Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-21-2008, 02:48 PM   #51
Supreme Member
 
v10viper04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 1,696
Car: 89' IROC , 84' Corvette,96' Caprice
Engine: Vortec 357, LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23 POSI , 3.08 POSI, 2.93 Open

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

you can have your SHOs they are nothing special... i would take a Camaro or firebird over a taurus anyday. even if they are slower.
v10viper04 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 09:12 PM   #52
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 1,459
Car: 92 trans am clone
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (6)
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

id take any gm except the geo part over a sho anyday too.
vipershark11 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 09:27 PM   #53
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

camaro's are fun but you cant carry any passengers comfortably, with the SHO you can carry them comfortably and quickly
92SHO is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 09:56 PM   #54
Supreme Member
 
v10viper04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 1,696
Car: 89' IROC , 84' Corvette,96' Caprice
Engine: Vortec 357, LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23 POSI , 3.08 POSI, 2.93 Open

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 92SHO View Post
camaro's are fun but you cant carry any passengers comfortably, with the SHO you can carry them comfortably and quickly
no offense but i know as a fact that when a car gets loaded up they become dogs... and i never was uncomfortable in my car even in the back seat. basically personal preference.
v10viper04 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 10:04 AM   #55
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

, for the driver its comfy thats about it unless your a lil kid
92SHO is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 03:38 PM   #56
Supreme Member
 
v10viper04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 1,696
Car: 89' IROC , 84' Corvette,96' Caprice
Engine: Vortec 357, LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23 POSI , 3.08 POSI, 2.93 Open

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

that comparing apples to oranges... its like saying my caprice is comfy but my camaro isn't.. i think the camaro is not bad for the size....
v10viper04 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 07:03 AM   #57
Senior Member
 
86firebird350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 331
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: none
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 86firebird350
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 92SHO View Post
camaro's are fun but you cant carry any passengers comfortably
thats not true...you can carry ONE passenger comfortably
__________________
86firebird350 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 11:31 AM   #58
Supreme Member
 
v10viper04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 1,696
Car: 89' IROC , 84' Corvette,96' Caprice
Engine: Vortec 357, LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23 POSI , 3.08 POSI, 2.93 Open

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

lol yea thats true, i don't find it uncomfortable but other ppl do lol o well i'm the driver so too bad! ha ha ha
v10viper04 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2008, 10:36 PM   #59
Senior Member
 
chaoz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pueblo CO,
Posts: 258
Car: 87 formula/69 beetle
Engine: 355/2.1
Transmission: T.C.I streetfighter th350/5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 lsd/

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

hmm. 3.4 v8???? in a sho... last time i was under the hood of the last gen sho it had a 4.6 from a mustang but some stupid plenum ive never seen befor.. this could have been a swapped car but i dont know why anyone would spend the money,,, other than that all i have seen is the super high output v6 WITCH IS A YAMMAHA NOT SUZUKI.. but they have to retarded high compression stock to run boost without hurting internals... anyway they arent slow i know sho's are ford stupid sleeper
----------
err looked it up and now humbly take the foot out of my mouth. sho v8s are tiny lil things... that 4.6 was rwd as i remeber it wasnt stock for sure...... still dont understand why someone would swap a stang engine into a taurus.... why not get a stang?

Last edited by chaoz28; 05-24-2008 at 10:40 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
chaoz28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2008, 01:19 PM   #60
Supreme Member
 
v10viper04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 1,696
Car: 89' IROC , 84' Corvette,96' Caprice
Engine: Vortec 357, LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23 POSI , 3.08 POSI, 2.93 Open

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chaoz28 View Post
hmm. 3.4 v8???? in a sho... last time i was under the hood of the last gen sho it had a 4.6 from a mustang but some stupid plenum ive never seen befor.. this could have been a swapped car but i dont know why anyone would spend the money,,, other than that all i have seen is the super high output v6 WITCH IS A YAMMAHA NOT SUZUKI.. but they have to retarded high compression stock to run boost without hurting internals... anyway they arent slow i know sho's are ford stupid sleeper
----------
err looked it up and now humbly take the foot out of my mouth. sho v8s are tiny lil things... that 4.6 was rwd as i remeber it wasnt stock for sure...... still dont understand why someone would swap a stang engine into a taurus.... why not get a stang?
I don't honestly believe they are that fast. Cars now a days can beat a modded SHO stock.
v10viper04 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2008, 01:19 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing

Tags
4l60e, 9c1, sluggish
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details