Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-22-2003, 03:04 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 512
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: 5.7 / 350 cuid
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
1979 Z28 v. 1989 IROC

I haven;t go to race yet, but my best friend has a sweet 79 Z28. Both are cars are bone stock. My 89 IROC has a 350TPI with the 700R4 and 2.77 gears. His 79 Z28 is a 350 Q-Jet 4bbl with a TH350 with 3.42 gears.

Alright guys, who's gonna win this one? From a dead stop to top speed. I want to get a little input before I put the tires on the pavement against him.
EYEROCK89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2003, 04:01 AM   #2
Administrator
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,130
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
You will.
IROCZTWENTYGR8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2003, 04:04 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 5,741

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I think you will win too. Those last 70's camaros were smogged down dogs.
25THRSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2003, 04:10 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Hawk92z-TDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arthur, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,256
Car: 92Z28x2, 99&00Z28, 87Roc & 86Clone
Engine: 412&421, LS1x2, 383 & 305
Transmission: T-56x2 & 4L60Ex2, T5 & 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4:10x2 & 3:42/2:73 & 3:27 & 3:73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Hawk92z-TDZ
With your 4th gear, 2.77's and extra power, I'd put U top speed. But I am not sure how bad your 2.77 gears are gunna kill ya at the jump. If he is bone stock though his 1979 350 doesnt have the kind of power your L98 has so theres a good chance u'll make up for the lack of gears.
Hawk92z-TDZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2003, 04:11 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Hawk92z-TDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arthur, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,256
Car: 92Z28x2, 99&00Z28, 87Roc & 86Clone
Engine: 412&421, LS1x2, 383 & 305
Transmission: T-56x2 & 4L60Ex2, T5 & 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4:10x2 & 3:42/2:73 & 3:27 & 3:73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Hawk92z-TDZ
Acording to my book the 1979 Z28 only had 350 175hp, Ironic as the 1978 is listed at 185hp and the 1980 at 190hp. Far cry from your 240hp. U should take him farly easy.
Hawk92z-TDZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2003, 11:31 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 512
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: 5.7 / 350 cuid
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Woo Hoo.....Thats what I like to hear. I just remembered that we both have aftermarket 3" exhast, but that should make mcuh difference. In a week or so, I'll have the race results and I'll let you guys know how it went.
EYEROCK89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2003, 11:53 AM   #7
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Maryland; USA
Posts: 11,634

Classifieds Rating: (0)
you should win!!
MdFormula350 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2003, 01:15 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 1,109
Car: 1990 IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: TH700-R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to curt86iroc
you are gonna kill him. my friend used to have a 78 z28 4 spd. my LG4, yes i said LG4, could keep up with it......
curt86iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2003, 03:17 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hillsborough, NJ, USA
Posts: 400
Car: 1996 Jeep Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Transmission: 5 speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Ian_F
Well, the LG4 could keep up with it on the top end, but the Z with a 4 speed and 3.73 posi rear definitly took you off the line Curt. Back to the real question. There is zero chance of you losing to the second gen. You have more HP, more torque and are lighter than he is. Should be a walk in the park.
__________________
Moderator over at NJFBOA

Currently driving a 96 Cherokee, but looking forward to getting back into an F-body.
Ian_F is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2003, 09:21 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 43
Car: 80 Z28
Engine: just another 350
Transmission: th350

Classifieds Rating: (0)
You may be surprised........

and third gens aren't that much lighter than 2nd gens.
__________________
1988 5.0 LX notch

1987 Firebird Formula WS6--totalled 6/03
denis is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2003, 09:27 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 5,741

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by denis
You may be surprised........

and third gens aren't that much lighter than 2nd gens.
You are kidding right? The second gens weigh over 500 lbs more than a 3rd gen.
25THRSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2003, 09:30 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 43
Car: 80 Z28
Engine: just another 350
Transmission: th350

Classifieds Rating: (0)
i meant that you may be surprised if that 79 takes you, i've been in 350 TPI cars with the same setup and it didn't feel like it had my car by much (my car only has a 2.5 exhaust and a performer with headers. I don't know about you, but second and third gens are about the same weight wise, both being overly heavy.
__________________
1988 5.0 LX notch

1987 Firebird Formula WS6--totalled 6/03

Last edited by denis; 03-23-2003 at 09:41 PM.
denis is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2003, 09:43 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 5,741

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The curb weight of the 79 camaro was 3,612 lbs. That is for the base model camaro. Your friend's probably weighs comsiderably more than that. The highest hp 350 for that year was a whopping 170 hp and 270 tq. You will have no problem whooping him.
25THRSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2003, 09:57 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 1,109
Car: 1990 IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: TH700-R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to curt86iroc
Quote:
Originally posted by denis
i meant that you may be surprised if that 79 takes you, i've been in 350 TPI cars with the same setup and it didn't feel like it had my car by much (my car only has a 2.5 exhaust and a performer with headers. I don't know about you, but second and third gens are about the same weight wise, both being overly heavy.
my 86 weighs 3480 lbs with me and 1/4 tank of gas. my friends 76 LT weighs 300 lbs more than me, around 3800 lbs. so there is a substantial difference.
curt86iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2003, 11:06 PM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 93

Classifieds Rating: (0)
This is slightly off topic, but are thirdgens the lightes f-bods? I knew they were lighter than the 4th gen and now the 2nd gen, what about 1st?
IROCJTOWN is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2003, 11:49 PM   #16
Administrator
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,130
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
It goes like this lightest to heaviest: 1st, Third, 4th, 2nd.
IROCZTWENTYGR8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2003, 11:15 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hillsborough, NJ and SJU in Philly
Posts: 637

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Your torque will probably keep you in front, out of the whole and all through the race. Just get a decent launch and take him out. The only way you can lose is if you spin too much. Feather the gas and you will probably still take him. Post the results too.

~Matt
__________________
White 86 Trans Am (bought for $800):
LG4, 180,000 mi, 2.73? posi (broken), TH-700R4, Edelbrock TES headers and y-pipe, a/c delete, dynomax superflow cat, open-air cleaner, Edelbrock Performer camshaft 2102, valve lift: intake .420 exhaust .442, mild (homemade) headwork, 180* thermostat, new flat black front bumper, Kenwood cd player, Dynomax catback, KYB shocks and struts & front control arm bushings in the garage

In the future: 3.73 gears, SLP posi, valves, springs, roller rockers, new pushrods, Afr heads, big lifter cam, lowering springs, 383 carbed and .03 overbore, ProBuilt 700R4, ram air through foglights, new high stall TC, new aluminum intake manifold, new white paint, new black with red accent decals, and hopefully 12s

Best track time (4/24/02): 16.45s @ 81.99mph w/ 2.44 60'

Daily Driver (bought for $4700):
'95 Chevy Blazer LT, 4.3L Vortec V6, 4WD, auto, 110,500 miles, leather seats, all options, tow package, rebuilt tranny, 3.73 posi, bone stock
Matt86t/a is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2003, 12:14 PM   #18
Supreme Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 4,258
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
the 79 is a freakin 16 second car for christ sake, what's the debate about?
__________________
***89 GTA*** L98, P1-SC procharger, 24# SVO's, Cobalt boost/fuel pressure gauges, AEM wideband O2, ported plenum, Edelbrock TES headers and catback, SFC's, Wonderbar and some other goodies...

98 Grand Prix GTP Coupe-Daily Driver
fly89gta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2003, 12:50 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Hawk92z-TDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arthur, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,256
Car: 92Z28x2, 99&00Z28, 87Roc & 86Clone
Engine: 412&421, LS1x2, 383 & 305
Transmission: T-56x2 & 4L60Ex2, T5 & 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4:10x2 & 3:42/2:73 & 3:27 & 3:73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Hawk92z-TDZ
He asked because he didnt know
Hawk92z-TDZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2003, 05:21 PM   #20
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Ancel Zero
The other dude has a 350 right? That will be a joke. I have a friend who has a '79 trans am (the "Bandit"), its all stock with a 403 in it. Needless to say I can pull well past him with my 91 Z28 350TPI. 1/8th, 1/4th, or highway, it makes no difference. Much heavier and a lot less power, that about says it all.
Ancel Zero is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2003, 06:20 PM   #21
Administrator
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,130
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Yup, 2nd Gens were the slowest and heaviest Gen.
IROCZTWENTYGR8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2003, 06:24 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 5,741

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by IROCZTWENTYGR8
Yup, 2nd Gens were the slowest and heaviest Gen.
Not all though, before the smog laws came into effect the early 70's camaros kicked some ***.
25THRSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2003, 07:06 PM   #23
Supreme Member
 
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chesterfield, Indiana
Posts: 4,148
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Sickness91Z28
yeah....the 79 is to heavy.....IROC all the way
__________________
1991 Z28 Camaro
Air Ride/INTRO Wheels
1999 30th Anniversary WS6 Trans Am
#357 of 1600 Produced
2008 HHR SS
318 H.P. LNF 2.0 Turbocharged
Sickness91Z28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2003, 09:15 PM   #24
Administrator
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,130
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Quote:
Originally posted by 25THRSS
Not all though, before the smog laws came into effect the early 70's camaros kicked some ***.
Yeah, I should have said mid-later 2nds.
IROCZTWENTYGR8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2003, 11:05 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 970
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Balanced and blueprinted 383ci
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: Auburn 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Hawk92z-TDZ
With your 4th gear, 2.77's and extra power, I'd put U top speed. But I am not sure how bad your 2.77 gears are gunna kill ya at the jump. If he is bone stock though his 1979 350 doesnt have the kind of power your L98 has so theres a good chance u'll make up for the lack of gears.
I wouldn't worry about the gears THAT much. My '88 ran 14.6 with crappy autozone headers and nothing else with 2.77 gears. It ran 15.0 stock. You'll kill him. And check sig for final time WITH 2.77 gears.
__________________
Sold: '88 L98 IROC T-top
Sold: '89 L98 IROC Hardtop (G92)
Parting out: '92 RS If you need any parts send me a PM. 383ci with lots of goodies, full suspension, trans, rearend, racing seats, gauges, etc.
BadBowtie88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2003, 03:51 AM   #26
Senior Member
 
Hawk92z-TDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arthur, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,256
Car: 92Z28x2, 99&00Z28, 87Roc & 86Clone
Engine: 412&421, LS1x2, 383 & 305
Transmission: T-56x2 & 4L60Ex2, T5 & 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4:10x2 & 3:42/2:73 & 3:27 & 3:73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Hawk92z-TDZ
Quote:
Originally posted by BadBowtie88
I wouldn't worry about the gears THAT much. My '88 ran 14.6 with crappy autozone headers and nothing else with 2.77 gears. It ran 15.0 stock. You'll kill him. And check sig for final time WITH 2.77 gears.
Read the post under that one and U'll see I corrected that when I found out the crappy HP on the 79
Hawk92z-TDZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2003, 09:04 AM   #27
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 113

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Does your friend want to keep his Z all stock? I ask this b/c he has a nice setup to begin with: 350/TH350, 3.42 posi, etc.

I had a '79 Camaro with an anemic 305 that was on its last leg. I found a 400sbc for sale (out of a '71 Caprice) and dropped it in my Camaro (didn't rebuild the motor). I added the usual, cam, carb, intake, headers (left the heads dead stock) and with the stock open rearend (2.73?), I ran a 13.8 @ 100. That was several years after I beat on the engine so I'm sure it was a few tenths quicker when it was first installed. My car was a great sleeper, it looked completely stock and surprised quite a few IROC's, 5.0's etc. The best thing about it was the 400 engine and the TH350 tranny that came with it only cost me $300!!
406TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2003, 12:22 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hillsborough, NJ, USA
Posts: 400
Car: 1996 Jeep Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Transmission: 5 speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Ian_F
I really don't want to rain on anyones parade, but my car (sig) was bought for $450, and since then I have put about $2000 into it. $1800 of which was to repair it from and accident and do a little motor work. I run a 14.8 @93mph this is with a full tank of gas (car weighing in at 3776 lbs!), broken distributor cap, header leak, and an unset valve (exhaust). I think with some work, the second gen will be a force to be dealt with.
__________________
Moderator over at NJFBOA

Currently driving a 96 Cherokee, but looking forward to getting back into an F-body.
Ian_F is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2003, 01:34 AM   #29
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 5,741

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Ian_F
I really don't want to rain on anyones parade, but my car (sig) was bought for $450, and since then I have put about $2000 into it. $1800 of which was to repair it from and accident and do a little motor work. I run a 14.8 @93mph this is with a full tank of gas (car weighing in at 3776 lbs!), broken distributor cap, header leak, and an unset valve (exhaust). I think with some work, the second gen will be a force to be dealt with.
I hate to rain on your parade, but what you have done to your car in your sig cost a lot more than $200. That is a far cry from the stock engine that came in that car. He was talking about stock, and in stock form the late second gens are not very good performers. Almost any car can be made fast with the right mods and money. You have a nice car it sounds like and its pretty quick, but it's definitely no where near stock.
25THRSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2003, 11:44 AM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 1,109
Car: 1990 IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: TH700-R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to curt86iroc
i think he said $2000, not $200.....and yes, it is a nice car
curt86iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2003, 12:00 PM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hillsborough, NJ and SJU in Philly
Posts: 637

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Ian was just giving more info on how fast these cars can get. His car came stock with around 170hp and he could have up to 300hp now. And for very cheap considering that most of the money went into repairing the car cosmetically after the accident. Why would you "rain on his parade" when 406TA said the same kind of thing only about a different car? The two of them were just talking about the modding of second gen camaros, sorry if that bothers you since the one in the race was stock.

~Matt
__________________
White 86 Trans Am (bought for $800):
LG4, 180,000 mi, 2.73? posi (broken), TH-700R4, Edelbrock TES headers and y-pipe, a/c delete, dynomax superflow cat, open-air cleaner, Edelbrock Performer camshaft 2102, valve lift: intake .420 exhaust .442, mild (homemade) headwork, 180* thermostat, new flat black front bumper, Kenwood cd player, Dynomax catback, KYB shocks and struts & front control arm bushings in the garage

In the future: 3.73 gears, SLP posi, valves, springs, roller rockers, new pushrods, Afr heads, big lifter cam, lowering springs, 383 carbed and .03 overbore, ProBuilt 700R4, ram air through foglights, new high stall TC, new aluminum intake manifold, new white paint, new black with red accent decals, and hopefully 12s

Best track time (4/24/02): 16.45s @ 81.99mph w/ 2.44 60'

Daily Driver (bought for $4700):
'95 Chevy Blazer LT, 4.3L Vortec V6, 4WD, auto, 110,500 miles, leather seats, all options, tow package, rebuilt tranny, 3.73 posi, bone stock
Matt86t/a is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2003, 12:43 PM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hillsborough, NJ, USA
Posts: 400
Car: 1996 Jeep Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Transmission: 5 speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Ian_F
I said I spent $1800 on repairing it from an accident AND motor work. to this day I have not spent more than $3000 on my car. This is not something that everyone can do. I got a lot of part for my car for cheap or all together free. For instance, the heads I got for $50. I got them ported for $50 too. The exhaust, rear axle, traction bars and headers I got for free. I was just trying to point out that with a little bit of work, the second gen can become quite fast for very little money(if they know where to look).
__________________
Moderator over at NJFBOA

Currently driving a 96 Cherokee, but looking forward to getting back into an F-body.
Ian_F is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2003, 12:43 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing

Tags
1979, 350, 700r4, 79, 80, axle, black, car, engine, posi, rear, stock, tucson, white, z28
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details