04-28-2008, 08:38 PM
#1 Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hudson
Posts: 74
Car: 92' RS 25Th Anniversary
Engine: 305ci TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip.
'92 rs vs 92 stang GT
LB9, 700R4, 3.23's Vs 302w/ ebelbrock 600cfm, T5, 3.73's whos your money on??????
04-28-2008, 08:49 PM
#2 Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 201
Car: 85 Firebird(s)
Engine: Custom 383
Transmission: Built 700R4
Axle/Gears: Built 3.73 w/locker
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Sorry kiddo, I gotta go with the GT
04-28-2008, 09:40 PM
#3 Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Western PA
Posts: 846
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350 TPI (swap)
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
GT wins. Youd need a L98 car to give it a run.
04-28-2008, 10:15 PM
#4 Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 1,791
Car: 98 ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
04-29-2008, 04:19 PM
#5 Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Yeah, definitely the GT. Is your car an LB9 or L03? Your info on the left says is a 305 TBI, which makes sense for it being an RS. Did you swap in then 305 TPI motor? Either way, money is on the GT, but you'll get absolutely obliterated if you're still 305 TBI.
04-30-2008, 10:56 PM
#6 Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hudson
Posts: 74
Car: 92' RS 25Th Anniversary
Engine: 305ci TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip.
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
my car is an LO3, The qeustion was theoretical between a buddy and myself we both already figured He would take me if I was t o swap to an LB9 but We anted 2nd opinions
05-08-2008, 07:28 AM
#7 Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,833
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Mustang... whether LB9 or L03.
__________________ 1989 Mustang LX 5.0: Stock Heads (valves), cam, Cobra intake. 3.73s. Slicks ET: 12.56 MPH: 107.2 60':1.69 17" ET Streets ET: 12.53 MPH: 108.3 60': 1.69 17" DRs ET: 12.87 MPH: 111.5 60': 1.93 18" Radials ET: 12.95 MPH: 109.2 60': 1.91
05-13-2008, 02:33 PM
#8 Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: ny
Posts: 197
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73(coming soon)
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
my stock formy seems faster than my 88 gt (both autos)...soo..if its a 5sp deff
__________________
TPI LB9
10 Bolt Posi
Header's(june14)
TCI Breakaway 2400 stall(july14)
tranny cooler Hankook
89 Formula WS6
05-13-2008, 10:58 PM
#9 Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orland Park,IL
Posts: 570
Car: Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z,96 Vette
Engine: 350 5.7 Liter
Transmission: 700r
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
__________________
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3001567
1/4 Mile- 14.3 at 94 mph. Full exhaust, 373 rear gears. Custom ram air *OLD*
New Parts. 350 Cubic inch, stealth ram intake, patriot heads, Comp 503 Cam, 1.6 Rockers, High output fuel pump. Project 12's car
05-13-2008, 11:44 PM
#10 Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bloomington Indiana
Posts: 1,827
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
To many variables, he has you on a good tune. His car on paper destroys yours by at least a full second but hey some people don't know what the screws on the carb are for and some people can't shift.
05-14-2008, 06:49 PM
#11 Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,833
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
billybird my stock formy seems faster than my 88 gt (both autos)...soo..if its a 5sp deff
Might be, my stocker went low 15s @ low 90 mph as an auto. Same motor went 13.0 @ 103 with a few bolt ons, 5-speed and tires.
__________________ 1989 Mustang LX 5.0: Stock Heads (valves), cam, Cobra intake. 3.73s. Slicks ET: 12.56 MPH: 107.2 60':1.69 17" ET Streets ET: 12.53 MPH: 108.3 60': 1.69 17" DRs ET: 12.87 MPH: 111.5 60': 1.93 18" Radials ET: 12.95 MPH: 109.2 60': 1.91
05-14-2008, 06:52 PM
#12 Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: ny
Posts: 197
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73(coming soon)
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
25thmustang Might be, my stocker went low 15s @ low 90 mph as an auto. Same motor went 13.0 @ 103 with a few bolt ons, 5-speed and tires.
lol...thats about the formy runs lol
__________________
TPI LB9
10 Bolt Posi
Header's(june14)
TCI Breakaway 2400 stall(july14)
tranny cooler Hankook
89 Formula WS6
06-23-2008, 09:03 PM
#13 Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hudson
Posts: 74
Car: 92' RS 25Th Anniversary
Engine: 305ci TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip.
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
06-23-2008, 09:06 PM
#14 Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ganiesville GA
Posts: 1,464
Car: 1992 z28/1992 RS heritage edition
Engine: 350 tpi, 305 tbi
Transmission: 700R4,T5
Axle/Gears: G92
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
he had the weight reduction mod. half a back bumper
06-23-2008, 09:10 PM
#15 Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hudson
Posts: 74
Car: 92' RS 25Th Anniversary
Engine: 305ci TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip.
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
behind every sh7t eating grin, there's a sh7t eating
!!!!!!
06-23-2008, 10:19 PM
#16 Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
good job beating that ugly pos rustang the only reason why there fast because they have a lower first gear better efi set up and weight a lil bit less but change the tpi intake and rear gears and put a t56 in and gameover
06-25-2008, 04:37 AM
#17 Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 466
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: L98 with headers/exhaust
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10-bolt
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
25thmustang Might be, my stocker went low 15s @ low 90 mph as an auto. Same motor went 13.0 @ 103 with a few bolt ons, 5-speed and tires.
Don't laugh, but my stock 1989 GT M5 went 15.003 when I picked it up with 70K-ish miles. After just doing "the tune", it went 14.6x and eventually was running 12s on a mild H/C/I before I sold it.
06-25-2008, 11:26 PM
#18 Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bloomington Indiana
Posts: 1,827
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
LOL that's priceless, he must've fell into the group I mentioned earlier.
06-27-2008, 12:14 PM
#19 Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYTHIRDGEN
Posts: 1,088
Car: 1989 T/A
Engine: PROCHARGED LB9
Transmission: FB BUILT 700r4 2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 BOLT EATON 3:73 POSI
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jeepboy180
wow, i think this is the first time, ive ever seen proof of a race on here..
GREAT JOB!!! anyone notice how ugly the rustang looked compared to a nice thirdgen.
06-28-2008, 01:35 AM
#20 Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Augusta, Ga
Posts: 2,213
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355ci L98 soon to be turbo'd
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
wow, thats pretty cool... I think both cars looked pretty good. Good ol' old school race...
07-02-2008, 10:10 PM
#21 Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,833
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Congrats on the win... can't knock a video with proof. Those auto Mustangs suck, ask me how I know
.
__________________ 1989 Mustang LX 5.0: Stock Heads (valves), cam, Cobra intake. 3.73s. Slicks ET: 12.56 MPH: 107.2 60':1.69 17" ET Streets ET: 12.53 MPH: 108.3 60': 1.69 17" DRs ET: 12.87 MPH: 111.5 60': 1.93 18" Radials ET: 12.95 MPH: 109.2 60': 1.91
07-02-2008, 10:10 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro
Paid Advertisement
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off