Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-09-2009, 11:53 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 31

Classifieds Rating: (0)
'86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

Hey
My cousin has a 02 monte carlo ss with the 3.8 L v6. if i remember right it's factory super charged. i have my 86 IROC with a 305 and 4L60 tranni i haven't Dyno'd it yet but i'm guessing high 100-low 200 hp with intake and exhaust mods or it feels like it anyway. So my cousin and i were BSin' at lunch and we're trying to figure out who's faster. i just got busted for speeding and i'm slowin way down.(got a warning) so a race is out of the question. thanks for your help.
1991firebirdman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2009, 08:34 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: southcentral PA
Posts: 71
Car: 97 Taurus SHO
Engine: 3.4 liter V8
Transmission: AX4N

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

Monte SSs were only supercharged in 04-05. It's an N/A 3.8.
__________________
'97 SHO, Yamaha V8 powered, Slow as hell
two60two is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2009, 08:39 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to Saigon_Bob Send a message via MSN to Saigon_Bob Send a message via Yahoo to Saigon_Bob
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

either way its really slow
__________________
-Alex
"It's a Chevy... If it ain't smokin, you're walkin." -----------
My Cardomain site

Engine:.040 overbore, Hugger Orange Paint Mod(lol), Moroso Deep Sump 7 qt oil pan w/ crank scraper and windage tray, 2 piece timing cover
Tranny:Factory T5 grenade ( pin pulled )
Ignition:MSD Pro-Billet
Air/Fuel:Dual Plane Manifold, Proform Carb, Holley Systemaxx II heads, Cam motion custom grind (224, 234 duration) cam
Headers:Hooker supercomp 1 3/4"
Exhaust:custom 2.5in true dual exhaust, Flowmaster 40s, 3" Tips
Exterior Styling:Stock, cowl hood
Suspension:Eibach Sportline lowering springs
A/V:Pioneer AVIC-N3 DVD/Navi
Misc:hidden starter switch
Saigon_Bob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2009, 10:53 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 4,258
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saigon_Bob View Post
either way its really slow
His Iroc isn't any better...
fly89gta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2009, 11:17 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: southcentral PA
Posts: 71
Car: 97 Taurus SHO
Engine: 3.4 liter V8
Transmission: AX4N

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

I'd say if he runs a 16 give or take a tenth or two they're about on par with each other. Probably be a close race pending condition of both cars. Butt dynos don't count.
__________________
'97 SHO, Yamaha V8 powered, Slow as hell
two60two is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2009, 12:02 AM   #6
Supreme Member
 
UnderCover89TBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 6,079
Car: 89 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: TBI
Transmission: 700R4 w/ Vigilante Stall Converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Send a message via Yahoo to UnderCover89TBI
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

prolly closer, monte might have the edge.
UnderCover89TBI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2009, 12:14 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 31

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

thanks
ya found out he didnt have a s/c after i looked @ it after school he didn't know what he was talkin about. Ya i know my Iroc is pretty pathetic for a v8. But around here anything half fast that can lay rubber with the REAR tires is "cool". The Iroc was TPI but the moron who had it before me hacked everything to H*&L.(ie. "lets put water in the radiator in december." its cold were i live). i really want to womp him so ill just keep savin my pennies for that 355 vortec i've had my eye on
1991firebirdman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2009, 04:31 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
vette9190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Park Forest,Il
Posts: 325
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4,
Axle/Gears: 3.73 w/SLP Zexel Torsen Limited Sli

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to vette9190 Send a message via Yahoo to vette9190
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

Smoked my buddies 01 Monte ss In my RS when all i had was an ignition and underdrive pulleys on it. In fact both of his Monte ss's ran near identical times at the track 87 ss and 01 ss I smoked both but were def different his 87 got the jjump on me by a half car( they came with 3.73 posi's from the factory)then I pulled right on by by about a car. the 01 I jumps by a car and opened up to about 2 cars.
__________________
91 RS 350 TPI, S_AUJPv4 chip, 24lbs, Ported L98 heads & intake, Accel 300+ ign., LT1 cam, BBK AFPR, Edelbrock true trak timing set, B&M trans cooler, vette servo, 2200 stall, March pulleys, Edelbrock TES into 3 in Catco cat in to Dynomax catback. 3.73 w/ SLP Zexel Limited Slip, UMI LCA's, SFC's, Coming soon Ported SLP runners and 1.6rr's
vette9190 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2009, 07:35 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 31

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

yeah we kinda raced after i got off work after a girls b-ball game. him and his woman passed me and she was yellin and doin that rock-on hand signal. so i desided i show him "real chevy power" shifted down and whooped him. he later came and said he wasnt really racing but i know he was. Camaro 1- Monte 0
1991firebirdman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2009, 07:51 PM   #10
Member
 
NemeSS-TyranT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 481
Car: GTA
Engine: 4.8 VORTEC
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

lol
NemeSS-TyranT is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2009, 09:44 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
89rs454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 378
Car: 1989 RS
Engine: Stock LT1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

Did you do the rock-on hand signal after you dusted his A**?
__________________
89rs454 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 11:53 AM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 31

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

ya now he says were gonna have a real race in April on "Speed Road" From a stop and 3-2-1 Go then we take off kinda race. who would win that race? i think i will because the 'maro launches pretty good better than his Monte anyway. What do you guys think?
thanks again
1991firebirdman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 08:59 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 33
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 350
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 auburn limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to RussianVolk
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

My buddy stayed up fender to fender with monte ss in his 4.3 jimmy. I was in the car, and both of us were very surprised.
RussianVolk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 09:52 PM   #14
Member
 
Paragus77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chaparral, NM
Posts: 140
Car: 1982 Z/28
Engine: Crossfire
Transmission: th700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 (G92)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

*sigh* from a reardrive v8 to a front drive v6, what was GM thinking? Thank the automotive gods they didn't do that to the F-Bodies...
Paragus77 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 12:18 PM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 31

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

i know what you mean FWD sucks. i drove the car on Sunday and it wasn't anything to get excited about. it was just like drivin a 2 door impala My camaro gets loads more looks down the highway then his monte does any way.
1991firebirdman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 08:46 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 29

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

own 2003 monte ss and would bet it would be closer than u think
edlisaj is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 11:40 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
d00012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Arlington, Washington St.
Posts: 537
Car: 87 Camaro -- 88 GTA
Engine: 2.8 MPFI -- 5.7 TPI
Transmission: T5 -- 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 -- 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to d00012
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

Quote:
Originally Posted by edlisaj View Post
own 2003 monte ss and would bet it would be closer than u think
I would have to agree with edlisaj, my dad has a 99 Grand Prix GT, and with some simple performance mods, it's faster than the stock GTP. But if the monte carlo is all stock, it will be a little sluggish.
__________________

Current Project(s)
--1987 Camaro Sport Coupe - Can't decide on LSx or turbo'd 3.4 for DD
--1988 Trans Am GTA - New addition! Soon to be vortec headed with FIRST intake, LTs, and LT4 hot cam.
d00012 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 01:51 AM   #18
Member
 
IROCKET4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 167
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: 5.7 litre
Transmission: Auto--700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Posi with 4 wheel disc brakes

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paragus77 View Post
*sigh* from a reardrive v8 to a front drive v6, what was GM thinking? Thank the automotive gods they didn't do that to the F-Bodies...
You dont know how close that nightmare was. The 3rd gen was originally supposed to be released in 1980 with front wheel drive but luckily they went back to the drawing board, made some changes and by 1982 had rear wheel drive back in the car.
IROCKET4U is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 11:36 PM   #19
Member
 
Paragus77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chaparral, NM
Posts: 140
Car: 1982 Z/28
Engine: Crossfire
Transmission: th700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 (G92)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

They better, I wouldn't be proud about driving a Chevrolet Probe around, lol.
Paragus77 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 09:20 AM   #20
Junior Member
 
Burgundy Bomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Western Ky
Posts: 62
Car: 84 Z-28, 01.5 Cummins 3500, 98 Ford
Engine: mild 355, built Turbo Diesel
Transmission: th-350
Axle/Gears: soon to be broken, 3.55's in diesel

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: '86 IROC vs 02 Monte Carlo SS

something to keep in mind is that every factory car, built side to side is different....

btw, if you only got a shift kit and a slap stick you would have a world of advantage.... super super cheap mods.
__________________
84 Camaro Z-28, th-350 trans, posi, 4 bolt, not a stock motor, trac bars, edelbrock top to bottom, headers, 3in cowl, spare parts 84 so with a much milder 355 and 700-r4 (WANTED 2 buy or trade- taco bell dinner, wheels, high rise intake, and chevy 12 bolt, or 8.5in, 270-213-0199)
Burgundy Bomber is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 09:20 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing

Tags
02, 1989, 2003, 700r4, carlo, carlos, chip, iroc, irocs, monte, put, sluggish, ss, swap, t5
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details