Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2009, 02:25 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Caney TX
Posts: 38
Car: 1988 Iroc Z
Engine: TPI 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: mini spooled 10 bolt 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

I was wondering who will win I have never got the chance to race a S2000 while in my Iroc. I have raced one stop light to light while in my pos sohc Del Sol and the S2000 only won by a car length.
__________________
B.lane 88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 03:47 PM   #2
Member
 
IROCKET4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 167
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: 5.7 litre
Transmission: Auto--700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Posi with 4 wheel disc brakes

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

I dont know much about their performance but I do know they put out 240 hp and weigh 2800 lbs. 1988 IROC 5.0 TPI put out 220 HP and weighed 3200 lbs.
I think gearing (I see you have 3.73 gears) and traction will determine the winner--should be close though.
IROCKET4U is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 04:20 PM   #3
Moderator
 
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 4,699
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: H/C/I L98
Transmission: Modified 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to IROCThe5.7L
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

Your best bet is a stop light race. You'll most likely get pulled on racing from a roll. I've read many times they lack torque big time and are difficult to launch.
__________________
1988 IROC-Z / 2007 R6 (Full exhaust | PCV | Flush Mounts |Tinted Windscreen | Fender Eliminator | Frame Sliders)

L98 with a little AFR, and a bit of comp cam (316 rwhp). - [Idle Clip]
IROCThe5.7L is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 04:39 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
intex1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: anderson ,sc
Posts: 795
Car: 89 formula
Engine: carbed 350
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via Yahoo to intex1982
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

you will lose that race stop or roll.....
intex1982 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 05:38 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 240
Car: 89 Formy
Engine: carbed 355ci
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

hed prolli win..but i dont think by alot at all..i think it will tight..mucho if the guy cant drive
__________________

89' W66 Formula 355ci
Cammed,Stalled,Geared
RedHawkLB9 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 05:43 PM   #6
Moderator
 
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 4,699
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: H/C/I L98
Transmission: Modified 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to IROCThe5.7L
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

I think if it's a light to light race, and he launches well, he will do ok. Of course the longer you go, the more he's going to catch up.
__________________
1988 IROC-Z / 2007 R6 (Full exhaust | PCV | Flush Mounts |Tinted Windscreen | Fender Eliminator | Frame Sliders)

L98 with a little AFR, and a bit of comp cam (316 rwhp). - [Idle Clip]
IROCThe5.7L is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 06:23 PM   #7
Member
 
T/Atime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 310
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

Quote:
Originally Posted by IROCThe5.7L View Post
I think if it's a light to light race, and he launches well, he will do ok. Of course the longer you go, the more he's going to catch up.

These to cars are so different in many ways. It would take and experienced S2000 driver to make that little car leave hard with out burning the tires. It would be a balancing act to say the least. And if he were to leave at a relaxed 3000rpms that would not be enough to pull on the Camaro from a dig. It all depends on the driver of the honda. Your job is easy, just point and shoot. I would say it would be an awsome race with two cars that should be low 15s-high 14s. If the S2000 can drive he might have a bit of an edge. But with slicks the S2000 is a solid 14.0s.
T/Atime is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 06:30 PM   #8
Supreme Member
 
SiCkRs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Norwalk, CA
Posts: 2,033
Car: 91 RS &91Z28
Engine: 305tbi &305 tpi
Transmission: 700r4 2500TCI stall &700r4 stock
Axle/Gears: 2.73 &3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

I raced a v6 mustang with a m90 supercharger and exhaust and headers with my 350 tpi iroc and i lost by 2 lentghs and that made me feel bad so now i am saving for a LT1
SiCkRs is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 12:30 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
chaoz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pueblo CO,
Posts: 258
Car: 87 formula/69 beetle
Engine: 355/2.1
Transmission: T.C.I streetfighter th350/5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 lsd/

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

Quote:
Originally Posted by JR350tpi View Post
I raced a v6 mustang with a m90 supercharger and exhaust and headers with my 350 tpi iroc and i lost by 2 lentghs and that made me feel bad so now i am saving for a LT1

am i the only one who thinks this came from way out in space somewhere???

anyway i agree it should be a very close race... but if he has anything as far as mods even a cat back exhaust.. say good bye bolt on mods make s2k more power than you would imagin.. one here with header high flow cat and hks power exhaust runs 13.7 on falkens at out track every weekend
__________________
87 formula 355 speed pro flat tops xe268h procomp 64cc heads hooker headers, true dual exhaust t.c.i. th350 alum. driveshaft 2200 B&M stall 3.73 lsd 750 demon carb holley contender manifold full msd ignition. steel 1.6 full rollers. 69 bug low 12's on motor 11.4 best with spray
chaoz28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 10:38 AM   #10
Supreme Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 4,258
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

Quote:
Originally Posted by IROCThe5.7L View Post
I think if it's a light to light race, and he launches well, he will do ok. Of course the longer you go, the more he's going to catch up.
Yup. No low-end torque and most S2000 owners are afraid to launch the car the way it needs to be launched.

A full 1/4 mile race would smack down the Iroc.
fly89gta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 10:48 AM   #11
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 152
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

no offense but the S2k would win
tyler92 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 11:59 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
camaro1185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 508
Car: 1988 Iroc
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: Auto (T56 being re-built)
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

Quote:
Originally Posted by fly89gta View Post
Yup. No low-end torque and most S2000 owners are afraid to launch the car the way it needs to be launched.

A full 1/4 mile race would smack down the Iroc.
THe reason we are afraid to launch them is that they have wicked weak diffs. a correct launch will kill the diff. i have launched the s2k many times, but every time i brough the rpms up really high so that i knew the tires would never hook.
but truthfully, even if he didnt launch at all, he still would smoke you. (s2k stock 0-60=5.5's, camaro stock 0-60=6.5-7's ish)
camaro1185 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 01:47 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Caney TX
Posts: 38
Car: 1988 Iroc Z
Engine: TPI 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: mini spooled 10 bolt 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

I know i only lost by a car length in my del sol and my camaro will blow the doors off of that car so I think I should be able to take one from stoplight to stoplight. I agree that on the highway or simalar conditions that the s2000 will walk on me
__________________
B.lane 88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 03:09 PM   #14
Member
 
IROCKET4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 167
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: 5.7 litre
Transmission: Auto--700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Posi with 4 wheel disc brakes

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro1185 View Post
THe reason we are afraid to launch them is that they have wicked weak diffs. a correct launch will kill the diff. i have launched the s2k many times, but every time i brough the rpms up really high so that i knew the tires would never hook.
but truthfully, even if he didnt launch at all, he still would smoke you. (s2k stock 0-60=5.5's, camaro stock 0-60=6.5-7's ish)
One thing that is being overlooked with your stock 0-60 numbers is that he is running a 3.73 rear end--they will improve his 0-60 times dramatically over stock.
I used to own a Porsche 930 turbo and that thing could run away from ANYTHING and I mean anything from a roll but off the line I would get killed--very hard to launch and 1st gear was just too steep.


Bottom line is the launch--if the camaro hooks up on a 1 block race (light to light) I really think this race will be closer than most people think.
IROCKET4U is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 03:21 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
camaro1185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 508
Car: 1988 Iroc
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: Auto (T56 being re-built)
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

Quote:
Originally Posted by IROCKET4U View Post
One thing that is being overlooked with your stock 0-60 numbers is that he is running a 3.73 rear end--they will improve his 0-60 times dramatically over stock.
I used to own a Porsche 930 turbo and that thing could run away from ANYTHING and I mean anything from a roll but off the line I would get killed--very hard to launch and 1st gear was just too steep.


Bottom line is the launch--if the camaro hooks up on a 1 block race (light to light) I really think this race will be closer than most people think.
Your right, i totally overlooked the fact that he had 3:73 gears. its still gonna be a close race, but i would still give it to the s2k. also if the s2k is modified at all, even slightly it would be very hard for a camaro to beat it.
camaro1185 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2009, 01:30 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
intex1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: anderson ,sc
Posts: 795
Car: 89 formula
Engine: carbed 350
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via Yahoo to intex1982
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

has any of you guy raced a s2000? i have ... they are low 14 cars stock.... that irocz at best maybe 14.6...
intex1982 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2009, 03:01 PM   #17
Member
 
FormulaL98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Elyria OH/Lexington KY
Posts: 247
Car: 88 Formula, 72 Nova
Engine: L98, Solid Roller 350
Transmission: 700R4, A833 "Hemi Box" 4spd
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3:27, Moser 12 bolt 4:88's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to FormulaL98
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

My roomates S2000 is behind me until 3rd gear when my L98 falls on its face.
FormulaL98 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2009, 10:27 PM   #18
Member
 
IROCKET4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 167
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: 5.7 litre
Transmission: Auto--700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Posi with 4 wheel disc brakes

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

If you want to compare applies to apples the s2000 doesnt stand a chance. What do I mean? A $11,000 s2000 (which would 100% stock) to a $11,000 IROC (which would be heavily modified).
Hell, if you even put steeper gears in the IROC (4.10) I think a 5.7 IROC would take a stock S2000 down.
IROCKET4U is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2009, 11:26 PM   #19
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
Car: 1987 IROC
Engine: 5.0 TPI all stock
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: posi!

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

S2k are pretty quick...if you got mods i think you got him...but when that thing pops vtec..watchout. Thats the only honda i like.
__________________

1989 IROC 5.7TPI
1994 Z28 LT1/M6
liljon285 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 02:40 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
chaoz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pueblo CO,
Posts: 258
Car: 87 formula/69 beetle
Engine: 355/2.1
Transmission: T.C.I streetfighter th350/5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 lsd/

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

err everyone here is looking at numbers vs numbers hp vs hp.... you guys need to remmeber vtec is a completely different animal compared to conventional valve timing depending how the driver is on it vtec kicks in ajusts to the power that the driver is asking for.. the s2k utilizes its power much much more efficiently than our iroc..
chaoz28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 02:49 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,920

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

the ONLY way the S2000 is a low 14/high 13 sec car is if its launched like you wanna break it. if not, its stuck in the mid 14s. most owners dont launch it like they need to... even if they do, itll spin like mad on the street

itll be a close race till about the "eigth" mile, then the S2000 will pull
tpivette89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 08:55 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,833
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

Quote:
Originally Posted by IROCKET4U View Post
If you want to compare applies to apples the s2000 doesnt stand a chance. What do I mean? A $11,000 s2000 (which would 100% stock) to a $11,000 IROC (which would be heavily modified).
Hell, if you even put steeper gears in the IROC (4.10) I think a 5.7 IROC would take a stock S2000 down.
I will toss in my .02 with regards to this statement. If you think comparing costs is a good comparison, think again. The S2000 is getting a newer car for that $11K. It's the same when comparing ANY old car vs a new car. So toss the money debate right out the door.
__________________
1989 Mustang LX 5.0: Stock Heads (valves), cam, Cobra intake. 3.73s.
Slicks ET: 12.56 MPH: 107.2 60':1.69
17" ET Streets ET: 12.53 MPH: 108.3 60': 1.69
17" DRs ET: 12.87 MPH: 111.5 60': 1.93
18" Radials ET: 12.95 MPH: 109.2 60': 1.91
25thmustang is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:15 AM   #23
Supreme Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 4,258
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

Quote:
Originally Posted by IROCKET4U View Post
If you want to compare applies to apples the s2000 doesnt stand a chance. What do I mean? A $11,000 s2000 (which would 100% stock) to a $11,000 IROC (which would be heavily modified).
That's the mentality ricers use when they take a clapped out $500 civic, build the piss out of it and think it's a better car than a Corvette because it's faster....
__________________
***89 GTA*** L98, P1-SC procharger, 24# SVO's, Cobalt boost/fuel pressure gauges, AEM wideband O2, ported plenum, Edelbrock TES headers and catback, SFC's, Wonderbar and some other goodies...

98 Grand Prix GTP Coupe-Daily Driver
fly89gta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 01:11 PM   #24
Member
 
IROCKET4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 167
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: 5.7 litre
Transmission: Auto--700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Posi with 4 wheel disc brakes

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25thmustang View Post
I will toss in my .02 with regards to this statement. If you think comparing costs is a good comparison, think again. The S2000 is getting a newer car for that $11K. It's the same when comparing ANY old car vs a new car. So toss the money debate right out the door.
New or old who cares? What does that have to do with this debate? Absolutely nothing. The point being dollar for dollar the IROC wins and it wouldnt even be close (you could go twin turbo for this kind of money). Sure its a nice bonus to pay $11k and get a newer car but if we are talking about speed, power and who is fastest this debate is over.
IROCKET4U is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 01:12 PM   #25
Member
 
8urv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland,Ga.
Posts: 123
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L V6 w/.425" cam (Int. & Exh.)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

the s2000 will undoubtedly win. those things are fast!!
8urv8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 01:25 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,833
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

Quote:
Originally Posted by IROCKET4U View Post
New or old who cares? What does that have to do with this debate? Absolutely nothing. The point being dollar for dollar the IROC wins and it wouldnt even be close (you could go twin turbo for this kind of money). Sure its a nice bonus to pay $11k and get a newer car but if we are talking about speed, power and who is fastest this debate is over.
I'm unsure wtf your actually talking about. You don't buy an S2000 to spend the least money to go the fastest, you buy one for other reasons... The person buying one is getting a newer, better car for the money. That has NOTHING to do with the race mentioned by the OP, so I'm unsure why your even bringing up the fact that a clapped out thirdgen costs less than an S2000? You could make a VW Beetle faster for cheaper than the thirdgen, is it better???

I guess I'm just unsure how you can justify only comparing performance when comparing the cost of two cars, when your buying more than just performance...

Unreal!
__________________
1989 Mustang LX 5.0: Stock Heads (valves), cam, Cobra intake. 3.73s.
Slicks ET: 12.56 MPH: 107.2 60':1.69
17" ET Streets ET: 12.53 MPH: 108.3 60': 1.69
17" DRs ET: 12.87 MPH: 111.5 60': 1.93
18" Radials ET: 12.95 MPH: 109.2 60': 1.91
25thmustang is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 01:45 PM   #27
Supreme Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 4,258
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
Re: 305 IrocZ V.S. Honda S2000

Quote:
Originally Posted by IROCKET4U View Post
New or old who cares? What does that have to do with this debate? Absolutely nothing. The point being dollar for dollar the IROC wins and it wouldnt even be close (you could go twin turbo for this kind of money). Sure its a nice bonus to pay $11k and get a newer car but if we are talking about speed, power and who is fastest this debate is over.
Again, see my reply. Rice mentality all the way. Also 4.10's would put a 305 Iroc in the low 14 second range? WTF are you smoking and can I have some?
__________________
***89 GTA*** L98, P1-SC procharger, 24# SVO's, Cobalt boost/fuel pressure gauges, AEM wideband O2, ported plenum, Edelbrock TES headers and catback, SFC's, Wonderbar and some other goodies...

98 Grand Prix GTP Coupe-Daily Driver
fly89gta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 01:45 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing

Tags
14, 1986, 1988, 1989, 305, camaro, del, honda, iroc, irocz, mile, mustang, nos, rs, s2000, sol
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details