Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing

Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-10-2007, 07:18 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 86
Car: 92 Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.0 tpi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 92fireformula
5.0 vs. 5.0

There is a kid with a 302 5.0 5speed mustang (Not sure of the year) and he wants to race me. 305 5.0 5speed formula. Mine is all stock except for 2 mangnaflow high flow cats and a flowmaster super 40 muffler. I am not sure what he has done to his mustang but i am pretty sure he has a flowmaster catback. My clutch is almost gone and i need new rear tires. Will this race be won who is the better driver? Let me hear your opionins.
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
92fireformula is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 07-10-2007, 08:01 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Denver area
Posts: 139

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 89redliningRS
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

TPI motor?

It outta be close if so. Most 5.0 stangs are mid to low 14's depending on the driver.
__________________
89 Camaro RS
305 CID Demon 650, Vortec Heads, LT1 Cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM Intake, SLP 1 5/8 Headers, Flowmaster 80 Series, 2800 RPM Midwest Stall, Spohn Sub-Frame Connectors, Hyfire 6AL
1/4 time: 14.5 @ 96 mph (Sea Level)
NOW RUNNING ON E85!!!!!
89redliningRS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 08:09 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 86
Car: 92 Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.0 tpi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 92fireformula
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

Yea its tpi
92fireformula is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 08:37 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
KrisW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: JAF/Afghanistan
Posts: 1,967
Car: 88 Formula Wannabe
Engine: 2.8(coming soon...Buick V6)
Transmission: V8 T-5
Axle/Gears: unk

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

If the stang is an LX 5 speed, you will have your hands full. They are a little lighter and with just a set of gears, it will stomp our 5 liters in stock form.

Our 5 liters are better suited to pickup trucks with the small bore and relatively longer stroke than the ford has. He has a 4 inch bore (like our chevy 302, 327, and 350 engines) and a short 3 inch stroke (like our old chevy 302 from the 60's) that allows him to rev up and hit his power band faster than our 305 can. With his bigger pistons, he is able to run much better heads with bigger valves and ports and our 305s are limited.

In the 80's those 5 liter mustangs were on par with our 350 cars. We could probably compete if we had the better cam specs and air flow that they had along with a 4 inch bore engine. If someone actually built a mild TPI 302 chevy 5 speed car you could probably even up with him.

I'm not just laying out stats; I had an 87 formula in NorCal with a TPI 305 and a 5 speed. I did a little exhaust work and a chip and I still lost by a fender to most 87-93 5 liter mustangs.

The GTs were actually slowed down by the ground effects and I could usually get them if I got the jump on them at the start.

good luck!!
__________________
"Towering genius disdains a beaten path. It seeks regions hitherto unexplored."
--Abraham Lincoln

Project "X" is now alive! Stay tuned for updates!

USE B-O-P!!
Stay original!
KrisW is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 08:46 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
ibmtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Glen Park, NY
Posts: 556
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: TPIS Supercharged w/IC & Nitrous
Transmission: 700R4 Probuilt
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Richmond

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

Been there done that many many times before. When my car was only a 305 TPI I used to get spanked on a daily basis by my friend who had a Mustang GT 5.0.. They are lighter, They have a shorter shift throw and previous sticky says alot more about bore and stroke. There is one good thing you could do, Challenge him to a road race on a windy road. You will run circles around him because of his wheelbase.
__________________
(ENGINE) 355 SBC - TPIS MiniRam - AFR 210 75cc Full CNC - BBK 58mm TB - JE Forged Pistons - Scat H-Rods - Eagle 4340 Crank - Crower 00482LM Cam - Vortech S/C @ 18LB - 10k RPM Nitrous Kit
(TRANSMISSION) Vigilante 2600 Stall Convertor - 700R4 Rebuild Kit Pro Street Elite by Pro Built PN# PSERK70088
(SUSPENSION) Full Hotchkis Subframes - Bay Braces - Torque Rods & Trailing Arms and More!!
(INTERIOR) Cyberdyne Digital Dash - Pioneer MP3 / DVD Player - (2) 1500+ Watts Rockford AMPS
More Forged than plastic - Way 2 Much 2 List..
Some Say I am

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2423655
<<--- Check out my ride!!
ibmtech is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 08:52 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,828
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

He is going to win.
__________________
1989 Mustang LX 5.0: Stock Heads (valves), cam, Cobra intake. 3.73s.
Slicks ET: 12.56 MPH: 107.2 60':1.69
17" ET Streets ET: 12.53 MPH: 108.3 60': 1.69
17" DRs ET: 12.87 MPH: 111.5 60': 1.93
18" Radials ET: 12.95 MPH: 109.2 60': 1.91
25thmustang is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 11:03 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
urbanhunter44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,222
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid lifter 355 SBC revvin' to 7k
Transmission: B&M Stage 2 TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt - 3.73 mini spool

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to urbanhunter44 Send a message via MSN to urbanhunter44 Send a message via Yahoo to urbanhunter44
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

302 SBF > 305 SBC
urbanhunter44 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 11:38 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: near Philly
Posts: 3,873
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44 View Post
302 SBF > 305 SBC
__________________
***89 GTA*** L98, P1-SC procharger, 24# SVO's, wideband O2, Edelbrock TES headers and catback, SFC's, Wonderbar and some other goodies...
fly89gta is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 11:51 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
2tonedmaro89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: oviedo, FL
Posts: 345
Car: '91 RS
Engine: 5.0L gross *** tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 2tonedmaro89 Send a message via Yahoo to 2tonedmaro89
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

im goin mustang on this one b/c of the shorter throw and weight alone
__________________

'91 RS 3.1L

'89 RS 2.8(R.I.P)
2tonedmaro89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2007, 10:31 AM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: thirdgen.org
Posts: 1,088
Car: 1989 T/A
Engine: PROCHARGED LB9
Transmission: FB BUILT 700r4 2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 BOLT EATON 3:73 POSI

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

if the stang is bone stock, with just exhaust.. i might be close. what condition is the mustang in? miles? stock gears? i could be an out of tune p.o.s. but then again youre mainly stock youreself.. it could be close.. do all the free mods u can, throw in a set of gears. and practice launching.. should be a good race.
8T9 BANDIT is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2007, 04:49 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,828
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8T9 BANDIT View Post
if the stang is bone stock, with just exhaust.. i might be close. what condition is the mustang in? miles? stock gears? i could be an out of tune p.o.s. but then again youre mainly stock youreself.. it could be close.. do all the free mods u can, throw in a set of gears. and practice launching.. should be a good race.
It COULD be a rat trapPOS, but COULD be the fastest stock motored 5.0 in the country, therefore go into the race thinking it is average or even faster (makes you better prepared) than average, and expect that. Never go into a race expecting the car to be slow... quick way to get beat and feel bad about it.
25thmustang is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2007, 05:43 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
ibmtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Glen Park, NY
Posts: 556
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: TPIS Supercharged w/IC & Nitrous
Transmission: 700R4 Probuilt
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Richmond

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

Many Many years ago when the Grand National came out, I had the cocky attitude that it was only a six cylinder 3.8 SFI and I could beat it with a 305TPI.. HMMMM! well you can image the rest... I came, I saw, I went home a Loser.
__________________
(ENGINE) 355 SBC - TPIS MiniRam - AFR 210 75cc Full CNC - BBK 58mm TB - JE Forged Pistons - Scat H-Rods - Eagle 4340 Crank - Crower 00482LM Cam - Vortech S/C @ 18LB - 10k RPM Nitrous Kit
(TRANSMISSION) Vigilante 2600 Stall Convertor - 700R4 Rebuild Kit Pro Street Elite by Pro Built PN# PSERK70088
(SUSPENSION) Full Hotchkis Subframes - Bay Braces - Torque Rods & Trailing Arms and More!!
(INTERIOR) Cyberdyne Digital Dash - Pioneer MP3 / DVD Player - (2) 1500+ Watts Rockford AMPS
More Forged than plastic - Way 2 Much 2 List..
Some Say I am

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2423655
<<--- Check out my ride!!
ibmtech is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2007, 06:01 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bloomington Indiana
Posts: 1,793
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt from the 87 WS6 donor

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via Yahoo to 1991CamaroRslow
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

The shittiest of Mustang 302's is fast with a proper tune up and gears (we proved this with a slap together peice of **** that went 13.7's at 100). I have however been in a bone stock 88 GT (girl own dealership serviced) mustangs that ran fine but was so Fing slow it was insane. I wouldn't bank on him being slow and you said it yourself with a bad clutch and bald tires there's absolutly no way you're winning this one. Fix those 2 issues, do some free mods to your car and hope he hasn't done the free mods to his.
1991CamaroRslow is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 04:56 PM   #14
Supporter/Moderator
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,090
Car: '90 RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to ShiftyCapone
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

The bore stroke ratio is an urban myth. You can have two engines with the same displacement with differnt bore stroke combos and have the peak and average powers be identical. The longer stroke engines will just make its power sooner in the RPM band. The 302 is a better stock set-up than the 305 because it suffers less from being under-valved. The larger bore unshrouds the valves better (just like the SBC 350 does). It has nothing to do with that magical 4" number. Only that the stock GM and Ford head designs were optimal for a larger bore. There are very few 4" bore motors and in fact many motors today have less cylinders, and lower bore stroke ratio than a 305 and make far more power (stock for stock).
ShiftyCapone is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 06:20 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 5,517
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShiftyCapone View Post
The bore stroke ratio is an urban myth. You can have two engines with the same displacement with differnt bore stroke combos and have the peak and average powers be identical. The longer stroke engines will just make its power sooner in the RPM band. The 302 is a better stock set-up than the 305 because it suffers less from being under-valved. The larger bore unshrouds the valves better (just like the SBC 350 does). It has nothing to do with that magical 4" number. Only that the stock GM and Ford head designs were optimal for a larger bore. There are very few 4" bore motors and in fact many motors today have less cylinders, and lower bore stroke ratio than a 305 and make far more power (stock for stock).


If you think bore/stroke matters all that much, go drive a Nissan Titan or Armada. They have a 3.8" bore, displace 5.6 liters and make 320 NET HP with 379 ft/lbs of torque. They also rev smooth as silk up to their 6,300 rpm redline. We had one torn apart at the Nissan dealership I work for after it puked a head gasket at 150,000 miles. The bore is tiny, yet the truck runs very strong.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=nPRbSaG7vRU

Last edited by Fast355; 07-12-2007 at 06:27 PM.
Fast355 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 12:29 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Titan85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 605
Car: 1987 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Titan85 Send a message via MSN to Titan85
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

I am also going to go with the mustang. I took on a v6 2005 mustang last night and it gave my 87 Camaro with a 350 TPI (all stock at the moment) a good run. I won it by about a car length and I got that lead in the first twenty feet and had just enough power to hold it but did lose some when we hit third gear. My Camaro definitely had more power off the starting line.

I would say you may get out in front at the start, but I doubt you will hold the lead. The 330 foot pounds of torque is pretty good, but the measly 225 HP you get from a stock Camaro 350 is pitiful.
Titan85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 10:31 AM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: thirdgen.org
Posts: 1,088
Car: 1989 T/A
Engine: PROCHARGED LB9
Transmission: FB BUILT 700r4 2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 BOLT EATON 3:73 POSI

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

get back to the topic guys.. will his formula beat this stang??
8T9 BANDIT is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 12:09 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,828
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8T9 BANDIT View Post
get back to the topic guys.. will his formula beat this stang??
No
25thmustang is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 01:18 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bloomington Indiana
Posts: 1,793
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt from the 87 WS6 donor

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via Yahoo to 1991CamaroRslow
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

I second the NO.
1991CamaroRslow is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 02:49 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
atc3434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to atc3434
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

You'd need to be a G92 optioned 305 to even run in the ballpark, and even at that the lighter Ford is gonna be pretty tough to beat. An L98 vs. a 5.0 stang is a decent race, but the stang is still likely to be quicker, the Camaro better pray for a good holeshot, because the Ford is quicker up top, and can leave very well when driven right.
atc3434 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 03:12 PM   #21
Member
 
89N10GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 248
Car: 1989 GTA / 2007 Hyundai Tucson
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10:1

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

no way in hell. even if you had a good clutch and tires. tell him to fallow you around some turns if you want to win.
89N10GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 06:08 PM   #22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 86
Car: 92 Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.0 tpi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 92fireformula
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by atc3434 View Post
You'd need to be a G92 optioned 305 to even run in the ballpark

I do have the G92 optioned 305. I need a clutch soon and I'm hoping to get get it replaced soon. Sometimes I have to double clutch it to get it into 1st.
92fireformula is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 08:47 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
urbanhunter44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,222
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid lifter 355 SBC revvin' to 7k
Transmission: B&M Stage 2 TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt - 3.73 mini spool

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to urbanhunter44 Send a message via MSN to urbanhunter44 Send a message via Yahoo to urbanhunter44
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

Even the L98s were a driver's race due to the power/weight ratio. Good luck though!
urbanhunter44 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 10:05 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kenosha, WI
Posts: 714
Car: 1987 Trans am GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to subliminal Send a message via Yahoo to subliminal
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

Yeah, youre going down. If your lucky your car is running low 15's and 5.0s are mid 14s stock.
subliminal is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 02:07 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
kairles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,049
Car: 90 Formula
Engine: Procharged LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to kairles
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

I think it will come down to driver and the condition/tune of the car. I beat a modded 5-speed GT by a car or two with my LB9 formula.
kairles is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 11:45 AM   #26
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: thirdgen.org
Posts: 1,088
Car: 1989 T/A
Engine: PROCHARGED LB9
Transmission: FB BUILT 700r4 2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 BOLT EATON 3:73 POSI

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

there's a bunch of formy 5 speed lb9's running mid to low 14's even one going 13's.. i think it will be a good race.. if the stang is well described it will only be a 14 sec car too.. so let us know what happens.
__________________
  1. 89 T/A LB9, WS6, TPI, 42K ORIGINAL MILES, CRANE 2032 CAM W 1.6RR'S, PROCHARGER P-1SC 10LB'S, SLP RUNNERS + PORTED PLENUM, 24# MOTORSPORT INJECTORS, FB BUILT 700R4 W 2200 STALL, EATON 373 POSI, EDELBROCK SHORTIES, BORLA CAT BACK, ALL UMI SUSPENSION. TOO MUCH MORE TOO LIST.
thirdgen.org CO-FOUNDER, JOIN HERE- http://www.thirdgen.org/
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
8T9 BANDIT is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 11:53 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
Titan85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 605
Car: 1987 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Titan85 Send a message via MSN to Titan85
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by 89N10GTA View Post
no way in hell. even if you had a good clutch and tires. tell him to fallow you around some turns if you want to win.
Lol, I did that. But I also won the drag race (but I had a 350 and he had a v6)
Titan85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2007, 03:25 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 387

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.0 vs. 5.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast355 View Post


If you think bore/stroke matters all that much, go drive a Nissan Titan or Armada. They have a 3.8" bore, displace 5.6 liters and make 320 NET HP with 379 ft/lbs of torque. They also rev smooth as silk up to their 6,300 rpm redline. We had one torn apart at the Nissan dealership I work for after it puked a head gasket at 150,000 miles. The bore is tiny, yet the truck runs very strong.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=nPRbSaG7vRU
Don't forget that 4V motors have WAY more valve curtain area than 2V motors. Look at the Ford Triton motors, they're ~3.5 inch bore and make decent power N/A in 4V format, even though they do OK in a 2V format too.

That being said, I think that the Stang will get you, fix the clutch do some free mods heck do some not so free mods and get some tires. Not hard Mastercrafts you normally put on, find something that is soft.
Drac0nic is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.