Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-24-2007, 08:23 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

iight this race is going between me and a close buddy of mine his mods are

his motor is a 7mGTE

full intake
full 3" turbo back exhaust including turbo elbow
HKS SSQV BOV
Spearco intercooler
To4e 60-1 trim rebuilt turbo ( 10lb)
Manual boost controller
tires and rims
metal headgasket
ARP headbolts
Spec stage 2 clutch
HKS Turbo Timer
Full Braided stainless steel oil and coolant feed and return lines

i got a l98 with

cold air intake
TB spacer
ported upper intake
ported SLP runners
Ported base manifold
accel 24lb injectors
TPIS AFPR @ 49psi
edlebroke nitrous noids
NOS fogger nozzle/ 125 jets
alston SFC
khumos 711
3 inch exhaust/cutout
3.23 rear end
timming set at 10*
100 octane race gas
all free mods

just wondering what you guys think will win. his car pulls hard when he gets into boost , but im sure i can rape him off the line. its going to be at a 1/4 mile strip too

Last edited by chevy boi; 08-24-2007 at 08:26 PM.
chevy boi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2007, 09:14 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
a mack6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pittsburgh & Allentown PA
Posts: 1,318
Car: 1992 Z28 (Heritage Edition)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to a mack6
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

stock for stock a mk3 turbo and a l98 are almost dead even. Just by looking at the mods, I would think you have the edge, unless the boost controller and intercooler are giving him a lot more power than i am guessing they are. Regardless, i think it'll be close.
__________________

1992 RS Heritage Edition **RIP**

1992 Z28 Heritage Edition 32,000 Miles
Black (w/ Red Stripes) & Black Interior
**Z03**G80**LB9**CC1**
a mack6 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2007, 10:31 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,473
Car: 92 Camaro
Engine: HSR 385 Lloyd Elliot Cam AFR 195cc
Transmission: Performabuilt Level 2, 3400 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 373

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Send a message via Yahoo to 89formula350b2l
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

I can tell you from my experience, the throttle body spacer doesnt help you at all....it will hurt you actually. I had one on my 383 and took it out i gained ab 10 rwhp and 10 rwtq....take it off and hopefully you have ur stock TB bolts... but i think it will be close....
89formula350b2l is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2007, 12:32 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by 89formula350b2l View Post
I can tell you from my experience, the throttle body spacer doesnt help you at all....it will hurt you actually. I had one on my 383 and took it out i gained ab 10 rwhp and 10 rwtq....take it off and hopefully you have ur stock TB bolts... but i think it will be close....
i got it for free with the runners and the injectors. i thought i felt a difference with it on but i might have not. any guess what ill run?
chevy boi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2007, 01:17 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
5678TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 1,852
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: broken 385sbc
Transmission: G-Force rebuilt T-5
Axle/Gears: Currie 9" Ford 4.30:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

do you really need the 100 octane gas?? some have said that race gas slows them down.. and good luck launching those kumho 711's.. my stock s-10 cant even get traction with those.. then again, i think i got an old set and it has been another 4 years since i got them..


on the bottle you should rape him.. plain and simple.. N/A should be interesting..
__________________

1984 Trans Am
385sbc(RIP)/t-5/4.30-9"
1.69-7.44-11.65 @ 116
next up-->383 with mild upgrades
5678TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2007, 04:05 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bloomington Indiana
Posts: 1,827
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via Yahoo to 1991CamaroRslow
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

I don't see you getting traction worth a crap and those kuhmo tires really aren't drag tires. Also you have a bunch of timing for a 125 shot, and the 100 octane race gas always made my TPI car run like total crap. I would say set your timing back to 6 degrees, skip out on the race gas, and hope those tires grab you'll be more than gold on this one. If I were calling the race on the way things sit right now i would say it will be close or he'll edge you out.
1991CamaroRslow is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2007, 03:20 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

well im still tuneing the car for the nitrous. i was useing 100 oct so i whouldnt get dentation with the nitrous. and the guys in the power adder board said about 2* per 50hp on the nitrous so i didnt think go 10 wasnt to bad of a idea. the track we are going to uses VHT track Bite which i was hopeing will help out with the traction worse comes to worse i have a friend that will let me borrow his M/T ET streets

beside traction anything else i should worry about?
chevy boi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2007, 04:31 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,473
Car: 92 Camaro
Engine: HSR 385 Lloyd Elliot Cam AFR 195cc
Transmission: Performabuilt Level 2, 3400 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 373

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Send a message via Yahoo to 89formula350b2l
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

worry that he doesnt have any other mods...
and yes i agree NA it will be close but on the bottle....Game Over man!
89formula350b2l is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2007, 12:55 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
86firebird350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 331
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: none
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 86firebird350
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevy boi View Post
and the guys in the power adder board said about 2* per 50hp on the nitrous so i didnt think go 10 wasnt to bad of a idea.
i think they meant 2* retarded for every 50hp of nitrous.
__________________
86firebird350 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2007, 01:44 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Mikz86TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 860
Car: '86 Trans Am and '03 S-10
Engine: 355ci and 4.3l
Transmission: 700R4 and NV3500
Axle/Gears: 7.625/3.42 Auburn and 8.5/3.08 Gov-

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Is a Mk3 a last version rounded one? Those are heavy pigs! Could be close IMO. I had no issues with a boxy turbo model from 55mph start on the hwy once. The guy sh*t a brick and followed me to find out what I had done. He was embarresed to find it had no power adder. =)
Mikz86TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2007, 03:13 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

no the mk3 is a late 80s early 90s one. the one im racing is a 91. so should i run the timeing at 4-6 dgrees and just fill it up with 91?

o and i was talking to him today and he sliped out that hes increaseing the boost to 14psi so now im gonna use the 150 shot jets.
chevy boi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2007, 11:05 AM   #12
Supreme Member
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 15,641
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: Twin Turbo 401
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 2.73's

Classifieds Rating: (16)
Send a message via AIM to Orr89RocZ
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

i'd keep timing at 8 degrees and use 91 oct for n/a

on the bottle i'd keep timing at 4-5 degrees
Orr89RocZ is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2007, 05:05 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bloomington Indiana
Posts: 1,827
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via Yahoo to 1991CamaroRslow
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Make sure the EST is disconnected and set your base angle timing to 4 degrees. Run NGK TR6 plugs with a .035 gap and jet up to the 150 shot. If you decide to run the 100 octane just mix a little bit of it with the 91 octane gas. The timing you have now is REALLY high for any ammount of spray. Stock you can go to about a 125 shot, after that I recommend taking out 2 degrees and 2 degrees for every additional 50 hp worth. So you would have 2 degrees out (4 degrees, 6 is stock) for a 150 shot and 2 degrees for a 200 shot, 0 for a 250 shot; and that should be about the limit for what you're doing now.
1991CamaroRslow is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2007, 02:52 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

kool so i knocked the timming to 6* and i got me so freash plugs and installing them today. is there anything else i can do to the car to get a little more out of it?
chevy boi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2007, 03:27 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Toyota h8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: toledo
Posts: 558
Car: 1991 TRANS AM
Engine: L79-TPI(not a missprint)
Transmission: 700r4(3300 rpm stall)
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Toyota h8r Send a message via Yahoo to Toyota h8r
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Im going to be the first and say the supra will either be door to door or be a tick faster with the camaro running spray. the reason i say this is ive owned three of the mk3 supras, and with the work that car has done....they fly! I hate talking bad about camaros on a camaro site but ive been there.... done that.Ill never go back to them pos cars though, between the headgaskets blowing and transmissions blowing.....they were a nightmare.....not to mention wiring....nightmare in itsself.

So only way your gonna get em is your car has to be tip top and have a ton of traction as the supras i had were horrible from a launch.

All i can say is dont get to cocky and just race him.....
Toyota h8r is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2007, 11:44 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyota h8r View Post
Im going to be the first and say the supra will either be door to door or be a tick faster with the camaro running spray. the reason i say this is ive owned three of the mk3 supras, and with the work that car has done....they fly! I hate talking bad about camaros on a camaro site but ive been there.... done that.Ill never go back to them pos cars though, between the headgaskets blowing and transmissions blowing.....they were a nightmare.....not to mention wiring....nightmare in itsself.

So only way your gonna get em is your car has to be tip top and have a ton of traction as the supras i had were horrible from a launch.

All i can say is dont get to cocky and just race him.....
im not cocky about this race at all, im acctully worried about it. and yea i helped him do his head gasket. and i know first hand how hard it pulls when it gets into boost. i was just wondering how my camaro will hold up aganist it
chevy boi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2007, 11:53 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bloomington Indiana
Posts: 1,827
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via Yahoo to 1991CamaroRslow
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

ET Street radials and launch on the spray! You'll be so far out ahead in the first 300 feet you should be set for the rest of the 1/4.
1991CamaroRslow is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 01:50 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

ok so i got my buddys M/T and the track we are going to uses VHT so traction shouldnt be a problem. normally i just spray 2nd gear so if i spray off the line will i be able to keep traction. i know i can damm near launch at WOT with the tires im getting, but i never launched it on the bottle
chevy boi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 01:58 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Mikz86TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 860
Car: '86 Trans Am and '03 S-10
Engine: 355ci and 4.3l
Transmission: 700R4 and NV3500
Axle/Gears: 7.625/3.42 Auburn and 8.5/3.08 Gov-

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Oh. Then that is the same model/body style I ran. No problems
Mikz86TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 04:05 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bloomington Indiana
Posts: 1,827
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via Yahoo to 1991CamaroRslow
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

With MT ET Streets or ET Street Radials you should be able to spray pretty much dead out of the hole and hook hard. If they're basic MT ET Streets air them down to about 14psi, if they're ET radials try 18 to 20psi in them.
1991CamaroRslow is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 01:27 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
rockit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Middleburg Hts. OH
Posts: 785
Car: 85 T/A, 92 Rs
Engine: L98:D,L03:<
Transmission: 700r4x2
Axle/Gears: 3.23 bw, 2.73 10 bolt.

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

i worked at a dragstrip and spraying off the line with vht(which we used) is like saying you want a jigsaw puzzle instead of a transmision. i'd save the spray for second, 60 ft is our domain anyways. less you're built to take the spray your stock 20 yr old stuff won't hold up to a 50 percent increase in power plus the traction increase those tires would give you.. all that power is supposed to get you going but it goes through some very destructible parts before it gets to the ground.. i'd rather lose a race then lose my trans, it's embarresing, it pisses off the track crew(i've cleaned up quite a few blown diff's, driveshafts, i even have a peice of sluminum connecting rod i found after a chrysler blew, grrrr) and makes everyone else run slower from the lub you just blew all over the 60 ft mark. not to mention you'll kick yourself as you install your new, expensive parts. i'm not trying to be cocky about this, just telling you what i saw in three seasons of running the starting line/burnout box 5 nights a week. launching on the juice is haaaard.

i just had a thought,how can they rate nitrous for an hp amount? i can see a torque amount but as hp is rpm related, wont x amount of spray be worth differing amounts of hp at various rpms??
rockit is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 01:37 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto CANADA - GM Parts Rep.
Posts: 1,372
Car: 1987 Iroc Z28
Engine: The KING of the 3rd gen TPI's.
Transmission: Beefed up T5
Axle/Gears: Aussie 3.45's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

I've never seen an MK3 that impressed me performance wise.

Sure I think they look nice, but I bet his car is all show and no go.

I'd run him in a stock L98 for that matter.
freestylzz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 01:44 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
rockit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Middleburg Hts. OH
Posts: 785
Car: 85 T/A, 92 Rs
Engine: L98:D,L03:<
Transmission: 700r4x2
Axle/Gears: 3.23 bw, 2.73 10 bolt.

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

i have a slip at home, from last week. mk3 murdered me, he ran a 13.3 but his intercooler was the size of a coffee table. i liked the car, flat black, plain rims, no tint nothing, just a mean *** ugly street car.
rockit is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 02:32 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Toyota h8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: toledo
Posts: 558
Car: 1991 TRANS AM
Engine: L79-TPI(not a missprint)
Transmission: 700r4(3300 rpm stall)
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Toyota h8r Send a message via Yahoo to Toyota h8r
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by freestylzz View Post
I've never seen an MK3 that impressed me performance wise.

Sure I think they look nice, but I bet his car is all show and no go.

I'd run him in a stock L98 for that matter.
The mods listed tell me that car will fly, i know first hand that very cheap upgrades and they scoot.....hence my screen name though "toyota h8r", they are fast as hell, but get unreliable with more hp....unless you have a ton of money and do it right. Ive seen mk3's lay down 800hp and run fast.....but at how much $$$$$?

Dollar for dollar a f-body will walk a mk3
Toyota h8r is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 07:42 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bloomington Indiana
Posts: 1,827
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via Yahoo to 1991CamaroRslow
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

You're never going to get the full benefit from your car unless you're blasting that guy in first. If the track has VHT and you hook well that's great, don't be stuid and spray immediatly when you jump on the gas but don't wait until second if you're sitting on ET Streets. I've sprayed my stock unreal milleage car through 3 stock 700r4's and none of them exploded on the line they DID however wear out quick (at least I suppose they were all used). I finally built a TH350 for the thing. I will warn you to keep an eye on that rear end, I did have my welded rear drop the spider gears while cruising but that was mostly because we weakened them with the welding. The warning from rocit IS valid, be logical with the spray and if you're on street tires wait until second, if you get the ET streets I'de spary as soon as the motor isn't lugging anymore which on a TPI car isn't long at all, just keep the jetting low and everything should hold for a good while.
1991CamaroRslow is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2007, 08:10 PM   #26
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Sounds like a drivers race to me and whose gonna get traction or not. If he can keep that supra up on its power band, you better hope your 60ft is pretty good. If their is vht down you should hook fine. Id spray in first after 3 grand.
Always2Slow is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2007, 11:21 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

update

well he ran into some fuel cut problem and is going to be knocking the boost to 8 psi. but due to this my friend needs his MT's back so hes out 6 psi and im out my DR. it should be going down this wesday so ill post when its done
chevy boi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 08:48 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,473
Car: 92 Camaro
Engine: HSR 385 Lloyd Elliot Cam AFR 195cc
Transmission: Performabuilt Level 2, 3400 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 373

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Send a message via Yahoo to 89formula350b2l
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

id beg for those MT's!!
89formula350b2l is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 03:57 PM   #29
Junior Member
 
RookieTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Weeki Wachee, FL
Posts: 52
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: G92

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

So who won?
RookieTuner is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 12:22 AM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

we never got to race. he had to focus on his classes and the race kinda went on the back burner. on the up side tho i did get to track my car and was running 13.5-13.0 almost all night. i am in despreat need on some tires
chevy boi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 12:42 AM   #31
Member
 
travishenry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Elverta, California
Posts: 161
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Engine: TPI 350
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

youll eat it for lunch. Cuz its a camaro
travishenry is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 01:54 PM   #32
Senior Member
 
rockit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Middleburg Hts. OH
Posts: 785
Car: 85 T/A, 92 Rs
Engine: L98:D,L03:<
Transmission: 700r4x2
Axle/Gears: 3.23 bw, 2.73 10 bolt.

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

haha yep, some thirdgen camaro's came with a limited edition blessing by the pope that means they never lose. this couldn't be had with a manual trans or t-tops which were considered "un holy".
rockit is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 12:33 AM   #33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kirkland Washington
Posts: 661
Car: 84 Camaro. 90 integra
Engine: LG4, 1.6 (402hp)
Transmission: 700r4, JDM ITR w/ kaaz LSD

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikz86TA View Post
Is a Mk3 a last version rounded one? Those are heavy pigs! Could be close IMO. I had no issues with a boxy turbo model from 55mph start on the hwy once. The guy sh*t a brick and followed me to find out what I had done. He was embarresed to find it had no power adder. =)

the last version one... slow and heavy pigs huh....

1JZ-GTE Twin Turbo I6
280 hp 272 ft·lbf limted by the gentalmans act.

runs 13.1 @109mph.

japans version

320hp 315TQ

thier noted as one of japans supercars and considered and undestroyable motor in many minds
84RIceEater is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 11:27 PM   #34
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by 84RIceEater View Post
the last version one... slow and heavy pigs huh....

1JZ-GTE Twin Turbo I6
280 hp 272 ft·lbf limted by the gentalmans act.

runs 13.1 @109mph.

japans version

320hp 315TQ

thier noted as one of japans supercars and considered and undestroyable motor in many minds
strong motor yes. indestructible no. 3 of my friends own mk3s one of them has 3 to himself. and ALL OF THEM blew there head gaskets. 1 of them spun a bearing while under 27 psi ( he was racing a supercharged chevelle). not to mention all the little bs wiring and the expensive parts they use. of course these are 7m motors. i havent ran into a mk3 with a 1j in it yet but hell ill race it for shits and grins
chevy boi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 11:42 PM   #35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kirkland Washington
Posts: 661
Car: 84 Camaro. 90 integra
Engine: LG4, 1.6 (402hp)
Transmission: 700r4, JDM ITR w/ kaaz LSD

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevy boi View Post
strong motor yes. indestructible no. 3 of my friends own mk3s one of them has 3 to himself. and ALL OF THEM blew there head gaskets. 1 of them spun a bearing while under 27 psi ( he was racing a supercharged chevelle). not to mention all the little bs wiring and the expensive parts they use. of course these are 7m motors. i havent ran into a mk3 with a 1j in it yet but hell ill race it for shits and grins
naw i dont know that much about 7m motors, but i would i was refering to the 1j
84RIceEater is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 09:05 AM   #36
Senior Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,833
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

I think the indestructable thing is in reference to the bottom end of them. I also don't know about the 7m, but the 2jz motors are strong as ****. A stock bottom end that can support 1000 hp, now thats insane. I also think in this race scenario, 10 psi is laughable. Even 14 is, my guess is he will run more boost than that for the race. With a boost controller, why not just turn the wick up to win?
__________________
1989 Mustang LX 5.0: Stock Heads (valves), cam, Cobra intake. 3.73s.
Slicks ET: 12.56 MPH: 107.2 60':1.69
17" ET Streets ET: 12.53 MPH: 108.3 60': 1.69
17" DRs ET: 12.87 MPH: 111.5 60': 1.93
18" Radials ET: 12.95 MPH: 109.2 60': 1.91
25thmustang is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 02:45 PM   #37
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto CANADA - GM Parts Rep.
Posts: 1,372
Car: 1987 Iroc Z28
Engine: The KING of the 3rd gen TPI's.
Transmission: Beefed up T5
Axle/Gears: Aussie 3.45's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

My younger brother has a 2000 Toyota Tacoma 5 speed which he tranplanted a 1JZ (twin turbo) motor and wiring harness in it. It's no laughing matter.
freestylzz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 04:12 PM   #38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25thmustang View Post
I think the indestructable thing is in reference to the bottom end of them. I also don't know about the 7m, but the 2jz motors are strong as ****. A stock bottom end that can support 1000 hp, now thats insane. I also think in this race scenario, 10 psi is laughable. Even 14 is, my guess is he will run more boost than that for the race. With a boost controller, why not just turn the wick up to win?
well i know he cant because he has horrible fuel cut problems. he was running into this at 14.5 psi and dosent want risk going lean by buying a fuel cut defender.
chevy boi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2007, 09:55 AM   #39
Senior Member
 
rockit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Middleburg Hts. OH
Posts: 785
Car: 85 T/A, 92 Rs
Engine: L98:D,L03:<
Transmission: 700r4x2
Axle/Gears: 3.23 bw, 2.73 10 bolt.

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

wait the mk3 is the round one? yea the engine has potential but they ARE heavy by jap standards, all their super cars are, the 3000gt MR, the r34 GTR and the supra they're all 3 liter cars (except the gtr it' only a 2.6) but they weigh like our cars do. they are on par with our cars weight wise but way ahead in technology and behind in literage. however 330 hp out of a stock 2.6 liter is damn sexy, skyline's just have that skyline sound too.

goes to show how crappy our head technology is, 2 valves just don't cut it these days. the skyline's torque curve puts tpi to shame as well, with peak torque being reached in roughly the first 20% of the rev range. The ls1 is a joke next to an RB26.
rockit is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2007, 02:50 PM   #40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockit View Post
wait the mk3 is the round one? yea the engine has potential but they ARE heavy by jap standards, all their super cars are, the 3000gt MR, the r34 GTR and the supra they're all 3 liter cars (except the gtr it' only a 2.6) but they weigh like our cars do. they are on par with our cars weight wise but way ahead in technology and behind in literage. however 330 hp out of a stock 2.6 liter is damn sexy, skyline's just have that skyline sound too.

goes to show how crappy our head technology is, 2 valves just don't cut it these days. the skyline's torque curve puts tpi to shame as well, with peak torque being reached in roughly the first 20% of the rev range. The ls1 is a joke next to an RB26.
nope the mk3 isn't the jelly bean looking one. its the one that kinda looks like a ford probe.
chevy boi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2007, 08:27 PM   #41
Senior Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,833
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevy boi View Post
nope the mk3 isn't the jelly bean looking one. its the one that kinda looks like a ford probe.
The MKIV's are one of the sexiest cars ever made. When done right, with the right stance, wheels, tires, paint etc... they look down right gorgeous!
__________________
1989 Mustang LX 5.0: Stock Heads (valves), cam, Cobra intake. 3.73s.
Slicks ET: 12.56 MPH: 107.2 60':1.69
17" ET Streets ET: 12.53 MPH: 108.3 60': 1.69
17" DRs ET: 12.87 MPH: 111.5 60': 1.93
18" Radials ET: 12.95 MPH: 109.2 60': 1.91
25thmustang is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2007, 09:52 PM   #42
Senior Member
 
5678TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 1,852
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: broken 385sbc
Transmission: G-Force rebuilt T-5
Axle/Gears: Currie 9" Ford 4.30:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25thmustang View Post
When done right, with the right stance, wheels, tires, paint etc... they look down right gorgeous!
that usually goes for every car
__________________

1984 Trans Am
385sbc(RIP)/t-5/4.30-9"
1.69-7.44-11.65 @ 116
next up-->383 with mild upgrades
5678TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2007, 10:03 PM   #43
Senior Member
 
5678TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 1,852
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: broken 385sbc
Transmission: G-Force rebuilt T-5
Axle/Gears: Currie 9" Ford 4.30:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockit View Post
2 valves just don't cut it these days. The ls1 is a joke next to an RB26.
i'm pretty sure chevrolet is getting it done with 2 valves per cylinder.. 505hp N/A in a production car.. people have gone 8's N/A with 2 valves per cylinder.. also, the ls1 has gone 8's N/A.. i doubt it is a joke next to an rb26.. what american cars lack in technology, is made up with displacement.. now days, it doesnt matter how many cylinders you have, how much displacement, etc.. if you show up to the race, what you have is fair game..
5678TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2007, 12:53 AM   #44
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kirkland Washington
Posts: 661
Car: 84 Camaro. 90 integra
Engine: LG4, 1.6 (402hp)
Transmission: 700r4, JDM ITR w/ kaaz LSD

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockit View Post
wait the mk3 is the round one? yea the engine has potential but they ARE heavy by jap standards, all their super cars are, the 3000gt MR, the r34 GTR and the supra they're all 3 liter cars (except the gtr it' only a 2.6) but they weigh like our cars do. they are on par with our cars weight wise but way ahead in technology and behind in literage. however 330 hp out of a stock 2.6 liter is damn sexy, skyline's just have that skyline sound too.

goes to show how crappy our head technology is, 2 valves just don't cut it these days. the skyline's torque curve puts tpi to shame as well, with peak torque being reached in roughly the first 20% of the rev range. The ls1 is a joke next to an RB26.

84RIceEater is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2007, 02:20 AM   #45
Senior Member
 
rockit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Middleburg Hts. OH
Posts: 785
Car: 85 T/A, 92 Rs
Engine: L98:D,L03:<
Transmission: 700r4x2
Axle/Gears: 3.23 bw, 2.73 10 bolt.

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

they do with 2.6 liters what chevy does with 6, who hoo for chevy.

do you want me to bring up the skyline's specs?? how bout a z tune or s tune compared to a z06? I'll compare an out of production 2000 ish skyline with a 2008 corvette any day of the week.

yea two valves can be awesome, but on the street, where gas mileage, and the ease of moddability, and the flexibility of an engine to get you around day to day and get you to the win on the spur of a moment, that's where new age heads are nice.. you know?

Skyline weighs as much as an f body, has more accelerating traction then a vette or an evo, has a better torque/powercurve then any of those listed above, it's bane is front tire wear and understeer, and i'd bet it's still better in those respects then an overwhelming percentage of world sports cars.
rockit is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2007, 03:31 AM   #46
Supreme Member
 
kairles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,307
Car: 90 Formula
Engine: Procharged LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via Yahoo to kairles
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

wow you must read alot. sorry but a skyline is not all that. how is the skyline or any other "supercar" ahead in technology? and as far as torque curves go, its a turbo car.
kairles is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2007, 04:24 AM   #47
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 3,355
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via AIM to InfernalVortex
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Before you start knocking high displacement pushrod V8s...

We dont have to waste crankshaft energy turning 3 too many cams, so we have a lot less drag on the motor and we actually get much better gas mileage per hp. It's called Brake Specific Fuel Consumption.

These super-tuned Ferrari V8s get worse mileage than LS1s and they're half the displacement. It's weird to think about a pushrod V8 getting good gas mileage, but in the big picture, it aint half bad...

InfernalVortex is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2007, 05:28 PM   #48
Senior Member
 
Toyota h8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: toledo
Posts: 558
Car: 1991 TRANS AM
Engine: L79-TPI(not a missprint)
Transmission: 700r4(3300 rpm stall)
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Toyota h8r Send a message via Yahoo to Toyota h8r
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockit View Post
they do with 2.6 liters what chevy does with 6, who hoo for chevy.

do you want me to bring up the skyline's specs?? how bout a z tune or s tune compared to a z06? I'll compare an out of production 2000 ish skyline with a 2008 corvette any day of the week.

yea two valves can be awesome, but on the street, where gas mileage, and the ease of moddability, and the flexibility of an engine to get you around day to day and get you to the win on the spur of a moment, that's where new age heads are nice.. you know?

Skyline weighs as much as an f body, has more accelerating traction then a vette or an evo, has a better torque/powercurve then any of those listed above, it's bane is front tire wear and understeer, and i'd bet it's still better in those respects then an overwhelming percentage of world sports cars.
Okay run a 08 Z06 vs a r34 skyline stock for stock and tell me who wins......

also, i have owned 3 different mk3 supras,
(2) 7mgte(3.0L turbo) , (1) 1jzgte(2.5L turbo)
They can be fast but dollar for dollar spent my 85 trans am has been faster.

My 89 targa 1jzgte(yes it was a swap as the true 2.5T cars are not legal in us)





My hardtop 87 7mgte car(motor was out in this picture)




My hardtop 86.5 7mgte
__________________
--1991 trans am--SOLD
--1989 formula--bought for parts and junked
--1985 TRANS AM--JUNKED
--1983 firebird--RUSTED OUT
one day ill own a camaro and keep it.......i dont like firebirds lol
Toyota h8r is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2007, 08:33 PM   #49
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kirkland Washington
Posts: 661
Car: 84 Camaro. 90 integra
Engine: LG4, 1.6 (402hp)
Transmission: 700r4, JDM ITR w/ kaaz LSD

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyota h8r View Post
Okay run a 08 Z06 vs a r34 skyline stock for stock and tell me who wins......]

run in what? stright line, road corurse? from a roll? also its a 8 year difference... look at the new model skyline... faster(in every thing) than a z06 and cheaper..

Last edited by 84RIceEater; 12-11-2007 at 09:45 PM.
84RIceEater is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2007, 10:34 PM   #50
Junior Member
 
406z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 68
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 406
Transmission: 350th
Axle/Gears: 373:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Iroc-z vs Mk3 supra

On topic: Here is what I got from wiki "The 7M-GTE MA71 is capable of propelling itself 0-60 mph in 6.2 seconds with a dismal 6.8 psi of boost. It reached the 1/4 mile in 14.7 seconds at a speed of 95 mph (153 km/h). Its top speed is 156 mph (251 km/h). Due to an extremely restrictive exhaust, the 7M responds very well to exhaust modifications"

It's a drivers race(period). If he is having tuning problems, you may walk him if he cannot work out his fuel and boost issues.
*********************
Quote:
Originally Posted by 84RIceEater View Post
run in what? stright line, road corurse? from a roll? also its a 8 year difference... look at the new model skyline... faster than a z06 and cheaper..
First, the GTR is not exactly a great deal cheaper. It is competitivly priced at 70k.

Second, yes it does run seven seconds faster than the time posted by an 05 zo6 around the ring, but....that is an 05!

Third, other than super tuner versions or etc, the GTR has laid its gauntlet down. It's accepted that what we have seen out of the GTR is what we will get.

The last two points are key. Yes the GTR is fast, but what about that 09 corvette?

We know the base model is receiving an exhaust upgrade this model year, but the z06 will remain unchanged.

Even more importantly what about any 2009 high performance model?

GM like usual is holding their cards close and hedging their bets. Nissan has ran its press, but all we have on the newer corvette zr1 is http://jalopnik.com/cars/detroit-aut...ble-326717.php .

So we have an engine pic with a guess at specifications, and a video. One can also find the laguna seca video, but it is just as ambiguos.

There are a thousand rumors as to what exactly the zo6 or zr1 will be like. Soem say they will use magnetic shock technology like Ferarri. The bottom line is no one, but the makers of the zr1 and new z06 know how it will perform. If the new corvette is going to kill hyper cars than I have no fear of a petty 350zish skyline.
*****************************************
406z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2007, 10:34 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing

Tags
1990, 2007, 57, 87, average, camaro, exhaust, horsepower, iroc, kit, ls7, make, mk3, mustang, price, supra, turbo, z28
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details