds. Even stock it was good for 15 sec flat. I broke into the 13's with carb, intake, headers, and exhaust. if it's the olds motor ("6.6 Litre", 403) it's most likely stock (they didn't take well to hot rodding, many parts look like swiss cheese for all the holes in em) and it's most likely backed by a turbo 350. My advice for the 403, don't try him from a rolling start. Regaurless, those 2.73 gears and that "no replacement for displacement" tourque should put on a good show



oh, and the smokey and the bandi car was a '77 trans am special edition with the 400 t/a and the turbo 350 tranny. the only reason people think it's a hot rod is becuase all the tire smoke... but with those gears they do that stock, easily
I have a Pontiac Performance magazine form 1980 where it states that they had built up 454 in the car they used for the chase scenes and tire burning. My dad also had a 78 T/A as I stated..went pretty good. The only mod he did was put a cam in it....which made a big difference. He also had a 73 Firebird with the 350 and shaker hood. I've got old pics I scanned of it but they are not the best quality.
__________________
'93 Mustang LX 5.0
too much to list...
CHEVY_EATER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2002, 08:39 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing

Tags
229, 350, 403, 66, cid, litre, mile, posi, quarter, ta
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details