Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing

Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-16-2009, 11:56 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 140
Car: 1986 IROC-Z 5 Speed
Engine: 350 + .060 @ 10.5:1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi 10-bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Just want an idea of what to expect. The LS1 is a close friend of mine and we just like to mess around sometimes at the track. I just got done putting a new 350 in my car and wanted an idea of what my times might be (I haven't been to the track yet).

98 LS1 Z28 specs:
Automatic
104,000 miles
Street tires w/ big traction issues
Home-ported TB
Hacked air box
Headers with borla catback
Mild tune, also homemade
Times:
1/8: Best of 8.8 @ 83mph
1/4: Best of 13.3 @ 106mph

86 IROC Specs:
T56 6-speed
Pro 5.0 shifter
3.73 Posi Rear
Street tires, moderate traction issues
Fresh SBC 350 + .060" = 360cu (5.9L)
71' Corvette heads, fully pocket ported, 1.6/2.02 valves
10.5:1 compression
Fully balanced
Eagle rods/pistons
Edelbrock RPM Air-Gap
Cam: Flat tappet, @ .050 lift- int. lift:.420, exh lift: .443, int duration: 204.0, exh duration: 214.0
Hooker shorty headers with true dual 2.5" exhaust
Aluminum Driveshaft
Spohn Rear LCA's

Flywheel power ratings: 380hp @ 5500rpm, 425tq @ 4000rpm

Figured I'd give you the complete rundown on my car. I'm not looking for suggestions on what to change about my car, or if you disagree with my choice of cam. All I'd like is an estimate of what an 1/8th and 1/4 mile race would result in between the two of us.
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!

Last edited by plasmeh; 07-16-2009 at 12:00 PM.
plasmeh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 07-16-2009, 12:34 PM   #2
Member
 
camaro1185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 215
Car: 1988 Iroc
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.27 (G92)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

I think you can probably take him.
camaro1185 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 12:38 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 140
Car: 1986 IROC-Z 5 Speed
Engine: 350 + .060 @ 10.5:1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi 10-bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

That's the thing, it's a girl! :P
plasmeh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 01:50 PM   #4
Supporter/Moderator
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,090
Car: '90 RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to ShiftyCapone
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Your car has a great foundation. Both the bottom end of the motor and the driveline is super solid. However, you will get beat. Your heads, cam and induction are limiting you.
ShiftyCapone is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 02:01 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
DIGGLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 768

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

yup, your car probably isnt making much power with those heads and cam. ill go with the LS1 car on this one. unless you put some drag radials on your car then you might have a race.
DIGGLER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 02:41 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 140
Car: 1986 IROC-Z 5 Speed
Engine: 350 + .060 @ 10.5:1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi 10-bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Race is scheduled for tomorrow night at an 1/8th mile track. Will post results.
plasmeh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 03:34 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
PHAT89TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Newark, Ca, USA
Posts: 1,465
Car: 02 ws-6
Engine: 5.7 liter
Transmission: t56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

1/8 mile track u will win. 1/4 mile track it will be pretty close. anything after the 1/4 mile u'll lose
__________________
1989 trans am T.P.I 305 (LB9) *Sold to 87tpi*

New ride: 02 pontiac trans am M6 ws-6
Mods bolt on's and a big vacuum leak!!!
PHAT89TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 04:24 PM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

If you are making 380hp at the fly and your car is right You will win, IF you don't get too greedy out the hole or mess up the shifts, Trust me. When she spins at the line and you don't she's going to get nervous and over power the tires even more while you row down the gears. Bolt on ls1s are good but it's the driver that most of the time wins or lose a race when street tires are a factor. I've seen cars with 100+ more hp get beat because of the driver. It's a different story when you are racing someone vs a clock!
Just don't spin out the hole!
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 07:04 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: near Philly
Posts: 3,870
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Wow that's a small cam.

I think if you can get some traction then you're going to squeak out the win.
__________________
***89 GTA*** L98, P1-SC procharger, 24# SVO's, wideband O2, Edelbrock TES headers and catback, SFC's, Wonderbar and some other goodies...
fly89gta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 07:29 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
randy87iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 408
Car: 92 Z28, 91 Z28
Engine: l98, LS1
Transmission: 700r4, t56
Axle/Gears: 3.27/4.56

Classifieds Rating: (15)
Send a message via AIM to randy87iroc Send a message via Yahoo to randy87iroc
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

ill go with the ls1 car for a few reasons

1. automatic, this would be a close race if hte launches were equal, and a 3.73 stick car needs some help in the tire department.
2. theoretically your car makes 380 hp at the flywheel, so if you roughly calculate 20% drivetrain loss your right at 300 wheel. Most Stock ls1 cars dyno anywhere from 280-310 (some a few more as mine dynoed 330) at the wheels.
3. someone mentioned flow as far as the heads go, and ls1 cars come alive on the big end. I really think its gonna come down to the launch and if you dont outlaunch it, i dont forsee you catching it before the big end.

good luck!
randy87iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 08:05 PM   #11
J91
Senior Member
 
J91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 354
Car: 91 Z28, 87 S10,67 Galaxy
Engine: 383fgdbottom,RHShds,cmprlrs,Hlly750
Transmission: Built 700R4, 3200 stall non-lock
Axle/Gears: 3:73,Auburndiff,Moseraxle,girdle

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Have to agree w/ above post, you don't have much cam, and LS1's rip on the big end, what kind of carb r u running?
J91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 10:49 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hubbardston, MA
Posts: 62

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Why does the LS1 have traction issues? Anyone that can drive, at least a little, will have no trouble launching an LS1. Unless the tires are bald, or the 10 bolt breaks! Also, hacked airbox? Why didn't they get a lid? Sounds ghetto. 13.3 with those mods isn't good. I have seen stock LS1's do better. Driver is questionable.
__________________

2002 WS6 Trans Am M6. SLP Lid,Magnaflow exhaust.
http://www.fquick.com/02BLACKTAWS6
T/A1988 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 02:51 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
randy87iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 408
Car: 92 Z28, 91 Z28
Engine: l98, LS1
Transmission: 700r4, t56
Axle/Gears: 3.27/4.56

Classifieds Rating: (15)
Send a message via AIM to randy87iroc Send a message via Yahoo to randy87iroc
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by T/A1988 View Post
Why does the LS1 have traction issues? Anyone that can drive, at least a little, will have no trouble launching an LS1. Unless the tires are bald, or the 10 bolt breaks! Also, hacked airbox? Why didn't they get a lid? Sounds ghetto. 13.3 with those mods isn't good. I have seen stock LS1's do better. Driver is questionable.


13.3@106 is pretty much right down a ls1 on street tires alley.... yeah you see some freaks get into the 12's, but they are just that.... factory freaks
randy87iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 03:19 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
STRIKER911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Independence Mo
Posts: 478
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 305 TBI (lo3)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Whatever is stock.

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by T/A1988 View Post
Why does the LS1 have traction issues? Anyone that can drive, at least a little, will have no trouble launching an LS1. Unless the tires are bald, or the 10 bolt breaks! Also, hacked airbox? Why didn't they get a lid? Sounds ghetto. 13.3 with those mods isn't good. I have seen stock LS1's do better. Driver is questionable.
Dont bald tires get better traction? More rubber on the track? Kinda like slicks?
STRIKER911 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 04:51 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oshkosh wi
Posts: 490
Car: 84 firebird
Engine: 383
Transmission: th350

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by STRIKER911 View Post
Dont bald tires get better traction? More rubber on the track? Kinda like slicks?
no
84firebird383 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 08:57 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 830
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by PHAT89TA View Post
1/8 mile track u will win. 1/4 mile track it will be pretty close. anything after the 1/4 mile u'll lose
I hear this all the time and it absolutely makes no sense. Yes the LS1 pulls great on the top end but it'll get to the 1/8 pretty quick also.

Quote:
Originally Posted by randy87iroc View Post
13.3@106 is pretty much right down a ls1 on street tires alley.... yeah you see some freaks get into the 12's, but they are just that.... factory freaks
Actually, that is pretty slow for those mods.

I was running that when the goat was bone stock and everybody knows how slow those are....
__________________
Rob
04 GTO
96 WS6
TTA 1387 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 11:40 AM   #17
Junior Member
 
BlueChevyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 41
Car: '84 Z 28
Engine: currently the 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to BlueChevyZ
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

I have almost the same motor combo, a few differences, my cam is stock, cast iron angle plug head, thats been ported, 1.5 roller rockers, Edlebrock Performer RPM intake, a Performer RPM 600 vac sec.(the way I aquired the motor) I dont have true duals, but the hooker shorty's into O.R.Y, and 3" from there back, 3.42 posi, a built 700r4, and S&W subframe connectors.

A chassis dyno will tell you alot, I put down 211rwhp/262 rwtrq,

I'll tell you the car runs out of steam running the 1/4, ran a 14.9, but the 1/8th isnt too bad, my best using Nitto DR's has been 9.10

Once I finish the body and get it painted I'm gonna try this cam to see the results Hydraulic Flat Tappet, Advertised Duration 262/272, Lift .420/.442, lobe seperation of 112, duration at 050 lift 204int/214exh.


My 1/4 time was against a stock GTO LS1, I tree'd the guy, had him beat at the 1000ft mark by 1/2 car, but then he drove around me from that point.
BlueChevyZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 12:07 PM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hubbardston, MA
Posts: 62

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by randy87iroc View Post
13.3@106 is pretty much right down a ls1 on street tires alley.... yeah you see some freaks get into the 12's, but they are just that.... factory freaks
This car isn't factory. Headers and exhaust with an intake should be doing better than a factory car.
__________________

2002 WS6 Trans Am M6. SLP Lid,Magnaflow exhaust.
http://www.fquick.com/02BLACKTAWS6
T/A1988 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 03:47 PM   #19
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

That LS1 might or might not run that 13.3 when he race it, that's my point. When you line up against another car you don't always make your best pass things tend to happen. As far as the cam goes it is small and makes for a torque motor but he has six gears to help him stay in the right rpm band. IF he can drive it and the car is right he should win. Had two cars that came to my shop that I built for the owners who were frnds, one full ported heads/cam and full bolt on ls1 the other heads/small cam full bolt on 355 sbc. Both on tires when they raced the eighth, sbc won by fender. LS1 dynoed 90hp more than sbc but still lost. At the track et wins races not mph or more hp.
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 04:12 PM   #20
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: wv
Posts: 127
Car: 92 rs
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

id have to see a dyno sheet to believe that head and tiny cam combo make that good of power...LS1....
__________________
355,stealth ram,dart platinum heads 200cc, gm hot cam..lunati pro mod 5.7 rods, je pistons,total seal gapless 2nd rings..sh*&^y 700r4 tranny...getting things together for t56 swap and 9" really lookin into a single turbo...
scamaro355 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 07:26 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: near Philly
Posts: 3,870
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dog Chevy View Post
That LS1 might or might not run that 13.3 when he race it, that's my point. When you line up against another car you don't always make your best pass things tend to happen. As far as the cam goes it is small and makes for a torque motor but he has six gears to help him stay in the right rpm band. IF he can drive it and the car is right he should win. Had two cars that came to my shop that I built for the owners who were frnds, one full ported heads/cam and full bolt on ls1 the other heads/small cam full bolt on 355 sbc. Both on tires when they raced the eighth, sbc won by fender. LS1 dynoed 90hp more than sbc but still lost. At the track et wins races not mph or more hp.
If they ran a 1/4 the LS1 probably would've easily pulled away.
__________________
***89 GTA*** L98, P1-SC procharger, 24# SVO's, wideband O2, Edelbrock TES headers and catback, SFC's, Wonderbar and some other goodies...
fly89gta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 07:57 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
JesasaurusRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 2,667
Car: 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to JesasaurusRex
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

slicks and steal the hit
JesasaurusRex is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 12:58 PM   #23
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by scamaro355 View Post
id have to see a dyno sheet to believe that head and tiny cam combo make that good of power...LS1....
Well here's that combo.
Roller cam .030 over 350/10:1 cr.
FULLY ported (high swirl) Sportsman II heads with 2.02/1.6 and beehive springs.
Comp Cams Hyd rller 212*/218* .487/.495 @110 retarded 6*for more rpms.
1.6 roller rockers.
2 barrel tb single plane muiltiport convertion intake manifold,ported.
holley 52mm tbi, fully ported no injectors.
32lb per hr injectors running 45psi with 89% max duty cycle.
EBL tuned by me.
255lph fuel pump with -8 lines all the way.
Underdrive pully.
1 3/4 long tubes headers.
dual 3" into 1 single 4" over the axle back into dual 2.5" with two 2.5" magnaflow round mufflers built by me.
built 700r4 trans with 3000 stall tc.
10 bolt with disc brakes, moser 28 spline axles, welded tubes, trutrack diff, 3.42 gears and girdle.
3" driveshaft, bmr torque arm. lca brackets, lca, drag bags, V6 springs all the way, drag struts/shocks, 275/45-17 tires and some other stuff.
Race weight 3550lbs.
Car has ac, heat, full int, AND smog pump that still works. Pulls 14 inches of vacum. Dynoed 350hp @ 6150rpm and 351lbs @ 4650 rpm and runs the quarter with 255/50-16 bfg dr mid to low 12s at 107-110 mph on 1.7 60 ft. Car is on youtube killing a mustang gt that he gave some cars on street tires and has mad low to mid range torque that makes it jet off the line at 3/4 thottle.
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 01:16 PM   #24
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by fly89gta View Post
If they ran a 1/4 the LS1 probably would've easily pulled away.
Might, might not. LS1 is a 2000 Z28 drop top fully loaded and heavy as hell, dynoed 440hp/400trq. I built both cars, tuned both cars, and driven both cars with DRs. LS1 makes more hp yes and has 3.73 gears but the car is heavy and can't hook like the 3rd gen. On the track and both with DRs the 3rd gen will put 2-3 cars on the LS1 before it starts to come back. In the 1/8 with DRs the 3rd gen kills it, in the quarter the LS1 should win on paper IF he doesn't get too far behind at the start. Drivers race with street tires.
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 03:06 PM   #25
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 140
Car: 1986 IROC-Z 5 Speed
Engine: 350 + .060 @ 10.5:1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi 10-bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

We raced one pass at the local 1/8th mile last night, wasn't a good race for either of us. The track was slick, I managed to get more traction, but still have a lot left in the car, probably 8.9 or so E/T.

LS1 (she messed up BIG time, nerves/bad track prep):
-Reaction: .9259 (.500 is perfect)
-60 ft.: 2.6041
-330ft: 8.1092
-1/8 ET: 12.4861
-1/8 MPH: 58.89

I later found out she ended up almost going sideways from putting her foot down too hard at the line. She took it easy the rest of the run.

IROC (shift to second resulted in a slide/tires broke free, let off)
-Reaction: .6679
-60 ft.: 2.1409
-330ft: 6.2846
-1/8 ET: 9.5559
-1/8 MPH: 76.91

I'm not one for excuses but this race was just plain bad. Combination of poor driving on both our parts and a slick track made for a bad pass. I'll post new results when we get in a more respectable run. I'm predicting a pretty damn close race with her inching me out at the end.
plasmeh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 03:28 PM   #26
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Well a race is a race, good win. Like i said before, different story when you line up next to someone, rookies tend to get the shakey legs .LOL.... Told you if she can't drive and you can you'll win. For the next race get some 15" drag radials and let her have it!!!!!!
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 03:32 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
DIGGLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 768

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

2.6 60' with a stab n steer? geez....
DIGGLER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 03:38 PM   #28
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by DIGGLER View Post
2.6 60' with a stab n steer? geez....

LOL, rookie driver. Before the next run he should get more seat time with some DRs and hope she doesn't, cause if she does then...... game over for the 3rd gen.
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 03:50 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
DIGGLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 768

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dog Chevy View Post
LOL, rookie driver. Before the next run he should get more seat time with some DRs and hope she doesn't, cause if she does then...... game over for the 3rd gen.
9.1-9.2 for the iroc, 8.40-8.50's for the LS1 car.
DIGGLER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009, 07:39 AM   #30
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 140
Car: 1986 IROC-Z 5 Speed
Engine: 350 + .060 @ 10.5:1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi 10-bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by DIGGLER View Post
9.1-9.2 for the iroc, 8.40-8.50's for the LS1 car.
Gotta love it...

Just got done throwing a Holley 650 DP on the car and decided to take it to the track Friday night along with the 98 Z28 and a few other LS1's.

My best of the night (on street tires with hard spinning off the line and in every gear): 9.01 @ 80.6 mph, 2.105 60'

I raced several LS1 cars that night, and kept dead even with them, or even pulled out the win. Here's some videos to prove the car isn't a turd:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhseYj4OKkU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOZE-oOGxG4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nL7DSBXlUZM

We're making a trip to Geneseo next weekend. I'll post some 1/4 mile results then.
plasmeh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009, 08:37 AM   #31
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

If I were you I wouldn't race her again until you get some drag radials. Traction is number one in drag racing. That 9.01 in the eight would be a low 14 in the quarter and if she match you on the 60ft she will pull on you after the 330ft mark. If she learns how to drive that ls1 and you pull a 2.1+ 60 ft you are done. Drag Radials to get that 60 down. Don't make me say I told you so.
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009, 08:56 AM   #32
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 140
Car: 1986 IROC-Z 5 Speed
Engine: 350 + .060 @ 10.5:1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi 10-bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

I have every intention of proving you wrong She made up absolutely no ground on me the 2 runs I raced her, and again on a pull to 100 on the highway. Don't worry, il have videos of the quarter to back up my claims.
plasmeh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009, 12:52 PM   #33
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Well if she still can't drive then you got her again. I'm one your side, remember I was the one who said you would when the first race. lol Do you know if she's been out getting some seat time or added some parts?
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009, 12:57 PM   #34
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 140
Car: 1986 IROC-Z 5 Speed
Engine: 350 + .060 @ 10.5:1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi 10-bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

She goes almost every Friday to the track but just doesn't get it off the line that well. Only parts that are on the car are headers, borla, and a tune basically. She will be adding an LS6 intake soon, we'll see how that does.

I know you are on my side, I just want to show the LS1 fanboys that the good ol' small block can keep up just fine.
plasmeh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009, 01:22 PM   #35
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Oh yeah, not only can the sbc keep up but we often put boot to ***. I've built both 3rd gens and 4th gens and I'm not impressed with what you can do with them cause it cost too much if you ask me. I know guys that are making 450+whp on motor but are running high to mid 12s. The sbc is a good and easy motor to work on and mod. I have yet to loose to a mudstain or LSanything and if I don't think I can take one then I'll just flip that switch and turn her loose!
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 03:54 AM   #36
Senior Member
 
Shadygrady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flowood,MS
Posts: 1,231
Car: 87 IROC Z RED W/T-TOPS,89 chevy 4x4
Engine: 5.7 L-98 TPI/4.3 v-6 TBI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall/700R4
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's/?

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

I like the car but you need some tires.Also,im no drag race/car expert but I`ve run an 8.7 at 80 or 81 in the 1/8th,1.96 60`(have to dig up the slips on the et).With my engine but that was with a stock stall,trans,2.73,Flowtech headers/Y-pipe and street tires.I`m not makeing 380 fwhp or 300 whp.I just dont see it even with your spinning and 2.2 60`.I figure I might be making 300 fwhp but I doubt it.Prolly more like 275 If I`m lucky.
__________________

5.7,Stock TPI,LT4 production cam w/1.6 R.R.
ZZ4 heads,Hooker 2460 headers w/full 3" exhaust
2500 stall,3.42 gear,suspension mods.Full list of mods in VB garage.
Shadygrady is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 08:29 AM   #37
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 140
Car: 1986 IROC-Z 5 Speed
Engine: 350 + .060 @ 10.5:1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi 10-bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

If you are making 300 fly horses and running 8.7 with 2.73 gears, you are my hero.
plasmeh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 09:52 AM   #38
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by plasmeh View Post
If you are making 300 fly horses and running 8.7 with 2.73 gears, you are my hero.
Yeah, that's mid 13s in the quarter. With some spray yeah on motor and street tires don't think so.
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 11:50 AM   #39
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 340
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 95 10 bolt, 4.10

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dog Chevy View Post
Oh yeah, not only can the sbc keep up but we often put boot to ***. I've built both 3rd gens and 4th gens and I'm not impressed with what you can do with them cause it cost too much if you ask me. I know guys that are making 450+whp on motor but are running high to mid 12s. The sbc is a good and easy motor to work on and mod. I have yet to loose to a mudstain or LSanything and if I don't think I can take one then I'll just flip that switch and turn her loose!
Time for the LSx fanboy to speak up. From my experiance, I spent over $3k on my old 355. Trick flow aluminum heads, big comp roller cam, air gap manifold and holley 750 carb as well as headers, full exhaust, etc. That was a good combo and good for about 425 flywheel hp.

Now I hate carbs and I just bought a 5.3 out of a 2005 tahoe. I don't know about you, but for 900$ with just 35k on it, 26 mpg on the highway, and 340 flywheel horse STOCK, it seems like a win win win in every category to me. Add a T56 and a cam for the engine and I now have an entire bulletproof drivetrain making 400 ish flywheel hp all for less than it cost me to build just my 355. Oh and it still gets 25 mpg on the highway with 4.10 rear gears!

The old SBC engines are great but they are no match for new technology.
__________________
1986 Trans Am, 2005 5.3 LM7 engine, LS6 intake manifold, cam, LS6 clutch assembly, T56 transmission w/ Hurst pro billet shifter, 95 TA 4.10 posi rear with heavy duty cover.
-Coming soon....dyno sheets!
whitedevilTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 01:11 PM   #40
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

That's cause you didn't know what you were doing with that sbc. Now back to topic please.
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 03:46 PM   #41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 340
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 95 10 bolt, 4.10

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dog Chevy View Post
That's cause you didn't know what you were doing with that sbc. Now back to topic please.
No.....thats because old technology is far insuperior to new flash tuning, sequential fuel injection, and head designs. I had built 4 SBC engines before that one and all ran fine with aftermarket cams and other parts, so maybe I got a bad motor or a bad part or who knows. I wish I still had it so I could have given it to you and watched you scratch your head over it. I had it at 2 performace shops and they couldn't figure out why it wouldn't run either, and they dug pretty deep into it!

I do know that the clearances are much worse on older engines, and the fact that LSx engines use re-useable o-ring gaskets is awesome. Simple fact is, you could never duplicate what the new engines have in an older SBC for ANYWHERE near the price of an LSx.

And as far as the topic, a bolt on LS1 car I would think would outperform your 360 in the quarter mile, especially with the pretty small cam your using. You need some top end to get the motors full potential against an LS1 and with a cam that size, theres room for improvement.
__________________
1986 Trans Am, 2005 5.3 LM7 engine, LS6 intake manifold, cam, LS6 clutch assembly, T56 transmission w/ Hurst pro billet shifter, 95 TA 4.10 posi rear with heavy duty cover.
-Coming soon....dyno sheets!
whitedevilTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 03:56 PM   #42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 340
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 95 10 bolt, 4.10

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dog Chevy View Post
I know guys that are making 450+whp on motor but are running high to mid 12s. The sbc is a good and easy motor to work on and mod. I have yet to loose to a mudstain or LSanything and if I don't think I can take one then I'll just flip that switch and turn her loose!
These guys you speak of cannot drive to save thier lives then. I know guys making 75 RWHP less in LS1's running high 11's. Not trying to knock you but If you have never lost to anything with an LSx, are you racing trucks? Anything that runs high 12's with a few bolt on's is a hard competitor.

What do you have for an engine?
__________________
1986 Trans Am, 2005 5.3 LM7 engine, LS6 intake manifold, cam, LS6 clutch assembly, T56 transmission w/ Hurst pro billet shifter, 95 TA 4.10 posi rear with heavy duty cover.
-Coming soon....dyno sheets!
whitedevilTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 04:09 PM   #43
Senior Member
 
Shadygrady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flowood,MS
Posts: 1,231
Car: 87 IROC Z RED W/T-TOPS,89 chevy 4x4
Engine: 5.7 L-98 TPI/4.3 v-6 TBI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall/700R4
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's/?

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Thats what I`m saying.I know I`m not making 300hp.That guys 1/8th times slower than mine and hes claiming 380 hp.I dont think so.My typical times were low 9`s.Some as high as low tens due to poor launch.I`m staring at one time slip i could find now that says

60` 1.968
78.24 mph
et 8.887

Dont see why my car is hard to believe as a high 13 second car with a race weight of 3500-3550 depending on how much fuel and couple other things.With an online calculater it was giving 270ish hp for those times with a calculated approx. 13.7 1/4.

These particular runs in the 8`s were good track prep I guess car hooked,no spin and went.Trying to upload a pic of this slip up from my blackberry.Moving due to divorce cant find all my stuff.

If some third gen 350 tpi`s touched high 13`s I dont see why better flowing heads,cam,1.6 rr,exhaust,less weight,and a tune couldnt do the same.I`ve seen bone stock 350 tpi hit 12`s on 125 shot.I dont think my car needs spray to hit high 13`s.

Last edited by Shadygrady; 08-18-2009 at 04:17 PM.
Shadygrady is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 06:31 PM   #44
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitedevilTA View Post
These guys you speak of cannot drive to save thier lives then. I know guys making 75 RWHP less in LS1's running high 11's. Not trying to knock you but If you have never lost to anything with an LSx, are you racing trucks? Anything that runs high 12's with a few bolt on's is a hard competitor.

What do you have for an engine?
Wellllll. I didn't want to get into this but.... While the LS motors are great engines they can cost $$$$ to build once you try going past a certain performance level. (I've built them too) And you r right, you can make any car run good with less hp if you set the car up better for drag racing. But most people that have these cars don't do that. They think because they have the LS1 or LS2 with bolt ons or heads/cam deal they should be ok, Not true. You could do a 500hp+ sbc that will look and drive like a dream if you match the parts right. I've done it. Hell even the software to tune with is cheap compared to the LS stuff. (I do that too) I've built sbc, bbc, olds, ford and pontiac motors over the years and any motor can be built to run with the right combo of parts. I had a 350 olds rocket in a 79' regal that was killing bolt on stangs, vettes and GNs back in the early 90s.

There are many little things that people forget about when it comes to the complete package. Some have the know how but not the resources and vice versa. Me and my guys race for money so we are very anal when it comes to detail. I've seen sooo many guys beat themselves buy foregetting the little things, (it's happened to me also) that's why I'm so greedy. That 350hp Camaro did beat a heads/cam full bolt on LS1 Z28 conver. And doing it with a 52mm tbi edelbrock mpi conversion with heat, ac, smog pump, full interior and 1-5/8 shorty headers at the time. On the dyno he was at 300whp by 4600 rpm. Both guys are customers of mine and frnds. The LS1 laid down 440whp on a mustang dyno. It was close but the 92' Camaro had a better 60' was lighter and had the more balanced package which made up for the hp dif. They both had Cams, fully ported heads, shocks, struts, dual exhaust, v6 springs, sbfc, lca+brkts, etc. He also killed a modded ws6 and a 07' vette on the e-way so anybody can be beat. LS guys tend not to hack thr cars up to make them go fast (many want to brag about dyno numbers, trap mph and rims). And they get big headed cause they beat a mustang or charger.lol
I haven't lost to a LS because I race for money and we set our races up right, if it's a race car then we do what we have to do to win. Oh and I've raced LS trucks too, with my 98' Tahoe that has some things done to it. lol

By the way I have a few engines
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 09:52 PM   #45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 340
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 95 10 bolt, 4.10

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

^ Too much to quote! Anyways, Sorry to be a little harsh but I can't stand when people tell me I don't know what I'm doing, as I have been working on engines and cars since I was 15. I love third gens, obviously, and thats why I own one. I also owned a 2000 firehawk, and absolutely loved the drivetrain in it. I figured why not combine the two since I like the style of a third gen and the drivetrain of a 4th gen. I'll be honest with ya. I HATE tuning. Always have, and always will. I can drive the hell out of a car and can shift with the best of them but tuning is my weak point. Thats why I chose a flash tunable set up which is the "craze" these days, and it's very easy to come by a shop that does it. Chip burning on the other hand is basically limited to people that buy the stuff and teach themselves, and I didn't want that.

Everyone has a preference and everyone can make a car fast as you said. I wasn't expecting everyone to agree with me anyways....it was just my preference and 2 cents. I also find it hard to believe that that 300 whp camaro took an 07 vette on the highway??? Racing from a roll is basically the car with more HP wins, as opposed to drag racing where technique and 60ft play a big role. I guess anything is possible though if the driver is not very good.

Anyways, were all car guys here, and I have respect for any decent third or 4th gen.
__________________
1986 Trans Am, 2005 5.3 LM7 engine, LS6 intake manifold, cam, LS6 clutch assembly, T56 transmission w/ Hurst pro billet shifter, 95 TA 4.10 posi rear with heavy duty cover.
-Coming soon....dyno sheets!
whitedevilTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2009, 08:31 AM   #46
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

It was at 300whp by 4600 rpms and the peak hp was 352 back then. That car was also setup with cold air induction from the cowl hood. I was driving the car that day from the dyno with the owner doing some data loggin (I love tunning cars). We started at about 65mph the vette pulled a car and before we shut down at about 140mph we had 3-4 cars on the vette. The owner was shocked after that but I told him " If he makes a move I'm going to get him so hold on". Those vettes headlights look mean from the rear mirror. lol That car is faster now and should run 11s next time at the track.
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 09:39 AM   #47
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 140
Car: 1986 IROC-Z 5 Speed
Engine: 350 + .060 @ 10.5:1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi 10-bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

Went back to the track last night after doing some rear suspension work. My old springs were completely shot, so I replaced them with moog's and some stiffer bilstein's. Also added LCARB's. Brought my time/trap down to 8.89 @ 82.70mph, 2.09 60' and really worn out street tires. The 98 LS1 ran a new best of 8.74 @ 84mph (don't know 60') on Mickey Thompson Street E/T's. We're heading to a 1/4 mile on Sunday and will hopefully get a run in with eachother, weather permitting.

Here's a video of last night of my IROC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFOG2Eq8tjg
plasmeh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 10:23 AM   #48
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

You better go get/borrow some Drag radials. With your trap mph it seems like you have the power to get into the 12s but traction is your problem. If she leaves with you or less than two cars behind you she might run you down buy the end of the quarter. With a good 60' she has the power to run high to mid 12s. Get some tires
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 10:41 AM   #49
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 140
Car: 1986 IROC-Z 5 Speed
Engine: 350 + .060 @ 10.5:1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi 10-bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

I can't throw drags on this rear, I'm sure it will break (already ripped apart a pinion at the track). I'll have to wait until I get something stronger in there, in the meantime, I'll just try to hang with her.
plasmeh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 12:15 PM   #50
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burbs, Illinois
Posts: 127
Car: A lot and 86' Z28 and 88' Camaro
Engine: 305, 383 and 565
Transmission: 700R4 and 4L80
Axle/Gears: Moser 3.42 and S60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 86 IROC vs. 98 LS1 Z28

I hear ya. Well you need to add more power or loose some weight. A good 10-15 more hp is all you need. Have you tried a carb spacer or underdrive pulley. What about some type of CAI to get more top end hp.
Big Dog Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing

Tags
14, 1991, 57l, 86, 98, bady, iroc, ls1, ls1s, mile, posi, quarter, specs, speed, transmission, z28
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.